Was the Cold War "Hot"?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The USSR won the battle for Antarctica, but lost the war.

I have a brother, our fathers are different, that's why they call us step-by-step. But I don’t understand how it is, having one mother, we are not relatives? But that's not the point. My brother's father did not run away, did not abandon his wife and child, he died. No, not a pilot and not a hero cosmonaut. He served on a missile boat in Cuba. Just during the Cuban missile crisis, when, as we are told, the world was on the brink of a nuclear war, and it was only by pure chance that no military clashes took place between the USSR and the United States.

Why was Gennady Rinusov, the father of my brother, dismissed from the fleet for health reasons, and six months later died in the arms of my mother? Wasn't he a cross-country skiing champion and a sportsman boxer? After returning from service, he became practically disabled. Spat out blood with lumps of lungs, covered with ulcers, completely bald…. Radiation sickness? I asked my mother about the details of the circumstances of the strange illness, but she herself does not know anything. Everything was very secret, and Gennady never shared details with close ones. It is only known that the boat on which he served was armed with missiles with nuclear warheads.

Project 183-R missile boat "Komar". These were the ones that Khrushchev transferred to Cuba by civilian dry cargo ships

Well, what is the first thought? Rocket fuel, of course. More precisely, the cause of the illness and the fleeting death of my brother's father could have been a pair of heptyl, which was used in those days as one of the components of the working mixture of jet rocket engines. Those engines were far from perfect. Leaks occurred as a result of depressurization, it was possible to breathe in heptyl during routine maintenance, when changing fuel, during repairs and maintenance, and anything could happen. But can anyone ever think that a nuclear explosion could have taken place? Such information could not go unnoticed! Is it so? I would not have raised this question if it had not been for some more circumstances that became known to me later.

1) Twice in my life I have met people who claimed that in the winter of 1950, 51 of the last century, an American bomber dropped an aerial bomb with a nuclear warhead on one of our garrisons in Eastern Siberia. The airfield with all the aircraft on the runway and parking areas, a military town and a radio location tracking station were completely destroyed. So that's it! This already does not fit into any framework! Could this fact be unknown? NO!!!! It can't be !!! Yes … I said so myself. Now I cannot be so categorical. Perhaps, after all, this is:

It is possible that Poltoranin is telling only half of the truth. Maybe the rumors I heard about the nuclear bombing and the facts declassified by the FSB and voiced in the video are an echo of one event? Or maybe not, maybe we are talking about one bombing, and about another one - the nuclear one is still silent?

One thing is clear, the Americans bombed the territory of a sovereign state without declaring war. And not hypothetical, and not some distant one, but our Motherland!

2) At one of the forums I met a whole discussion about the fate of "Soviet ships - ghosts". Interested, the theme is just amazing! In the late 1940s, three Project 45-bis destroyers Vysoky, Vazhny and Impressive were built in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Judging by the information, these were miracles of technology and weapons of that time. During the construction, some kind of captured Japanese technology was used for ships designed to sail in high latitudes!

Destroyer of project 45 bis

Pay attention - even on a rare photo, the destroyer has no identification marks.

What are the naval historians so concerned about? And the fact that the fate of these ships to this day is hidden in darkness. They were last seen in December 1945 in the Chinese ports of Qingdao and Chifu. The ships went south and never returned. What else went south with us at that time? The Slava whaling flotilla under the command of Captain Voronin and the Ob diesel-electric ship. I think it is not necessary to remind how the USSR used civilian ships for military purposes? I believe that there is every reason to believe that Stalin sharply increased the Soviet military presence … in Antakrktida. Now everything falls into place. Of course, since "Slava" and "Ob" were in the area of the Queen Maud land in Antarctica. So where else could our top-secret, to this day not declassified destroyers rush? I think that it is quite logical to assume that there is the same. Now let us recall one more incident in Antarctica that seems to be unrelated to our topic at the same time:

4th expedition to Antarctica of Pindos Admiral Richard Byrd

Now it became clear to me where the legs grow from this rotten duck about the Ahnenerbe, fascist flying saucers and other nonsense in the style of REN TV, TV-3, etc. Of course, how can the Pindos admit that their entire fucking fleet was destroyed by several Russian ships, including a whaler!

The first to explode was the American press. In one of the central American magazines, Foreign Affers, the former adviser-envoy of the United States and the USSR, George Kennan, who had recently urgently left Moscow "for consultations with his government," published an article in which he expressed the idea of ambitions of the Soviets, which, after the successful end of the war with Germany and Japan, are in a hurry to use their military and political victories to plant harmful ideas of communism not only in Eastern Europe and China, but also in distant Antarctica! " Indeed, why not talk about Stalin's "bloody regime" here …

In response, the USSR published its memorandum on the political regime of Antarctica, where it dotted all the "i's" in the US intentions "… to deprive the USSR of its legal right based on discoveries in this part of the world by Russian seafarers made in the early 19th century." After this statement and other decisive actions (and Stalin was a master at them), Truman's Secretary of State James Byrnes resigned, forced by the president himself. This man has always advocated the toughest sanctions against the USSR. His last words in office were: "The damned Russians cannot be frightened."

Now everything is really lining up into a single logical chain. Once again, review the entire post from the beginning in a nutshell, and then you are unlikely to disagree with my conclusions:

According to international law, the newly discovered land belongs to the country that made the discovery. Who and when discovered Antarctica need not be reminded? At that time, not a single sane person could even think of daring to approach the shores of Antarctica without the permission of Russia. Why was Germany calmly present there? Two versions:

- She was in the stake. You remember that on the eve of 41 years from the very first day the National Socialists came to power in Germany, there were only two socialist states in the whole world. The USSR and the German National Socialist Republic, our main friend and partner.

- Germany, without Stalin's demand, invaded Antarctica, and it was for this that the Piri Reis map was fabricated. To prove that it was not the Russians who discovered Antarctica.

Further, it is obvious that Russia, weakened by the war, did not have enough forces and means to control Antarctica, nevertheless, even then it was known that Antarctica is the richest warehouse on earth for uranium, zinc, nickel, in general, just the entire periodic table, and in new conditions When the Soviet nuclear program began to develop, Stalin simply could not allow the Americans to take away what legally belongs to Russia. Naturally, he sent a fleet to defend the sacred borders of the Motherland, and our sailors kicked the Pindos so hard that they invented all sorts of flying saucers. Oh well…

That's when the motive of the confrontation became clear, the understanding came of what really happened. The Amers are well aware that only one of the Soviet fleets is able to really protect Antarctica from invasion - the Pacific. It is for this reason that a warning strike was struck at a base near Vladivostok, and possibly another nuclear strike at a base somewhere in Kamchatka, in Sovetskaya Gavan, or Gertner Bay. The reason for the collision at the Land of Queen Maud is understandable, and hence the true reasons and motives of the Caribbean crisis follow. Rockets in Cuba are just blackmailing Khrushchev for losing the war for Antarctica. For in 1959, Russia was deprived of all rights to Antarctica and declared it a common property (as soon as they will deal with Siberia).

The outcome of the war with America 1945-1961. disappointing. Everyone is present in Antarctica now. Even dwarf European provinces have scientific bases all over the continent. Americans are the owners there and spend billions !!!! for scientific research. Who will check what they are doing there? Or maybe a long time ago, uranium has been exported, although mining is prohibited there. Or maybe there is already a network of military bases? We are practically no longer there. Following California, Colorado, Washington, Alaska, Aleuts and Hawaii, the Pindos chopped off Antarctica from us.

What's next? Chukotka, Kolyma and Kamchatka?