Experiment: three things kids often get sick from

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

How often do children get sick? Experts from the World Health Organization explain: if your preschooler catches infectious diseases 6-8 times a year, this is a sign that the baby's immunity is developing normally. This is the opinion of pediatricians from around the world.

We are led to the idea that it is normal for a person to get sick, that the world of pathogens is so strong and diverse that, despite the progress of medicine in recent years, it is not possible to cope with it. American epidemiologists came to the conclusion that epidemics in the current decade break out four times more often than in the 80s of the last century, and the number of diseases causing epidemics has increased by 20%.

Today, already as an epidemic, they speak of such an ailment, the existence of which was discovered only about 70 years ago. This is autism, with which almost every hundredth child lives in the USA and Great Britain today! There are many similar examples.

It is obvious that medicine does not at all justify the aspirations of people who hope with its help to somehow protect themselves from diseases. But fortunately, as it turned out, it can be done without medicine! How? - It's very simple - you just need to raise the level of the child's own immunity. How? - You just need to stop oppressing him!

The fact is that nature initially gave a person a very strong immunity, which allows him to practically not get sick. Especially if this immunity is completely taken from the mother and was not suppressed at birth: the pulsating umbilical cord was not pinched; strong cellular poisons were not introduced into the bloodstream in the first hours of the child's life with the vaccine; the adaptive mechanisms of the newborn to extrauterine life were not disturbed in the maternity hospital; the child did not inherit staphylococcus from the maternity hospital (about 90% of modern maternity hospitals are infected with staphylococcus), etc. But, unfortunately, there are practically no ideal situations in our world.

But, despite this state of affairs, removing only the main depressing influences, you can achieve indicative results. A similar example is an experiment conducted in our family with our own child, as a result of which our child stopped getting sick and practically does not get sick for about three years! So that someone does not think that we are experimenting on our child, I will say that at first I performed it on myself and received a convincing result.

I also wanted to add that during the experiment, no medicine recommended or folk remedies were used to increase the activity of the body's immune system. No diet, gymnastics, hardening, any immunostimulating, tonic or vitamin preparations (even of plant origin) were purposefully applied. It's just that the child lived as usual, and not in the most environmentally friendly place - the metropolis of Moscow. We, of course, tried to acquire the least harmful, in our opinion, products and use a balanced diet, but we understood that it was impossible to completely protect ourselves in food in a metropolis. Therefore, they did not show fanaticism. We showed intransigence in other things … But, however, we must tell everything from the beginning.

It all started with that unhappy day when the eldest daughter, after another test of Mantoux at school, was brought home by an ambulance with the words: “All children have a normal reaction, but your child is not normal. There was anaphylactic shock (the body's reaction to the introduction of an exorbitant amount of a foreign allergen) with a short-term loss of consciousness, so deal with your child yourself!"

I, as a meticulous person, began to understand. I shoveled a lot of information and was extremely amazed that the test for tuberculosis - the Mantoux test, is the introduction into the body of a number of substances alien to it: a weakened tuberculosis virus - tuberculin, which has strong allergenic properties; extremely toxic cellular poison - phenol; polysorbate Tween-80 with estrogenic (female sex hormone) effect, etc.! And this is all despite the fact that the Mantoux test absolutely does not have the reliability of the result. That is, intoxication with the strongest poisons is guaranteed, but the result is not! …? - No answer! Why can't you just take a person's blood for analysis and test it for tuberculosis (as they do, for example, for AIDS, or some other disease) without harming the body and getting a 100% result? - No answer!

A similar unrequited bewilderment arose in me when I began to study information on vaccination. The same introduction into the body of a large number of substances alien to the body for the sake of creating a very dubious, and even then only temporary, immunity to some kind of disease, and harm is caused by poisons to the entire body as a whole!

This follows from the composition and mechanism of action of the vaccines. Here's how they are made. Strains (pathogens) of a certain disease are cultivated (grown, multiplied) in a certain nutrient medium on biological tissues, in most cases, not of human origin. By the way, subsequently, particles of these tissues (foreign protein) enter the bloodstream with the vaccine (it is impossible to completely separate the resulting strains from biological tissue).

Then, in order to weaken the grown strains, they are exposed to a strong biological poison, which, later, together with the weakened strain, also enters the bloodstream. Formaldehyde (formalin) is often used for this purpose - a potent mutagen, carcinogen and allergen. It is used in vaccines: DTP, ADS-m, AD-m, against poliomyelitis, tick-borne encephalitis, hepatitis A, in some vaccines against influenza.

Some vaccines are created using genetic engineering methods, when they genetically modify and recombine the DNA and RNA of viruses and create an antigen that can induce an immune response in the body (vaccine against hepatitis B, against influenza, against human papillomavirus).

Aluminum hydroxide is used as an adjuvant, a substance that increases the production of antibodies in the body. However, it is very toxic and allergic, and can cause the development of autoimmune diseases (the production of autoimmune antibodies against healthy tissues of the body). It is present in such vaccines as against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, DTP, ADS-m, AD-m, against tick-borne encephalitis.

To preserve the resulting mixture in most vaccines, merthiolate (or thiomersal - from Mercury - mercury) is used as a preservative - a salt of mercury, a substance known to be good at preventing biological fluids from decay. But merthiolate is also a pesticide, a powerful allergen and cellular poison, affecting primarily the nervous system and the human brain, which also enters the human bloodstream! Today, it is banned as a component of mass childhood vaccinations in the United States, the European Union and some other countries. In our country, mertiolate is used in vaccines against hepatitis B (the vaccine is administered at the hospital in the first 12 hours of a child's life), DTP, ADS-m, AD-m, a vaccine against hemophilic infection, in some vaccines against influenza and tick-borne encephalitis.

The negative effect of mercury compounds on the nervous system in the presence of aluminum hydroxide increases dramatically, but despite this, they are found together in such vaccines as against hepatitis B, DTP, ADS-m, AD-m, in some vaccines against tick-borne encephalitis.

Thus, with vaccines, such alien substances as aluminum salts, mercury salts, formaldehyde, phenol, antibiotics (neomycin, kanamycin), genetically modified organisms, various biological pollutants and foreign proteins enter the human body. Unfortunately, nature has not foreseen that substances that are not intended for this at all will enter the human body, and even parenterally, that is, immediately into the blood, bypassing all existing protective barriers of the body.

We considered that there are too many such substances to create a healthy immunity to diseases in a child and decided to see how the immune system would react when all these substances stop entering the body.

In childhood, most diseases are easily tolerated, therefore, in pre-Soviet Russia, children were taken to visit sick children so that the child could become infected, get sick and acquire immunity to as many diseases as possible, because the natural course of the disease creates lifelong immunity in the body.

The youngest daughter at the time of this decision was about 4 years old. We were obedient parents, we followed all the doctors' instructions - the main part of the vaccination calendar was more or less successfully completed. Well, the child did not particularly stand out from his peers - he was sick 4 - 6 times a year. A child who does not get sick at all most likely has a weak immune response, which means that worse diseases await him than a runny nose, the doctors explained.

To enhance the effect of our experiment, at the same time, we also decided to abandon antipyretic drugs, since we learned that temperature is one of the most effective types of the body's immune response to a disease. After all, as it turned out, most pathogens die at a temperature of 39 degrees! Starting to bring down the temperature with antipyretics at 38.5 °, as doctors prescribe us, we, in essence, prevent the body from giving a decent immune response to pathogens. And the folding of protein and blood occurs at temperatures above 42 ° and few people have an organism that can raise such a temperature on its own. I have not found descriptions of such deaths, and there are many descriptions of recoveries from a high temperature. Subsequently, we ourselves were convinced of this, when, after the flu, ascertained by the doctor, his virus burned out at a temperature of 40, 5 ° in one night, and recovery began.

Our experiment to restore a child's own immunity would not have been complete if we had not decided to gradually abandon such foreign substances for humans as antibiotics. After all, they, first of all, disrupt the composition of the intestinal microflora, and in fact the intestine is the largest organ that forms immunity. It is in the intestine that the lymphoid tissue is located, which serves as the source of 70% of lymphocytes that produce antibodies - immunoglobulins.

So, to sum up, we decided to abandon: 1 - from cellular poisons and substances alien to the body (Mantoux test, vaccination); 2 - from substances that suppress immunity (antibiotics); 3 - from substances that directly interfere with the body's fight against diseases (antipyretics). That's all, actually! We refused only, in our opinion, from the main factors interfering with the vital activity of the organism. Again, no special diet, gymnastics, hardening, immunostimulation, etc. were used.

As a result, we saw that the child began to hurt less and less. This has been happening for about 4 years. The control group in the experiment consisted first of the children in the kindergarten group, and then the classmates, who generally continued to get sick as usual and were considered normal.

But the difference became especially noticeable when, after these 4 years, our child stopped getting sick at all and has not been sick for 3 years! We do not consider our experiment finished, it continues. We will continue to observe the child in the dynamics of development. But even the result that has been achieved so far is very eloquent and indicative. We do not believe that by our actions we have protected the health of the child. In our opinion, we removed only the main factors of negative impact on the immune system and the child's body, but even this gave such convincing results!

We believe that the main harm to immunity is caused by vaccinations from early childhood after the completion of the vaccination calendar. Later in life, this depressed level of immunity is only "supported" by such things as revaccinations, Mantoux tests, antibiotics, antipyretic, ionizing radiation, stress, etc., without giving the body the opportunity to restore it.

Due to imposed misconceptions about health and disease prevention, it is very difficult for parents to pull a child out of this vicious vicious circle. But isn't the health and success of the child in the future a good reason to figure it out and change something?

After all, neurotoxins reduce the potential of the brain and it may happen that a child in the future will never be able to reach the level of development that was originally possible.

It is in the hands of parents that the key to the well-being of their own children is held, and I wish all parents to use it for their good.