Comparison of modern Russia and the USSR, or why horseradish radish is not sweeter?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

On August 26, 2017, the founder of the Conceptual project, entrepreneur and public figure Vitaly Valerievich Antipin would have turned 48. In memory of him, we are starting a retrospective publication of his articles and videos. In them, he raises complex and important issues of our time, which have not lost their significance until now. The amazing courage of Vitaly Antipin's thinking allows him to go beyond the generally accepted template and express the most interesting assumptions and conclusions.

Today, a whole generation of people has grown up who do not remember the Soviet Union, but have a warm feeling of nostalgia for it. They sincerely do not understand those who "fought for freedom" in the Soviet years. What did these people lack? Why did they suffer? Let's see if it was so good to live in the USSR, as patriotic publicists tell us? And really the people who dreamed of changes in Soviet times were completely wrong? What is the difference between Russia and the USSR, and is horseradish sweeter than a radish?

And again we live in "such a difficult time." Only instead of the word "perestroika" the word "modernization" sounds. Again, no one says anything, because they are not going to rebuild, but they are going to pretend that someone will modernize something. But who and what exactly, as before, remains beyond understanding. Well, and, of course, all this again goes to the collapse and dismantling of the current "system", as it was in the past.

Now, however, appeared smartphones, laptopsother gadgets … But have people changed internally on the territory of the country? This is the question that interests us the most. After all, these people, like those of the past, want happiness, but happiness is not money, and it just does not fall on anyone's head undeservedly.

Recently, people from a rather large country, at the behest of a pike or from some influenza virus, suddenly turned their gaze "to their backs" as they said Kozma Prutkov, and began to seriously compare the era the USSRand the current "Russia" … Why? We are not going to claim that this is a miraculous phenomenon? Let's just say, this is clearly the impact of "Our" media, working out someone's command and gently and gently introducing into our heads, consciousness and mass unconscious the beautiful and mysterious, and, consequently, an attractive image of the USSR.

LLC "Russia": status and founders

Many today are trying to convince us of the fairness of the distribution of wealth earlier in the USSR, for example JSC "USSR", and the injustice of the distribution of the wealth of the allegedly the same country in the form LLC "Russia" today. They say that we have injustice because there are shareholders in OOO Rossiya, but there are many mercenaries. Yes, it is, only the LLC form has nothing to do with the fairness of dividend distribution. This is only a form, but, as you know, content is more important than form.

Equity can be exercised in any form of organization. For example, take the charter Ltd … If the charter says that the company was created to receive profit and distribute it among the founders, this is one thing. But if you write in the charter that so many percent of the profit goes to the founders, and so much in the form of an addition to the wages of employees, then this is another LLC. So, it is not about the form of LLC, but about the worldview and intentions of the authors of the organization and those who implement their plans in life?

How does ZAO "USSR" work?

We have the same with JSC "USSR" … Such a closed society really means that everything that belongs to it is the property of all its members. But, Firstly, was it closed with us?

Secondly, in each JSC the property is distributed according to its own algorithm, and it is not necessarily fair. The same charter and its law enforcement practice determine the fairness of distribution of the property of the CJSC. If the distribution of material wealth were fair, then with the birth of each child in our USSR, he would receive some share of it for free use, as in some countries. And then, say, at the time of marriage, I would receive a house. Well, or he would receive an apartment not the one that will be given, but the one that his family wants, in accordance with what ZAO can. And not after 30 years of work in hazardous industries for a symbolic fee, but as soon as it was needed to improve the living conditions of the family, or even in advance. And he would not go to the sanatorium where he would be sent, but where he would like.

After all, it turns out that the USSR was a hidden form of slavery. Now yes, open, but this is the same slavery. Talk about a beautiful and just USSR is talk about changing the current wrapper of slavery to a new one, similar to the one before last, but not changing its essence.

Property rights in Russia and the USSR - was it there?

In addition, you need to understand that the right to property is the right to manage it, it is an opportunity realized in practice. Did our citizens in the USSR have such an opportunity? We were told that the "national economic plan" determines the fair distribution of wealth and wealth. But did the people make this plan? Did he follow up on it? Could he change it? No, I couldn't. This means that equality in the USSR was fictitious.

We are assured of the presence of the "well-honed work of the entire state" before. This is probably a joke? What kind of perfection is there? This there, as now, was not close. I myself have seen how fresh concrete was dumped into the first pits that came across, only because the cars with it arrived half an hour before the end of the working day, and no one wanted to stay and work it out where it was needed. We then, as an example of the fabulous correctness of capitalist management, were told that they order concrete machines for a certain time, up to minutes, and they come in accordance with this order. It was hard for us to believe in such a possibility then, and it was very vividly discussed in the brigade.

Here the saying goes: "Everything around is collective farm, everything around is nobody's." In the USSR, for example, they built roads where they were not needed, and did not build where they were needed. Sabotage and sloppiness was pretty often. There was also an excessive zeal to do more good and useful things, under which they ruined the native cultivation of flax in the northern regions, for example, and launched corn, which here will not give birth at all.

And the increase in prices "at the request of the workers." There were a lot of things. Only now there could not be a "polished" management of the national economic complex. Why, you ask? Because there was no such task at all. Rather, she stood only by publicity, as a worker and collective farmer, an architect Mukhina at All-Russian Exhibition Center.

Satanic rituals in the Great Patriotic War

As another example of the greatness of the Soviet era, we are given the fact that "we defended during the Great Patriotic War." And who is it "we" ? Are we the fifth column that did everything to make the war bloody? Are we the ones who, under the guise of fighting Zionism, added blood and helped destroy property? Are we the ones who, playing our games, allowed the enemy to immediately capture half of the country? Managers who, at the cost of unjustified people's blood, hung orders on their chests? We, these are those who from conquered Germany, just like the Nazis from the USSR, drove carriages with motorcycles, furniture, antiques, with German governesses for their children, future socialist managers? Who are we?

It is important to understand here that the goal of that terrible war was not to capture Hitler USSR, and not a reflection of the USSR aggression and seizure Germany.

The main purpose of that meat grinder is the maximum number of people killed.

And only then the prevalence of the US currency on the planet and so on. Everything was done so that we killed each other as long as possible, as much as possible, and as mercilessly as possible. In fact, it was a satanic ritual, consisting of many satanic rituals, such as Rzhevskaya massacreor Leningrad blockade.

Sports as a means of crowd control

Look at what they managed to turn us into. All of us. Well, or almost everyone. For instance, "pride"modern country: "sport" … What is this phenomenon? I think this is a proven means of duping, robbery and crowd control.

What we used to call the term "sport" today, it is:

1. Transformation of a person into a spectator. From the subject to the controlled object.

2. Colossal business: construction, entertainment, brand.

3. Laundering huge amounts of money from the budget to personal capital.

4. Undermining and destroying the health of a large number of active people.

5. Looping of the psyche of many on their own significance, on the one-sided development of the individual.

6. The diversion of a huge amount of time, effort, energy and money of people from solving their own problems.

7. Promotion of harmful products like pepsikola by encouraging them to imitate their favorite athletes.

8. The withdrawal of people's attention and funds from physical culture. (In fact, sport does not allow physical education to develop).

9. Easy promotion of a lot of nosy politicians, a springboard for people with limited thinking into big politics by pumping up their popularity (look how many State Duma deputies have quit sports!).

10. Everyone rejoices at the victory of their team over others, in general, in the immoral use of technology: doping, NLP, training, bribes and contractual results, deceit against rivals, intelligence of rivals' secrets, just intimidation. What abomination is there in modern sports?

After all, sport has not become so today, it was made so long ago. It was only by the announcement that our athletes were considered amateurs, but in fact, at a certain level, they all became real professionals.

Who and why actually destroyed the USSR?

And what about the modern media? Listen carefully to the news. Mixture spells with illusionism and satanism, that's what it is. What can you see on TV besides obscurantism? Or such camouflage?

We are told that the USSR was destroyed by the elite, when they wanted to transfer the acquired property and power by inheritance to their children. What does inheritance have to do with it? Couldn't they have done that anyway? They could and did. Only when they realized that the owners began to dismantle the system, and it would not be possible to inherit it soon, as they were used to, then they helped to quickly destroy the country, pushing everything that was possible along the bottom of the barrel and foreign accounts with an increase in the speed of shoving. Converting money and power into Company, Ltd, cooperatives, artels and partnerships.

Many of them did not even realize that their rat escape from a sinking ship was a predictable transition from imaginary socialism to imaginary capitalism, through cutting off some part "Elite" and creation through privatization of their replacement.

Elite Conflict of Russian Society

So we come to a very interesting moment, revealing the reasons for the modern conflict. world pseudo-elites and Russian pseudo-elite … This conflict lies in the fact that the task of the world elites is the constant instability of the life of society and systems in Russia. They had to first swing the pendulum into extreme pseudo-socialism, and then into extreme pseudo-capitalism, now they are preparing some kind of extreme pseudo social patriotism. Ours "Masons" I really want that with this "Labor" the created stable matrix of robbery and fooling people did not collapse for as long as possible. After all, if such a robbery lasts the time they need, perhaps they will be able to reach the level of world domination and maybe even become The "best" of the villains of the planet. Well, or at least make the supreme villains reckon with them. And so what happens? They just started to "work" for real, but here these worlds are against something, they do not allow to devour properly.

Opponents of the capitalist system assure us that the lower the wages of production workers, the higher the profits of its owners. This statement is false. Categories "good" or "Bad" salaries - a relative and comparative parameter. People can work with songs for a very small salary if they have a high idea in their heads that needs to be worked for. And the profits will not necessarily be higher. By general agreement, for example, and through the intentions of the owners, it can be done so that goods or services of very high quality created by production will be sold at a very low price, and the profits of the owners will be very low or even none at all. Here everything again depends on what kind of worldview the owners have, and through what idea they implement it.

Who lives well in the USSR?

We are told about the excellent position in the subsidized spheres of life the USSR … This shows a complete lack of understanding of the amount of funds needed for these areas in comparison with the possibilities of a normally organized economy. Economic processes in Russia today and in the USSR before, they had two main tasks, for which they were organized:

1. Control over natural resources

2. Providing maximum distracting employment for the population.

Both of these tasks have been and are being addressed. When our patriotic analysts begin to talk about the fact that some form of this system was or is more effective than the previous one, it touches. It touches something like watching the children play in the sandbox: they play peacefully - it's cool, they will argue who is more important here - even more fun, they will pour sand into each other's hats … well, children, what to take from them.

Pinocchio, Alice's Foxes, Basilio's Cats and the Field of Wonders in the Land of Fools

Oligarchy today, oh, this is a word that has set everyone sore on edge. Oligarchs, oligarchs, our media shout! They stole your money! Here they are, Alice's foxes and Basilio's cats! Pinocchio, Pinocchio grab them, otherwise they will go abroad. Well, who else believes in this circus? They took everything for themselves! They got all the property of the people! They fatten and live happily, buy yachts, football clubs when people …

Okay, let's think about what a person needs to be free:

1. Calmness, 2. Confidence in the future, 3. Some materially sufficient stable security, 4. The ability to transfer to children in full the material, mental and spiritual wealth accumulated over life.

We will not go further, let us dwell on this. The question is: what kind of freedom do our "oligarchs" have?

1. Calmness they never dreamed of, but they do their best to pretend that they are calm, this is their task - to pretend.

2. Confidence in the future? There is nothing to comment on.

3. Some kind of material support? How many of you, friends, need a pood of gold weights around your neck? And with these weights they are forced to smile sweetly and even dance sometimes. I think, too, you can not comment.

4. The ability to transfer? What? Spiritual they simply do not have. The mental is one-sided and materially obsessed. All their material things hang in the balance: a step to the right, a step to the left is regarded as an attempt to escape.

Is it really not clear that those persons who carried out such robberies on the planet, as with Indians in America, or as with us 91st, will always be in the shadows, and will always put up whipping boys in their place, looking for a "freebie" Berezovsky and Abramovich … In fact, they signed an oligarchic agreement with them.

Here's the loot and the opportunity to take it, you will pretend to be an oligarch who robbed the country. And when people ask where their money is, everyone knows who this "Fedya" is, and then the answer to the code phrase: "Shurik, maybe not, this is not our method" will be an unambiguous, formidable answer "We need Fedya … … ". And those who really took the jackpot from us will remain in the shadows and begin to build, or rather launch, a previously prepared new scheme of robbery and control.

People, tools in the modern economy

Many, describing the injustices that are now happening, say that people have become a tool, a consumable. Worn out - thrown overboard, survive as best you can. Let's agree that this is really bad. But. As I remember until 1991 in all the media they shouted that we have old guys who are degrading in management, at all levels. Down with them! Make way for the young!

It turns out that someone does not care how today or how wrong yesterday is, but it is important that we want today as yesterday and yesterday as today. Instability is important. Why? Because dark deeds are easier to do on the sly. Under instability, people will not be able to calmly comprehend what is happening. Here's what they need. So that we do not understand and realize that all this, both the USSR and the Russian Federation, is one slave system in different variegated wrappers.

Mutual understanding in the USSR and Russia

They ardently prove to us that in the previous system everyone was for each other and understood that if one person works more efficiently, then everyone will also work the same way, and the whole country will grow stronger day by day. I think that it is not even worth expanding this topic too much, since the delusion is obvious here. The slogans are - yes, there were. There were people who lived according to these slogans, there were those who lived according to these slogans during the day, and in the dark, followed completely different slogans. There were people who pretended to live by these slogans, and there were those who took advantage of the fact that others live by these slogans.

And there were those who did not care about these slogans. It is important to note here that the ratio of these categories of citizens gave what we received in 91.

Here is another interesting statement by those who advocate returning to the USSR: "The standard of living of citizens with a" basic right "will be significantly higher regardless of the political and economic model in the country." We supposedly had some kind of "basic right", and thanks to it, we were richer. The level of many diaspora-organized communities, and there are many of them in Europe, is significantly higher than that of other citizens.

Especially if they are engaged in drugs, like the Gypsies, or protection and swindling, like the Chechens. Yes, even the standard of living of shepherds in Dagestan will be significantly higher than the neighboring Stavropolitesif all budgetary possibilities are directed at keeping them in the USSR. Indeed, in the USSR, almost all republics were subsidized and dated, in essence, the Russian Federation.

Dumping in the labor force

Yes, that's what you can call what is happening today, but this is only in appearance, and concerns a very limited number of citizens. Locals do not go to the salaries that migrants go to, but they will not go to other jobs, even twice as good as emigrants. Where are they going? What do they do? Mostly the situation has been corrected criminal-corruption-bribery systemgrowing up on the same "Blate", and forces the locals to go into the areas of trade, fraud associated with the receipt and giving of bribes, in the crime and in the state. structures that are almost the same today.

Most often, this is all spliced in one or more "Commercial" enterprises. And even if one family member works in a budget place for a meager pay, the second, as a rule, already in the so-called commerce or so-called production. But if the very existence of these industries and even more so commerce in our country today is based on bribes, kickbacks, then what kind of honesty in society can we talk about? Again, only about fictitious.

What are migrants really going for?

Migrants allegedly come to us for a meager salary.

Do you think it's true? Alas. This is a very well-organized system, with an agreement of roles and zones of influence on national, religious and diaspora grounds. Everything is scheduled and everything is taken into account. If you think, looking at some Kirghiz, that he is poor, living in your stairwell in a closet under the stairs, came to a meager salary, you are greatly mistaken. Even at the level of the last Kyrgyz, and even more so their social "Majors", "Colonels", they know exactly why they are here.

They came to take land from the degrading Russians and other indigenous peoples. And you think they will leave here? No. They were given such an opportunity, too, not by chance, but this is a separate conversation.

Their patrons have been in Russia for a long time and "Work" at the very top of the criminal-bureaucratic pyramid. We only have one way left:

create an order for themselves so that it can be broadcast to the nearest territories, so that they request it themselves.

This will happen exclusively with a change in the social paradigm, concept and the development of a practically applicable ideology on its basis. On the basis of ideology, scientific, political, economic and other systems are built … We have to learn a lot, understand a lot, go through a lot. And we don't have much time for that. The entire population makes money. And he is in a hurry to satisfy his ever growing parasitic needs.

Russia yesterday and today

In the USSR yesterday and in Russia today, the following proverb is very popular: "If you are so smart, why are you so poor?" The answer to this question is not at all difficult. People who can be called the "Man of the Russian Civilization" have, for the most part, a heightened sense of justice. We inherited this from our ancestors who survived conciliarly in difficult climatic conditions.

In conditions when the paradigm of society is money, our people, though forced to survive, adjusting to the rules of the game imposed from above, but he does it reluctantly and without much enthusiasm. A system built on automatic lifting upthe most immoral people, does not give a decent person a chance.

Our people cannot and do not want to live in such a system without justice, without a high common Idea. "Okay" … And what does it mean to live well? In essence, as proclaimed in society, it is to have money. Using the oligarchy as an example, we discussed above that this is a delusion.

In the USSR, the idea was voiced about equality of all to all … But, like many slogans of those years, it remained a slogan. So we are arranged objectively, that our child is always closer to us than a neighbor's, always closer to a fellow soldier than someone from a division, always closer to a Russian to a Russian than to a Russian to an Uzbek, always closer to a Russian than an American, etc. This is how it works. There are, of course, exceptions, and there are all sorts of combinations. But we are talking about basic, decisive laws.

What happened in 1991?

We are told that all the people in 1991 were "thrown". Let's think about who you can "throw" … It seems to me that you can throw someone who sat down to play cards in the hope of winning money. You can throw a reseller who came to buy a deficit. But if you run, say, a farm, how can you come and throw you?

Now, if you were told that you seem to be running a farm, and then they told you: "You don't rule anymore" … Well, everyone shrugged their shoulders, what can you do, nothing has changed.

We are told that in the USSR, everyone had a share. How nice to be in "Share", very much this word warms up. How truly magical it is. But it, in fact, means that you don't need to do anything, you don't need to make decisions, you don't need to take responsibility for others, you don't need to nurture and give birth to ideas either, you are in a share and you are secured, calm.

To each according to his work?

In the USSR, the most important information was hidden from us. We were told that labor is divided into mental and physical. Hiding by this the fact that labor is divided into managerial and productive. Further, the work of people is divided into four more main categories.

Managerial is divided into:

1) Administrative and managerial labor

2) Creative and managerial work

The productive one is divided into:

1) Mechanically productive labor

2) Creative and productive work.

Well, please tell me what shares should be in a person standing on a conveyor and with a bell who does not even remember the name of his plant, and the one who invented and launched this conveyor. Who came up with the most complex product that is made on this conveyor. Who runs this plant, or who improves the operation of this plant, comes up with new methods of administration and tests them in practice? Day and night living by the Deed …

The difference between labor and labor can be the same as between glass and diamond. It looks almost the same, but in quality and value - heaven and earth. The Soviet system almost did not take this into account, equating the work of a creator or manager with the work of a person on a conveyor belt.

Social puppet in the USSR

Society is controlled in many ways, and since we are describing the topic of what was “done” to us, let's look at how we did it.

Remember the movie The Diamond Arm? And a cute-looking song from it: "Song about hares" ? In fact, this is a matrix, a phrase from it: "we do not care" performed so original Nikulin, there is a code phrase of the late USSR. After the whole country began to purr this song, its meaning was inevitably broadcast to all the activities of people. This is how they do it, including, of course.

You can also write many films and phrases from them here. For example, the same Gaidai with the phrase: “He who does not work eats. Learn student.

And the songs? This is a separate topic altogether. It's like Christianity. First, under a plausible pretext, they make people with a slavish worldview, and then they do abominations and crimes under your inability to discriminate and your inability to organize Goodness on your land.

The whole system of education, sports, religions, entertainment, "culture" makes a spectator out of a person. And then we are surprised that we are not doing anything or we are doing badly. We just don't know how, we are spectators! Everything, remote control and popcorn in hand and booty in the sofa - look and listen, Satan speaks and shows. We are plankton, energy batteries for someone. So, at first they bought us for a doll of a good life "in a share", and only then they threw us, and how not to throw it … First, our native holidays were taken away from us. fights and other entertainment collective. Actions in which everyone was not a spectator, but a participant, the creator of the process. And our famous choral singing? Such a society could not be conquered without some kind of long-term cunning plan, and an army of villains

How to live on?

The question is not whether we are good or bad. Not that our sages were not very much and missed, for example, Christianity in Russia. The question here is that those who conquered us so competently came with a very specific plan, with a goal. They have already even tried and polished methods, the level of immorality of which people in Russia could not even imagine.

Moreover, the goals and methods of achieving them are competently and cynically camouflaged as good.

All their actions were coordinated. Among them was a system of strictest discipline and methods of collecting and transmitting information. Normal people, without opening this system, without describing everything in lexical form, without giving people other goals, could not change the situation.

It became possible only now with the advent of Public Safety Concepts … Only now with knowledge and understanding of the Concept, with management skills when using IT. Inspired by good intentions and healthy enthusiasm, we will be able to unfold the vectors of Civilization for the Benefit of all people on the planet.