Roman law - a concise vocabulary for slaves

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Many have heard that the legislation of most states, including Russia, is based on the so-called "Roman law". But what is actually hidden behind this concept? And what is the difference between a person and a citizen, spelled out in the Constitution of the Russian Federation?

Author of this article, blogger rodom_iz_tiflis

The topic of Roman law was suggested assucareiraand turned out to be so deep that I doubt my modest possibilities to reveal it even superficially. I do not have the slightest legal education or experience, so I just collect and compare well-known, but rarely mentioned facts, and make your own conclusions. I, as a person, from birth have every right to express my own opinion.

IMPORTANT NOTE:

The Constitution of the Russian Federation is taken as an example, for the purpose of illustration. There are no calls in the article to change the existing constitutional order. Even if it may seem so to you. This article is just an analysis of free sources.

Slave law

Roman law is the right of society slaveformations, but it is on Roman law that the legal systems of Russia, all European countries and most countries of the world are built. In other words, the legal structure of most countries is based on the principles of slavery, which is reflected in the symbolism (see below), the constitution (see below) and I clearly feel it on my own skin.

The economic foundations of slavery

A man owns the results of his labor, while a slave does not. This is the main economic meaning of slavery.

What does the Constitution of the Russian Federation say about the ownership of the results of labor (Article 37):

Article 37

3. Exercise of rights and freedoms humanand citizenshould not violate the rights and freedoms of others."

It is important that a person and a citizen are two different legal concepts, in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Chapter 17 they are used jointly "a person and a citizen", and in paragraph 2 of the same chapter there is only a "person" and speaks of his rights FROM BIRTH. In accordance with Roman law, a "man" by legal status corresponds to a patrician, and a "citizen" - to a plebeian, that is, to a slave.

The fact that a slave considers himself a man (that is, a patrician) is legally insignificant, that is, it does not mean anything. Citizenship is certified by an official document that is legally binding.

If you still have doubts about your status, please note that the Constitution stipulates a referendum, the second name of which is plebescite, that is, the expression of opinion by the plebs. As whom do you have the right to participate in the referendum?

Rome

What is Rome? It's a strange question, isn't it?

Rome is not a location, not a state, not a nationality, but a legal structure of a society based on the principles of slavery.

It is well known that in addition to Rome in the form of a republic and - subsequently - an empire, there were:

1. (Eastern) Roman Empire - Imperium Romanum

Also known as:

- Byzantine Empire

- Roman Empire

- Basil Romeon

- Romania

- Greek Kingdom

I think everyone knows about the similarities of this coat of arms with the Russian, Austrian, and many others.

2. Holy Roman Empire - Sacrum Imperium Romanum

Since the Middle Ages, it has been called: Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. It was founded by Otto the Great as a direct continuation of ancient Rome at the time of the baptism of Rus and Byzantium and existed until the era of Pushkin and Napoleon.

3. The Third Reich - Drittes Reich, literally - the Third Empire.

It is enough to look at the symbolism to see the continuity:

The first Reich, or empire, was considered the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation itself, and the second Reich was Kaiser's Germany. You don't have to be a linguist to read in the Kaiser - Caesar, Roman Caesar. And on the head of Kaiser Wilhelm II is the same recognizable eagle:

Note also the Maltese cross to Wilhelm and compare the symbolism with the sign of the President of the Russian Federation:

4. Third Rome

The idea of a third Rome, allegedly, remained just an idea, despite the symbolism and principles of the structure of the Russian Empire

Caesars The kings of the Russian state, according to traditional history, since 1762 are the Holstein-Gottorp dynasty, the closest relatives of the Hanoverian dynasty, which became the ruling Windsor dynasty in England. However, their claims to Roman status are unequivocally expressed in the surname they chose for themselves - the Romanovs (Roman, from Roma-Rome).

5. Romania

The name of the country comes from lat. "romanus" - "Roman".

The Romanian language is very close to Italian, which, in turn, directly goes back to "folk Latin". The eagle coat of arms completes the composition.

There are also a number of other large and small countries, peoples even of the Sultanate, with a direct reference to Rome.

Thus, Rome, Roman is not a territorial, not a national, not a hereditary sign, but the status of a society based on the principles slavery.

Symbolism

The legal system implies a system of punishment for acts provided for in the law. Violation of the law leads to punishment, which in Roman law was carried out by lictors (executioners). The symbol of the lictors was the fascia, which gave the name to the fascist movement:

- National Fascist Party (Italy)

- National Fascist Party (Germany

Fascia is widely represented in state symbols, I propose to familiarize yourself with the gallery. Fasciae are ubiquitous in St. Petersburg, in particular - on the bas-relief of St. Isaac's Cathedral.

The cover of the "revolutionary" Constitution of the RSFSR of 1918 with two fascias deserves special attention:

That is, the RSFSR was built on the same principles of Roman law. I want to note that the Constitution of the USSR of 1936 (Stalin's), in my opinion, is built on completely different principles, and does not contain Roman symbols. It looks like Stalin made an attempt to organize society on a different principle, and it is not for me to judge how successful he was in this.

I understood in a different way why Spartak was (and remains in Russia!) One of the most popular sports teams in the USSR. For me, the words from which school began: "We are not slaves" sounded differently …

The fact that the emblem of the Federal Penitentiary Service of the Russian Federation is closely crammed with Roman symbols once again confirms the broadest application of Roman law up to the present moment:

What is fascia and what is the meaning of symbolism? Nowhere is it really said about this, it is officially said that this is a bunch of birch or elm branches, into which a bi-penis was inserted (sorry moa), he is also a Labris. The LBR-LWR set of letters is commonly used in connection with the legal aspects of slavery:

- LaBRis, as a weapon of an executioner who legally has the right to kill a slave

- LiBRa, scales required for the mansipation procedure described in Roman law (transfer of ownership of a slave). Until now, the scales are a symbol of justice.

- LiBRa, the measure of weight is the Roman pound, from which the Italian Lira is derived. A piece of metal by weight was required for the legal validity of the mansipation procedure

- LiBeR, Roman patron god of plebeian slaves

- LiBeR, freedom in Latin. Note that there are two synonymous concepts in English - Liberty and Freedom. I believe the former applies to slaves seeking freedom, the latter to freeborn patricians.

- LaBoR, labor

and so on, and so on …

But back to the fascia. Here is the etymology of this word (link):

From Proto-Indo-European * bhasko (“bundle, band”), see also Proto-Celtic * baski (“bundle, load”), Ancient Greek φάκελος (phákelos, “bundle”) …

Fakelos !!! In ancient Greek - FAKELOS !!! Now the torchlight processions of the fascists (or it would be more correct to call them torch-bearers, in ancient Greek) and the torch in the hands of LiBeRty - the statue of the USA's liberty - become clear. So that no one has any illusions.

In my opinion, the fasces were used in the execution at the stake, which was widely used by the Romans and spelled out in Roman law as one of the punishments, long before the Inquisition established by the Roman Catholic Church. Tradition, so to speak. That is, the fascia is both a symbol and a tool for enforcing the law. Pay attention to the bundles in the fire and bi-penises (the entertainers were the Romans!) In the background:

I will add to the symbols of Roman law the Roman toga - a wide woolen cloak or mantle, which only querent people had the right and obligation to wear - slave owners who were free from entire sections of Roman law and potentially had the right to judge themselves.

The emperors wore a purple (purple, crimson) toga, and querent people who wanted to get into the Senate - whitewashed, snow-white, which they called Candida, and future senators, respectively, candidates.

Wherever there are fasciae, torches, scales, robes, purple as symbols - you can rest assured that Roman law applies.

Well, "three in one" - George Washington, chairman of the Philadelphia Convention, which adopted the US Constitution, free mason, with an outstretched toga in the background and fascia at the right leg. Check out also Abraham Lincoln's supposed abolisher of slavery articles on togas and fascias.

Nationality and citizenship

Obtaining citizenship to the Russian Empire meant voluntary slavery (servitude) and was obtained through baptism into the Orthodox faith.

The decree of 1700 (without month and day) identified “ baptism Orthodox Christian Faith "with" a departure in the name of the Great Sovereign to eternal servitude."

The Senate decree of August 27, 1747 "On the oath promise of foreigners wishing to swear allegiance to eternal citizenship of Russia" introduced the moment of eternity into the text of the oath: a kind and obedient slave and an eternal subject with my surname …"

Now it becomes clear the stubbornness with which they refused to baptize in Russia, because it automatically meant slavery, according to the decrees! In any case, slavery for foreigners, but by that time Russia had already become an Orthodox serf, and it is completely incomprehensible when and by what right slavery began.

The principle of identity “subject = slave” has not changed even today, only the form and names have changed. De facto, you CANNOT REFUSE citizenship of your own free will, you can only CHANGE citizenship. This article uses a real example to describe how a lawyer and jurist with a non-Russian surname made an unsuccessful attempt to renounce Russian citizenship.

There is also a video in English on the network about how parents in the UK refused to register the birth of a child, and they succeeded by law! And on the topic of the fact that birth certificates are securities traded on American stock exchanges, a huge number of videos have been filmed.

Everything becomes clear if we turn to Roman law. Slaves, as well as livestock, are property and can be transferred (not sold, namely, transferred) to another owner in the course of the mancipation procedure (alienation of the rights of one owner and the simultaneous acquisition of rights to slaves or livestock by another owner). We are well aware of the name of the movement for mancipation - E-mansipation, when women want to move from a slave position in the family to another form of slavery, that is, to change their masters.

Once again - a slave cannot become free, he can only change the owner with a great desire. You cannot free yourself from citizenship, you can change citizenship if you want to. Well, take a look, after all, at the symbols on the covers of passports:

And do not flatter yourself - "Common Law" of Great Britain and the absence of an eagle on the cover of the British passport is not an option. The law of the sea has even more "interesting" features that should be written about separately.

State

And again, a stupid question - what is a state?

The republic-public, the main form of the structure of most states, comes from the Latin "res publica", which is translated as "common cause". That is, a republic is a form of a social order that is united by a "common cause."

There is a very similar well-known expression in the closest to Latin - Italian language, which, although it sounds dissimilar, but means "our business", I would say - "our common business." Of course, you guessed it - the translation of "our case" is Cosa Nostra.

Why did the mafia choose such a name, so clearly read by "people in the subject"? Does the state structure have anything in common with armed groups that are involved in drug trafficking, slave trade, and murder of innocent people?

Yes, there were a number of state corporations, from the East India Companies to the Russian-American Company, with their own flag, embassies, and regular troops. These companies are often confused with states, and, for example, the first Indian War of Independence (the Sepoy revolt), as well as the first Opium War in China, were wars against the British East India Corporation, not Britain as a state.

So where is that fine line between government and corporation? From the point of view of Roman law, there is no difference, it is just an unification of people.

This is how such a union was defined:

"Those who are allowed to form a union under the name of a collegium, a partnership, or under another name of the same kind, acquire the property of having common things, a common treasury and a representative or a syndicate, according to the model of the community, by means of which, as in the community, what must be done and done together "(D.3.4.1.1)."

Considering that citizens are slaves - these are also things, then the Roman provision on unions applies to the state, and to the syndicate of thieves in law, and to other associations of those who are allowed to form an alliance. From the point of view of Roman law, all these unions have a legal basis.

Could some slaves have been more privileged than others? Of course, here's the definition:

"Nomenclator (lat. Nomenclātor from nomen" name "and calare" to call ") - in the Roman Empire, a special slave, a freedman, less often a servant, whose duties were to prompt his master (from the patricians) the names of the masters who greeted him on the street and the names of slaves and servants of the house."

Many people remember the Soviet nomenklatura and its privileged position in comparison with other citizens-slaves.

One could continue, but even so there is already enough information for independent conclusions about who he is and in what position he is.

Do I have a recipe - what to do to change the current situation? No, alas, I'm still in search. Perhaps I will write a separate post about my thoughts, as well as the esoteric component, and perhaps I will not do this. Be careful in the comments, do not break the law when expressing your opinion.

I am human.