Veto on the abolition of Conscience

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Vazgen Liparitovich, our readers ask us if there is a contradiction in your theses about the benefits of high-volume production in world trade and the need for import substitution for the countries of the Eurasian Union. On the one hand, as an economist, you emphasize that global trade provides opportunities that are not available and nowhere to be found in a closed producer. On the other hand, you strongly advise to minimize contacts with NATO-controlled markets of the planet …

- I appreciate the simplicity, so let's do it this way: do you, Anna, are you buying or growing potatoes?

And so and so it happened …

- You see! So you, within the framework of the family budget, know what world trade is and what import substitution is. Agree, you cannot say once and for all: it is ALWAYS more profitable to buy potatoes or it is ALWAYS more profitable to grow potatoes. Depends on the circumstances. The decision is made by weighing the arguments. It happens that it is easier to grow - or, on the contrary, to go to the store for her … But if you know for sure that a gang of your enemies are waiting for you in the store, preparing your murder? Whereas? Will you go to the store ?!

An unexpected detective twist …

- I think that you shouldn't go to the store where you are expected to be killed. Do you understand? And it seems to me just delirium - to discuss the quality, the price of potatoes in this store … At this point, estimates of the economic sense come to an end and completely different arguments work. You can try to find another store, or grow it yourself, or do without potatoes altogether, but … I think there is nothing to continue, the question is settled. As well as the issue of world trade for Russia.

Do you think they are deliberately trying to destroy Russia?

- I am an analyst, and I cannot otherwise interpret the totality of the facts that I have. If they tried to kill you many times, can we say that they want to kill you?

Have you tried many times?

- Genocide of Serbs solely for their cultural and linguistic affinity to the Russians. Genocide of Russians in Transnistria in 1992. De-lingualization and disregarding of Russians in the Baltics - contrary to all applicable European laws on languages, peoples, the prohibition of national-racial discrimination, etc. Genocide of Russians in Dudayev's Chechnya, controlled by the CIA.

The economic genocide of Russians in Russia under Yeltsin, recognized by the majority of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, and ruled by American advisers …

The genocide of Russians today in Ukraine …

Everywhere - where the hands are not short - Russians are either killed, or, in the most "humane" case, they are converted into some kind of "Turchenians", into "Janissaries" - not only forcing them to forget their roots, but also forcing them to hate!

To speak in such a situation about some kind of "controversial" plans for the destruction of the Russians - I think that the analyst is simply indecent …

Vazgen Liparitovich, how is Russia hindering the world, and why are they constantly trying to dismember and destroy it?

- To put it very briefly: Russia is vetoing the long-matured decision of the Western powers to completely and completely abolish morality. We decided that there are a lot of people - it's hard for ecology. They decided to kill 5-6 billion people.

For them, in this respect, there are neither moral problems nor technical ones. But as soon as they start, Russia breaks in with its veto. Gradually comes the understanding that this "land of the conscientious" must be ended. Because this country thwarted eight or nine genocides only in the last decade, not counting the previous ones!

She is a member of the UN Security Council, she has planetary veto powers - and she sticks her nose everywhere. Plus a powerful army and nuclear weapons. And now she - in fact, alone (China sometimes joins in "abstaining") - vetoes the complete abolition of morality in international relations …

Why does the West need a complete and unconditional abolition of morality and ethics? What is the benefit to him in the cultivation of the universal Sodom ?

- Let me explain on my fingers: the goal is to destroy 8/10 of the world's population. Motivation - resources are running out, there is nowhere to increase consumption, "growth limits". You read - this is a completely official American state doctrine, it is freely available! Do you think it is possible to kill 8/10 of the world's population - if before that you do not abolish the "ancient chimeras" of morality, conscience and religious commandments?

I think it is absolutely impossible … The executioners will have nightmares …

- So you yourself have answered your own question! To save resources - you need to destroy the population, to destroy the population on an American scale (as we have seen in different parts of the world) - you need to abolish conscience. Not just temporarily disable or block, but cancel as such. For this, Sodom is needed - in the words of your great Russian seer Dostoevsky - "one or two generations of debauchery, unheard-of, despicable debauchery, when a person turns into an ugly cowardly, cruel, selfish scum."

People are turned into animals, mainly to take away their logic, so that they believe everything they see - and they will only see TV screens. Because the shamelessness of the West is tired of living underground and pulling the strings of its puppets at night, it wants legalization, it wants to go out into the light of the ramps, to officially proclaim its absolutism - and so that no one utters a peep. Amoralism is tired of wearing the mask of morality, it wants to take off the mask, to appear as its true face - but so that no one is afraid of this face.

And this is difficult, extremely difficult, because morality is deeply embedded in a person, and all its damages by any acids of postmodernism are superficial. Western people are already ready to believe any slander - but even they are not yet ready to openly proclaim virtue as vice and vice versa.

This is especially difficult when there is Russia - a country that is accustomed to confrontation with the West, and, which is very important, is able to withstand this confrontation. It is worth starting to implement the plan to clean up humanity on the planet - and billions will be drawn to Russia as a natural alternative to this plan. Everything will be thwarted.

Conscience and shame, as concepts, cannot be abolished within a single NATO: it will play into the hands of the NATO adversary. Conscience needs to be abolished everywhere, and Russia has the right of veto, and the whole mechanism of stripping humanity because of it alone (some 140 million people, less Bangladesh !!!) - is jammed.

Imagine the rage of people - who have long owned almost the entire planet. People who are obeyed by billions of weak-willed slaves. People who have long decided what they will do and have thought about their decision well. People who have a roadmap and a point-by-point plan - how, whom and how much they will clean up in the first stage, the second, and so on … And suddenly - some 140 million people - stand across everything! As they say - "And Baba Yaga is against!" The terms of the planetary plan are disrupted, plans are thwarted, the generation that saw itself as the priests of a new era goes to the grave …

I think they are very angry …

- Not that word! After all, conscience between them in international relations and in courts has long been abolished. It is very convenient: no matter what nasty thing he did, he immediately justified himself. And here on the side is Russia. For Russians, conscience is not "what the boss considers beneficial," but something solid. Very uncomfortable. For the boss, for example, it is beneficial to burn down the city and call it a victory of democracy, and he can do it if no one interfered - and here the Russians … And they say that the burning of the city or the massacre of the people have nothing to do with the victory of democracy! No matter how cynical and resourceful the West is, it has to reckon with such a juror. Great discomfort arises: all the dirty deeds on any continent have to be done with an eye to Russia.

It turns out that…

- … That Russia is a factor that transforms the power of the world Shamelessness from autocratic to constitutional! It's like a parliament under a tyrant. In general, he always interferes with the tyrant, but especially interferes - when something hellish, prohibitively inhuman is conceived. Such as the elimination of most of the people - because they eat a lot and devour the planet …

What would you, Vazgen Liparitovich, say about Western democracy?

-That everyone dresses in the fashion of their age. In the twentieth century, there was not a single Hitler, not a single Pol-Pot who would not claim that he was elected by the people, controlled by the people and carried out the will of the people. Therefore, American totalitarianism, without inventing anything new, repeated the main myth of its century … However, I am not Vyshinsky, and for me recognition is not the queen of proofs; you never know what people will tell about themselves? In fact, in the United States, not only is there no democracy, but there are not even mild forms of authoritarianism characteristic of stable regimes, such as Brezhnev's …

In fact, the Orwellian era is coming to the West. It is important to emphasize that Orwell wrote about the West! Literary scholars emphasize that in the eerie world created by Orwell as a forecaster, Orwell saw the future of England, not the Soviet Union.

And he was not mistaken. The current state of the United States is such that not only the application of morality, but even a simple understanding of what morality is, has long been lost. There is an impudent and cynical planting of leading cadres imprisoned for the Great Genocide. The leaders of states are planting gorillas, in which not a single muscle will tremble when the order comes to eliminate 90% of the population. And he will come - if he has not already come. I guarantee. American environmental fascism is a terrible thing, and no one canceled plans for a total reduction of the planet's population, or even criticized them on the western side.

Who do you see as the butchers of the coming Great Genocide?

- You don't need to go far for examples. First of all, Petro Poroshenko comes to mind. They put him in power with such a crunch of lawlessness that American justice, long dead, and having seen everything before death, turned over in its grave. The world media began to have feverish, inflamed delirium: here he is, the chosen one of the people! Can this be? If this can be - then the Moon is made of cast iron. Any lie must have some kind of boundaries, while humanity is being trained for boundless lies, for a world in which everything is woven from lies, and objective reality does not exist at all.

Do you think that the election of Poroshenko is a vivid example of the transition to the world of the dystopia of the Orwellian language?

- Yes it is. What did Poroshenko's "voters" not know? That he is an oligarch, a thief, a marauder of privatization slimy with blood, a putschist, a traitor to his (Jewish) nation and an impostor into a stranger, an American spy and just shit? To whom this was not known in the world - raise your hand! Who didn't know that ?! On the contrary - for the purity of the experiment, the Americans themselves took the trouble to convey this to everyone: here, all this is so, but nowhere, the creature will not go away!

Our will is, but yours is not! It will be necessary - you will vote for Chikatilla, for Jack the Ripper - and on election posters they will butcher victims in order to emphasize the superiority of our will over yours!

Now we are told that, they say, the people's choice, transparent voting, by the overwhelming majority in the first round … If it works, if they believe it, then the restrictions are lifted, you can do whatever you want and say whatever you want about it.

You can carry out genocides and call them "vaccinations", you can pass off the execution basement as a maternity hospital, and throw babies into tigers' cages under video recording, and the announcer will explain that this develops tolerance …

Orwell's language triumphed in the West completely, unconditionally and finally. The words at first lost their meaning, and then acquired the opposite meaning to the previous one. America will now call a state of peace war, and a state of war - peace.

Is Russia hindering this?

- Yes, as the last bastion of the world, in which conscience is not sold to take away in the supermarket …

Author: Anna KURGANOVA