Table of contents:

The enslavement of Russia (part 6)
The enslavement of Russia (part 6)

Video: The enslavement of Russia (part 6)

Video: The enslavement of Russia (part 6)
Video: Leonardo da Vinci: Drawings 2024, May
Anonim

Start:

We continue to study the points of the "Pulkovo meridian".

Point 3 (let's go slowly).

-Lake Ladoga, Island Balaam, Abrahamic Strongpoint on it

- and the city, now popularly called " Peter", with the Abrahamic Strongpoint under the code name" Saint Isaac's Cathedral".

Let's first consider the problems that arise today if we try to recover some information from ancient sources. For example, not only a description of an event, but also its localization by card and time frame /Chronology.

First problem:

- The correct name of the city or area.

If the source is in "Sanskrit", then we have a very similar reading, since both "Russian" and "Sanskrit" are SYMBOLS. If we know the rules for replacing / alternating letters, and dialectical varieties, then it is quite easy to identify the correct equivalent variants in modern spelling / pronunciation and distorted ones.

This is obvious, for example:

milk = malako = milk, city = city = guard = guard.

Difficulties arise if the source language is not "Aryan". For example, if it is Jewish or Cohen-Greek a source that uses only consonants. Then the origin of modern pronunciation / spelling becomes completely NOT obvious.

- יהוה (Yod heh vav heh) = Yahweh = Jehovah = Lord

A particularly difficult case arises if the "Aryan" ancient source was first used to create the "Non-Aryan" source, and then we try to get to the bottom of it to the real localization …

See for yourself:

translate into "Cohen"

- Peter = PTR

when translated again into a syllabic language, we get by default

- Pe-Te-Ra.

Considering the dialectical varieties among the peoples of Sketia living in neighboring regions, we will get the following options:

- Peceri = Pechora

and the localization of the point is immediately blurred from the Pskov region to the Northern Urals (if you do not take it even more broadly), it cannot be precisely defined without additional information.

Second problem:

- EvilIntentional concealment or substitution of ancient names, EvilIntentional distortion of localization of events.

For example, let's take a city Kolyvan".

There are several cities / villages with this name on OUR territory, let's take only the most famous ones:

Modern Tallinn - it is officially stated that it has been known as a city since 1154, put on the map under the name Kolyvan … But opening the map to which the historians refer, we find that Kolyvan is located several hundred kilometers towards modern Belarus. This is despite the fact that other cities of the "Baltic" are marked quite accurately, at their present locations.

Modern Novosibirsk (Novo-Nikolaevsk) - founded under Peter the Great on the ruins of the conquered ancient Kolyvanias if it were a new city in an open field. And the name Kolyvan was transferred to fifty kilometers and assigned to the village. Accordingly, the Abrahamic Cross was thrust into the ancient history of this region.

Evil Intentionally distorting the LOCALIZATION of events in the Bible (assuming that the events themselves are described reliably).

The Bible in general is a collection / compilation:

- description of ancient historical events, - ancient "pagan" legends, with changed rhetoric and meaning.

- ancient "pagan" allegories, with changed rhetoric and meaning.

- remake for the Herd.

What points should we consider if we take the Bible as a "source"?

If we assume that any part of the Bible can be historical evidence, then we must be very careful about:

- Names (especially voiced), - Localizations, - Chronology.

All three of these categories can be distorted either in the original text, and / or in its translations, and / or in its interpretations.

I will give one example (which is useful to us) - Babylon, I take it from the first "Bible Encyclopedia" I come across with a historical bias:

Well, a typical, stereotypical story about Babylon and the Tower of Babel, you can immediately add a stereotypical localization to it:

Image
Image

And historians are not at all embarrassed by the fact that Babylon - The Center Where INTERNATIONAL Trade Flows Intersect … International, not Local.

But all the real information is known to historians, but if it is correct, at the right moments, it is easy to keep silent Deceive With Truthful Words

Let's just pull out the default and see what happens.

Babylon = Babylon = Bäb + Ili (m) = Gate of God

But this name is used by the Persians.

(Until now, fair-haired + blue-eyed are considered true Persians.

I recently gave a beautiful disclosure on the forum Raybased on OUR language - Baba Lono, and I will add one line that the interlocutor gave me:

" … Brahma is "gate" in Belarusian, i.e. "woman"…")

In addition to the Persian name, there was another, Arabic, which we know today as CAIRO (Cairo).

Babylon = Cairo

Image
Image

Check it out?

Today's historians know this very well:

Image
Image

And what can the ancient historians know about this?

- Since this is the World Trade Center, it will not be difficult to find out. We take the cards and look (there are a lot of cards, so as not to litter I show only two):

1447 year

Image
Image

1500 year

Image
Image

Babylon - the trade gateway between the Mediterranean and the Red Seasand also … - next to Giza with pyramids

Now let's go through history, in its official form:

- as we have already seen on the map of Al-Idrisi, in 1154 Cairo / Babylon - Land of the Great Horde, - in 1168 he is captured by the CATHOLIC Order, during the First Crusade.

- in 1250 he was liberated by the Horde Army and from 1250 to 1500 he was again under the rule of the Great Horde … (We already remembered who were the kings in Egypt), - Persia - until 1504 is part of the Great Horde, - from 1504 to 1540 - the collapse of the Great Horde occurs, - Babylon wiped off the face of the earth and in 1517 the "Turkish" Empire began to plunder it (again I put it in quotation marks, put it in memory), and then the plundering and DESTROYING of the cultural heritage will be continued by the French and the British.

What do we get? But these questions:

1. A question for biblical experts:

- guys, and WHEN was this book actually written?

2.

- WHAT happened in the early 16th centurythat wiped out a millionaire city and zeroed out its population? (only after 300 years the population of Cairo grew to 200,000 people, and this is a new population with a DIFFERENT "Culture")

- WHAT was the beginning of the collapse of the Great Horde and the replacement of the Worldview of OUR peoples?

- WHAT was that, about which there is not a single historical document in the public domain?

Now let's get back:

- Lake Ladoga (Lada-Ga), - Island Balaam, - town Peter on the river.

Very often the name of the island Balaam disclosed as Finnish Earth-Baal … And with this, in principle, one could agree, if not for the presence of a real Baal Land between Vyborg and Kotka - Vaali-Maa.

But in the Bible there is a complete coincidence of transcription - sorcerer Balaam, and we have here an ideal place for hermitism, an island on the lake Movement towards Ladaon which now Abrahamic Strongpoint (why would?).

Numbers 22: 5

- And he sent ambassadors to Balaam, son Veorov, in Peforwho is on the river Euphrates

Check it in the original source ?:

Image
Image

- He sent ambassadors to Balaam … v PTR, which the on the river of the land of the children of his people

Sounds different, right? And there is no hint of Euphrates … But is it too beautiful a "coincidence"?

Let's take a look at Peter carefully (in addition to many researchers of its antiquity).

As soon as we begin to examine Peter carefully, distrust immediately arises in the official version of its laying in the swamps, under Peter 1, and further construction.

There are a huge number of inconsistencies (for more details, see the articles here:

Obviously, Peter 1 started RESTORING Peterrather than construction.

Then it turns out that a city already existed in this place, and not just a city, but a large and powerful center. This means that there must be some historical information about its presence, you just need to find it.

And this is where the problems begin …

As we have already seen, the entire ancient history of Russia was replaced by the Abrahamic handicraft during Christianization. All ancient historical documents were taken out in an unknown direction and disappeared from access.

If you try to look for information in Western archives, then you need to understand that:

- on the 15th century and earlier, in general, all over the world, there are very few historical documents that make it possible to make more or less accurate localizations on modern maps of territories related to Asia, To Great Horde, - too many gross inaccuracies.

- Western travelers got access to this territory only in the 16th century, after the collapse of the Great Horde.

- Western maps may contain their names, which we do not know, for example: Lake Peipsi - Peibus; fortress Koporye - Coporoia

If we take the first good western description of those places and a map from Herberstein "Notes on Muscovy", then there is no mention of the presence of any large, albeit destroyed, city. Here it is perfectly clear that he himself did not visit the described places, but used other people's stories and information. And the release date of his "Notes" - after 1540, after the collapse of the Horde.

The only option is to assume that the ancient "Peter" befell the fate of Babylon, simultaneously with Babylon - at the beginning of the 16th century, and you need to look for information about it at the end of the 15th century, at a time when the Baltic Sea came under control Hansa Teutonica.

And this is what we have before our eyes - portolan Christopher Columbus, 1492:

Image
Image

she is in color:

Image
Image

Eastern part of the Baltic, there is a city for reference Riga, and in the most eastern part:

c. obexion = Capital Obexion

(I give this inscription in a slightly incorrect form - it is useful for maintaining intrigue. A more correct disclosure will be a little later)

Close to the capital, another object is shown, which today looks like this:

Image
Image

What we have?:

- v 1703 year Peter 1 "laid construction in the swamps" already available in the presence of objects, and subsequently moved the capital of the "Romanov" Russian Empire to the place of the Capital of Great Russia.

Let's remind a little of the official history (the map is officially dated 1492):

- 1472 - Muscovy begins expansion.

- 1480 - Muscovy takes the first step towards the exit from the Great Arda ("Standing on the Ugra"), but remains a principality within it.

- 1490 year - project Translatio imperii.

- 1518 - Muscovy no longer agrees with the Great Arda whom he elects as rulers, but continues to pay "Federal Taxes" to Arda. Will stop paying these taxes only in 1700 year, under Peter 1.

- 1524 year - whipping up hysteria by Catholics Global Flood … (One of the foundations of voluntary Christianization is "He who believes will be saved").

- 1535 year - after the seizure of White Russia by Muscovy, Ivan the Terrible briefly becomes King of the ONE KINGDOM.

Let's take another look, was its location accidentally indicated ?:

Image
Image

and we ourselves will a little outline the boundaries of this "One Kingdom".

Recommended: