How did Tartary die? Part 1

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The fact that until the beginning of the 19th century on the territory of modern Siberia there was a huge state of "Tartaria" today, a lot of articles have been written and several documentaries have been shot, including those published on the site of "Kramola":

"Great Tartary, only facts"

“Great Tartary - only facts. "The Roman Empire"

“Great Tartary - only facts. Griffin"

“Flag and coat of arms of Tartary. Part 1"

“Flag and coat of arms of Tartary. Part 2"

I will not retell all the facts and evidence of the existence of Tartary, it will take up too much space. Those interested can familiarize themselves with them at the links above. In my opinion, they are quite convincing and comprehensive. The question is different. How did such a huge state, with a huge population, with many cities, suddenly disappear without a trace? Why don't we find the remains of cities, objects of economic infrastructure, which must be in any large and developed state? If a large number of people lived, they had to trade, move between cities. This means that there should be roads and bridges, many villages along them, which serve caravans, etc.

The absence of a large number of material traces on the territory of Siberia is one of the most powerful arguments in the mouths of supporters of the official version of history, according to which "Tartaria" is just a myth that old cartographers mapped. If there were a huge state in Siberia with a multimillion population, then there should be many cities, settlements, roads connecting them, and other traces of life. But in fact, we do not observe these traces in Siberia in due amount, in their opinion.

In one of the articles, also published on the Kramola portal, the author tries to explain where Tartary could have disappeared. In short, according to the author, Tartaria was destroyed by a massive nuclear bombardment, which burned out forests in Siberia and the Urals, and also, allegedly, left many craters from nuclear explosions.

I must say right away that I do not deny that nuclear explosions were carried out about 200 years ago. After reading this article, as well as acquaintance with the videos "Distortion of History" with Alexei Kungurov, despite the initial skepticism about this version, my friends and I managed to find several traces of nuclear explosions, including a very readable crater 40 km away. from Chelyabinsk, where I live, near the city of Yemanzhelinsk. The diameter of this funnel is 13 km (the original size of the images is available by clicking on the picture):

But this version has a serious problem. First, it does not explain the disappearance of all traces of the cultural and economic activities of the inhabitants of the vast empire. Secondly, in order to carry out such a total cleansing of the territory, it was necessary to detonate a lot of nuclear charges. In fact, it was necessary to cover the entire territory of Siberia with a uniform grid of explosions, with a step of the order of 100-150 km, and maybe less. Moreover, studying old maps, I found that on some of them on the territory of Siberia, a lot of cities are depicted, especially in the area between the Irtysh and Ob rivers. That is, at that time there was a fairly high population density. And this means that without such a dense bombardment, a lot of people would inevitably survive, and there are also many small and medium-sized settlements left. In fact, it turns out that most of the settlements on the territory of the same Chelyabinsk region were founded in the first half of the 19th century, and in the interval from 1825 to 1850. Moreover, there is a version that some of the cities and villages, which were allegedly founded in the 18th or even in the 17th centuries and are mentioned in various documents, were rebuilt on the site of once existing settlements or near them (I will tell you more about this oddity below).

The problem is that in the event of such a massive uniform bombardment, we should observe on the territory of Siberia just a more or less uniform grid of craters, but, alas, we do not observe it there. A number of craters and other traces are observed in the Urals and the Volga region (eastern bank of the Volga). And further from the Urals to the east, there are no such traces characteristic of nuclear explosions.

But, if you look closely at the satellite images of the territory of Siberia, we can find completely different traces there!

For the first time, my father-in-law, Vasily Alekseevich Karpaev, drew my attention to these unusual objects several years ago. Moreover, they are clearly visible both on satellite images and on topographic maps, and most of them are known as "Siberian tape forests".

These are several narrow strips of pine forests, an average of 5 kilometers wide, which stretch from the Ob River diagonally from northeast to southwest almost to the Irtysh River. The longest line is over 240 km long. Along the profile, these are wide depressions with a depth of 20 to 200 meters. According to the official legend, these trenches were dug by a glacier many thousands of years ago, after which they were overgrown with "relict" pine forests.

But this explanation about the "traces of the glacier" can be accepted only if you do not think about what we actually see in the pictures and maps. Such traces cannot be left by a glacier. The theory of the glacial origin of such formations takes its roots from observations of the consequences of the movement of glaciers in mountainous areas, in particular in the Alps. In the mountains, due to the large difference in elevation, the ice really begins to flow, breaking through trenches and gorges on its way. But the fact that traces similar in force and size can form on relatively flat terrain, where we observe "ribbon pine forests", is only an assumption. Even if we assume that there was a thick ice layer that "crawled" to the north, then the ice should have flowed over the existing terrain. At the same time, the glacier will never "slide" strictly in a straight line, just as rivers never flow strictly in a straight line, but bend around the natural unevenness of the relief. The photographs clearly show that the tracks start from the left (western) steep bank of the Ob, that is, they actually cut the slope perpendicular to the prevailing relief. At the same time, several tracks go almost in a straight line, and even parallel to each other!

These tracks cannot be artificial structures either, since it is completely unclear who and for what purpose could have dug such trenches.

These traces could only be left by large objects that fell from space to the surface of the Earth. This is confirmed by the fact that the azimuth of the slope of the tracks is from 67 to 53 degrees, while the tracks from the fall of small objects in the area of Lake Chany, in which the deviation from the initial trajectory during the passage of the atmosphere was less due to the smaller cross-sectional area, lie in the range from 67 to 61 degrees. This practically coincides with the angle of inclination of the Earth's axis of rotation to the plane of the ecliptic, that is, to the plane of rotation of planets and asteroids around the Sun, which is 66.6 degrees. Therefore, it is completely logical that objects, the same asteroids, which move in the plane of the ecliptic, falling on the surface of the Earth, leave traces exactly at this angle. But the "retreat of the glacier" precisely at this angle, and even in spite of the existing terrain, is absolutely not logical.

To make sure once again that this is the right angle, I deliberately found an image of the Earth's globe, rotated in the right way. In this case, the "tape burs" are located just horizontally.

What can you say by looking at these footprints. First, several large bodies fell at the same time, with a diameter, judging by the width of the tracks, about 5 kilometers. Two lower long tracks, more than 240 km and 220 km long (№1 and №2), are well read on the pictures. The distance between them at the beginning is about 30 km. Further to the northwest, about 40 km, there is another trail about 145 km long (No. 3). Still further, at a distance of about 100 km, there is another well-readable strip, the widest of all, 7-8 km wide and 110 km long (No. 4). When approaching, between stripes No. 3 and No. 4, many small traces can be seen, which do not form such clear stripes and are most likely left by smaller fragments.

But that's not all. If we move further to the north-west from the trail number 4, then we will see a lot of blurred stripes, which are traces from the fall of a huge amount of "smaller" debris. For example, they are very clearly visible in the area of Lake Chany:

In this case, these "small" fragments, judging by the size of the tracks, in fact, were also quite large. The width of many "stripes" is from 500 meters to 1 kilometer, the length is ten or more kilometers. For comparison, let me remind you that the size of the Chelyabinsk meteorite, which fell on February 15, 2013, caused so much noise and caused a lot of damage, is estimated at only 17 meters! The number of fallen objects, judging by the footprints in the photographs, is many thousands!

By measuring the width of the strip, on which such traces are visible, from the axis of incidence of track No. 4, we obtain a value of about 330 km. The total width of the visible affected area from track No. 1 is more than 500 km.

If we look at what this place looks like on the relief map, then, firstly, we will see that these are precisely the depressions in the terrace of the left western bank of the Ob, and secondly, that parallel to track No. 1 below it to the southeast, at a distance of 42 km and 75 km from its axis, two more "furrows" can be seen parallel to it (on this map, a darker green color denotes lower places, as is customary on physical maps). At the same time, the near track is longer and is cut by ravines and channels of small rivers, as well as by the bed of the Alei River, along which many fields are plowed up, therefore it is not as clearly visible in ordinary photographs as the main tracks. On the relief map, this trail goes from the city of Rubtsovsk, through which the Alei River flows. At the same time, if before the settlement of Pospelikha the bed of the Alei River has a rather complex shape, then further, before it flows into the Ob River, it flows inside a narrow, fairly straight strip 1 km wide, which runs just parallel to track No. 1.

As for the most extreme trail, the length of which is about 75 km, it is interesting because a river called Porozikha also flows along it, but at the same time it flows in the opposite direction from the Ob river! Where this furrow ends, Porozikha flows into the Charysh River, which again runs towards the Ob River and safely flows into it after about 100 km. If these traces were left by a glacier, as we are assured, how did it happen that one part of the glacier, in the area of the Alei riverbed, crawled in one direction, and the other part, 32 km from it, crawled in the completely opposite direction?

The fact that we have a large number of objects of various sizes, which at the same time move along almost parallel trajectories, since all tracks in the zone of the beginning of the tracks go at the same angle, as well as a very wide zone of their fall, we can state the following:

1. All these objects fell to the surface of the earth at the same time. That is, these are not traces of many disasters that occurred at different times.

2. These are not fragments of one large meteorite, which split into many fragments when it collided with the Earth's atmosphere. Otherwise, they would follow diverging trajectories from the explosion site, that is, they would have the shape of a fan, the rays of which would converge to the point of explosion.

In other words, it was a collision of the Earth with a large meteorite field.

The fact that the tracks are very elongated, and their depth is relatively small 4% - 0.4% of the track width, suggests that these objects fell almost exactly tangentially to the Earth's surface, and their large length indicates a high rate of entry into the atmosphere of these objects, which could not be extinguished by either the Earth's atmosphere or prolonged contact with its surface.

If these objects flew at a steeper angle, then they should have crashed into the surface and formed craters on it, which are on the surface of the Earth and the planets of the solar system and their satellites from many others, including large meteorites. The same thing should have happened if they were moving at a low speed, less than 8 km / s. When entering the atmosphere, the longitudinal velocity should have dropped, and the velocity towards the center of the Earth, due to the force of gravity, should have increased, due to which the angle of incidence should have become steeper.

If they fell at an even shallower angle, then they should either fly through the upper layers of the atmosphere and, due to the high speed, go further into space, or even bounce off the atmosphere in general, just as stones bounce off the surface of the water when we start up " pancakes ".

Based on what we see, or rather what we do not see, we can say what these large objects consisted of. At the end of the tracks, we see neither large boulders, nor a placer of stones that could have formed during their destruction, and in general we do not see the soil from the surface, which a stone meteorite should have heated in front of it by a breakthrough trench 5 km wide and 240 km long. And given the size of the object of several kilometers, at the end of each trench a mountain several kilometers high should have formed, in front of which there would be an earthen rampart in a semicircle. Similar earthen ramparts should have formed along the edges of the trench (just like a bulldozer that breaks a trench with a blade). But instead, we see that at the end, the tracks begin to widen and form a pattern characteristic of a river delta that flows into the sea. It can only mean one thing. These objects were ice icebergs and consisted mainly of water. At the same time, at the beginning of the contact with the surface, they were still hard, which explains the fact that at a sufficiently long length of tracks they have approximately the same width. But from friction against the surface and the atmosphere, they eventually heat up and melt, turning into a giant wave, which already spreads in all directions, washing away everything in its path. This, most likely, explains the fact that the tracks were not very deep and long enough, while they have a profile not with steep slopes, but with rather gentle slopes. If the meteorite were stone, then it should have dug a moat with steeper and sharper edges. But in our case, the lower part of the iceberg melted faster than the upper one from intense friction with the ground, and formed a water layer, which played the role of a lubricant that improves sliding, as well as smeared the edges, forming a smoother transverse profile.

At the end of trails # 1 and # 2, you can clearly see that they begin to expand very quickly and ultimately merge into one continuous wide strip, which also agrees well with the theory of ice meteorites, which ultimately melted, forming two giant waves sweeping away everything in its path is like a tsunami, and joined together in the last section. It is also interesting that from the meteorite, which left a trail southeast of the trail №1, along which the Alei River flows, there is also a very characteristic blowout zone. After the impact and the formation of a wave, most of it crossed the watershed line between the Ob and Irtysh rivers and went to the last one near the city of Semey. Apparently, judging by the footprints in the photographs, the water from the ice meteorites, which left traces No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3, ultimately left the Irtysh.

I find it difficult to fully imagine the scale of this catastrophe, but it is obvious to me that in this strip, more than 500 km wide and more than 250 km long, everything that was on the surface was destroyed. The tsunami wave demolished all buildings, all plants, destroyed all living organisms. At the same time, during the fall and deceleration against the atmosphere and earth, the surface of the meteorites had to warm up to high temperatures, which means that the water, into which the ice turned, had to intensively turn into steam. Based on what we see in the images, especially in the area of Lake Chany, the density of objects in the fallen meteorite field was quite high, which means that in the area of the fall, the air should have been filled with superheated steam, and possibly some kind of gases. if the meteorites were not only water. Mixing with the soil on the surface of the Earth, all this mass, together with the vapor, had to rise to the upper atmosphere. In other words, I have great doubts that at least someone could have survived in the immediate disaster zone, unless they had specially equipped shelters capable of withstanding a nuclear strike. And such shelters, as we all understand, at the beginning of the 19th century, when, in my opinion, this catastrophe occurred, no one knew how to build yet.

When I began to study more closely space images of nearby territories, I very quickly discovered that the affected area was not limited to the area shown above.

First, similar parallel tracks with a characteristic tilt angle, but smaller, were found on the left western bank of the Tom River near the city of Tomsk, where a number of meteorites fell from this meteorite field.

If we move to the west, to the area of Omsk, Kurgan and Chelyabinsk, then there we will also find traces of a meteorite bombardment, but they already look somewhat different.

A little higher than Omsk, on the left western bank of the Irtysh River, we will see characteristic blurred tracks, as well as many round lakes, which are craters from fallen meteorites. The angle of inclination of the tracks is from 65 to 67 degrees. There are a lot of footprints and craters, ranging in size from 2 km to several hundred meters, but most of them are from 700 meters to 1200 meters. The fact that the trails have become shorter, and there are also almost circular craters, suggests that here the meteorites either flew at a slower speed, or fell already at a more vertical angle, and possibly both at once.

From the Irtysh, the strip of tracks clearly visible in the images is about 110 km.

Further to the northwest, above and east of the city of Ishim, another large area of meteorite fall is observed. Moreover, characteristic parallel tracks in the images are read almost to Tobolsk itself, the width of the strip from Ishim is about 180 km. From Ishim to Tobolsk in a straight line 240 km, that is, from Tobolsk the fall strip passed only 60 km. This is important because the first edition of the Britannica encyclopedia, published in 1771, mentions that the capital of Tartary was in the city of Tobolsk.

In the west, this track field is bounded by the Tobol River. In the Tyumen region, we no longer see such traces. If we look to the west of Ishim, we will see that there traces are also very well read in the south to Petropavlovsk, which is located in the north of Kazakhstan. To the west, the strip continues almost to the city of Yuzhnouralsk in the Chelyabinsk region, but in the Kurgan region we almost do not see the characteristic elongated traces, but we continue to observe many lakes and swamps of almost circular shape with a diameter of 200 meters to 2 km, while most of them have a diameter within 700 meters to 1 km. The total length of the field is about 600 km. In the south, the traces are well read throughout the north of Kazakhstan, including the characteristic smeared traces under the town of Rudny. But there the angle of incidence has already become 70-73 degrees, which may be due to the fact that in this place the fall was later and the Earth managed to turn around its axis, which changed the angle of incidence of meteorites. For the same reason, at the end of the trail, we mainly observe crater lakes, and there are practically no elongated traces.

Traces north of Ishim

Traces northeast of Ishim above the village. Abatskoe

Footprints near Tobolsk

Footprints under the town of Rudny, north-west of Kazakhstan

As an example, I want to give a fragment of a photograph north of Chelyabinsk, where there are also many lakes, which, according to the official version, remained after the retreat of the glacier. But, interestingly, here we generally do not observe round lakes with a diameter of 500 to 1500 meters, and the existing lakes are far from round in shape, since they fill natural depressions of the relief of a complex shape.

The shape and size of lakes north of Chelyabinsk

Thus, in the west of Siberia, we have a gigantic affected area, which suffered from a massive meteorite bombardment, the total area of which exceeds 1.5 million kilometers! If before the catastrophe there was any state on this territory, then after it there could be no talk of any greatness and power of the few people who miraculously survived.

General outline of areas of clearly legible traces

Well, the skeptics will say. The fact that such a gigantic catastrophe was, judging by the pictures, we can agree, but from what follows that it happened exactly 200 years ago? It could have happened several thousand, and maybe even millions of years ago, and therefore has nothing to do with the disappearance of Tartary, which, perhaps, did not exist at all.

About this, as well as some very important conclusions that can be eventually drawn from all the available facts, I will talk about in the next part.

Dmitry Mylnikov

Dmitry Mylnikov

Other articles on the site sedition.info on this topic:

Death of Tartary

Why are our forests young?

Methodology for checking historical events

Nuclear strikes of the recent past

The last line of defense of Tartary

Distortion of history. Nuclear strike

Films from the portal sedition.info