Under the leadership of the Chosen

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

“Under the leadership of Rumyantsev was

27,000 infantry and 3,000 cavalry

How many times did the enemy's forces increase

the forces of the Russians if the army of the grand vizier

consisted of 150,000 people?"

(Problem from the 4th grade mathematics textbook)

Sometimes, I really want to fantasize about the future, but unfortunately, all my fantasies, as a rule, are clothed in the form of reality, since I quite clearly imagine that all this will take place in the future.

In this regard, I am forced to talk with the reader on the topic of teaching and refute the common phrase "eggs do not teach a chicken."

Let me tell you friends that we are dealing with a completely mossy view of the retirement age generation about today's youth. In order to explain this nonsense expressed by someone, I want to make a small excursion into the future, and then, so that young people do not turn up their noses too much, plunge them into the past.

It is often difficult for people of retirement age to keep up with the modern rhythm of life, to master new technologies, and existing training programs, as a rule, are aimed at young people. Therefore, special courses and master classes for retirement age audiences are gaining popularity. Along with this, there is a growing need for specialists who can find an approach to older people and explain everything to them in an accessible way.

It is quite obvious that in the near future people will sit down at their desks, who will be forced to re-learn modern technologies and social relations.

As proof, remember your grandmother, who is afraid to pick up an ordinary remote control to switch the TV or set up the microwave. Even now you can meet old people who do not know how to use mobile phones.

This I mean that very soon there will be a large and demanded audience of "dummies" who simply will not survive in the modern world if they are not taught the rules. And this is where those notorious "smart eggs" come into play.

It is important for a specialist in teaching people of "silver age" to be not only a good teacher: he must be able to explain the material as clearly as possible and understand the psychological characteristics of older people. He will draw up training programs, develop teaching methods, prepare materials and conduct classes. And note, with those people who stood at the origins of the creation of the entire technical world breakthrough. And these are very smart people who are simply lost in modern social construction. Here they also need the help of "eggs". Or teachers for "chickens".

So, you see, I'm not such a dreamer.

However, there are things that cannot be hidden behind the most modern developments, since they are based on the centuries-old reflections of mankind, philosophy and spiritual heritage. Sooner or later, any most advanced PC user will come to them, and no computer is able to give them a competent explanation.

For example, here is a question from my reader Elena Panina, addressed to me and to my assistants:

“" IN THE BEGINNING THERE WAS A WORD "… why IN THE BEGINNING? … why THERE WAS? …. why WORD? …"

Well, dear programmers, are you ready with an answer? It seems not, unless you throw me a few texts from Internet publications, which boil down not to explanations, but to the dogmas of the churches. Well, so I can, despite my ancient age. Can you explain to me why this is so? Here the reader asks directly - it is clear that your dogma is not particularly impressed by your dogma.

Frankly, and me too. Since the time of the formation of church dogmas is the Middle Ages, the times when knowledge was not very perfect.

However, back to the question, readers.

This question is just an example of how it is not necessary to ask it and use fragments of quotations outside the context of a phrase, depriving them of all meaning. This phrase from the Gospel of John Chrysostom must be given in full. And it sounds like this:

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

(John 1: 1).

Let's not judge a woman harshly, who, by the way, sometimes asks me questions that make my brains boil. I noticed her for a long time and I am even a little afraid, you can see the desire to gain knowledge from her. Yes, and the amount of information is sometimes striking - the lady is undoubtedly smart, and from the photo she is also a beauty. Thank God that our women are not only spinning in front of the mirror.

However, let's move on to the question.

As you can see, the proposal is divided into three parts:

1. In the beginning was the Word

2. The Word was with God

3. The Word was God.

Looking ahead, I will explain that before you is the most ordinary Trinity, where all three hypostases are combined into the Wisdom hidden in the utterance itself.

The development of theological thought in connection with the Trinity mystery in the East and West proceeded along different paths. Latin theology proceeds from divine unity in which faith reveals the relationship of the Three Persons. And for the Greek Fathers, who replaced the Byzantine Fathers, in the first place are the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, since it is in Them that the desire and admiration of Their inexpressible unity should be drawn.

In Byzantine practice, the Trinity is Faith, Hope and Love, whose harmony creates Sophia, that is, Wisdom.

That is, the Greeks turned Faith into the Holy Spirit, Hope into the Son, and Love into the Father. At the same time, having failed to find a common understanding of this unity - Divine Wisdom. Following the example of their Western partners, they simply created a dogma.

But it is the Holy Wisdom of God that is dedicated to the biblical temple of Solomon (Suleiman the Magnificent) in modern Istanbul - Hagia Sophia (Al Sophie). Why's that?

In Greek Orthodoxy, Faith, Hope, Love and Sophia are three holy women and their mother - a later distorted understanding of the Trinity. The perception of the One Father did not fit into female images in any way, so the ancient Byzantine traditions were changed to the ones we are accustomed to today. And the Wisdom of God is defined as "the ways of the Lord are inscrutable", they say, here is the dogma "God's providence" and do not rock the boat.

Did Christ teach us this, calling: "Ask and they will give you, seek and you will find, knock and they will open to you." (Mark 6:31). True, today this phrase is understood too materially, forgetting that the knowledge, skill, and skill requested from God are more weighty than fed loaves, because they allow a person to become a creator himself. The Almighty is a great worker and he likes working people - a lazy person does not have his patronage, since he is capable of wasting the spark of God.

Who told you that the icon of Rublev "Trinity" depicts the Father, Son and Holy Spirit? It depicts three young men and none of the other looks like fathers. Oh, the priests told you! It happens that they have not said this yet, depending on the wind from the slopes of power.

Let's analyze the parts of the phrase of interest to the reader, only in its entirety.

1. In the beginning was the Word.

Since the Gospel tells about the life of Christ, then this Word is Christ, sent to people with his teaching. And the word "in the beginning" means that he is the main or standing at the beginning - the boss, that is, the teacher of the beginnings or rules. Apart from God, there are only one creature in his house - angels. That is, Christ is an angel placed in the beginning or the Chosen Angel. Here are the words of Holy Scripture about him:

“… all the heavenly host and all the saints that are above, and the host of God, are cherubim and seraphim, and ofhanim, and all the angels of power, and all the angels of dominion, and the Chosen One (emphasis added), and other powers that are on solid and above water"

- Enoch, chapter 10, verse 34

A natural question arises, why was the word “was” used, if Christ is a man and one should say “was” the Word?

Everything is simple: before his kissing in the body of the Savior (and this is the Byzantine emperor Andronicus Komnenos, which I talked about in other works), Christ was an angel, that is, a sexless being, like all human souls. That is why the “was” was applied.

However, why are we accustomed to referring to the angel as a masculine "he"? Indeed, at the moment of receiving Wisdom from the Most High (that is, the teaching itself), Christ did not yet possess any sex. The reason for the creation of the male image of an angel is still the same - his incarnation in Jesus.

Holy Scripture does not cite a single text where incarnation took place in a woman. Knowing full well that the angel is incorporeal and asexual, we name him in the masculine gender. So what's the deal? And the fact is that all this confusion occurred among people thanks to the Good News about the boy. Since that time, all angels have become "men", especially since most of them are portrayed as warriors of the Light.

The first part of the text talks about the Faith given to the angel, that is, about what will support the spirit of people. And the angel was not sent simply, but the Chosen One, who stands at the beginning of all angels.

2. The Word was with God.

Here we are talking about the parting words given by the father to his son, since we are all children of God. This is also understandable, since in this parting words to the angel lies the Father's Love, the main theme of all Holy Scripture.

3. The Word was God.

Here we are talking about the Hope with which we turn to God on the basis of the teaching that Christ brought to earth.

That is, the very shamrock arises, which in its harmonious development will give the Holy Wisdom.

Well, now that the readers have learned about all this, I invite them to put all three parts into a single sentence, exactly as it is written in John.

"In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

Faith + Love + Hope = Sophia or Wisdom.

In Russian theological vocabulary - if the special term Sophia is not used - there is a certain separation of the terms "wisdom" and "wisdom", when the latter is given a special sacred meaning - cf. exclamation "Wisdom, forgive me" when reading the Gospel, etc. However, this in no way diminishes the degree of filling the very concept of "wisdom", since in any case

"All wisdom is from the Lord and abides with Him forever"

(Ser. 1: 1)

Here the concept of "prudence" should be introduced, which denotes the qualities acquired by a person through life, while the "higher mind" of God (Sophia the Holy) in the Abrahamic religions is a priori equated to infinity, and has no properties of further improvement in time. That is why the Old Believers do not perceive the Old Testament as wisdom, assigning the role of Wisdom only to the Gospels, as taken about Christ himself. They do not believe in the Vedas, as well as other spiritual practices.

However, in some agreements they approach the Koran, understanding it as a retelling of the Gospels, performed in a different form. I explained earlier that all world religions emerged from ancient Christianity, and not as it is understood today.

In English, wisdom, which means "wisdom" for them, goes back to the same Indo-European root as the German wissen "to know." The Russian meaning of these words is "to see and to know", and in the Greek it is history. Agree that seeing and knowing does not mean being wise. The bear also knows honey, but is stupid, like the rabbi of the Bratslav synagogue. As for the History (Is Torah I), it also describes only what they saw and knew, but did not receive the wisdom itself. If the teaching of Christ presupposes an incredible work of the brain, which means its improvement, training, search for answers, then the Torah and the Old Testament are dogmatic interpretations: how to build a temple, how to make a sacrifice, how Jesus Navin acted. This is all written by outside observers who often do not understand what is happening. But the Gospels tell us about the Great Sage, who not only produces incredible things, but also explains them. What are some of Christ's parables worth?

It is like demonstrating experiments to scientists and then explaining them.

The word "sage" was associated with a craft, a practical skill - the word "wise" (who knows how to do something) was used like the word "smart"

None of this is found in other spiritual books that expound the DOGMA. And why this is so, there is no explanation. The Gospels, however, give explanations, even in a bible that is circumcised to the point of impossibility. I have already said that the Old Believers have about 200 Gospel books! And he even gave a list of them. I will not be too lazy to do it here.

The Helmsman of 1620 contains the following extremely curious section. I am presenting it in the same form as it is present in Kormcha, without translation into modern Russian. The necessary explanations have been added in brackets:

“About the books of the Old Law and Novago. The essence of the books of the Old Testament 22. Toliko by hearing is imagined from the JIDOs (emphasis added by the author).

Genesis, Exodus, Aevgitsky, Numbers, Second Law, Jesus Na-vin, Judges, Ruth, Four Kingdoms, therefore the Remains (that is, the books of Chronicles - Auth) ›therefore there are two Ezra, Psalter, Proverbs, Churchman (Ecclesiastes - Atfra.), Song of Songs - Auth) in Job, Prophetic 12: the first - Josiah, 2 - Amos, 3 Micah, 4 - Joel, 5 - Jonah, 6 Obadiah, 7 - Nahum, 8 - Habakkuk, 9 - Zephaniah, 10 - Haggai, 11 - Zechariah, 12 - Malachi; therefore Isaiah, Jeremiah, Baruch, Lamentation, Epistles, Hezekiel, Daniel. Behold the Old Testament.

New packs are not too lazy to decide (that is, I will not be too lazy to list the composition of the New Testament - Auth).

Four Gospels - Matthew, Mark, Luke, John; Acts of the Apostles, Epistles of the Councils seven and the Apostle: Jacob is one, Peter's two, John's three, Iudino is one, Pauline Epistles 14: the first to Romans, two to Corinth, Galat, Ephesus, Philip, Kolasai, Solunyan, two Jews, Timothy, two to Titus, to Philemon; the final Revelation of John (APOCALYPSE - Auth), John Chrysostom, John Damascene, John the Theologian, Gregory Decapolitus, Cyril of Alexander, Dionysius the Areopagiite, Simeon the God-Receiver, Isaiah the Great (New Testament Isaiah in the Old Testament! Jeremiah! And in the Bible he is in the Old Testament - Auth), DANIEL (New Testament Daniel! And again referred in the Bible to the Old Testament - Auth), Paralipomenon (New Testament books of Chronicles! Rearranged into the Old Testament according to the Biblical text - Auth), Defutorony, Apocalypse (that is, a certain OTHER APOCALYPSE, since the Revelation of John was already listed above - Auth), Varlam, Ephraim, Pan-dock, Limonis, Patericon, Nil, Asaph, Maxim, Pavel Monasian, Basil the New, Granograf (hence, a certain CHRONOGRAPH was part of the New Testament; where is this New Testament Chronograph today? - Auth), Palea, Eclisiastus (New Testament Eclisiastus! And again dragged into the Old Testament. - Author), Six-Day, Genealogy, Stream, Depth, Beads, Krinitsa, Ios if Matafin, Cosma Indikoplov, Anastasius of Sinaisky, Athanasius the Great, Apostolic, Jesus Navvin (New Testament Jesus Navin turns out! Could it be the cannons of his medieval hierokhon pipes from which the walls fell? - Auth), Jesus Semeramin, Jesus Sirakhov (New Testament Jesus! Tired of repeating about the Bible - Auth), three Interrogations, Phisilogue twelve, Iyakovlich, Job (New Testament Job! Bee, Supply, Stool, Wanderer."

Well, as a reader, I saw how many people wrote down the words of Jesus and were personally acquainted with him. And what do you know from the Jewish Bible, besides the canons and what is adjusted to the canons? I hope now you understand for what values the Old Believers went to the fires, refusing to accept the priest's "Christianity", for which they burned in log cabins, rotted alive in the dungeons, over which the "Orthodox" priests were gossiping about the faith in their cells? Or do you think the Solovetsky monastery built by the Old Believers just made them a prison?

Today is full of all sorts of new religious teachings and beliefs, ranging from neo-paganism to Vedism. However, none of the adherents of these religions would answer the question of my reader, as I did, the old believer of the Qatari Church of Mary Magdalene from France, the most common godumil of the Volga, whose ancestors came to Languedoc Roussillon and Catalonia during the great Slavic conquest of Europe in 12 century, and then again in the 14th.

If you know the basics of ancient Christianity, then it will not be difficult to understand any question posed by the reader and you will not need the help of dogmatic literature, of a dubious nature, no matter what attractive name it carries.

For example, no one today can explain the origin of the name of one of the most ancient spiritual books "Paleya". Yes, you ask any grandmother-reading room in the Old Believer village, who did not know the priests about this, she will tell you that Paleya is SUNLIGHT.

And the Gospel is Ivan Gelius, or GOD'S GIFT (ivan) of the SUN (helius). That is, it is one and the same, but only distorted in the Bible. As through a cloudy glass.

Well, that seems to be all, although it is worth reminding those who wish to repeat other people's nonsense, such as "eggs do not teach a chicken."

Today, few people know that this is not a Russian proverb at all, but an English proverb. Hope the reader knows the difference between the two? This proverb belongs to an illiterate lover, and then to Elizabeth's husband, Khokhl Razumovsky, who tried in vain to understand what the English envoy told him:

"Don't teach your grandmother to suck eggs" - "Don't teach your grandmother to suck eggs."

Under the word "eggs" the sly and lazy crest understood the only possible and understandable opinion about his own manhood. Moreover, the grandmothers of Europe, then they already called the English queens, who, according to Razumovsky, sat on a sack of wool and incubated eggs, although the speaker of the Parliament of England sits on the sack.

In general, I notice that many creations of the intellects of Golopupenok and Poperek have taken root in Russian reality.

In general, Rozum (and in Ukrainian it is the mind) was explained the essence of the saying, which he altered in the hohlyatsky manner: "eggs do not teach a chicken." This became his favorite saying, which he applied to place and out of place.

Today this expression is considered the standard of wisdom and the pearl of the educational system. I don’t know, as for me, in the first part of the miniature I told about the inconsistency of this statement. In addition, in one of the works I answered the question which came first, an egg or a chicken.

What else I want to add. There are many types of energy in the world, but they all have an electrical explanation. Knowing this, I am surprised to watch the letters from readers that at the time of death, the body decreases in weight by 21 grams. I do not want to dwell on the experiment of the last century, which was conducted by another "great" scientist of the West, weighing patients at the time of death, I will simply say that biological death is the same process as other processes in the world, which means that it requires energy, even for its attenuation … Indeed, at the time of death, weight loss is observed, but this is nothing more than a physical process of attenuation.

The human soul is an incorporeal angel, implanted in a bodily shell, one of those who left the Father's house with Sataniel and moved to earth. It would be foolish to understand that the body is holding back the soul from leaving its prison. Indeed, during sleep or under the influence of hypnosis, as well as drugs, the angel has the ability to leave the body. It is not the flesh that holds the angel back. This is just a spacesuit that protects the people in it (this is how deceived angels are called, while the fallen are called non-humans). The angel is held back by CONSCIOUSNESS, that is, not just knowledge, but some other knowledge accompanying it. By analogy with the words "co-ruler, co-founder, co-author, etc.". And only with the loss of this consciousness does the soul leave the body.

It will not be possible to tell what such consciousness is in one work, but the mechanism of this is truly amazing in its functionality. It is possible to understand it only in the case of gaining Wisdom, for which all paths are open by God. Do not believe that there are questions that are forbidden to us. Once, we knew the answers to them, and our ancestors with the help of the "knowledge-consciousness" mechanism received them in a new, already human form of being.

Soul or Dousha (as the ancestors called their people in Russian) does not have an electrical origin, unlike the whole world. This is a completely different part of the Universe, living according to its own laws, which are characterized by the only parameter known to man, SPIRITUALITY, existing outside the flesh and time-electricity (I told you earlier that this is the same thing) from which all the flesh and materials of the world are created.

You ask, do I know what an angel and spirit in general are?

Yes, I know and I am happy to have such knowledge. But I cannot explain this to the reader. And it's not about my tongue-tied or narcissism. How do you, a caveman, tell about a microcircuit, if questions about the Word baffle you? What examples can I present to you what I see, I know, but I will never use? It won't work on your fingers, because you don't understand the nature of your fingers either.

I have been studying the epic for 34 years and even created a scientific school. However, few of my assistants, who sincerely want to understand the essence of the Universe, are now able to even roughly estimate the scale of the Great Design. To comprehend Faith, to cherish Hope and ignite Love is extremely small. It is necessary to create their harmony, because any bias towards one of them will sweep away all your efforts. God is not a meaningless kneeling vigil or endless repetition of prayers. This is just slavery, not freedom. God is Holy Wisdom, embodied in the simple phrase of John Chrysostom, which we analyzed today.

The reader has the right to decide for himself which side to take in this theological dispute, because he is the master of his life, and I am only the one who accidentally spoke to him.

In any case, good people, disagreeing with the person he likes, wish him all the best. And since I like you, the wishes of health from me will not interfere with you. Take in your piggy bank:

- Be healthy, buddy.

Player.

Silver lilac hoarfrost

And the smells of herbs in pearls.

Nature's shy genius

Arranged easels in the meadows.

He draws the world of forget-me-nots, Holding a smile in his mustache.

Philosopher of foggy horns, Tender feelings, magical motive

He can do these colors

And it plays with light easily.

And the shadows, fearful children, They run far from him.

Whether the maestro draws snow

Or autumn is a sad chord, As a conductor of the orchestra, He sets the music for everyone.

Difficult to be proud of the score

And the veil hid the passages.

Against the background of the rain, two figures

Draws love pastoral.

Thoughtful and bright Playful, Soul to plow, cunning.

Under the sky high, beautiful, He pitched a tent for the stars.

Gusts of wind through

The imperious crown tears from the clouds, thunder.

And the sound of the pouring rain

The singer enters the cantata.

And we're all full of expectations

Hopes, promises, worries.

Carries us away in waves of desire

Our destinies, passionate gambler