Modern fashion - from Jews to homosexuals

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Who sets the standards for high fashion? Why is it considered that a thing becomes obsolete in a month and you need to buy a new one? And everything "old" has to be changed to "new" more and more often. But how did this order of things come to be? And how does it affect our psyche?

History of the issue

When a feudal system was established in Western Europe, in which landowners and cultivators formed the basis of the socio-economic system, the Jews, in addition to their usual practice, which was mentioned earlier, applied several new methods of enrichment at the expense of local residents. Appearing in any country, the Jews first of all presented rich gifts to the imperial family, the royal family or the family of a duke, prince, count, baron, in other words - to the family of the ruler of that country, regardless of what title the ruler had.

Moreover, the gifts were not anyhow, but very specific. Luxurious outfits and expensive jewelry. It would seem that this is special, rich gifts to rulers to create a good impression of themselves and to obtain permission for their residence and their activities on the lands of this state. In other words, a placating bribe. But the ambassadors and merchants of all countries and peoples at all times acted in this way, and then a natural question arises, why are Jewish gifts specific? The Jews would not be Jews, if even their gifts were not forced to work for themselves both in the literal and figurative sense of the word. Simply, the gifts from the Jews were robes of brocade and silk, richly embroidered with gold and silver, precious stones and pearls. But it was curious that the Jews donated not their national rich outfits, but outfits … accepted in the everyday life of these countries, with "small" additions. And these "small" additions were materials available, mainly ONLYJewish merchants, and precious stones, the trade of which was, again, in the hands of all the same Jews.

Thus, the Jewish "gifts" in fact turned out to be "Trojan horses", and this is the reason. When the imperial or royal or royal or … a couple appeared in front of their courtiers in dresses donated by the Jews and in jewelry donated by them, all the nobility of the empire, kingdoms, kingdoms, etc., tried to keep up with them and … turned to the same Jews to purchase matching outfits and jewelry from them. And here the Jews, having full control, asked the aristocrats for their goods PRICES, MANY TIMES EXCEEDING THE REAL … The almost complete monopoly of the Jews on trade in these countries-states allowed them to set practically any prices, since no one knew the purchase prices, and no one else had the necessary materials and jewelry. And the outfits were sewn by the same Jewish tailors, jewelry was made by the same Jewish jewelers. In other words, the aristocrats had no choice but to accept the "game" on the terms set. The Jews played on the dignity and pride inherent in aristocrats. For the majority of aristocrats, not to lose the honor of the family was, at times, more important than their own lives. And meeting the requirements of court etiquette was an important factor for aristocrats to maintain family honor.

Thus, gifts to crowned persons of magnificent dresses and ornaments led to the fact that the nobility of the country or empire ordered similar outfits and ornaments from the Jews for themselves, repeatedly overpaying for this. In addition, through the bribed nobles of the same crowned heads, the Jews "unobtrusively" inspired them with the idea that enlightened monarchs should patronize the arts, hold balls, arrange magnificent hunts and trips. And what crown bearer does not want to be known as an enlightened monarch !? With rare exceptions, the monarchs of large or small countries and empires wished to leave to their descendants exactly the image of an enlightened person and … began to arrange balls and hunts for their subjects, at which they themselves appeared in dresses and ornaments presented to them by the Jews. Following them, the noble aristocrats arranged the same, who also tried to outmaneuver each other. Also, each monarch tried to outstrip his neighbors, monarchs, so that only he and no one else would get the title of the most enlightened monarch!

It would seem that there is nothing wrong with leaving a "trace" in history as an enlightened monarch, patron of the arts, it seems not … but the whole point is how this is done! Balls of crowned heads, dresses and ornaments of aristocrats cost a lot of money, gold or silver coins, which were withdrawn from the treasuries of these crowned heads and aristocrats, and "flowed" into the bottomless pockets of Jewish merchants! After the majority of aristocrats “updated” their wardrobe and jewelry of their wives and daughters in this way, the Jews presented new “gifts” to the crowned heads for the next ball - even more luxurious outfits and even more unique jewelry. And everything was repeated again. The aristocrats reopened their treasuries and … again the sonorous gold and silver coins changed their owners. There is a limit to everything and, sooner or later, the treasuries are empty. But everyone had already joined in this "game", and no one wanted to lose their honor. The "old" outfits and ornaments were no longer suitable, and they began to be carried to the Jewish usurers, who gave insignificant prices for them. In order to “find” new funds, new taxes were introduced, real estate was pledged and, sooner or later, both the crowned heads and the aristocrats were bound hand and foot by the Jews by their debts. Having reached this stage, the Jews "offered" their debtors a "simple" way out of their delicate situation. The crowned bearers were offered to cancel all debts for a small favor. This "little favor" consisted only in allowing the Jewish merchants to follow the victorious army and buy from it everything that the valiant warriors would want to sell for gold and silver coins.

But what valiant army are the "good" Jews talking about ?! After all, the conversation is about debts! What does the army have to do with it, and why are the Jews asking for permission to follow it and for the right to buy up? The army does not march victoriously on its own territory; such a march is possible only across the expanses of its neighbors. And for this you need "only" DECLAREthis or that neighbor WAR … After all, this is such a "trifle" for a valiant monarch, because he always dreamed of glorifying his name with great deeds, and what could be "better" than the glory of a great commander !? And that the treasury is empty is not a problem. "Good" Jews are ready to give money for the war, and the valiant monarch will pay for it with his trophies. And the "valiant" monarch had no choice but to start a war with one of the neighbors, since it is always easy to find a reason to start a war, in extreme cases, you can come up with a reason. If the “valiant” monarch does not wish to render such a small service to the “good” Jews, then they (the Jews) will “ FORCED"Ask him to settle accounts with them on promissory notes, otherwise they already have nothing to" feed "their children with.

Thus, the "poor" monarch is completely dependent on the "good" Jews, who, by blackmailing in this way, achieve what they were striving for - the beginning of hostilities. Any war is a super profit for merchants. Super profits come from military supplies, which provide a "wide field" for financial fraud, and … super profits are also obtained from the monopoly received by the Jews for the purchase of war trophies, including prisoners of war and captured civilians.

N. V. Levashov, fragment

Pederasty and fashion

Some designers do not hide their orientation and openly declare their gay.

The French designer Jean-Paul Gaultier, famous for his futuristic costumes for the world cinema and stars of the first magnitude such as Madonna, Marilyn Manson and Mylene Farmer, has never hidden his own. He never hesitates to dress male models in women's suits and skirts at shows, this brings him additional resonant popularity.

British designer Alexander McQueen has repeatedly stated his gay identity in numerous interviews. And in honor of the conclusion of his partnership with director George Forsynt, he threw a chic party on the island of Ibiza, which was widely covered in the press.

American fashion designer Tom Ford became famous while working at the Gucci fashion house, and for a couple of years he began to open his own boutiques under the Tom Ford International trademark. For over twenty years, Tom has lived with his partner Robert Buckley, a journalist by profession. Tom would like to adopt a child, however, Buckley is against this idea.

French couturier Yves Saint Laurent, who at the young age of twenty-one took over the Dior house after the death of Christian Dior, and later founded his own fashion house, had a constant partner and lover Pierre Berger. Berger was there for almost the entire life of Saint Laurent, and in 2008, a few weeks before the death of the great couturier, the relationship between Saint Laurent and Berger was officially registered as a civil partnership.

Gianni Versace was a renowned Italian designer and founder of the Versace fashion house. He met his future partner Antonio Damiko, who worked as a model and later also as a designer, in 1982. The love relationship lasted 15 years until Gianni was shot in 1997 in Miami Beach. The killer of the great designer was a homosexual serial maniac who later committed suicide.

Valentino, the founder of the eponymous brand, has already retired after showing his latest collection in Paris in 2007. With his lover Giancarlo Giammatti, he was close for 12 years, carefully hiding this connection from prying eyes and ears, even from his own mother.

The most famous pair of homosexual designers are Italian fashion designers Stefano Gabbano and Domenico Dolce who work together under the famous brand Dolce & Gabbana. However, for many years, the couple hid their relationship from the ubiquitous press.

Other well-known designers such as Christian Dior, John Galliano, Giorgio Armani, Pierre Cardin, Karl Lagerfeld are also highly suspected by the media of involvement with sexual minorities. But this has not been proven by facts.

For those who believe that fashion does not strongly determine our psyche and our way of life, this ten-minute material will be useful to watch:

For those who would like to get acquainted with the world dictatorship of consumption, we recommend a detailed documentary film, which has already been published on the KRAMOL website. This film will tell you how planned obsolescence has shaped the course of our lives since the 1920s. When manufacturers began to reduce the durability of their products in order to increase consumer demand.