History - a high society lady or a corrupt girl?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

A whole staff of so-called "historians on the pay" is working on her image tirelessly day and night. She wears her versions "up" for correction, creates, sculpts and sculpts from all this a beautiful and majestic statue of the splendor of the state, which by its nature remains the same corrupt girl, every time running to a new owner. Likewise, Russian history rushes from century to century in search of the only one to whom it will be faithful forever. But the "only ones" come and go, the centuries change, but you want to live well, you want to live in splendor and luxury, so you have to dissemble, dodge, lie openly in some places, and at times, as if not on purpose, but for the need of the state to let blood especially knowledgeable, or especially linguistic.

Modern history is written not by hermit monks, as in the Middle Ages, one page a day, reading and rechecking a hundred times, but by today's gadgets. Thousands, millions, billions of signs per second, it is easy to drown in such a volume of information, but one who knows the direction will reach land. Modern zombie technologies are perverted in the competition among themselves for:

- selling any garbage at any price;

- the suggestion that white is black;

- mass management. With just one message in the media, on a fictitious topic, it is easy to drive the masses out into the street, and then it is enough for someone to shout “they are beating ours!”. You can list a huge number of such items, from the "end of the world" to the rise in the price of tokens for travel in the subway, but I'm deviating from the topic.

Working on the article "Where is the city from?" (in the near future it will be published on kramola.info - ed.), I got confused in a large number of inconsistencies in a very recent, in my opinion, history. The time span of 200-300 years is not the illiterate Middle Ages, when writing was rare, and books were considered a miracle. It is the most significant part of Russian history, the most popular sovereign, that caused me a large number of questions.

Until recently, I believed a history textbook for secondary school, there was no reason to doubt it, but while rereading it in a secluded place, I caught myself thinking that I was reading a fairy tale, known to everyone for my generation by A. S. Pushkin. Sovereign Peter the First appears in it as a magician: he waved his left hand - the city grew up, waved his right - the city was populated by the nobility and rabble, slammed, and canals were dug, immediately lined with granite. I am silent about the buildings, I just haven’t figured out what he did with his hand when he needed hundreds of thousands of cubes of brick and granite (I’m missing out on marble, there was simply nowhere to take it). In the absence of roads, brick factories, granite quarries, and trucks, colossal construction was carried out. And he also managed to instruct forts, here and there. Probably, V. I. Chapaev learned from Pyotr Alekseevich the tactics of building a battle. We take potatoes, put them on - there will be St. Isaac's Cathedral, but this one, smaller, will be the Hermitage. The one that woke up will be fortresses in the bay. And lo and behold, in the morning everything stood.

And around the city, all the people lived in wooden huts, the benefit of the building tree was for the future, such a construction did not require special skills and labor. For centuries, they were building from wood, an excellent, well and quickly processed material, only the Moscow and Novgorod Kremlin, a dozen or two cathedrals with monasteries, and a couple of fortresses in large cities, built under Ivan IV the Terrible and before him, were brick at that time.

Reading the lines of the official textbook, I stumbled upon an even more interesting detail of the story. Peter the First was not the initiator of this tale, they began to write it, tearing out the pages of an older and, in my opinion, more significant history.

The seizure of power by the Romanovs and the total extermination of the heirs of the Ruriks, their history, their deeds, their influence on Europe and Asia, required new pages, and such pages were written after the total destruction of the church chronicles of the times of the Ruriks. Strange fires in the archives of churches broke out here and there, and what they managed to save was confiscated for safety by the people of the sovereign. We now know more about ancient Rome and ancient Greece than about the times of the Rurik rule. Even the icons and frescoes of churches were removed and chipped off by order of the Romanovs. And if you start to lie, do not stop, for you will be caught in inconstancy.

In Peter's times, in connection with the transfer of the capital to St. Petersburg, the Moscow Kremlin fell into desolation. In the holy walls for Ruriks, weddings were played and performances were staged, a tavern was placed on the territory of the Kremlin, and a prison in its cellars. When the question of repairing the dilapidated Kremlin arose, Peter did not give money, he did not care about the old Russian shrines, he looked to Europe, which surprisingly did not kneel in front of him, as under Ivan IV Vasilyevich the Terrible, but on the contrary taught and controlled everything … Peter was surrounded by Swedes and Dutch, Germans and Austrians, even Turks. He did not like the advice of his fellow tribesmen. The Moscow fire of 1737 destroyed not only part of the Kremlin, it destroyed the archive located in the building of the large palace, with documents of the deeds of the sovereign and the state. "Descriptive cases of past years", maps, data on the borders from 1571 to 1700, documents and decrees, thus providing an unplowed field for the work of "Romanov historians", it was much easier to compose on a blank slate than to refer to primary sources.

The Romanovs turned the Kremlin into a big brothel. By the beginning of the 19th century, houses of debauchery and thieves' dens were located on its territory. The historical monuments of the Rurik era caused extreme irritation among the Romanovs. The cathedrals of the times of Ruriks on the territory of the Kremlin were either demolished (Sretensky Cathedral, Heraldic Tower), or rebuilt (Khlevenny, Kormovoy and Sytny palaces). The palace of Ivan the Terrible on the Sparrow Hills was destroyed.

In 1806, the palace of Boris Godunov was sold at auction. When there was no need for perestroika, barrels of gunpowder were used, as in the case of the Holy Trinity Ipatievsky Monastery in Kostroma, the Godunovs' estate, where about 60 people from the Godunov family were buried. Is it possible that someone warned the Romanovs that over time a DNA examination would be found, and it would not be difficult to prove that Boris Godunov was from the Rurik family?

But the greatest irritation among the Romanov dynasty was caused by written sources, which contained data "on the hierarchy of the sovereign's people, their kinship, merits and deeds of warriors." All appointments to government positions took place on the basis of "parochialism", the very hierarchy prescribed in the "category books". On January 12, 1682, the Romanovs abolished "localism" in Russia, destroying all the old "category books", which mentioned the low origin of the Romanovs themselves. Instead of them, new ones were ordered, for people loyal and devoted to the dynasty. The “House of Pedigree Affairs” created for this purpose made only two books, “velvet” and lost. The first one to be checked turned out to be a falsification, where the genealogies of the families of many officials were written from the ceiling.

Until the end of the seventeenth century, a "degree book" was kept in Moscow, compiled in 1560-1563. on the initiative of Ivan the Terrible's confessor Macarius, Metropolitan of Moscow. The book contained a history from the first Russian princes to the time of Ivan IV Vasilyevich the Terrible, a grandiose chronicle of the Rurik dynasty. It was on its basis that frescoes were made in many Russian monasteries (the Archangel Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin).

The book stated that the Rurik dynasty descended from the Roman emperor Augustus, but during the time of Alexei Mikhailovich, the book, which was kept in a written order under seven locks, mysteriously disappears.

In 1672, in an ambassadorial order, the Romanovs compiled the "Big State Book" or "The Root of Russian Sovereigns", the so-called "Titular". It contained painted portraits of all the great dukes from Rurik to Alexei Mikhailovich. The Titular was written arbitrarily, without relying on previous history, in the spirit of the greatness of the Romanov dynasty, by their own order.

At the same time, the Austrian diplomat Lavrenty Khurevich (one last name is worth it), a subject of the Austrian emperor Leopold the First, who visited Moscow in 1656, compiles a new history of the Romanov dynasty, and sends it to the tsar as an instruction for further transformation of history.

And in 1673, the same Khurevich publishes an extended history "The Genealogy of the Most Holy and Noble Grand Dukes of Muscovy" called the genealogy, where he scrupulously substantiates the royal blood in the veins of Alexei Mikhailovich along with other European monarchs, and in 1674 sent it to Moscow. The order is completed, the money has been transferred, a comfortable old age and the family's prosperity are secured, for divulging a secret - you know …

In Europe, the Romanovs were treated condescendingly, not counting as equals, but loved in their own way, for their devotion to European traditions and the lack of pressure that was always present in the Rurik dynasty. In most of the European chronicles of those years, the Romanovs were simply not mentioned as a royal dynasty.

The only thing that could not be destroyed is the geographical maps copied and transported by travelers around the world. Ivan Kirillovich Kirilov was appointed by Peter I responsible for the creation of the geographical atlas of Russia, the whole work consisted of three volumes of 120 maps each, but the imperial academy banned Kirilov's atlas, 360 of the most accurate maps were destroyed, even the printed boards were broken. Peter I was horrified by the size of the territories that remained from the Ruriks, and with which the Romanovs were so mediocre.

Great Tartary, with its scope, power and kings descended from the Roman emperors, was no longer there, so it was not worth remembering about it either. And only after the death of Peter I, Kirilov publishes and prepares for printing 37 maps, 28 of which have survived. In the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty, Nicholas II, there was practically no Russian blood, but he became Russian in spirit, it was he who raised the state, not listening to European advisers, for which he paid. Since then, new states, new rulers have appeared on the world map, which means that new hours of the next, rewritten history have died away.

Now it's hard to remember, it was like this:

or like this:

But how was it the same)))