Unobvious reasons for world parasitism

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

When it comes to talking about the parasitic multilayer system cultivated by our civilization, the analysis rarely goes further than the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Illuminati. Like, all the tsimus is in these comrades. This is very partly true, but also very superficial. The simplest analysis shows that the principle of parasitism itself is widely represented in areas to which these comrades have nothing to do.

Which in turn means that the Rockefeller-Rothschilds are not the root cause, but the same consequence of another more important and deeper reason. The underlying structure of today's civilization. Civilization itself is built on this principle. Now we will show it. As usual, briefly.

To show this, let's go back 50 thousand years ago, when there was no sapiens yet. Rather, it was, but by sapiens we mean his Cro-Magnon model. It appeared about 40 thousand years ago. Until that time, the Neanderthal was the king of nature. Being not a very weak uncle, he resolved issues mainly on his own, often using a forceful scenario, and therefore was largely independent.

Any civilization built on the Neanderthal had to be two-speed, when this uncle did different work, and what work was decided by another uncle, smarter and perhaps not so strong. But smart. It is clear that this second had to be different from the first physically (and genetically, respectively). It is clear that the Neanderthal saw this difference. And it is clear that this civilization could exist only in ideal conditions, because any long-term problems were guaranteed to lead to the fact that the Neanderthal said - you are evil, I will leave you - and went free into the pampas. Because he was independent and could take great care of himself. Unlike the clever people who needed this uncle for various jobs.

In this case, the smart ones were heavily dependent on them. Is it good - they thought. Most likely they shouldn't have liked it. I would definitely not like it. And since they are smart, they were probably looking for ways to change the Neanderthal. Well, such as genetic selection, there, crossing of species, do not expect mercy from nature, etc. And so, after some experiments, these Michurinians did create a less powerful and dependent creature, but also more agreeable to collectivization.

Moreover, the whole genius of this invention lay in the invariance of the model. If the Neanderthal was stable but little modified during life, then this new model, due to its collectivity, was more developed. If thrown in the forest, then it remained a weak, muggle shadow of a Neanderthal, which had little chance of global success. But collective social coexistence gave a lot of advantages over its predecessors.

Those who preferred to live in communities of 25-30 people, since the subsistence economy that they led did not allow them to scrape together food for a larger population within the community. Since the Neanderthals led a gatherer-hunting way of life, and he needs large lands.

In addition, the new model was more dependent on civilization and civilizers, which, in general, was required. Moreover, the model was designed in such a way that civilizers could take its forms, with sufficient development of this model. In modern terms, this is called initiation. That is, the working model visually differed very little from the managerial one and did not cause rejection, as in the case of the Neanderthal. Bingo!

Here a whole gamut of issues was solved, which were impossible to implement under the Neanderthal man. Needless to say, as soon as this model was obtained, the meaning in the existence of the latter disappeared. The species, which existed for 300 thousand years, disappeared without any cataclysms in less than 1000 years. If you say that he was not helped in this, it will look very strange. But the "help" could be different. I come to the conclusion that there were almost natural reasons. Since every Neanderthal tribe requires large territories, the expansion of the Cro-Magnon habitat automatically leads to the disappearance of the Neanderthal, as it was in Japan with the Japanese and Ainu. Although, they probably ate someone, not without it.

Here it must be added that modern scientists assert that the person turned out somewhere in Africa. They don't specify which model is specific. If we talk about the Cro-Magnon, then his homeland is just not Africa but Europe. The area now occupied by Aquitaine and Gascony in France and also by the Basques in Spain. Thus, that "African" person has a very indirect relationship to the current model. And today's man is basically a descendant of the Cro-Magnon. Let's go further.

Having received a promising model, residents of Michurin began to build social models based on it. Since the model was highly dependent on collective action, the phenomenon turned out that when a Neanderthal solved an issue, he did everything himself, and the Cro-Magnon solved it by forcing him to do others together.

So Michurinians got the opportunity to integrate into civilization on an absolutely natural basis, without rejection of society, but on the contrary, with its full support. Moreover, the presence of problems only strengthened the dependence of the population on Michurinists and increased their power. Needless to say, the creation of artificial problems has become an integral part of modern society. Since it retains the status of managers. Come judge us, sir.

There really was a problem. If the Neanderthal was strong and dense, and therefore mentally safe, then the new model, and without any initiation, had the opportunity, with the development of skills, to reach a state of development, relatively close to the Michurinians, and sufficient to create independent sources of control. It was both good and bad. But more is bad.

The bad thing is that a rather small local gathering of uninitiated (Yale) Cro-Magnons, a little smarter than the rest of their neighbors, could self-organize into a clan or clan. The genus possessed its own internal laws and did not want to obey external control at all. On the agenda of the Michurinians were dumped two pressing issues - the first, how to destroy the clans and the second, how to make the population stupid.

The second issue - negative selection - has long been proven by independent anthropologists. Although addicts continue to argue with them. This is fine. Grants, s. But the methods of negative selection were still unclear. A small analysis of Russian poets, for example, was done by Vladimir Semyonovich Vysotsky. Remember his "Who ended his life tragically is a true poet." The author of the study also did not pass this cup, apparently somehow he felt it.

Since nothing is accidental, it can be assumed that the individual informational attitudes of many prominent personalities are not put forward by someone in the best way for them. This causes increased wear and tear of their organisms and, as a result, early care. Thus, when exhibiting positive characteristics, on the contrary, already for a non-initiative deep population, it is possible to increase their reproductive capacity and percentage in the population. Which works like a subtle negative selection.

Of course, all this is leveled by natural selection, where the smartest survives, therefore, the primary task of the Michurinists was to abolish this selection by raising the civilizational level and dependence on public services. Automation of production, global division of labor and electronic intelligence contribute to this in no small measure.

Civilization is built in such a way that only those who can do only one thing, but a lot and quickly, without thinking, can survive economically. Multi-machine operators and generalists are doomed with this approach. Which also works for negative selection. As a result, the volume of the brain over the past several thousand years has decreased in the average Cro-Magnon (that is, you and me) by about 10-15%. And the system is working properly.

The process of destruction of clans and clans has almost been completed with the introduction of states as instruments of oppression / organization / methods of development (emphasize the necessary) and continues to progress towards the destruction of families and other small remaining social formations towards the atomic state of society, which is the easiest to manage. Especially in the presence of recognition systems, social classifications and other artificial and intellectual features of the New Wonderful World.

Thanks to all these transformations, the degree of parasitism of civilization reaches unprecedented values for wildlife. Since the measure of success is paper or electronic money - essentially worthless pieces of paper or tic-tac-toe on media - real work is devalued and depends entirely on the mood of those who print these pieces of paper.

That allows them, in the presence of proven mechanisms for returning funds to the base, simply to rob real producers or resource holders in exchange for these worthless candy wrappers. Which, in turn, takes away the resources necessary for development in favor of purposeless consumption by carefully selected representatives.

And the chances of the robbed to understand or change this mechanism are more and more illusory, since the very structure of civilization, Homo sapiens itself, its current model, is initially dependent on these civilizational buns. Plus, negative selection and the absence of organizational alternative structures (what were the tribal and clan structures, trade unions next in turn, etc.) add color to this picture, bringing it to full completion.

Needless to say, Michurinians are still present in this process, and they are much higher than all the observed Rockefeller-Rothschild horizons. It is these Michurinists who promote further progressive ideas that make the ordinary person more and more dependent on civilization. And with the increase in labor productivity, the discovery of new technologies for civilization, this dependence is seen more and more weighty.

It is she who will be the locomotive of material support for the hypertrophied redistribution of goods from producers to pure consumers, which is popularly called parasitism. This tendency will only grow, and who will be in the first and who will be in the second is spelled out in the information model of society. Whose qualities are suitable for the description of which model - he gets such settings. Thus, the qualities that Michurinians need will be brought up. And which ones are easy to guess. Dependence, obedience, lack of initiative. Those who are violent, disobedient, independent will have different attitudes. The song of Vladimir Semyonovich was about them.

It is certainly tempting to slide down to complete dependence on civilization (electric car, electric gene, electric muzh, etc., all electric), but for these buns they require a fee (obey), which not everyone will go to. On the other hand, shooting back into the fields and gardens is also stupid.

As the saying goes, the Reds came - they rob, the Whites came - they also rob. Where can the poor peasant go. It is difficult to say, perhaps the best position is somewhere in the middle. And since there are many middle ways, everyone has their own, then everyone decides for himself where it goes. In fact, finding your middle ground, a balance between social dependence and personal freedom, is finding your place in life. In my opinion, so.

Which is what I wish everyone. Well, all the best.