The Apollo Moon landing was filmed by Stanley Kubrick

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Illustrious astronaut Alexey Leonov, personally preparing to participate in the Soviet program of the lunar exploration, denied long-standing rumors that American astronauts were not on the Moon, and the footage, broadcast on television around the world, was allegedly edited in Hollywood.

He told about this in an interview with RIA Novosti on the eve of the 40th anniversary of the first landing of US astronauts in the history of mankind, celebrated on July 20 Neil Armstrong and Edwina Aldrin to the surface of an Earth satellite.

Correspondent: So were the Americans on the moon or were they not?

Correspondent: Where did the rumors come from?

Finally, if the light source is slightly covered, the halo is retained due to light scattering in the atmosphere. We see this in the pictures of Apollo. There are no such optical phenomena in a real vacuum.

Apollo 14. AS14-66-9305

3. Dust is the cause of optical phenomena on the Moon

On Earth, we often see a blurry sun, for example, through a cloud. This is the scattering of sunlight by aerosols (fog, smoke, dust). Their volume in the earth's atmosphere is no more than 0.1% of the volume of gases that make up atmospheric air. Likewise, one can assume for the moon. This means that in order to observe at least approximately the same optical phenomena (corona, crown and light scattering), the total mass of particles on the Moon per unit volume must be at least 1 g / m³. This is a huge amount of particles and is tantamount to the existence of an aerosol atmosphere on the Moon. Until now, nothing of the kind has been found.

DISCUSSION

We have more than 5% of the volume of images of human being on the Moon 1969-1972 with images of halos, crowns of the Sun and light scattering, which indicates the presence of the atmosphere. Considering that 5% of the images are included in the terrain panoramas, it can be firmly asserted that 30% of the images from the entire volume of photographic materials or more than 70% of the astronauts' stay on the surface of the "Moon" were made in the presence of the atmosphere.

Panorama Apollo 12 (a12pan1162447) consists of more than two dozen photographs, two of which are with the Sun.

More than 70% of the photographs are from Stanley Kubrick! The statement of the renowned cosmonaut Alexei Leonov in support of the American stay on the Moon and the insignificant studio filming is untenable.

In addition, all images are linked to libraries: 1) expeditions, 2) image numbers, 3) audio conversations, 4) Apollo videos on the official website of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). And this means that images of terrestrial origin, together with audio conversations to them, NASA passes off a person's stay on the moon as documents.

Conclusion: This is a falsification of a person's stay on the Moon, which has been maintained at the highest official level for over 40 years.

+ Glare and optical effects from the "sun" for Apollo 11

First, what is important to note is the presence of up to 10 different optical axes (the optical axis is the lens) and the absence of one axis of the light source (in this case, the sun) in the images.

According to the laws of Optics, all flares on the optical axes for one light source converge at one point. This is not in any photograph of Apollo 11 when they were on the surface of the moon.

At the same time, for images from the orbit of Apollo 11, we see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, the absence of a huge number of light effects is also noticeable, in particular, the absence of an optical halo.

Several light sources in the sky on the "Moon" for Apollo 11 are also indicated by the doubling of the lunar module's shadow.

Below pictures

Several axes of the light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5872HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70 mm

Three axes of the light source. Apollo 11, AS11-40-5935HR. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Film Width: 70 mm

These patterns are evident in other images with optical highlights.

Below are the glare from the Sun in the same Hasselblad Apollo 11 camera:

View of the Earth from orbit, Apollo 11; AS11-36-5293. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm.

View of the Earth from orbit; Apollo 11, AS11-36-5299. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 80 mm; Film Width: 70 mm

We see one optical axis of the light source, the Sun, the absence of a huge number of light effects is also noticeable, in particular, the absence of an optical halo.

Several light sources in the sky on the "Moon" for Apollo 11 are also indicated by the double vision of the lunar module's shadow:

Doubling shadows from the lunar module indicate multiple light sources above the lunar surface. AS11-37-5463, AS11-37-5475, AS11-37-5476 and with increased contrast, brightness. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Magazine: 37; Description: LUNAR MODULE SHADOW ON SURFACE; Film Width: 70 mm.

Two shadows exactly follow the contour of the lunar module and details: an antenna for long-distance communications and for radio communications of astronauts, a system of auxiliary engines, and more. And this is not one random shot, not three shots, but a series of Magazine 37 photos - about 20 shots!

One could suggest that there are always two shadows on the Moon - one from the Sun, the other from the huge and bright crescent of the Earth!

However, look - this is Earth in the Apollo 11 images:

View of the lunar module and the Earth for Apollo 11; AS11-40-5923, AS11-40-5924. LUNAR MODULE; EARTH.

Compare with the brightness of the Sun (see pictures above). In general, the Sun is far from the most powerful star of all, but it is relatively close to the Earth and therefore shines very brightly - 500,000 times brighter than the full Moon and 5,000 times brighter than the full Earth when viewed from the Moon. Our planet shines several orders of magnitude lower! Also, keep in mind that the Earth is at its zenith. And what is the shadow of the Earth ?! Under you!

All together are NASA's absurdities and lack of knowledge.

But even after the publication of this fact that images of Apollo 11 being on the "Moon" indicate the presence of several light sources in the sky and this is a fake, NASA defenders persist in their "Americans have walked on the moon." The amazing nature of the debaters!

This note about multiple light sources in the sky on the Moon does not apply to glare for the rest of the stay: Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17. For the shots of these missions - we have one axis of the light source. And here it should be noted that the shooting conditions are the same - the low position of the Sun above the horizon, the optical equipment is the same - a Hasselblad camera, the shooting technique is the same, the image is the same as for the Orlov … However, the axis of the light source is the only one. Photos of Apollo 11 fall out of the general pattern. Probably, NASA in the "first" flight to the moon lacked the power of one searchlight.

It is also possible to note the secondary "oddities" of the glare on the Apollo 11 optics, the Apollo mission in general:

• the presence of equidistant twisted spirals in the glare, as in a long-range searchlight;
• asymmetry of glare elements, which is possible if the light source itself does not have symmetry;
• glare from the presence of a liquid droplet on the lens (re-reflection on the droplet surface);
• a halo and a crown (crown) around the sun for Apollo 12, Apollo 14, Apollo 15, Apollo 16, Apollo 17, which is possible only with the presence of an atmosphere;
• other.

The halo and crown around the sun in Apollo 17 (AS17-147-22580) indicates the presence of an atmosphere. Details about the halo and optical phenomena. Image Collection: 70mm Hasselblad; Lens Focal Length: 60 mm; Sun Elevation: 16 °; Description: STA ALSEP; Film Width: 70 mm.

Conclusion: in front of us, several light sources illuminate the surface of the "Moon" for the Apollo 11 astronauts. This indicates a hoax by NASA of lunar conditions in the pavilion on Earth.