Esther and March 8. history of the holiday

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

It would be natural to meet spring on March 1. It would be logical to honor her on March 22 - the day of the vernal equinox. Woman's Day could be celebrated on any Sunday in the spring. But why was the 8th day of March chosen? Why it is celebrated on November 7 - I understand. Why the day of class solidarity of workers is celebrated on May 1 is also known to everyone (at least the official version assures that this is a memory of the workers' demonstration in Chicago). But the choice of March 8 was not explained in any way. Neither official historiography nor folk legends have preserved anything about any event that once happened on March 8, and it turned out to be so significant and memorable for the fiery revolutionaries that they decided to preserve the memory of this day for centuries.

Is it true that March 8 is a woman's day? After all, everyone knows that March 8 is International Women's Day. Also, everyone knows that women live in all countries. In addition, in recent years, almost everyone has learned that March 8 was celebrated only in the USSR - women from other countries did not celebrate it.

Why was the day when the revolutionaries had to take to the streets and declare the current infringement of rights, as well as their indestructible conviction in the coming emancipation, was it determined on March 8? Who was fired from work that day? Who was thrown into jail? Which of the leaders of the democratic movement was born on this day? No answer.

This means that the motives for such a decision were not social, not historical, not public. The creators of this holiday associated something personal with this date. What? How could this day be dear to the leaders of the European revolutionary movement at the turn of the century?

Since the motives were personal, it means you need to take a closer look at the personalities. And this series of portraits is familiar to us from our youth. Only recently did we allow ourselves to notice that it was not only their belonging to the party of the revolution and their devotion to the ideas of the International that brought these luminaries and heroes together. They also had an ethnic relationship. The International, as it turned out, was extremely mono-national. Well, today this is a fact, without which a serious conversation about the history of the revolutionary movement in Europe at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries is impossible. It was the immigrants from the Jewish people who raised the world to fight the “world of violence” and called for it to be destroyed “to the ground”.

It turns out that on March 8, only one woman is actually praised - the biblical Jew Esther, thanks to whom the Jews then destroyed more than seventy-five thousand white Persians - strong people (the color of the nation) along with their wives and children. In other words, the genocide of the White Persians, carried out by the hands of the Jews, is being celebrated, which became possible only thanks to the use of the new tactics by the Jews - the “institution of Jewish brides”! And it was this day that the atheist Bolsheviks made one of their main holidays after the victory of the "Russian" revolution of 1917

Esther is dedicated to the annual and most cheerful holiday of the Jewish people - the holiday of Purim. And it is celebrated just at the turn from winter to spring (the Jews keep the lunar calendar, and therefore the time for the celebration of Purim slips in relation to our solar calendar in almost the same way as the time for the celebration of Orthodox Easter slips in relation to it). Perhaps, in the year when it was decided to start celebrating "International Women's Day", the holiday of Purim fell on March 8th.

It would be both inconvenient and too frank to change the date of the holiday of the Revolutionary every year: it would be too noticeable that only Purim is celebrated. And therefore, it was decided to separate the celebration of the Woman-Destroyer from the holiday of Purim, fix it, and annually on March 8, regardless of the lunar cycles, call on all the peoples of the earth to glorify Esther.

The Jewish holiday Purim is celebrated on the fourteenth day of the spring month of Adar according to the Jewish calendar (corresponding to the end of February - the beginning of March according to the Gregorian calendar) in memory of the miraculous salvation of the Jews who lived in the Persian Empire during the time of King Ahasuerus (367-353 BC).) from the machinations of the malicious anti-Semite Haman, who decided to destroy and exterminate the Jews.

Basically, the whole month of Adar is declared by the Jews a month of fun. But let's see why the whole people, in this case, the Jewish people, rejoice and rejoice? And for this we turn again to the Old Testament, to the Book of Esther:

"Old Testament". Book of Esther. Chapter 7. Feast at Esther. Execution of Haman.

It is clear to everyone that the "evil" Haman was executed, but before returning to the continuation of TOPai, I would like to clarify a few points. Esther became the Persian queen, which means that at least she was not a slave in the Persian Empire. The thing is that, according to traditions that existed in ancient times, SLAVEcould not become a queen, no matter what charms she possessed. Of course, even being a slave-concubine, a woman could influence events from the shadows through the use of sexual magic on her “master”. But, all the same, even in this case, such a woman would remain a slave, regardless of what real power she had. Esther is not a slave, not a concubine, but a Persian queen. Even her husband, the Persian king Artaxerxes, does not know that she is a Jew. The Persian king also does not know that the Jew Mordecai is the uncle of Queen Esther, and that it was he who “prepared” his niece for her role in order to make her a Persian queen, and through this to achieve power over the country. The institution of Jewish brides was and is very widely used by the Jews to achieve their goals. Haman, being one of the highest officials of the Persian kingdom and the second person after the king, most likely exposed Mordecai's conspiracy and was preparing his execution. This is confirmed by the fact that he was hanged on the tree on which he wanted to hang Mordecai. Haman and his ten sons were executed, and all his property was transferred to Queen Esther. But not a single Jew was executed or killed, but already for an attempt to prevent a coup d'état, the family of the most noble nobleman of the Persian kingdom was executed immediately after this coup took place. Haman's invitation to the feast by Queen Esther was a trap to decapitate any possible opposition to the Jewish planned coup. And this is confirmed in the same Book of Esther:

"Old Testament". Book of Esther. Chapter 8. The king allows revenge on the enemies of the Jews.

King Artaxerxes TRANSFERS HIS RINGtaken from Haman to Mordecai! Let me remind you that THE KING'S RING- not just an expensive piece of jewelry, but SYMBOL, literally and figuratively, OF THE ROYAL AUTHORITY … The transfer of the royal ring to someone meant TRANSFERthis person EXECUTIVE POWERin the Persian Empire. And … such a person became the Jew Mordecai, who, according to the Persian traditions of that time, had no right to such power. But that's not all, these are just flowers, the berries are still ahead:

"Old Testament". Book of Esther. Chapter 8. The king allows revenge on the enemies of the Jews.

A curious situation turns out, the Persian king voluntarily "invites" Mordecai and Esther to write on his behalf whatever they want, and to fasten it with the royal ring, which he himself gave to Mordecai. He at least knew what Haman had written in letters sealed by the royal seal, for he recognizes these letters as valid and therefore he cannot cancel them. This means that he was aware of what Haman was preparing, which means that the king knew about the upcoming coup d'etat by the Jews, the ultimate goal of which was to seize power in the Persian Empire. And what do Mordecai and Esther write in the new letters, sealed by the royal seal:

"Old Testament". Book of Esther. Chapter 8. The king allows revenge on the enemies of the Jews.

And again, just like in the Book of Joshua, it is indicated that it is necessary … ELIMINATE, Killand KILL ALL THE STRONG IN THE PEOPLE … And them CHILDRENand WIFE, a NAME OF THEM TO RUN! To destroy all the strong in the people … not those who will attack the Jewish houses, but all the strong in the people, even if none of these strong people was going to participate in the Jewish pogrom that never took place. In principle, these lines speak of a general uprising of the Jews in the Persian Empire, and the day of the uprising is indicated. Moreover, the Jews begin to avenge more MISSING BURNS … And to take revenge is cruel WITH THE COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF THE STRONG IN THE PEOPLE- the colors of the nation, and again, the people of the white race, since the Persian Empire was created by the Slavic-Aryans. And again, with all this, the Jews do not forget about gold and silver, since it was in the hands of the strong people that this gold and silver was mainly concentrated. On the appointed day, the Jews revolted:

"Old Testament". Book of Esther. Chapter 9. The Jews take revenge on their enemies.

In the capital city, the Jews killed “only” five hundred people. But according to the text of the Old Testament, it is clear that only men are meant, and the destroyed children and their wives are simply not taken into account. But it should be remembered that even these five hundred Persians destroyed by the Jews were strong among the people, in other words - the carriers of the active genetics of the people. Not just people were destroyed, but the color of the nation. Destroyed ARISTOCRACY, who was then "strong people" among the people, and who herself would hardly have participated in the pogroms. But it was she who was destroyed by the Jews. The facts of the Jewish pogroms that happened in the past indicate that the bulk of the pogromists have always been from the very bottom, for the most part, from the category of outcasts, in other words, from parasitic elements, which, unfortunately, were enough in every nation or nation. Because only human waste can kill a defenseless child or woman. And if the Jews killed both children and women, and did it everywhere, it becomes clear who they really are:

"Old Testament". Book of Esther. Chapter 9. The Jews take revenge on their enemies.

These lines from the Old Testament speak of the destruction in two days of the Jewish coup in the Persian Empire SEVENTY FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED TEN PEOPLE … And it is this event that has been celebrated by all Jews in the world since that time. For ancient times, such a number of those destroyed in just two days was just HUGE NUMBER … But how many Jews were killed in the pogroms ?! This is not mentioned at all, since no pogroms happened. Further, these tens of thousands destroyed by the Jews were STRONG IN THE PEOPLE, mainly - aristocrats who were from the Slavic-Aryans, who originally created the Persian Empire.

The main population of the Persian Empire was made up of people of the gray sub-race or black race, who did not pose any danger to the Jews. In addition, in order to destroy such a number of people, it was necessary to have a lot of weapons, and the Jews had to be several hundred thousand to carry out such a massacre, and all of them had to be sufficiently trained in the use of weapons.

The question arises: if the Jews were slaves, where did they get so many weapons from and when they were able to learn to wield them, and who taught them this? The slave or the merchant, the manager were not soldiers, in the Old Testament there is no mention of Jewish soldiers, but only of the "peaceful" and "loyal" subjects of the Persian king. Where did the “peaceful” Jews get so many weapons that must still be bought from the masters, delivered to the empire unnoticed, and secretly taught how to use these weapons?

In addition, there must be an excellent organization of the action, a clear plan of who and what should do, and when, so that the action takes place simultaneously and efficiently. After all, most of the destroyed STRONG PEOPLEwere professional warriors who were trained in the use of weapons from childhood. And it’s not easy to kill such people. The lack of information about the Jews who died involuntarily suggests that most of these people were killed when they were not expecting an attack.

And if we consider that in the Persian Empire, the Jews were managers, service personnel, confidants who lived in the houses of the Persian aristocracy, then this suggests that most of the murdered aristocrats were killed in a dream, when they did not expect an attack at all. Whether the Jews were slaves or free is irrelevant. If the servants did not kill their master themselves, then at least they let the murderers into the houses of their masters at night and indicated where they could be found. All of the above indicates a thorough and long preparation for such an action, and that Haman was absolutely right when he tried to prevent this seizure of power by the Jews in his country. Haman, as a top statesman, even in his position had to worry about the security of his country, not to mention the fact that he was a patriot.

The preparation of the Jews for the seizure of power in the empire was to trigger preparations for countermeasures. Without a doubt, he had his spies in the camp of the Jews and knew about the upcoming seizure of power by the Jews in the country through the Jewish "bride" - Queen Esther, who was introduced into the king's inner circle. The Jews, through their spies, as mentioned in the Book of Esther, learned about the countermeasures that Haman was preparing, and they had no choice but to deliver a preemptive strike. And it is this preemptive strike that is described in the Old Testament. The description of the events themselves suggests that the coup was almost ready, and Haman's actions only forced the Jews to act a little ahead of the schedule and speak a little earlier and take the risk, lighting up their main "weapon" - Queen Esther.

But the most interesting thing about the text in the Old Testament is that the Jews had to DESTROY ONLY STRONG PEOPLE, and nearly seventy-six thousand were destroyed from the white Persians - the descendants of the Slavic-Aryans, who created the Persian Empire. It is possible that there were significantly more victims, since the Book of Esther speaks only of the destroyed men, and not a single word about women and children, although the text of the royal letters written by Mordecai speaks of the need to destroy both women and children of powerful people. and looting their property.

If we consider that each destroyed strong man had a wife and one child, there must have been both his parents and his wife, then with the most conservative estimates, the real number of slaughtered white Persians and their families will be at least FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE! This is only by the most conservative estimates !!! But in reality, the strong people of the Persian Empire, cut out by the Jews for two days, it seems, were much more, if only because in those days it was not customary to have one child in a family, and usually there were five or six children in an average family!

Imagine how many Persian children were slaughtered by the "poor" Jews just because MAYBE, on the part of the Persians themselves there could have been something similar in relation to the Jews themselves !!! The Jews in Ancient Persia massacred more than five hundred thousand people for the fact that they ONLY WANTED TO MAKE!!! But whether any of the strong people of the Persian Empire wanted to cut out the children and women of the Jews, nothing is known for certain …

In the text of the letters sent, it is said about the need to plunder the property of the destroyed, and in the description of the events of the coup, it is said that the Jews:. It would seem that a discrepancy turns out - the order says about the need for looting, but during the actions this does not happen. Did the Jews attack the houses of the Persian aristocracy, kill everyone, including women and children, and at the same time "forget" about gold and silver ?! Did they leave empty houses for others to plunder? But this is not mentioned in the text either! After all, the Persian aristocracy was very rich. Let's not rush to conclusions about the "nobility" of the Jews, who ruthlessly destroyed both women and small children, including babies. And they did this in relation to the people who gave them a roof over their heads and the opportunity to settle on their lands. Nice thanks.

Further, Aman sent letters with royal seals to the Persian regions not to the houses of aristocrats, but to government officials with an order for the troops to suppress the upcoming coup d'etat by the Jews. Thus, if anyone came to carry out the Jewish pogroms, it would be simple soldiers. The aristocrats would be only their bosses, giving orders to their soldiers. In addition, you should pay attention to what happened to the property of Haman himself when he was executed!

Haman's property is no one either " DIDN'T rob », « SIMPLY »King Artaxerxes and Queen Esther, in turn. It seems that a similar thing happened in all the Persian regions. After the destruction of the Persian aristocracy, the Jews "simply" took their possessions and received all their treasures. So why rob yourself !? To make the situation more "transparent", it should be clarified that the phrase: means not only, not even so much his palace, but ALL REAL ESTATEand MOVABLE PROPERTY OF THE WHOLE CLAN OF AMAN, in which (clan) Aman was the eldest in the family. And this means a huge fortune, since according to traditions, Aman was the second person in the empire, and most likely, he himself was from the royal Slavic-Aryan family. And it is quite possible that he was a man who has more rights to the throne of the empire than King Artaxerxes himself.

Maybe this reason also played a role in such a "strange" behavior of the king of the Persians, who himself allowed the Jews to kill his aristocracy, and with such genuine "curiosity" he specified how many and where the Persian nobility - strong people - were killed by the Jews! Maybe it was also beneficial for him to get rid of possible pretenders to the throne by the hands of the Jews.

King Artaxerxes ruled the empire for only fourteen years (his other name is Ahasuerus (367–353 BC)), and only a few years after the events described in the Old Testament. So what the Jews did to his own people did not benefit him. Several years of his reign after the events described in the Old Testament are a clear confirmation of this.

Thus, the behavior of the Persian king can be explained either by the above reason, or by the following.

The Jewish "brides" were trained in sex magic, which is the foundation of the lunar cult, the cult of the Black Mother - Kali-Ma. A woman trained in black tantra is capable of COMPLETELY SUBMIT TO YOUR WILLa man, so much so that a man zombified through sex will fulfill any desire and order of the woman who subjugated him. Especially if this man is susceptible to the magic of sex. And there is still the option of having problems with the psyche or mental abilities. It is quite possible that all the above reasons were present in one combination or another and proportion.

But one thing is certain - the behavior of the king of the Persians completely contradicts common sense and traditions of the ancient world. And confirmation of this can be found in the book of Solomon Lurie "Anti-Semitism in the Ancient World", in which he tries to explain the reason for the cruelty and barbarism of the Jews.

Solomon Lurie writes:

"Anti-Semitism in the Ancient World", Solomon Lurie, Petrograd, 1922.

Solomon Lurie, as a Jew, tries to find an explanation for the cruelty of the Jews in the psychology of time itself. But, giving examples of legislation in the Theosian state, he involuntarily only emphasizes the cruelty of the Jews and their deceit. From the above passages it follows that a number of crimes in the Teos state were punished with the death penalty for the criminal and his relatives.

But were all crimes punished so severely even in this state? I think not. All the crimes cited in the passage are in one way or another related to the security and integrity of the state itself. A professional in the manufacture of poisons is already dangerous because the poisons he makes can be used by enemies of the state and thereby cause chaos in the country, in addition, the secrets of the "profession" are usually passed down from generation to generation and require long training and knowledge.

Therefore, there was legislation prescribing the execution of the entire family, which was engaged in the production of poisons and was the bearer of the secrets of this profession. So, although this measure was cruel, it had a foundation and logic. The death penalty for disrupting the supply of bread to Theossa is also associated with the stability of the state and the well-being of it and its inhabitants. Bread supply disruptions lead to an uncontrolled rise in bread prices, impoverishment of the general population and an increase in the capital of speculators, which can lead to popular unrest and threaten the stability of the state itself. That this is so, in the past of civilization there are many examples of this.

There is no need to speak directly about punishment for crimes against the Teos state. In addition, all the provisions of the legislation indicated by S. Lurie relate to punishment for already committed crimes! But if you believe the same Old Testament (read - Torah), then the "pogroms" were only planned and had not yet been committed! In other words, the white Persians were killed along with their families for something they didn't even commit!

Thus, the facts cited by Professor S. Lurie in defense of Jewish cruelty in no way justify it. And even if the Persian Empire had laws identical to the laws of the Theos state, then the actions of Haman, who tried to prevent a coup d'etat, are completely adequate to the spirit of that time, and the Jews have no reason to complain about their lot.

The Persian Empire gave them a place under the Sun, and the Jews, in "gratitude", prepared a coup d'etat and the destruction of the strong people of this people. In addition, they not only prepared, but also successfully carried out a coup, destroying the flower of the nation of the Persian Empire, getting their hands on the enormous wealth of the destroyed people …