A different picture of the world. Part 1
A different picture of the world. Part 1

Video: A different picture of the world. Part 1

Video: A different picture of the world. Part 1
Video: Wait AT LEAST 30 Days To Buy & SAVE | Used Car Prices CRASH 10% 2024, November
Anonim

May 27, 2016, Friday, 13:00. The marble hall. ON THE THRESHOLD OF A SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH

Press conference

A different picture of the world - fantasy or reality? Doom or flourish?

Participants of the meeting with journalists:

Moderator - Alexander Evgenievich SEMENOV, President of the Association "Ecology of the Unknown", professor at the Academy of Geopolitical Problems.

Timur Rafkatovich TIMERBULATOV, Doctor of Economics, Candidate of Military Sciences, Academician of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Academician of the Russian and European Academies of Natural Sciences, President of the KONTI Group of Companies.

Vladimir Akimovich ATSYUKOVSKY, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Academician of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics. K. E. Tsiolkovsky, Honorary Member of the Russian Academy of Electrical Sciences.

Stepan N. ANDREEV, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Scientific Secretary of the Institute of General Physics named after A. M. Prokhorov RAS, member of the Council of Young Scientists RAS.

We are confident that our world is material. But what is matter? Of what is the world around us woven, ourselves? What is the basis of atoms, planets, stars and galaxies? What is ether, and why has a scientific "veto" been acting on this very concept for more than a hundred years? And why can modern mankind either perish or move abruptly along the path of a prosperous civilization?

Humanity has already discovered hundreds of galaxies containing billions of stars. All this is our Universe. But how much do we know about her? How did it come about? Is it finite or infinite? How does it live and develop? What awaits humanity in its unexplored expanses? Isn't it time to try to answer these questions from different, new positions?

The development of the present civilization is entirely dependent on the sources of thermal and electrical energy. It's no secret that hydrocarbon energy is a very tough tool for managing a handful of people across the entire human community. Atomic is unsafe. Wind and solar energy are not efficient enough and are very expensive. Can humanity count on the use of qualitatively different methods of obtaining energy?

Recommended: