Another look at the forgery of Peter I

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Peter I, as the visible head of the colonial Anglo-Saxon administration, did his great deeds not at all in the interests of the Russian people.

Professional historians have long come to the conclusion that almost all documents and memories of the childhood and adolescence of Peter the Great that have come down to us are forgery, invention or blatant lie

The contemporaries of the Great Transformer, apparently, suffered from amnesia and therefore did not leave to the descendants any reliable information about the beginning of the Great Path of the Great Genius

This mistake a little later, fulfilling the order of Catherine II, was corrected by the German storyteller Gerhard Miller (1705-1783). But, oddly enough, another German, historian and scientist Alexander Gustavovich Brickner (1834-1896), and not only he, for some reason did not believe in these tales

Physicists joke that clarity in science is one form of complete fog. For historical science, whatever one may say, such a statement is more than true. No one will deny that the history of all countries of the world is replete with dark spots. And the further into the forest, the more amazing firewood.

It becomes obvious (not to everyone, however) that many events did not take place in the way that official historians interpreted them. There were either no events at all, or they took place in a different place and at a different time.

In many ways, no matter how deplorable it is to realize it, we live in the world of a story invented by someone

Let's see what the Pharisees hammered into our heads from historical science about the first decades of the tumultuous activity of Peter the Great, the builder of a renewed Russia.

AND THEY DRIVED THIS IS WHAT:

• Peter was born on May 30 according to the Julian calendar or June 9 according to the Gregorian calendar in 1672, or in 7180 from the Creation of the World according to the Byzantine calendar, or in 12680 from the "Great Cold" in the village of Kolomenskoye, and, perhaps, in the village of Izmailovo near Moscow. It is also possible that the tsarevich will be born in Moscow itself, in the Terem Palace of the Kremlin;
• His father was Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov (1629-1676), and his mother was Tsarina Natalia Kirillovna Naryshkina (1651-1694);
• Baptized Tsarevich Peter was Archpriest Andrei Savinov in the Chudov Monastery of the Kremlin, and, perhaps, in the Church of Gregory of Neokesaria in Derbytsi;
• The tsar's youth spent his childhood and adolescence in the villages of Vorobyov and Preobrazhenskoye, where for some reason he served as a drummer in a funny regiment;
• Peter did not want to reign with his brother Ivan, although he was listed as the Tsar's understudy, but spent all the time in the German Quarter, where he had fun in the "All-Insane, All-Drunken and Extravagant Sobor" and threw mud at the Russian Orthodox Church;
• In the German Quarter, Peter met Patrick Gordon, Franz Lefort, Anna Mons and other prominent historical figures;
• On January 27 (February 6), 1689, Natalya Kirillovna married her 17-year-old negligent son to Evdokia Lopukhina;
• In 1689, after the suppression of the conspiracy of Princess Sophia, all power passed completely to Peter, and Tsar Ivan was removed from the throne and died in 1696;
• In 1695 and 1696, Peter made military campaigns with the aim of capturing the Turkish fortress of Azov;
• In 1697-1698, as part of the Great Embassy, the genius Transformer for some reason secretly under the name of Peter Mikhailov, the sergeant of the Preobrazhensky regiment, went to Western Europe to acquire the knowledge of a carpenter and carpenter and as an appendage for the conclusion of military alliances, and painting his portrait in England;
• Returning from Europe, Peter zealously embarked on his Great transformations in all areas of the life of the Russian people, ostensibly, as we are convinced, for the benefit of it.

I will not consider all the ebullient activity of the genius Reformer of Russia in this short article, the wrong format and the wrong opportunities. I will dwell only briefly on the first two decades of the prince's extraordinary life.

WHERE AND WHEN Was Tsarevich Peter Born and Baptized?

The mystery of birth

It would seem a strange question!

German historians, interpreters and translators, as it seemed to them, explained everything to all interested parties, presented documents, testimonies and witnesses, memoirs of contemporaries, appearances, passwords, and so on.

And that's not quite so!

But as?

Let's hear what those who doubt the reliability of the presented evidence of the birthplace of Petrusha assert.

Although until recently it was dangerous to doubt, those who nevertheless conscientiously studied the Peter's era often fell into a stupor.

For example, such historians as N. M. Karamzin (1766-1826), N. G. Ustryalov (1805-1870), S. M. Soloviev (1820-1879), V. O. Klyuchevsky (1841-1911) and many others, with surprise, stated that the exact place and time of the birth of the Great Transformer of the Earth is unknown to Russian historical science.

There is a fact of the birth of a Genius, and it seems that he is not! Somewhere in distant lands this dark fact was lost. Whether there is life on Mars, whether there is life on Mars - science does not know this! There are only one clumsy and unsubstantiated assumptions.

How so?

This cannot be, because this can never be! A sharp turn, however! Why did the Peter's chroniclers miss such a fateful event in the history of Russia? Where did they hide the prince? This is not some kind of slave to you, this is blue blood!

Gerhard Miller reassured those who were too curious: Petrusha, perhaps, was born in the village of Kolomenskoye, and the village of Izmailovo sounds good enough to be inscribed in golden letters in the annals of history.

For some reason, the court historian himself was convinced that Peter was born in Moscow, but no one except him knew about this.

He could not be born in Moscow, otherwise there would be a record of this great event in the birth registers of the Patriarch and the Moscow Metropolitan, but there is none.

Muscovites also did not notice this joyful event. Historians have not found any information about the commemoration of the birth of the Genius.

In the rank books ("sovereign ranks") there were conflicting records of the birth of the tsarevich, which speaks of their probable falsification. And these books are said to have been burned in 1682.

If we agree that Peter was born in the village of Kolomenskoye, then how can one explain the fact that Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina was in Moscow on that day? And this was recorded in the category books of the palace.

Perhaps she secretly went to give birth to the village of Kolomenskoye (Izmailovo?), And then quickly and unnoticed returned back. Why does she need such incomprehensible movements? Maybe so that no one would guess ?!

Historians have no clear explanations for such somersaults with the birthplace of Petrusha. Some kind of mystery, a complete fog for the profane, but not for the initiated!

Those who are too curious have the impression that for some very serious reason, German historians, the Romanovs themselves and others like them, tried to hide the birthplace of Peter and tried, albeit crookedly, to pass off wishful thinking.

How can you hide such protruding ears? The Germans (Anglo-Saxons) had a difficult task. We wanted the best, but it turned out as always.

Therefore, let's look for the same Tsarevich Peter, like Miller, but with wings.

The sacrament of baptism

And with the baptism of Peter, there are also some inconsistencies.

The anointed of God should have been baptized by the Patriarch or, at worst, the Metropolitan of Moscow, but not by any archpriest of the Cathedral of the Annunciation, Andrei Savinov.

It is out of order!

Official history tells us that Tsarevich Peter was baptized on June 29, 1672 for the feast of the Apostles Peter and Paul in the Chudov Monastery by Patriarch Joachim. Among others, Peter's brother, Tsarevich Fyodor Alekseevich (1661-1682), also participated in baptism.

But here's the catch: in 1672 Pitirim was the patriarch, and Joachim became so only in 1674. And Tsarevich Fyodor Alekseevich in 1672 was a minor and could not, according to the Orthodox canon, participate in baptism.

How do traditional historians interpret this historical incident? They do not interpret it intelligibly.

WAS NATALIA NARYSHKINA THE MOTHER OF PETER I?

Why do historians have such doubts? Yes, just because Peter's attitude to his mother was, in scientific language and high literary style, shitty and swinish.

Reliable evidence of their joint presence at any significant events in Moscow does not exist, or historical science does not know.

The mother should be close to her son, Tsarevich Peter, and this would be recorded in any documents.

Historians have not yet found reliable evidence.

But with the Tsarevich and subsequently Tsar Ivan Alekseevich (1666-1696), Natalya Kirillovna was seen more than once. Although Ivan's year of birth is somewhat embarrassing. However, German historians could have corrected the date of birth.

As the saying goes, if a fact does not fit into a coherent historical structure, then so much the worse for the fact.

Naryshkina died in 1694. Peter never once visited his sick mother and was not at her funeral or commemoration. But Tsar Ivan Alekseevich Romanov was at the funeral, and at the funeral service, and at the commemoration of Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina.

Tsar-tsarevich and king-prince Peter Alekseevich, or simply Min Hertz, as he sometimes affectionately called himself, at this time was busy with more important matters.

He drank and had fun in the German settlement with his German, or rather Anglo-Saxon bosom friends.

Suppose that the son and his mother, as well as with his beloved and unloved wife, lawful Evdokia Lopukhina, had a very bad relationship. It happens, you must agree!

But not to bury your own mother !? This is how you need to be a bastard!

And why did contemporaries, except for German historians, never see Natalia Naryshkina and Petrus together, even at his birth?

And if we assume that Natalya Kirillovna was not Peter's mother, then his shocking behavior becomes at least understandable and logical

The son of Naryshkina, apparently, was the one with whom she was constantly. And this was Tsarevich Ivan.

And Petrusha was made the son of Naryshkina by such "Russian scientists" and historians-illusionists of the Russian Academy of Sciences as Miller, Bayer, Schletzer, Fischer, Schumacher, Wintsheim, Shtelin, Epinuss, Taubert …

PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PETER I

Physiology, psychopathology, onomastics, science fiction, forensics …

A few words about what kind of strange fruit it was, Tsarevich Petrusha?

Everyone knows that Peter was more than two meters tall, and for some reason his feet were small! It happens, but still alarming.

The fact that he was a psycho with bulging eyes, a neurotic and a sadist is also known to everyone, except for the blind.

But much more is unknown to the general public, or they are not interested in it.

For some reason, his contemporaries called him a great artist. Apparently, because pretending to be Orthodox, he brilliantly and incomparably played the role of the Russian Tsar.

Although at the beginning of his career he played, I must admit, carelessly. It was difficult to get used to, apparently, drawn to his native Penates. Therefore, when he came to a seedy town codenamed Zaandam (Saardam), he had a good time, remembering his reckless childhood and youth.

Peter did not want to be a Russian tsar, but wanted to be the ruler of the sea, that is, the captain of an English warship.

In any case, he gave such testimony to the English king William III of Orange, that is to say, Prince of Nosovsky, or Willem van Oranier-Nassau (1650-1702).

Duty, objective historical necessity and the requirements of the Procurators to do great things did not allow Petrus to give free rein to his personal passions, preferences, aspirations and ambitions.

With reluctance of heart and teeth, Peter had to submit to circumstances of force majeure.

Peter was in many ways sharply different from his Russian brothers-tsarevich and, above all, by his hatred and contempt for the Russian people, for Russian history and culture. He hated Orthodoxy pathologically.

No wonder the common Russian people considered him A REAL KING, replaced and in general ANTICHRIST.

Peter only at the end of the 1890s began to respond to Pyotr Alekseevich. And before that, he was simply called Piter, Petrus, or even more original - Mein Herz. This German-Dutch transcription of his name was, apparently, closer and dearer to him.

By the way, it was uncharacteristic for the Russian Orthodox tradition to give the name Peter to the tsarevich. This was closer to the Latins, since Saints Peter and Paul were in greater favor with Catholics and Protestants than with the Orthodox.

Peter possessed qualities unique even to kings and kings. Judging by the "documents" that have come down to us, he could be in several places at the same time or not be anywhere, both in time and in space.

He also loved to travel incognito, under a false name, to drag ships for some reason on land, like on water, to break expensive dishes, to break ancient masterpiece furniture, to personally chop off the heads of his mistresses and Orthodox clergy. He also liked to pull out teeth without anesthesia. Not at home, of course.

This wizard could and did a lot more.

But if he could now find out what feats, deeds and noble statements were later attributed to him by the German (Anglo-Saxon) court historians, then even his eyes would have completely jumped out of their sockets from surprise

Also, everyone knows that Peter was a carpenter and knew how to work on a lathe. And he did this work professionally.

Let us ask ourselves an unexpectedly impudent question: why could he do the work of a simple joiner and carpenter so well? After all, to sing like that, you have to study for twenty years! Well, not twenty, but it takes several years or at least months to acquire skills in carpentry. When did Peter manage to learn all this?

Linguistics

I wonder what languages did Peter speak?

For some reason, he spoke his supposedly native Russian poorly, like a foreigner, but his writing was absolutely disgusting and bad. But in German he spoke fluently, and in the Lower Saxon dialect of this respected language.

Did Piter speak Dutch and English? The answer is yes. In England, in parliament and with representatives of Masonic lodges, he communicated without an interpreter.

Some semi-educated polyglot

But with the knowledge of Russian, allegedly his native language, Petrus Min Hertsevich disappointed, although from the cradle he should have been in the Russian colloquial environment.

It all looks strange somehow.

Let's take a short excursion into the field of linguistics

Modern literary languages were not yet formed in Europe at that time. For example, in the Netherlands at that time there were five large equal dialects: Dutch, Brabant, Limbur, Flemish and NIZHNESAKSONSKY.

In the 17th century, the Lower Saxon dialect was widespread in parts of northern Germany and northeastern Holland. It was similar to the English language, which, whatever one may say, unambiguously indicates their common origin.

And why was the Lower Saxon dialect so universal and in demand?

It turns out that in the distant and foggy Hanseatic trade union, which in the 17th century stubbornly dissolved in the same fog, the Lower Saxon dialect or language, along with Latin, was the main one. It was used to compile trade and legal documents and write theological books. Lower Saxon was the language of international communication in the Baltic region, in cities such as Hamburg, Bremen, Lubeck and others.

HOW IT WAS IN REALITY …

An interesting reconstruction of the Petrine era was proposed by the modern historian Alexander Kas. She logically explains the existing contradictions and inconsistencies in the biography of the Great Light Pilot and his blackand darksurroundings.

Why was the place of birth of Peter exactly unknown, or was this information from us, the profane, withheld and concealed?

Because for a long time it was impossible to voice the fact that Petrusha was born not in Moscow or even in Russia, but in distant Brandenburg in Prussia. He is half German and Anglo-Saxon by blood in education, convictions, faith and culture.

From here it becomes clear why the German language was native to him, and as a child he was surrounded by German toys: "German screw carabiner, German map" and the like. Petrusha himself fondly remembered his children's toys when he got drunk as a lord and in the smoke.

His children's room was upholstered in Hamburg worm cloth. Where did such good come from in the Kremlin ?! The Germans were not very favored at the time at the royal court.

It also becomes clear why in childhood and adolescence Peter was surrounded entirely by foreigners, not only adults, but also children.

We are told that he did not want to reign with Ivan, he took offense and retired to the German settlement. It is interesting that the German settlement, as historians described it, was not in Moscow at that time.

And they would not have allowed the Germans to indulge in orgies and mock the Orthodox faith. In a decent society, one cannot even speak out loud about what Peter did together with his Anglo-Saxon drinking buddies and drinking-buddies. But in Prussia and the Netherlands, these performances could well have taken place.

Why did Peter behave so unnaturally for the Russian tsarevich?

But because Peter's mother was not Natalya Kirillovna Naryshkina, but his alleged sister, Sofia Alekseevna Romanova(1657-1704).

The historian S. M. Solovyov, who was given the opportunity to rummage through the archives, called her "the hero-princess", who was able to free herself from the tower, that is, to get married, but could not bear from it (the tower) "moral restraints."

In other words, she married a foreigner and, under his influence, began to spit on her former homeland.

Sofia Alekseevna in 1671 married Friedrich Wilhelm Hohenzollern (1657-1713), the son of the Elector of Brandenburg. In 1672, the baby Petrus was born to them.

Taking the Russian throne with the existing arrangement of the princes was problematic for Petrus. But the Anglo-Saxon Sanhedrin thought differently and proceeded to clean up the pretenders to the Russian throne and prepare their own candidate.

We will conditionally single out three attempts to seize the Russian throne, although this process was and remains permanent.

After all, what a strange thing happened then!

Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov died at the age of 47 and somehow very suddenly. This happened during the stay in Moscow of the Great Embassy from the Netherlands, headed by Konrad Fan Klenk in 1675-76.

Nimble Konrad with all his organized crime group (Organized Crime Group) was sent to the Russian tsar by the same Prince of Orange (Willem van Oranier-Nassau or Nosaty Raven) after Alexei Mikhailovich threatened him with sanctions.

It seems that Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich Romanov was poisoned by the Anglo-Saxons. They were in a hurry to vacate the Russian throne for their own. The Hohenzollerns strove to seize Orthodox Russia and plant the Protestant faith in its people.

With such a view of these vague events, inconsistencies with the baptism of Peter are removed. He was not baptized, but baptized from the Latin faith to the Orthodox after the death of Alexei Mikhailovich. At this time, Joachim was already the patriarch, and brother Theodore reached adulthood.

And then Peter began to teach Russian literacy. According to the historian P. N. Krekshin (1684-1769), training began on March 12, 1677.

Tsar Fyodor Alekseevich also something quickly went to the next world, and Ivan Alekseevich for some reason was considered a sick body and spirit. The rest of the princes generally died in infancy. Some strange mor!

First tryto put Peter on the throne in 1682 with the help of amusing regiments was not crowned with success. Godkov Petrusha was not enough, and supposedly the brother of Tsarevich Ivan Alekseevich was alive and well and was a legitimate contender for the Russian throne.

Peter and Sophia had to return to their native Penates (Brandenburg) and wait for the next suitable opportunity.

Tell me what's wrong?

But so far not a single official document has been found stating that Tsarevich Peter and his alleged sister, that is, mother, Sophia were in Moscow from 1682 to 1688.

In simple scientific terms, the guys fled to their native Prussia and did not expect that they would have to go back.

Could it be somehow logical to explain the absence of Peter and Sophia in these years in Moscow?

If necessary, then you can.

Pedantic millers and schlozers have found a way out. It turns out that since 1682 Russia was ruled by two tsars: Ivan and Peter during the regency of Sophia Alekseevna. It's like two presidents, two popes, two queens Elizabeth II.

Perhaps the gallant German historians were tired of their overwhelming work and began to see double in their eyes? There could not be such a dual power in an Orthodox country!

It is known that Ivan Alekseevich ruled in public, and Pyotr Alekseevich was hiding in the village of Preobrazhenskoye, which at that time was not in the Moscow region. There was the village of Obrazhenskoye.

What a trifle for Gerhard Miller! The error came out. He said it was - it means it was! Apparently, the name of the village, as conceived by the Anglo-Saxon directors, should have looked like a symbol of the transformation of Russia.

Well, it sounds beautiful!

And in this nonexistent village it was necessary to hide the modest drummer Petrus, who, over time, would have to turn into the Messiah and the Greatest Transformer of Russia.

How beautiful the guys (Anglo-Saxons) came up with! Apparently, Ekaterina Sekond paid well for lying.

But that was not the case

Peter was hiding in Prussia and preparing for the mission, or rather, he was being prepared.

This is what it really was. This is reasonable and logical.

And the officialdom convinced us of something else. In the fact that in the village of Preobrazhenskoye, Peter was engaged in playing the war, creating amusing regiments. The amusing town of Preshburkh was built on the Yauza River, which was stormed by gallant guys.

Why did Miller move Presburg or Presburg (the modern city of Bratislava) from the Danube to the Yauza River? One can only guess why he had such spatial hallucinations.

And Peter also loved to wander around the village of Izmailovo out of nothing to do and for some reason peep into other people's sheds. What if something is there!

And for sure! Wow! Luck! An English boat has ended up in a barn! How did he get there so far from the North Sea and dear England? And most importantly, why and who put him there? Miller alone knows.

And when did this epoch-making event happen? Historians mumble that it was somewhere in 1686 or 1688, but they are not sure of their assumptions.

Or maybe Peter didn’t find this English boat, mysteriously slipping away like Albion ?!

Why does the information about this remarkable symbolic find look so unconvincing?

Because there could be no English boots in Moscow sheds

Second try the seizure of power by the Anglo-Saxons in Russia in 1685 also failed brilliantly.

Soldiers of the Semenovsky (Simeonovsky) and Preobrazhensky regiments, dressed in German uniforms and waving flags bearing the date "1683", tried to seat him on the throne for the second time Petrus Friedrich Hohenzollern.

This time, the German aggression was suppressed by the archers under the leadership of Prince Ivan Mikhailovich Miloslavsky (1635-1685).

And Petrusha had to, in his underwear, and looking at night, jumping on a bare horse, rushed into the dark forest, frightening the surrounding young peasant women with his bare butt.

As in the previous time, Petrus Khrenovich's path was the same: to Prussia in transit through the Trinity-Sergius Lavra.

Having come to power a few years later, the sadist and pervert Min Herz Hohenzollern dug out the coffin of his relative Ivan Mikhailovich Miloslavsky from the grave and installed it under the scaffold so that the blood of the archers executed by Petrus, the loyal defenders of Orthodox Russia, would drip into it.

Third attempt The Germans' seizure of power in Russia began a few years later, and on July 8, 1689, Peter became the sole ruler, finally displacing his brother Ivan.

It is believed that Peter brought from Europe after the Great Embassy of 1697-98, in which he allegedly participated, only astrolabes and foreign globes. However, according to the surviving compromising documents, weapons were purchased, foreign troops were hired, and the maintenance of mercenaries was paid six months in advance.

Interesting! What are mercenaries? Against who?

We state that in the last decade of the 17th century, under the leadership of the wedding general Petrus Min Hertz and his foggy entourage, the next stage of the Great Crusade to Russia began. Or speaking in Russian, Drang nach Osten

WHAT IS OBTAINED IN THE DRY RESIDUE?

Peter I was the son of a princess Sophia Alekseevna Romanova (Charlotte) and Friedrich Wilhelm Hohenzollern (1657-1713), son of the Elector of Brandenburg and the first king of Prussia.

And, it would seem, why would historians build a vegetable garden here? Peter was born and raised in Prussia and in relation to Russia he acted as a colonizer. What is there to hide?

Nobody hid and does not hide that Sophia Augusta Frederica of Anhalt-Tserbskaya, who disguised herself under the pseudonym of Catherine II, came from the same places. She was sent to Russia with the same assignment as Peter. Frederica had to continue and consolidate his great deeds.

And for whom did Frederica of Anhalt-Zerbskaya try so hard? For Russian peasants? Well, here I just want to exclaim after Stanislavsky: “I don’t believe!”

After the reforms of Peter I, the split in Russian society intensified. The royal court positioned itself as German (Anglo-Saxon) and existed on its own and for its own pleasure, while the Russian people were in a parallel reality. In the 19th century, this elite part of Russian society even spoke French in Madame Scherer's salons and was terribly far from the common people

Peter I, as the visible head of the colonial Anglo-Saxon administration, did his great deeds not at all in the interests of the Russian people.

Alexander Arsenin