Imperial standard construction of Tomsk

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Tomsk has not escaped development in the global style, so to speak. Why, it would seem, in the distant and God-forgotten Siberia, were houses built the way they were built all over the world?

It is interesting how sometimes unexpectedly a person's eyes open. They open as if a certain veil falls from the eyes. They open quickly and immediately. Apparently this is how the psi-blockages are removed and the awakening of self-awareness. Quite recently, I somehow "suddenly" realized that the entire world architecture is sustained in the same style: pediments, columns, pilasters, balusters, but you never know. Almost everything is built up as if it was built up according to a single project, urban planning plan and using a single technical documentation. In countries, continents, cities, houses are sometimes like two drops of water, similar to each other. And not only individual houses, but entire streets. I thought that I should share the "discovery" with my colleagues. Yes, no, as it turned out, many authors are already writing about this. These are Mikhail Volk, Dmitry Mylnikov, and some other authors who wished to remain anonymous. I read their work with interest and realized that there seemed to be nothing to add. But, I just can't help but share about the wooden and stone buildings in Tomsk, also designed in the world style. So, Wikipedia gives us this definition of the concept: pediment.

Top of the building of the Greek National Assembly in Athens. The fronton (fr.fronton, from Latin frons, frontis - forehead, front part of the wall) is the end (usually triangular, less often - semicircular) of the facade of the building, portico, colonnade, bounded by two roof slopes on the sides and a cornice at the base.

Isn't it, well, a very recognizable element of architecture? Almost every city in Russia has a building with such a pediment. These are buildings of pre-revolutionary buildings, these are also buildings of the Soviet era. Well, there is no need to talk about world development. All countries and continents have the same architectural elements and twin buildings! Further, Wikipedia gives us the main types of gables:

The translation is as follows: 1. From English - pots. 2. From French to the present. 3. From French - circular. 4. From French - the wind. 5. From French - intersect. 6. From English - double. 7. From French - an architectural overhang (for the arch). 8. French - top. 9. From French - no return. 10. French - triangular. 11. From French - no base. 12. From French - by winding. Such gables are, so to speak, characteristic signs of construction. But what is interesting is that historians give us this architectural style as antique. The word "pediment" itself has a Latin stem. Yes, and historically they tie us this to the Renaissance and ancient Rome, which means they are unambiguously trying to convince us that this architecture is Italian, at best, Greek, etc. Why, then, the designations of the pediments in the above figure are translated from French? It turns out that these are not Greek and especially not Italian concepts. The ruling elite of Russia two hundred years ago, without exception, all spoke French. Was it not the state language of the winner in the unknown war that the elite of Russia spoke? I have already written about the strange development of Tomsk in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The city was founded in 1604, and the total development begins only almost three hundred years later. This is just about the question of what happened in the world two hundred years ago? And to whom did we lose the unknown war? For many things, it seems, you will never find an answer, but there are artifacts that can, albeit indirectly, shed light on the questions of interest to us. For example, the architectural style of the wooden buildings in Tomsk:

The central pediment is the characteristic number two or seven. Window gables are definitely number 12: "by winding". Only where is here "by winding" when, if read without translation, it is easy to read in Russian: "a pair of elements", or "a pair of ribbons". Or here is the characteristic casing, decorated with prehistoric plants with psilophytes, with a circular pediment.

But the stone buildings of Tomsk are of even greater interest in this context.

And this is already in another hemisphere of the Earth.

Toronto. Canada.

Bishop's house. Tomsk (built at the end of the 19th century).

Arita. Japan.

Santiago. Chile.

TUSUR building Tomsk (date of construction, late 19th century).

DC "Energetik". Tomsk (mid XX century).

Calcutta. India.

Tomsk Imperial University (late 19th century).

Mexico City. Mexico.

Clinics of the Siberian Medical University. Tomsk (late 19th century).

Shanghai. China.

This is Tomsk again.

Find ten differences, so to speak. No, there are of course some differences, but not constructively, but in architectural terms. So to speak, to somehow leave your name in history. The name of a particular architect or builder. Only! Otherwise, these are typical projects and typical technical documentation. As a builder, I will say the following: documentation at the stage of design development and, a package of technical documentation for the project, is one of the serious expense items. Typical projects and those. documentation reduce construction costs significantly. Nobody will develop something separately if standard projects can be used. So Tomsk is built up with typical buildings. It seems that when drawing up the town-planning plan for the development of Tomsk, it was precisely the technical documentation of the former global civilization, preserved deliberately, was used. If you look at the building of the Palace of Culture "Energetik" in Tomsk, the pediment of which is clearly number 2: "up to now", you just want to laugh, because this building was built very much in the style of "up to the present" and specifically in time the present (50s of the XX century). And how many of these "DKs" in the "up to now" style are there all over Russia and around the world? Hundreds, if not thousands. These are all typical saved tech. documentation for the construction of a previous civilization. I will support the authors who, in this context, say that conversations on this topic can be continued endlessly. I will support it for a simple reason, because the legacy of the former global Russian civilization, which was recently erased from the face of the planet, is almost infinite in itself. Another, not even indirect, but direct evidence of a practically single world, is the pillars and masts carrying electrical wires. Take a closer look at photos from different continents and you will see one typical constructive way of making these masts and a way of transmitting electricity through them. By the way, I found confirmation of my version of a single technological standard base here: S. S. Ozhegov. "Typical and re-construction in Russia.." Typical design of residential and "government" buildings in the first half of the 19th century.

I deliberately did not post all the photos of Tomsk buildings bearing the stamp of typical world construction. There's no point. And I don't want to overload the article unnecessarily, and in fact, everything is already clear. But I can't help but share a photo of this wooden house, well, I just can't. Pl. Batenkov. Tomsk. In addition to the series of articles "Someone else's" relatives ", so to speak. On the pediments is the bird Sirin, described in the Vedas, and the Owl from the flag of Tartaria. Tomsk still continues to open itself up. Or does it just keep opening your eyes? Nevertheless, I just want to ask myself the question again: - So what kind of faith was there at the beginning of the 20th century in Siberia? This article has been on the table since May 2015. Somehow I was not going to publish everything. I decided to publish it when it became, as it were, a continuation of the article "The Last City of Tartary"

It just becomes clear now how, as the former territories of the Rus were colonized, not only a new worldview and ideology came to these territories, but even a typical world architecture. The architecture of "colonial" columns, pediments and other elements. One could of course give more photos and examples, but it makes no sense. And so everything is clear. This is not native Russian architecture. Our architecture is the architecture of chambers and chambers, not "granite-stone chambers". Such "colonial" architecture came to Tomsk so late for a simple reason: almost until the middle of the 19th century, the sovereign and administrative power of the Rus was still here. The power of Artania, Rus Mary, Tartary. The name itself is not important, as it is important that on this remaining piece of land of the Russian spirit, before, it would seem, the last gasp, the Vedic roots of our people were still alive. Actually, they are still alive!

In conclusion, I would like to ask thoughtful readers: what do you think should have been done to instill in the minds of earthlings fear of global civilization and the global order of the world? That's right, write the Apocalypse! All this anti-globalization mouse fuss is just a cover. The world is not meant to become global! Does not imply in our philistine understanding. They just won't let him do that. In any case, they won't give it yet. But it has been managed and managed for a long time from a single center. Global peace is not beneficial and dangerous when the main slogan is: "Divide and rule!" And in order to camouflage the ins and outs, hysteria "about the coming of the Antichrist and the perniciousness of globalization" is just needed. Judging by what is happening in the world now, one involuntarily asks the question: Has the Antichrist already reigned in his inherent “divide and rule” a single global formation? A separation formation can also be global, right? Is not it?! P. S. Photo of Western cities taken from here: