Harry Potter - Mein Kampf for modern children

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The Harry Potter books continue to come out, and so will I. The Harry Potter series has many meanings and many patterns of action. Fascism runs like a red thread throughout the story - this is its center around which the action revolves. At first glance, the book is anti-fascist - against the most vicious necromancer named Voldemort, who considers the “half-breed” (mom is a wizard, and dad is an ordinary person, or vice versa) a lower caste.

At a second glance, fascism still in Rowling's books is that people are divided for the elite (wizards) and ordinary people. I discussed this in detail in the post Analysis of Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.

At a third glance, there is also Russophobia in Rowling's books, the classic fascism of the "West" towards Russia.

Let's start with the name Voldemort - this is not the Will-to-Death, but the name Valdemar - the Norman version of the name Vladimir. The author changed “a” to “o” and added “t” at the end of the word to make it sound more opposite and look like the word “mort” - “death”. “Valdemar” would be too frank, and the task of works of art of this type is to prevent the idea from reaching consciousness, but to launch Russophobia directly into the subconscious. I am not saying that the task was set deliberately.

What is the fault of this Vladimir, besides all the nightmares and horrors that he does?

1. Vladimir questions the continuation of the power of Dumbledore (the main "good" wizard) and his accomplices. That is, it destroys the world of fascism and slavery familiar to them and threatens to become a new ruler according to his rules, different from theirs.

2. Vladimir indulges the development of magic and wizard-wizard marriages.

The symbol of the enemy for the “West” is Stalin, as he raised the average sports level of the population, the level of health, education, and the measure of understanding of the ongoing geopolitical processes. This is dangerous for the existence of the existing fascist regime, and therefore is regarded as a direct military attack.

“Magic” in this context is the understanding of the exercise of government on planet Earth. Since wizards rule everything - both wizards and Muggles. The one who knows HOW to manage is the one who rules. Suddenly, Vladimir appears, whose measure of understanding of the management process matches, if not exceeds, that of Dumbledore. There is only one way out - to destroy it in any way. The worst thing is if Vladimir repeats Stalin's experiment, gives "magic" knowledge to Muggles, and then the power of Dumbledore and the team is lost forever. Stalin has been gone for a long time, but they still fear him. Rowling's name is Stalin - Vladimir, as an average Russian name. Vladimir (Stalin) died, and now he returned as Vladimir (Putin).

It so happened historically that this danger exists for the Western elite always from Russia, but of course, it is not limited to Russia alone. So, the “most evil evil” is blamed for the development of body and spirit (post Amazing Maurice and his obedient rodents), but what does Rowling put?

Let's turn all this Western Rowling propaganda from head to foot. The fascist regime is coming to an end. Harry Potter is the gang's only hope to maintain undivided power. Vladimir knows this and seeks to kill Harry (by the way, what is the prototype of "Harry Potter" in real life? I admit that it is the most fascist ideology). Propaganda is launched about how bad Vladimir is and how he seeks to destroy the “innocent child”. Pure marriages between Russians and Russians are outlawed. On this, in fact, all of Vladimir's “evil” ends.

Whoever has gone further than the first book, tell me what is next, just write in a normal position - where the feet are on the ground, the head is in the air, and not vice versa.

A bit of psychology. It is easy to see that both Rowling's books about Harry and Pratchett's about Maurice describe an incredible horror. This and SO is not written in children's books. This is the style of Stephen King, who loves to delve into the stinking heap of horror. Why are authors in the West drawn to such unhealthy, disgusting horrors? A healthy response from the reader is to throw such a book away and “ban” the author. But no, King is one of the most popular authors, Harry Potter breaks book charts records.

What kind of masochism? Quite simply, attention strives to where the pain is. Until the pain goes away, attention will return to the sore spot. The pain goes away with forgiveness - simplifying things and learning a lesson. If we take the generalized Western consciousness, it turns out that there was some kind of trauma inflicted on an entire people. Whether war, violence, long-term slavery - all this took place in the history of Europe, and continues to happen. The elite simply heal wounds, returns attention to pain, but does not allow them to heal, replacing “bad” with “good”, constantly slip new “bad” ones, and use the energy of anger and resentment for their own purposes. Therefore, it is so important to figure out what kind of “bad” it is? Why is he presented to you as “bad”? Who benefits from this? How does this affect you personally?

Admire Voldemort - this is how Putin is introduced to Western media outlets. Hitler promoted the idea that Russians are subhuman, Rowling hoisted the fascist flag.

My blog: