Alexandria

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

“Why, you, did you give the Russian everything: lands, lands, oil, gas, gold, diamonds … But you didn’t give me all these riches,” the Ukrainian asked God

The fact that St. Petersburg is not St. Petersburg, I wrote in other works, telling that the legend of its creation does not stand up to criticism. Peter the Great did not build anything on the Chukhonsky swamps, for the very reason that there, a long time ago, stood the Russian city of Oreshek, the northern headquarters of the Russian tsars, emperors of Great Tartary, our Russia or the Horde. The last word was called not so much Russia itself as its armed forces. For example, the chronicler writes in relation to Temnik Velyamin Mamaev, known to you as Mamai: “The horde of Zaleskaya beat you,” meaning not all the armed forces of the country, but one of its “military districts”. Yes, and Mamai is not an evil Tatar, but the most, that neither is a Russian man who hired Livonian (you need to understand European) troops and organized the first civil war known to us in Russia.

In the Novgorod land, Prince Georgy (Yuri) Danilovich founded the Oreshek fortress in 1323. Founded 57 years before the Battle of Kulikovo. Moscow will be founded by Dmitry Donskoy, and the battle itself will take place on its modern territory, the famous Kulishki, where they were previously sent to hell. The city that bears the name of Peter is older than Moscow, although I do not exclude that it is possible that a certain settlement existed there before the Kulikovo field, but definitely not a capital city.

In my miniature about the Nyenshan world, on the basis of which Sweden had the Baltic and the shores of the Gulf of Finland (bought, not conquered, although there were battles too), I wrote that Peter in a strange way, in a few years, rose from the swamps, and it confuses me. Then there was another series of miniatures, where I developed the theme and found which city was issued for the construction of St. Petersburg. Those who wish will read all this in my cycle of miniatures "Around and around Peter". I also wrote that Peter the Great and Peter the Great are different people, claiming that Peter the Great is a man named Isaac, in whose honor the famous Cathedral in St. Petersburg was built. I studied in this city, in a closed educational institution, and this city is Leningrad for me. Therefore, do not blame me, the reader, if I will write it that way.

Isaac has always attracted me with his architecture, and I found a lot in common with Stockholm. Strange, not Russian architecture, with Roman sculptures amazed the imagination, but it pulled me, all the same, as if it were my own.

The gradual study of the epics of Russia led me to an amazing conclusion - this building did not belong to the talent of the French Montferrand. By the way, there is no such nationality, this is citizenship. This is the work of Russian architects, only the official period of the construction of the cathedral has not been established by historians, but many early times, dating back to the 14-15 centuries.

What was Peter building? Peter was building a certain fortress, which is now called Oreshek, and he did not build, but restored. He simply renamed the real Oreshek in the city of his own name, and transferred the name to the place of a small fortress.

Did not build Peter and the Peter and Paul Fortress. It was and its polygonal layout, indicates its construction by the Russians of the 14-15th centuries. Perhaps, there was a construction of some structures in the fortress, but most likely they are just a reconstruction of those already there.

I talked about the "antique" monuments of Leningrad, about the Alexander Column, which for some reason everyone calls the Pillar of Alexandria, on Palace Square and much more, which appeared much earlier than the official date of the construction of St. Petersburg.

And yet Isaac did not give me rest. Too well he fit into the "antique" architecture of Russian architects.

And then I decided to look at different engravings that would be available to me, say, on the Internet. The very first glance at the captured material plunged into amazement - Isaac exists on engravings, long before his appearance in 1858. Moreover, I did not set myself the goal of climbing into the times before the 19th century, although I am sure that there will be no less evidence of forgery and falsification of the construction of the temple. It seems to me that I know to whom the Russian people actually built this temple and will name, to whom the Bronze Horseman monument was actually erected, and whose cathedral the Romanovs stole from the Russian epic, passing it off as a temple to Isaac of Dalat, unknown in Russia.

But let me start my story with the official version of the construction of the cathedral?

Today historians say that Isaakiev was three. The first was laid down under Peter the Great, the second from the time of either Elizabeth, or Catherine the Great, but the third … The third is presented like this:

1818 - the project was approved;

1828 - the beginning of the installation of the first columns;

1837 - installation of the upper columns;

1838 - gilding of domes began, which lasted until 1841;

1858 - consecration of the cathedral.

Moreover, the Bronze Horseman stood before this cathedral was erected, as evidenced by the inscription on the Thunder Stone, the pedestal of the monument. Here is the Russian version:

"TO PETER the Pervy EKATERINA second lt 1782"

I ask readers to pay attention to the spelling of the word "first". I turned to a well-known linguist for advice and received an answer that discouraged me - the inscription does not belong to a resident of Leningrad. The person who wrote this inscription is clearly not German Catherine and not a native of St. Petersburg in the 18th century. This is a feature of the Central Russian dialect, rather this Volga, or possibly Moscow.

Here is an excerpt from a letter from a friend of mine who is studying Russian:

“In St. Petersburg of the XIX century. there was a colloquial pronunciation, which was suggested to be avoided: vyunosh, sharp-eyed, vokhra; at the same time, vobla spoke and wrote, eight (the last two are now recognized as the literary norm). The ancient pronunciation with a soft "er" in the words FIRST, verkh, four and others was gradually replaced by the pronunciation with a hard p, which is characteristic of St. Petersburg vernacular (today it is literary). That is, the inscription on the monument was made to some kind of ancient Peter, but not to Catherine's. She simply could not know this peculiarity of pronunciation, just as Falcone could not know it. No joke, on the antique monument to write common words, which were avoided in the age of Catherine, and indeed long forgotten. Can you present Putin's report at the RNBO in Old Russian or in Church Slavonic? Of course not! Putin knows neither one nor the other.

But among the people, the rider was exactly the FIRST, and he wrote it down on the monument.

I found a painting on which there was no inscription at all in 1820: M. N. Vorobiev. St. Isaac's Cathedral and the monument to Peter. 1844 This painting has many small details, but there is no inscription on the Thunder Stone of the Bronze Horseman. I doubt that an artist, and even Vorobyov, would be inaccurate.

Excuse me, gentlemen, what is there in the background of the picture? My dear mother, but this is St. Isaac's Cathedral! With gilded domes, with columns - a magnificent cathedral, which is depicted like this 12 years before its consecration.

Of course, one can imagine that the work on the facade was completed, but where is the fence around the construction site? And this is with our tradition to pull off everything that lies badly ?! Where are scaffolding finally scaffolding? The cathedral is clearly well maintained and functioning.

That's when I climbed further. And again, the amazing is near, but it is forbidden. So, it seems, V. Vysotsky sang. Risking to get to the Kanarchikova dacha, I moved back centuries, studying various lithographs and engravings. The depth was not so deep - only a quarter of a century.

View of St. Isaac's Square from the Senate. Unknown author. Painted lithograph. 1820s Isaac in all its glory, but the monument to Peter is not in its usual place. Excuse me, but the project was approved only in 1818 and there should be nothing but a construction site! Have you seen our construction sites? Make it Chaos! And, nevertheless, two years after the approval of the project, the cathedral stands shining in beauty. With a gilded dome.

Today we are convinced that 60 people died from poisoning with mercury vapor, and during gilding a different technology was used than leaf (front) gold. Interestingly, experts would confirm this if they looked at the dome close up. Something tells me that there is no trace of mercury.

Returning to the death of Isaac's goldsmiths, one should pay attention to the fact that the copper sheets of the dome were covered with gilding at a copper-cast iron factory located on the Gutuevsky island of St. Petersburg and owned by the Scotsman Charles Byrd. At that time, carriages, dishes, figurines and other utensils were also gilded there. But the main order was, of course, the dome of Isaac. It happened like this. The surface of the copper sheets was thoroughly cleaned from fat, ground and polished, and then covered with amalgam - a solution of gold in mercury. After that, the sheets were heated on special charcoal braziers, constantly rubbing the amalgam until the mercury evaporated. At the same time, gold diffused into copper and a thin gold film remained on the sheet. Today, you will be told that this type of gilding is prohibited, but here's an interesting thing - the Moscow Kremlin also has an amalgam of 1898, but there is no news of deaths.

I inquired about Gutuevsky Island and Charles Byrd, asking my fellow detectives to check if there were traces of mercury on this island. The specialists went to those places and checked all the maps that must exist in every city in the services of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Russian Federation. The point is that the places where such factories worked are FOREVER, dangerous to occupy.

The island, now called Gutuevsky, has changed many names. The Finns called him Vitsasaari, that is, Prutov, or Kustarnikov ("witsa" in Finnish means a twig, a vine; "saari" - an island). On the plan of St. Petersburg in 1716, this island is called Uninhabited; on the plan of St. Petersburg in 1717, published in France, the island is designated under the name of St. Catherine. Later we meet other names: Krugly, Primorsky, and then Novosiltsev - after the name of its former owner, the wealthy lieutenant Novosiltsev.

At the end of the 18th century, the island was bought from Novosiltsev by the Olonets merchant-shipbuilder Konon Guttuev, who later was a ratman (advisor) of the department of civil affairs of the city magistrate. The island got its modern name from the surname of the former owner. So the history of this island is purely maritime, there has always been a port and not a single factory, and even more so the mention of Charles Byrd. For the first time this name appears in the 20th century, simultaneously with the names of the "Peter's builders" of St. Petersburg. Apparently, this is a legend, because, as a safe amalgam of ancient Russian masters, it was already forgotten, and the tests with mercury from the British and Europeans ended in failure. Russia always shone with domes, but Europe did not. There is practically no such coverage.

The maps showed - no traces of mercury were observed on the island in the next millennium.

So, Isaac in the paintings shines with gold and architecture much earlier than its construction began. However, it doesn't hurt to check.

Lithograph from the album of Montferrand, last page. Parade on Palace Square in honor of the opening of the Alexandria Column on August 30, 1834. Despite the fact that Montferrand allegedly completed the Cathedral only in 1858, he depicts it in finished form in 1834.

Engraver A. Apert after drawing by I. Charlemagne. General view of St. Petersburg. 1840. The cathedral is shown ready.

View of the Isaac's bridge and the new cathedral. Lithograph and drawing by G. Tretter. 1820s The Bronze Horseman is not in his place, to the left and closer to the barracks of the naval crew, and the cathedral is standing and even gilded, although according to the official version it was gilded in 1838-1841. And Tregger saw him gold for a long time, 20 years before the start of work.

View of St. Isaac's Square from the Senate. Unknown author. Painted lithograph. 1820s There is no monument in its usual place. The square is empty and the Senate building blocks the right side. What if the Horseman is right there. Check it out! The version is correct, here is the confirmation:

View of St. Isaac's Church and the bridge. Lithographers L.-P. Bishebois, V. V. Adam. 1840th. The rider stands to the right of the Isaac Bridge.

So this is where all these legends about the transportation of the Thunder-stone and the copper Peter galloping at night come from !!! The monument was simply dragged from place to place! And the reason is simple - if the figure could be removed from the stone, then the stone could not be broken. Although they tried. There are clearly three different structures visible on the stone.

Here's what I think about this. First, the Romanovs removed the FIRST figure from the pedestal and decided to blow up the Thunder Stone. The result is minor cracks at the base of the stone, front and back. Look, do not be lazy, the photo is currently available on the net. According to my fellow miners, this is exactly how they undermine the rock, but you can see the Thunder-stone, seriously goes into the depths and much more than we think. He was always there and no one dragged him anywhere, until the Romanovs got down to business, or rather those who pretend to be them. After an unsuccessful attempt to undermine, on a stone, work was carried out to restore its appearance. Damage sites were tightened with geopolymer concrete and sanded with granite chips, and the color could not be found. So now they make granite monuments in cemeteries, applying crumb to a concrete base. Like granite, like marble, like basalt. And then grinding. Granite is not layered, gentlemen. It is not for nothing that it is called the eternal stone, which is homogeneous and mined in the Urals, different from that mined in Tibet. Different conditions of birth, this is what I say to you as an obstetrician on stones.

It's time to turn to your geological friends. The answer was not long in coming - scientist Viktor Kreidenkov explains:

Erratic boulders - (from the Latin errandus wandering) large stones transported by a glacier over long distances, therefore, may differ from local rocks:

That is what my friends, in my opinion, and it is so clear that the Thunder-stone stood there long before the appearance of the city of Nut, which was later renamed Peter. This is a boulder, which was processed by ancient sculptors, for a pedestal, some kind of Russian saint. I have already mentioned it in other works and am not going to hide it in this one. This is a monument to George the Victorious, the real founder of the Russian Nut, Prince George Danilovich, who is also called CHINGISKHAN (great khan per.). And here's what I'm guessing. Peter the First (as it is written with a small letter and with a soft era on the stone) is one of the names of Georgy Danilovich, most likely his godfather. Apparently he was born on Peter's Day, in the summer, when brooms for the bath should be prepared - the leaf is the strongest.

Falcone did not cast anything, this is not his profile at all. He had never done anything like this before the Bronze Horseman, never after. By the way, Montferand is not an architect, but a draftsman. Montferrand's album is what he did in St. Petersburg - he painted from life. Falcone, simply made a hand to George the Victorious, changing its position and removing the spear. It was this hand that tormented him at night, and he writes about it in all his correspondence, not saying a word about the monument itself. And the head, George, was attached by Falcone's student-mistress. Everything else was there. Isaac also stood.

We tried to move the Thunder Stone, oh how we tried. An echo of these works is the story of the delivery of a stone from the shores of the Gulf of Finland and Peter galloping at night. At first they were able to move to the left by several tens of meters, but the admiralty began to crack and even collapsed. It was then that they built a new one, announcing that the old one had burned down. Swindlers, in a word. They dragged the stone back to its old place, but there was not enough strength. Left in the middle. All this is in the lithographs I have indicated and in many of the paintings.

The fact that Isaac is an ancient building, I guessed even as a cadet, 35 years ago. And the reason is simple, we were told how much work it cost to transport the granite columns for the cathedral, and I asked the guide why the granite had stratified. Traces of a fallen fur coat are visible on the columns. All the same technology as in the repair of the Thunder Stone. The Alexandrian pillar on the Palace Square, and many other megaliths were made in the same way. Including Stonehenge. This is an artificial stone. I remember that they didn’t answer me at that time and simply turned the conversation to hoarfrost topics. Much later, from the work of Moscow scientists, I learned that the Giza pyramids were also built of geopolymer concrete covered with crumbs. In general, all stones in ancient buildings, where it is impossible to push a sheet of paper between them, these are artificial stones and a method of construction, this is formwork.

However, then I did not understand how ancient it is and to whom it was delivered. I really believed that Isaac was a Russian saint who was always revered. But with today's knowledge, I will say that they did not know him until the 18th century, and the wooden church for him, or the first Isaac, erected by Peter-Isaac to his saint, stood in a completely different place. St. Isaac's Cathedral was already standing with a gilded dome when Peter and his retinue arrived on the banks of the Neva. And it stood for a long time, like the Kazan Cathedral and many buildings of that time. By the way, there was also the Winter Palace, which was simply completed to the complex over the Winter Canal. And further. Peter did not dig canals on Vasilievsky Island. They were there before him. On the contrary, he fell asleep on them, destroying the memory of Northern Palmyra, the northern Venice of the Slavs. Now these are the lines of Vasilievsky Island.

However, back to the cathedral. I have been looking for historical parallels in this case for a long time and have found it. In front of Isaac lies the Alexander Garden.

The garden was originally named after Emperor Alexander;;, however, during its history it managed to change several names. After the revolution in 1920 it was renamed the Workers 'Garden, then, in 1936, it became known as the Workers' Garden named after Maxim Gorky. Finally, in 1989, it was renamed the Admiralty Garden, but this was an erroneous return of the historical name, so in 1997 the garden became Aleksandrovsky again. Strange, the column on the palace square was also Alexander's, but then, as I said, it became the Alexandrian pillar. I wrote about her in other works. The column stood there until the accession of the Romanovs, and Augustus Caesar stood on it. Now he is in Odessa. This is Duke Richelieu, or rather the emperor Augustus, who was passed on to him.

And maybe all the same, the garden is not Alexandrovsky, but Alexandria?

Let's fast forward to Byzantium. And again the official version:

The Forum of Emperor Constantine was located in the current Chamberlitas Square in Istanbul. There was a colonnade, statues of pagan gods and Christian saints brought from various temples of the empire.

The central place in the forum was occupied by a majestic column with a marble capital at the top. And on the capital was erected a golden statue of Constantine the Great in the form of the god Apollo with seven rays emanating from his head (this is how Duke looked earlier, standing on a column of Palace Square and holding a spear)

A nail from the Cross of the Son of God was fused into the statue. The height of the monument was 38 meters, it was erected in 330 by the order of Emperor Constantine and stood for 800 years, glorifying the first emperor of the great Empire.

According to legend, under the base of the column, the emperor walled up a cache of holy relics with his own hand - the hatchet from Noah's ax, the armchair of Moses, the remains of Jesus' bread and "Palladium" - a wooden statuette of Pallas Athena.

The Latin Crusaders dug an adit under the column in search of holy relics. The relics were not found, but the foundation was damaged, and they did not see the sculpture. At that moment there was only a column.

I looked through a lot of materials about the construction of a column in St. Petersburg and found drawings and drawings that say that there was a certain structure under it, with windows and doors, which were opened by those who tried to reconstruct the column.

Here's what I'll tell you, reader, before the Latins, the Slavs visited Byzantium. They took the ax from Noah's ax, Moses' chaise, the remnants of the loaves of Jesus and "Palladium" - a wooden statuette of Pallas Athena.

Then, in Nut-Peter, the Alexandrian pillar was completely repeated. This happened during or after the fall of Byzantium, that is, in the 15th century. It was under this pillar that these relics were immured. They lie there to this day.

And the complex of the Kazan Cathedral, Isaac, the Alesandrian pillar, the Alexandrian garden and other buildings is nothing more than a completely reconstructed forum, which was named after Constantine. Constantine only built it, but it was not dedicated to Isaac of Dalmatia. In general, Isaac means LAUGHTER, JOY. That is, it is a temple of JOY, I suspect that the Nativity of Christ.

But why the column and the garden of Alexandria? And here for the answer, one should go even in more ancient times - to the First Rome, to Egypt.

Today we know practically nothing about him. Its capital was Alexandria. The meaning of the name Alexander is the protector of people. In general, in ancient times, the word Alexandria meant what is understood now: a palace-park-temple ensemble. An example is Alexandria Peterhof, or Alexandria Park, is an arboretum in the city of Bila Tserkva, founded at the end of the 18th century (Ukraine). I will develop this thought. Most likely, we are talking about the residence of some kind of ruler. How can we not recall the Hanging Gardens of Babylon?

So the whole complex described by me in St. Petersburg is nothing more than a repetition of the forum of Constantine in Byzantium. By the way, the Vatican is also Alexandria. With his column PETER, who is now revered as an apostle. And we are talking about the same PETER THE FIRST - George the Victorious. The Vatican was built by the Slavs. Batu Khan named him after you - Batya Khan. Do you know who was called that in Russia? Ivan Khalifa, czar-priest, brother of Georgy Danilovich. You know him as Ivan Kalita. Later, when papism decides to secede from the Slavic empire, Peter will appear on the pillar with the keys. But there are no relics under it, but in St. Petersburg there are!

I understand that it is difficult to comprehend what has been said, but this is exactly the case, and not otherwise.

Nutlet was built as the second Byzantium and the Neva, this is the Bosphorus, Jordan.

The mother of the Russian cities, which were built on the model of Byzantium, is not Kiev on the Dnieper. Modern Kiev is generally the Khazar city of Sambat. Kievan Rus is Byzantium.

Byzantium (more precisely Bizant) is a character in ancient Greek mythology. The son of Poseidon and Keroessa (daughter of Zeus and Io), or the son of Nisa from Megar. Descendant of Io, founder of the city of Byzantium. The Byzantine king received the Argonauts.

Who is Io? This is a heavenly cow. Jordan is named after her - a cow ford. This is the famous Slavic Woman in labor or … Mary the Mother of God! That is, Byzantium is not the most ancient name for a city on the Bosphorus, which also translates as a cow's ford.

Byzantium, Kiev, Constantinople, Ilion, Constantinople, Istanbul, Troy, Rome are all the names of the same city on the Black Sea strait - cow ford. He's also a Nut. And Peter is Nut.

Now attention, reader, I will tell you what O-PEX is. This is, PLUGGED FRUIT, the second option EASILY PLUGGED FRUIT. Fruit plucked by Eve. Not an apple, but a nut that Adam ate, for which he was expelled from Paradise.

By the way, byzant-walnut is very common in heraldry, and is depicted in a circle.

Let's go back to Peter. Here is the Peter and Paul Fortress built in the shape of a star (not by Peter and Menshikov!) By our distant ancestors. In the center of it stands the Cathedral of Peter and Paul, with its gilded spire buried in the sky. The fortress itself is on the Hare Island. That is, it is the Star crucified on the cross, the one that is depicted on the crosses of Orthodox churches. Some consider it the Sun. Perhaps I will not argue. And from the very center of the Peter and Paul Fortress, the spire of the cathedral bursts out into the sky, symbolizing the Ray of Resurrection, along which Jesus ascended. Look at the pictures that carry this plot - there is just a ray. Let's draw conditional lines between the extreme points of the rays of the star, its bastions. You will get a cross, which, having the center of the Peter and Paul Cathedral, rests on the base of the Kazan Cathedral on Nevsky Prospekt. This is a very strange cathedral, with its arms wide open to a semicircular colonnade.

We recall the crosses on Russian churches: the cross itself, in the center of it is a star with the initials I. Kh.. We go down to the base: a ball, which is a nut-byzant, and below at the base is a crescent.

That is, we can safely say that Petropavlovka - Kazan Cathedral is a huge cross lying on the ground.

You ask, where is the nut on the cross? My answer is that this is a fountain in the square in front of the Kazan Cathedral. He has always been there, since the construction of the temple of Our Lady of Kazan. Why a fountain? Read my cycle of miniatures "Aqua is a gift from God", but for now remember that water and a horse are spelled the same in Latin. The Trojan horse is not a horse, but an aqueduct through which the Greeks entered Troy or Byzantium. Abandoned aqueduct.

Now let us remember the name of the man who became a type of Christ. Andronik Komnenos, son of the Byzantium sevastocrator and the Russian princess Maria the Mother of God. Room or komon means a horse in Old Russian, and Komnenos is most likely a rider.

In the Bible, he is presented as the son of a carpenter. This is also understandable. Even now the Old Believers call komni carpenters, but not simple ones, but those who make the SKATE on the roof of the hut, or rather the entire roof. As you know, the ridge is called so because the head of the horse, the room, was cut out of the butt of the wood, which lies the entire length of the roof on the rafters. The creators of the Bible deliberately led away from the truth, presenting Comnenus as a carpenter, and he was the king of the Jews, about which he himself spoke more than once. It was only then that the whole people who believed in one God were called Jews, and not the people that are known today.

What is a roof in huts for? The flat roofs of the Arabs do not know the water, but our roofs primarily save from precipitation. That is, the room is a kind of amulet from water and its very sign. Like, don’t urinate me downpour, I’m mine! In Slavic mythology, all elements are indicated by a horse. He was even born in the ocean. That's just not in the world, but in the universal. I already wrote that ether is a special state of water, which is much denser than our Earth. Moisture, steam and ice are just one of the five forms of its state. So Komnenos is the Son of the Ocean. Nikola Tesla said that the entire material world was created from ether.

Please note that the horse is not carved in churches, there is a cross guarding it. That is the sign of God.

And now again to Byzantium.

Calvary or Mount Beykos, hanging over the Jordan-Bosphorus, is located opposite Hagia Sophia, a temple dedicated to the Wisdom of the Creator. It was built by Suleiman the Magnificent, represented in the Bible by Solomon. The construction of a Christian church by a Seljuk Turk, do not be surprised - Islam is the same Christianity as Orthodoxy. This is now orthodoxy declared in translation, as Orthodoxy, in fact, ortho is right, and doxia is faith. So in the early days of Christianity we are all RIGHT. Besides, Suleiman is also Komnenos. A descendant of Mehmed the Call-Giver, whose great-grandfather was Comnenus, one of the children of the husband of Mary the Mother of God, who fled to the Seljuks, but from another woman, built a temple of the Holy Wisdom of God, and not a woman named Sophia. Sophia translates as wisdom. And the word Turk means a person, Turks are people, that is, the ancestor of Suleiman fled to the Suljuk tribe.

The complex with the Column of Constantine, the Hippodrome, Hagia Sophia itself, the gardens around it are somewhat to the right of Mount Beykos.. Exactly the same as in St. Petersburg. In this case, Isaac is not just a temple of the joy of Christmas, but Hagia Sophia - the shamrock of God the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. That is, the Trinity underlying the Wisdom of God.

Before us is the temple of the Trinity or Sophia. You can call it this way and that. The essence is the same. This is a temple that has brought together all the hypostases of God, and therefore Joy. Here is both Christmas and Resurrection. It is a temple to everything that happened under heaven. But the crucifix is taken to the side, to Krestovsky Island. Everything is like in Byzantium-Istanbul.

So, it's time to draw a conclusion. Nutlet was built as a pantheon of Christianity during the fall of the Byzantine Empire at the beginning of the 15th century, although it was laid earlier. This is a city of Russian culture, just not Great Russia, but Kiev-Byzantine. The Roman emperors ruled first in Byzantium, and then their branch, the Comnenus, ruled in great Russia. The Komnenos are the descendants of Christ, according to Mother Mary - her relatives. Rome is the name of God. Same as Rod, only changed to Roma. This name is heard in the echoes of the name of the city on the Tibbra, which was never Rome. And it means all the same God, the ancestor of all people, who created man.

Modern St. Petersburg is Yorosalim in the north. Yorosalim is one of the names of Byzantium. In this name, the root ROS is clearly audible. This was the name of the nomadic tribes of the Arabs, who are now called Jews.

This name consists of E - the Russian pronunciation of Io (read the heavenly cow, the symbol of Mary in labor), Ros - Rus, and Alim. The last word is Arabic, meaning knowledgeable, scientist, wise. That is, this is the city of Mary's SON, a Russian guy from the Komnenos family, the Son of Ether, who was wise. By the way, one of the reflections of Christ is Pythagoras. I hope there is no doubt about his wisdom?

The Romanovs, or rather those who call themselves that, not without reason indicated themselves to be buried in the Cathedral of Peter and Paul. Most of all, under the cathedral there is something that, like in the Alexandrian column, has to do with the deeds of God. Only here is a relic brought from Constantinople and associated with the crucifixion and Resurrection.

I think this is the Cross of Jesus or part of it. Perhaps the Holy Grail. Here you need to think carefully and understand why the cathedral is in honor of Peter and Paul.

Today, there is substantiated evidence that Mary the Mother of God gave birth to Jesus in a monastery at Cape Fiolent in the Crimea. And she died in a place between Chufut-Kale and Bakhchisarai. There is a monastery with a self-explanatory name - the Assumption of the Holy Mother of God. not far away is the Josaphat Valley. For a long time, this monastery was closed to the public - the Romanovs did not let anyone in there. And now, unexpectedly, in St. Petersburg, during lavish ceremonies in the Cathedral of Our Lady of Kazan, Kutuzov is buried. Strange thing, why not Suvorov? There are more services to the Romanovs. No matter how Rymnitsky Vasilyevich became for the defeat of the last Horde emperor of Russia, whom we now call Pugachev. And it happened in the Rymnik mountains - modernly called the Urals. Simultaneously with the burial of Kutuzov, the monastery on Fiolent began a normal life - it was opened. True, the Romanovs will always highlight and visit it, mostly behind the scenes.

But what if we assume that Mary the Mother of God was secretly reburied in the Kazan Cathedral, under the guise of Kutuzov? After all, the Russian world was very ambiguous about the figure of this freemason commander who glorified Moscow. Disputes continue to this day.

After all, we know Kutuzov mainly from the works of Soviet ideologists. And what they are, we can determine for ourselves - just look at the Ukrainian Kravchuk and Turchinov, or the Russian Gorbachev.

The splendor of Kutuzov's funeral amazed his contemporaries. Honors are directly royal.

I will be researching this burial in the near future, but what I know resembles the burial of a completely different person. Therefore, I end the miniature, as always with a morality. Forgive me, reader. I am a writer, which means I must bring ideas of good to the world of people. Here is my parting word for you:

WHILE YOU ARE RUSSIAN, EVERYTHING DESCRIBED HERE IS YOURS. AS ONLY YOU STOP BEING THEM, THE NUT WILL BECOME A PETER BREAKING A WINDOW TO EUROPE.

Choose your own way.

Good news

Worldly concerns from God are a lesson

But the time will come and fate will come true, The whole world will suddenly resound with the cry of a child, And the diaper will smell "fresh" air.

The birth of the world, Almighty, again, He will sing a lullaby, pleased with the child.

Love will arise of unprecedented power!

Your blood will play out in your child.

His soul, in him will find a dwelling

And life will flow according to its laws, Good luck and prophetic victory!

A tear on my grandfather's eyelash will hang, Grandma will squeeze a good heart, And the human race will come to life again.

Two mercies of God will merge in the child:

The soul and the born bell is ringing.

So any person will become akin to God, Having tried on Him the measured century.

From good news to the last hour

From trampled death, the Great Savior, From the first cry of a noble soul, We are ablaze with the love of the people for God.

Is the daughter-in-law full, or is the daughter carried -

Of the Great Universe, these miracles.

Read the continuation in the miniature "Under the canopy of the eagle and the guard of the field marshal."