Table of contents:
- The rule was this: what one person invents - gradually becomes available to all of humanity
- After the collapse of the USSR and the related breakdown of the main vector of human civilization, the concept of "developing countries" quietly faded away. It has been replaced by the concept of “failed state”, and the list of “finished countries” is constantly growing
- By itself, the change in the philosophy of the "developing world" to the "finished periphery" meant a decisive rupture of the American Empire with the common human civilization. It was decided to move from the development of mankind to its self-devouring "from the tail" …
- Even worse: the improvement of life in some places is no longer self-sufficient - it is inextricably and directly related to the deterioration of life in others
- We were invited to a banquet of cannibals, and in the role of food, not guests
- The difference between dollars and oil bought for dollars is that dollars can be printed, but oil cannot. We are talking about an absolutely nonequivalent exchange: EVERYTHING for NOTHING
- A person is a resource site
- It turns out that money is earthly (and underground) fruits. You are a smart person, my reader, you understand that instead of cucumbers you can substitute oil and gas, copper and nickel, wheat and beef, and anything else
- In a man-eating economy, the amount of resources collected in the hands of one owner tends to infinity, and, accordingly, the number of owners tends to zero
- What are the real values of objective reality?
- So what is really valuable in the world? If money and even manufactured goods can be spanked in any quantity, then natural resources cannot be spanked on the machine. How many of them were in the Paleolithic - the same number of them today, and even less …
- Most of all, natural raw materials should be valued, which in the cannibalistic economy of globalism is valued, just the same, least of all
Video: Cannibals banquet
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
The best sons of mankind believed in the cosmic solidarity of people. That is: if one person has achieved something, then all of humanity has achieved it with him. Scientists from different continents corresponded, in a hurry to share their findings.
As soon as a telegraph appeared in one place - and soon telegraphs rattled everywhere - in Africa, in the Australian desert, in the Far North … They invented a cinema in Paris - and soon cinemas opened all over the world. Chumakov invented the polio vaccine in Moscow, and soon it was received by Japanese children [1].
So - with any novelty of progress: literally in a few years it has already appeared in the most remote boondocks.
The rule was this: what one person invents - gradually becomes available to all of humanity
This is not only a principle of humanity. This is the principle of civilization: knowledge is multiplied by division, the power of knowledge is associated with their quantity. There should be as many carriers of knowledge, as many as possible, because the rapidly growing amount of human knowledge cannot fit in one head …
That is why backward countries even at the time of my carefree school childhood (80s of the twentieth century), politically correctly called "developing". They say that they are not so hot today, but they are adopting the knowledge and experience of leaders, and tomorrow they will be like us …
After the collapse of the USSR and the related breakdown of the main vector of human civilization, the concept of "developing countries" quietly faded away. It has been replaced by the concept of “failed state”, and the list of “finished countries” is constantly growing
The concept of "Failed state" was first used in the early 1990s (as you can imagine, earlier it was impossible to be so frank) by American researchers Gerald Hellman and Stephen Rattner.
By itself, the change in the philosophy of the "developing world" to the "finished periphery" meant a decisive rupture of the American Empire with the common human civilization. It was decided to move from the development of mankind to its self-devouring "from the tail" …
It is both unnecessary and impossible to develop the backward, we were told. The ecology of the planet will not survive if every Chinese or Indian has a Belgian or Norwegian consumption level. There won't be enough resources.
And quietly, without unnecessary noise - humanity was divided (naturally, without asking its consent) - into the living and the dead. The dead do not yet know that they are dead, but they will gradually be "brought" - says the concept of the "golden billion", which nowadays is shrinking to several "golden millions" [2].
In this new world, everything that is invented to facilitate and improve human life is no longer for everyone, even in theory.
Even worse: the improvement of life in some places is no longer self-sufficient - it is inextricably and directly related to the deterioration of life in others
If intensive development means deepening the processing of existing resources, then extensive development is a simple mechanical involvement of new resources.
It is clear that it is easier to develop extensively, and it is cheaper, than to "bite into granite" intensively. Robbery has always provided a profit above honest labor. Nothing has changed in our time either …
What happened to us in 1991?
We were invited to a banquet of cannibals, and in the role of food, not guests
In this cannibalized global economy, the worse our affairs are, the higher their standard of living, and vice versa [3].
The difference between dollars and oil bought for dollars is that dollars can be printed, but oil cannot. We are talking about an absolutely nonequivalent exchange: EVERYTHING for NOTHING
Why have we become food for economic cannibals?
Because we naively hoped that they would share their standard of living with us, as we do with Afghanistan or Cuba.the logic of the "developing country" and the "catch-up development model").
We wanted to sit at their table, but ended up sitting on their fork!
At the same time, there, on a fork, realizing where such an abundance of meat comes from at their table: in the spirit of the unforgettable French horror film "Delicacies" …
Of course, it is too late for us to be sober about the economy now. But better late than never. I believe that the process is still reversible, although every day there is an increasing threat of its irreversibility …
Do you want to live? Accept the biting, like a slap in the face, elementary truth: a person is born naked and without anything. And he cannot live like that.
You can be born, but you can't survive.
Before Gagarin, no one went into Space, which means that everything that a person receives - he receives from the Earth: everything with which he lives and survives is located on some territory.
Now the next step to understanding: what, a man is alone in the world, naked, without anything, and eager to find the material benefits of the Earth? No, as you understand. Wherever a person stretches his little hands, everywhere he meets the Master, who came before and “staked out” the plot …
And what does a person do? He first selects resources in his favor, and then defends them in the struggle.
Tearing a person off from the territory of his feeding is the same as tearing him in half: death in both cases! Therefore, by the very fact of his life, by the fact that he is not a corpse, a person proves that he has a certain area of resource support on planet Earth.
A living person, in the economic sense, is "not two arms or two legs, a head is two ears."
A person is a resource site
That is, simply with an equal sign: a vegetable garden = a person, there is no vegetable garden, there is no person … Well, how can he live - a paw, like a bear to suck? So after all, the bear does not suck its paws, these are all hunting tales …
With the development of technologies and commodity exchange, with the expansion of the division of labor, industrial cooperation - there is a PULVERIZATION of a person's personal resource site. This process sprays, sprinkles our food garden sometimes over the entire surface of the Globe.
This gives rise to the illusion that the personal resource site, so roughly and visibly outlined by the fence in the terrible era of “fencing”, has disappeared, as it were. But this is an illusion, and a very dangerous illusion!
Yes, yours, reader, lands are scattered in tiny patches in a huge space, mixed with other people's plots, but they have not ceased to be.
Cucumbers are grown for you on the ground, and tomatoes for you are also grown on the ground, that is, for your own sake, they load the fertility of the space, which could be used for other purposes.
Let's take such a simple and understandable model.
A man has a greenhouse where cucumbers grow. This means that a person can directly grow cucumbers for himself. But, let's say, he went to the city, and does not want to be engaged in gardening. He rented out a greenhouse. The tenant sends him money. With this money, a person buys cucumbers in the city …
Are these the cucumbers that grew in the owner's greenhouse? From a botanical point of view, not necessarily. It can be any kind of cucumber, even from China. But from the economic point of view, the purchased cucumbers are exactly the same cucumbers that grew in the greenhouse
What is the tenant paying for?
For the opportunity to grow cucumbers. If there was no such opportunity, then there would be no lease. The tenant decided for himself that it was profitable for him to exchange the cucumbers ripening in your greenhouse for a certain amount of money
This means that money goes into cucumbers, and cucumbers back into money. Whoever has cucumbers has money, and whoever has money has cucumbers
It turns out that money is earthly (and underground) fruits. You are a smart person, my reader, you understand that instead of cucumbers you can substitute oil and gas, copper and nickel, wheat and beef, and anything else
Thus, money is the tube of your (and my) life support apparatus, which connects us to our resource site. Turn off the life support apparatus and the person will die …
Why is money not work? You yourself will answer this question: what kind of work does the tenant of the greenhouse have with you in our example? You have left for the city … All 100% of the work falls on the tenant. Why is he paying you then?
Because he lacks his own territory. And you have it. Together with her - without any difficulty and even his shadow - money is formed with which you buy cucumbers in a vegetable store, disdaining to grow them yourself …
Labor does not make money. If you go to a vacant lot and dig a huge hole there, there will be a lot of work, but no one will pay you. In the same way, as with the water crushing in a mortar, attempts to disperse the clouds from the bell tower, etc.
In a man-eating economy, the amount of resources collected in the hands of one owner tends to infinity, and, accordingly, the number of owners tends to zero
The main goal of this economy is to take the lives of "superfluous" people and "superfluous" peoples out of the brackets.
The rich are getting richer - but fewer and fewer.
The policy of modernization of the backward was replaced by the opposite support for their archaization. They are simply being helped (and quite effectively) to destroy themselves.
In the 1960s, the United States tried to "bomb Vietnam into the Stone Age" with its own hands. But then they realized that it was easier to do this with the hands of the natives. They are no longer “hammering” Ukraine into the Stone Age, but are leading it arm in arm.
What are the real values of objective reality?
Of course, the least value is money. They are generally conditional icons! What value can they have?
Somewhat more value in manufactured goods and consumer goods. These are still real goods - telephones, vacuum cleaners, cars, refrigerators, etc. They are not as conventional as money.
But let's not overestimate the value of manufactured goods. It is very conditional and relative. The cost price of a small batch product is sometimes several times higher than the cost price of a large batch product
Roughly speaking, you start a punching machine - and it will stamp you how much you need. The speed is not satisfied - find technological solutions to increase it … There is not enough day shift - enter the night shift …
Theoretically, you can slap any number of manufactured goods and consumer goods - there are no boundaries for modern technology, there would be payment. Order a modern concern 3, 5, 10 times more products - they will only be delighted and find ways to fulfill the order.
So what is really valuable in the world? If money and even manufactured goods can be spanked in any quantity, then natural resources cannot be spanked on the machine. How many of them were in the Paleolithic - the same number of them today, and even less …
And the question arises: if our "elites" were normal people, and not degenerate criminal psychopaths - WHAT should be valued more dearly and above all else?
Naturally, not money waste - be it dollars, euros or rubles. And, as we understand, not manufactured goods, not consumer goods - skillfully, it is easy to organize their production anywhere and anytime.
Most of all, natural raw materials should be valued, which in the cannibalistic economy of globalism is valued, just the same, least of all
Manufactured goods are valued higher than raw materials, although this is absurdity and insanity, the recoverable cannot be equated with the irreplaceable.
And American waste paper is generally placed above all else, it executes and pardons, disposes and distributes, directs, wherever it pleases, both the flows of raw materials and the flows of manufactured goods …
There is nothing new under the Moon: once the slave owner disposed of ALL the grain grown by the slaves (as well as the slaves themselves) - without personally growing a single ear.
As a parasite of the process, it simultaneously acted as a source of life and death. Until the slaves got tired of it, and they "cut" the slave owner over themselves …
[1] Chumakov, Mikhail Petrovich - discovered the polio vaccine. The vaccine, produced at the Chumakov Institute, has been exported to more than 60 countries around the world, and has helped eliminate large outbreaks of polio in Eastern Europe and Japan. In Japan, where the epidemic was severe, mothers staged demonstrations for the government to buy vaccines from the USSR.
[2] “Let the earth's population never exceed 500 million,” says the first line of the American Tablets, a huge granite monument in Elbert County, Georgia, USA. That is, it is no longer the "Golden Billion", but at best only half of it …
[3] If, for example, a person is brought to such poverty that he is ready to sew sneakers for a bowl of potato peels, then these will be the cheapest sneakers in the world. For whom? Well, of course, not for the one who sews them, he only gets potato peelings. And for the one who buys, for the country where the sneakers are imported …
And first of all - for the country that uncontrollably prints world money - that is, uncontrollably disposes of the natural resources of the planet.
Recommended:
Karl Petterson: the Swede became the king of the cannibals
The story of Karl Emil Petterson - the man who the cannibals wanted to eat, but made their king
Legends of Saiduk - red-haired giant cannibals
North Indian Payutes in Nevada
Cannibals and Altruists: Nothing Personal - Just Business
Manipulation is a tool for managing a person, as a result of the use of which a controlled person performs actions that, without the use of this tool, would never have performed or refrained from actions that he was obliged to perform
Who pays for the banquet
In the famous Soviet comedy "Ivan Vasilyevich Changes His Profession" there is such an episode: the house manager, who has fallen into the past and pretends to be a tsar, asks a question - Wait a minute! At whose expense is this banquet? Who will pay? To which he gets the answer - In any case, not us. They say that in the original version the answer sounded like this - People, father, people