Devilry

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

«… America is an island; Australia is an island; Africa is almost an island; Asia together with Europe will also be almost an island. Why on earth should this whole body, this huge piece of land, like all other pieces, surrounded on all or almost all sides by water, be divided into two parts on the basis of a completely different principle? Does nature set any boundary here? The Ural ridge occupies about half of this border. But what special qualities does he have in order to confer the honor of serving as the border between two parts of the world, out of all the ridges of the globe, an honor that in all other cases is recognized only over the oceans and rarely over the seas? This ridge at its height is one of the most insignificant, in terms of transition - one of the most convenient; in its middle part, near Yekaterinburg, they cross it, as through the famous Alaunskaya flat upland and Valdai mountains, asking the driver: where, brother, are the mountains?.. But the Ural ridge, at least, is something; further, the honor of serving as the border of two worlds falls on the Ural River, which is already perfect nothing. A narrow river, at the mouth of a quarter of the Neva as wide, with completely identical banks on either side …»

(N. Danilevsky, historian, 19th century)

If you read carefully the epigraph to this miniature, any person will have doubts about the adequacy of the geographers who established the division of Europe and Asia. Any person looking at the map, if he wants to understand it in detail, will find not 2 continents at all, but one, but as they say, do not believe your eyes.

If you ask a modern geographer about the reason for the appearance of the part of the world, Europe, he will answer that it happened historically. Then a logical question arises: why is geography, and not history, engaged in this part of the world? Now they are talking about the presence of a certain continent of Eurasia. Based on logic, this name can be defined as historical and geographical. Allow me! But, at the junction of the two sciences, either a general theory should arise that satisfies both sciences and explains the fundamental principles of each, or an axiom that does not require proof. There is nothing of this in the question of Europe. Moreover, beyond the Ural Mountains (Riphean, Rymnitsky, Yaitsky, etc.) there is not Asia, but Siberia! That is, all the same logic dictates that divided, either by geographers or by historians, the continent consists of two parts: Europe and Siberia. And together they are Asia!

A modern person, busy with his own affairs, absolutely does not care what and what is called. Meanwhile, he does not know about the greatest deception of mankind, where he is assigned the role of an extra.

Judge for yourself. There are six parts of the world - America, Africa, Antarctica, Australia and Oceania, Europe, Asia. Much of this division is geographically very logical. Part of the world America is, in fact, a single continent with adjacent island territories. The Panama Canal artificially divided North and South America only in 1913. Before that, both Americas were completely one continent. With Africa, Antarctica, Australia with the adjacent archipelagos of Oceania, everything also fits into geographical logic.

But what about Europe and Asia? Here geographic logic disappears altogether. By the way, a similar phenomenon is observed with Antarctica. If we take the accepted historical and cultural definition of the continent, then the question is logical: who is the bearer of the historical and cultural tradition there? Are the penguins?

Any historian will tell you that Asia (Asia) is inhabited by Asians (Asia). Then, according to logic, Europe should be inhabited by "Europe". We are dealing with some Europeans. That is, not as a single people, but as a numerous gathering of peoples, as the official history presents them to the world today. However, in Europe we see a nation of exactly the same white people as in Asia, but in Asia there is not only a white race.

I was surprised to learn recently that Israel is also Europe. For example, he is present in all European institutions, and his athletes compete in European games. Interestingly, the Jews are dancing (they are girls). On the map, he is in Asia (Middle East, on the border with Africa), and on paper in Europe.

Something tells me that the historical and cultural nuance was given to Europe, Antarctica and Israel quite recently, not earlier than the 19th century. Vaughn and Danilevsky are surprised at the epigraph to my work, which he wrote at the end of the 19th century.

Something? not okay with this Europe! Let's find out what it is all about?

First, let's evaluate the definition of Wikipendia:

Europe is named after the heroine of the ancient Greek mythology of Europe, the Phoenician princess, kidnapped by Zeus and taken to Crete (while the epithet of Europe could also be associated with Hero and Demeter).

Gentlemen, I myself recommend that you take a textbook on mythology and try to combine the characters indicated here. It will turn out to be a kind of hybrid of Napoleon with Apollo (Apollo). Let me explain more simply: if you decompose the mythology on the shelves, then no Phoenician princess could exist at the time of Zeus - they are separated by thousands of mythological years. As for the statement of Hera and Demeter, the author just laughed, knowing who they were. In this incident, I propose to figure it out for the reader himself - I guarantee a minute of fun. One thing I ask you, the reader, do not get carried away with tales of a lustful bull and an accessible girl. The criminal code of all countries defines this as bestiality, and such a transformation of Zeus is nowhere else in mythology. Strange in general, this Zeus - the supreme god-thunderer could simply send a taxi driver in a chariot for Europe - why bother himself? Not logical, some kind of god, in this particular case. This can be explained by one thing: the previously known mythology was ruled by someone, in a very recent time. The fairy tale about the white bull (how the Russian people noticed this story with Europe !!!) is a supplemented phenomenon and does not fit into the logical chain of mythology. They just inserted it into an already acting plot, a gag

However, let's look at a more scientific formulation of TSB:

Europe (Greek Europe, from Assyrian erebus - west (in other sources - presumably west, - auth.)); in ancient Greece, this was the name of the territories lying to the West of the Aegean Sea) …

Let us assume that Erebus is indeed west, although the word "presumably" is boring. Etymologists are unlikely to find something in common between EREB and EUROPE, here you need to drag on cannabis well!

However, the reader and I are athletic people, do not perceive bad habits, we will not smoke, but simply look to the west of the Aegean Sea. And there is nothing except Italy and Spain. Something tells me that this is not Europe either. Painfully small compared to the one stated on the card.

I think that there will be enough excursions with official historians, otherwise it is not surprising to go crazy with them. Let's take a better look at the old cards. Earlier than the 15th century, about any Europe, we are not talking about them. There is a completely different name - Livonia.

Excuse me, but there must be someone who will call the former Livonia Europe. And again, a strange thing: America in honor of Amerigo Vesputchi, Asia in honor of the Asians, Australia and Africa also have explanations for their names, and, moreover, it is quite logical. Antarctica too. Even Oceania and Antarctica are legitimate. But with Europe they are strenuously pushing a white bull to us, apparently the father of this brainchild is in no hurry to gain fame, rightly fearing a trial and alimony.

Well, it’s not the first time for me to start looking for parents, and therefore I hasten to inform the reader that the voluptuary has been found! And this is a daddy of daddies - the Pope of Rome!

Obviously, by the 15th century, a certain unified political force had spread its influence over the western territories of Eurasia so much that it united them with a single name - Europe. And despite the fact that there were many different states, they all found themselves in a dependent position. Only the Catholic Church could be such a force, but it remains silent.

Over the years of service in the authorities, I had to call for a frank conversation and not so silent. I remember in those years, in the Soviet publications flashed information about the excellent work done by the Soviet security officers, on the recruitment of one of the cardinals of the Vatican. The noise was incredible then. No one could believe that the cardinal of the Roman curia would sing songs commissioned by the KGB of the USSR. And he sang and still sang! Why did I tell you this? And to ensure that the reader understands that the Vatican consists of people who eat, sleep, defecate and generally live like ordinary people. The entourage of the Roman church makes them less accessible, but still vulnerable. Therefore, I am sure that, given a good opportunity, a trained agent would "bother" dad himself - not a great trick. However, I digress.

Everyone knows that the official language of the Catholic Church was originally Latin. If she appropriated any name, it was in Latin. I propose to look into the dictionary of a dead language, created just in the 15th century. It is in the Latin created at the specified time that "Romance" languages, which have never existed before, will appear in Europe. Until the 15th century, the Pope wrote in Slavic letters and in the Slavic language. And Latin, a fictional language, tira esperanso.

So it says, is it a dictionary for us? But what:

eurus, i m (Greek; Latin vulturnus)

1) eur, southeast wind L, Sen etc.;

2) poet. east wind, also. storm H, V, St; wind (in general): primo sub euro Lcn at the first gust of wind;

3) poet. east VF, Cld.

euro – aquilo, onis m [eurus] - north-east wind Vlg.

eurocircias, ae m (Greek) - east-southeast wind Vtr

euronotus, i m (Greek) - southeast wind Col, PM.

eurous, a, um [eurus] - eastern (fluctus V).

Wai wai wai! What an embarrassment however! It’s necessary to plunge into it, and even with two feet. Citizens, official historians, do you even represent the cardinal points? With what banana, your Europe suddenly became the east? Do not know? Then I will answer you: the truth is recorded in the story of the white bull and the queen - we are talking about the theft of the eastern territories, which never belonged to the Vatican. This is the late insertion into mythologists. However, I will temporarily move away from this topic.

For those who are not sure that Europe is directly related to the Latin East, I will give the spelling of this word in Latin:

Europa, ae and Europe, es (acc.en) f - Europe.

Euro - pa (pars - part. Lat.) - Eastern part.

Tell me, reader, have the historians not seen this? I doubt! Then answer another question: can you imagine what level the crooks taught you at school and still teach your children, and what such teaching has led the world to?

So, let's imagine a certain center from which the conquest of the now known Europe began. I see him as the Vatican. For us, Europe is the West and they are Westerners. But we are east for them, and this means that the conquest went east of the Vatican, into the territory of a certain state, which in Latin jargon I propose to designate as EURO-East.

Apparently, Europe is a political concept. Finally we got to the most shameless profession in the world - politics.

The spread of the influence of Catholics in the countries of Europe took place from west to east. And since the process of conquering and subjugating the culture of other peoples is not a quick matter and is still unfinished, the new lands captured by the Catholics were called the east for a long time. These are the very vast areas that are today called Europe (France, Germany, Poland, the Baltic countries, etc.). Obviously, there was a gradual Catholicization of these territories. Not only happened, but is happening to this day. A striking example is Ukraine. But the Vatican is in the south, and went from west to east. So the beginning of the conquest is worth looking for somewhere in the west of the continent, where Catholicism actually originated. I will not bother the reader with details, I will only say that the birth of Catholicism did not take place in the Vatican, which for a long time was not the spiritual center of the Latins. Catholicism originated in Spain among Sephardic Jews, as Judeo-Christianity. During their exodus from Spain (they were simply expelled from the country), they moved to the region of Italy and took over the Vatican.

Well, everything is clear with Europe: this name is political and has nothing to do with historical-geographical, denoting a certain territory united by the political principles of the Roman Church. I hope the reader realizes that any church is a political phenomenon, as opposed to FAITH?

What is Asia?

Asia - what a word. TSB states:

Asia (Greek As; a, probably from the Assyrian asu - east), the most extensive part of the world (about 30% of the total land area), part of the Eurasian continent.

Again this word "Probably"! The question arises: if Asia has its own language, why use Assyrian? Was it impossible to define with your own word? And then historians define the name Asia as the kingdom of King Asia, an ally of the Spartans. Where is Asia and where are the Spartans? And what kind of heroic act did Assiy do to call the whole country that way? In world practice, this is no longer found. And then with Herodotus Asia this is what is now called Asia Minor.

So nothing would have cleared up, but the Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus described some Ases-Alans. And these Asses dwelt in that very Asia. Again, it is clear that geography is far from the main thing here. Asia, this is a political entity - the country of Ases. Its borders are outlined not by seas and mountain ranges, but by wars and treaties. This means that the name of the part of the world Asia, like Europe, has a clearly political origin.

I think the time has come to say what Asia means. This is the distorted word Russia (Rasiya), a new geopolitical formation of the 16-17 centuries, which appeared on the site of Great Tartary (Russia, Horde) as a result of the Romanov coup and the Great Troubles. An agreement was concluded between the Romanovs and their curators from the Vatican, according to which Catholicism spread to the Urals, that is, the borders of Europe were established. This was the name of the new state, which would bring together all the states formed as a result of the wars of the Reformation, the states from the Atlantic to the Urals with the capital in the Vatican. And then there will be Asia, that is, the Slavic empire will be divided into two parts, two new states: Europe and Russia.

Great Tartary was not a monolithic state. It included many states with the rights of federal districts. Something like now in Russia: Astrakhan Tartaria, Moscow Tartaria, Blue Tartaria (Little Russia) and many others. The largest region was Siberia, lying beyond the Urals, and of course, Livonia. It was in the latter that an absolutely new, aggressive civilization began to emerge.

Today we mean by Livonia the lands of the Livonian Order in the modern Baltic. This does not correspond to the real state of affairs. Livonia is a state formed in the western part of the vast continent, which continues to expand (united Europe).

There have always been two Christianities: Tsarist Christianity, or Russian and Apostolic Christianity, or modern Christianity. The first related to the Russian faith, on the basis of the kinship of the rulers of Russia with Christ. Realizing themselves to be His relatives, the kings demanded that they be worshiped as gods. It is these Russian tsars who are the gods of Egypt and other peoples, and Christ in Egypt is Osiris. Today this Christianity is known as Old Belief. It was practically destroyed and slandered by the new Christianity - the apostolic Judeo-Christianity. It is called Apostolic because of the dominance in it of the teachings of the Apostles, who each created their own church (for example, the Church of St. Peter in the Vatican). Tsarist Christianity did not accept the apostolic teaching, correlating only with the teaching of Christ himself. Tsarist Christianity is both Greek and Roman gods, Egyptian and Syrian gods, Buddhism, Islam and early Judaism (not to be confused with modern one) and of course Russian Orthodox Christianity. In general, all world religions emerged from tsarist Christianity.

Livonia at that time was not homogeneous. It is inhabited by various Slavic tribes. This will be the case until the time when … Algerian tribes migrate from North Africa to the continent. So they will bring aggressive apostolic Christianity, which will first appear in Spain, and then begin to move throughout the west of the continent.

In the western territories, the process of seizure and unification of territories and peoples took place. When the nations could not be brought into conformity, they were completely destroyed. So the multimillion-dollar tribal unions of Lyutichi and Venedi, inhabiting all western lands, were destroyed. Broken peoples were mostly left in Europe. This, by all definitions, was genocide. A certain political force, the manifestation of which we observe in the actions of the Catholic Church, divided peoples into pieces, pitted against each other, weakened in civil strife. Then this same force gathered all the peoples under its control into a single fist, and threw it into the destruction of the rest. Everything was accompanied by the planting of apostolic Christianity. Consider this force a modern ISIS, I cannot give any other comparison yet. By the way, the tasks of ISIS are about the same.

After that same power had established itself in the ashes, the Age of Renaissance was needed. But the revival of their own, and not Greek or Roman culture, as historians usually explain. Europe could accept Greek or Roman culture, introduce anything, just not revive it.

Thus, by fire, sword, lies and betrayal, the "peaceful" Catholic religion - ideology - way of life - a different civilization was cut into the living body of the peoples of the West. The civilization of slavery, lies, luxury and poverty. Habitat ideal for social parasites. And they called it - Europe (eastern part). Its border was provided for in the Urals. That is, according to the concept of this civilization, these lands still had to (and still have to !!!) be conquered. Numerous examples of history, such as the plan of Barbarossa Hitler, confirm this. Europe many times went to Asia and many times crawled into its hole, beaten.

So, what happened in the 15-17 centuries. The main event of that time was the destruction of the Slavic empire as a result of the Great Troubles. Preparations for it took a long time, almost 2 centuries, with the gradual rejection of territories in the west of the empire. As a result of the Romanov coup, the territories of the Blue Horde (Ukraine) and Moscow Tartaria retreat to Europe. Political power does not need Europe to be defined as something unified; it is much more profitable to present it as a kind of union. Muscovy becomes a part of Europe and European "specialists" rush into it. Then Astrakhan Tartary falls (the war of S. T. Razin) and a new state of Russia, equal in size to Europe, appears. Local rulers no longer want to obey the Vatican, realizing what power they received and what kind of people they rule. The Romanovs create their empire, forgetting about the previous owners, and succeed in this. Their empire, which Europe calls in the days of Peter the Great, Muscovy, is gradually, as a result of wars, turning into a huge state from the Urals to the borders of the then Europe. In the east of the Russian Empire is what remains of the Great Tartary. This state with its capital in Tobolsk was ruled by Ruriks, the remnants of those who were killed in Moscow by the Romanovs.

It cannot put up with the fact that territories have been taken away from it, and then this country attacks the Romanov empire, that is, Europe. Russia is ruled by Catherine the Second, not the Empress, but the PRESIDENT put to rule by the Vatican. Who remembers, she came to the throne as a result of the murder of her husband Peter. This war is known as the "Pugachev" uprising. In fact, this is not an uprising, but a real war of 2 states, the border between which ran along the modern border between Europe and Asia

Suvorov defeated the troops of Tartary, for which he became the Count of Rymnik, after the Roman name of the Ural Mountains. The Rymnik river has never existed in Moldova. This name will appear on maps after Suvorov's victory over the Turks there. In fact, Rymnik is the ancient Yaik or the Ural River.

Those who have read Pushkin's "The Captain's Daughter" remember that events are developing there just on the border of these States, where there were many fortresses, in one of which the protagonist served.

The border between Europe and Asia is the border between 2 states that were formed on the ruins of the Slavic empire: United Europe and Siberia.

The winners still prefer to hide it and there are good reasons for that. After all, the conquest of Europe is not over to this day.

But how to hide it, if there are legends in the memory of peoples, and the old cards have not destroyed everything: no, no, and which of them will come out. But cards are cards, propaganda is more effective. Moreover, now the zombie box is available even to those who do not know how to read.

This is where geography came to the rescue. The European geographers of that time were very practical people and involved in big politics. Everything that previously divided two civilizations (armies, states, treaties) has gone into oblivion. Great generals became bearded robbers, empires turned into a gathering of warring princelings, big cities - into recently felled guard fortresses. And in geography, 2 new parts of the world appeared.

According to the authors of the forgery, not only the political background of the issue should be hidden from the Russians, but also from the whole world, and first of all - from the Europeans. They shouldn't know that the many supposedly independent European states are just a sign. It cannot be shown that the whole of Europe is governed by one power.

The reader will, of course, be interested in what kind of power it is. Unfortunately, the scope of the miniature does not give me the opportunity to continue this topic here, but I refer the reader to the next miniature, which sets out in detail all the THREE forces ruling the world. It is called the "Third Force"

Centuries pass. On the old border of confrontation between two civilizations, there are no cordons, guard regiments, fortresses and secrets. There are no customs and strict border guards. There rivers flow and silent mountains stand, endless steppes stretch and seas splash. Nature is indifferent to events in the human world and land has no natural boundaries on its area. And what is stuck in the form of pillars by people is as short-lived as their empires.

I could end on this, but I would like to tell the reader about the numerous legends of the peoples of the world talking about a dying and re-emerging empire.

There is such an ancient Russian spiritual book Paley. Before the Romanov reforms, she, together with Kormcha, replaced the Bible, which was not known in Russia and was considered a harmful book.

The phoenix bird legend is one of the most popular in the European cultural tradition. Herodotus spoke of the phoenix burying his father, followed by Elian, Achilles Tatius, Philostratus, Ovid, Tacitus and Origen. In late antique and medieval literature, the phoenix acquires the features of a peacock, with which it enters the visual arts. The life of the legendary bird is traditionally associated with India and Lebanon. Phoenix, of course, is not a real bird, but a mythological character.

The Old Russian reader, through the Physiologists, Palea and the Apocrypha (The Book of Enoch, The Revelation of Baruch, About All Creation, The Discourse of Panagiot with Azimit), could have known several versions of the legend about the phoenix. In the Apocrypha, this is a solar bird, on which the awakening of earthly roosters depends. In the "Debate of Panagiot with Azimite" and in the "Revelation of Baruch" the phoenix appears as a giant bird protecting the world, wetting its wings in the Ocean and preventing the Sun from scorching the whole world with its heat. "Physiologists" and related works of Christian books give different versions of the phoenix bird, which burns itself and is reborn from the ashes in details and details.

Here is a quote from the Bulgarian Physiologist: “Our Lord Jesus Christ said:“I have the power to give my life and I have the power to take it again.” There is a bird called the phoenix. All 500 years, she lives in the bowels of Lebanon and fills her wings with aroma, then in the month of Paremot or Formut, she appears to the priest of the city of Areg. The priest then brings her a vine, which the bird takes in its claws. Flying away with her, she leaves the city in order to return to the altar, where she makes a fire and burns herself. The next day the priest enters the temple, looks for and finds a worm in the ashes; this latter, developing wings, turns on the second day into a small bird, and on the third leaves the priest and returns to live in his old place.

If a bird can destroy itself, then how can you, foolish ones, do not believe Christ, who said: "I have the power to give my life and I have the power to take it again."

But Paley reproduces a completely different version of the legend, therefore, its Compiler used other sources as well. It is about the revival of FAITH and this bird is a symbol of faith and a state filled with this faith. We are talking about Russia.

Legends must come true. Perhaps, as a bird Phoenix, Russia must burn in order to be reborn. And death has a very specific, definite, healthy meaning: the new population will be biologically stronger and stronger than the previous one. New Russia will be a country without a sick past. The development of the new industry will not be constrained by the framework of the former anomalous structures. The development of social relations will be based on the laws of biology and logic, and not on obsolete ideas and imposed ideologies.

Be that as it may, the whole history of Russia is an example of this: now a complete decline, then the revival of the empire. Apparently this makes a lot of sense. And this means that the knight-dogs will dive under the ice of Lake Peipsi more than once. Following their evil spirits.

(Continuation in miniature "Egyptian Power")

© Copyright: Commissioner Qatar, 2015