The false historian Karamzin. Part 1

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Guided by facts from the biography of Karamzin and his works, the author of the article provides undeniable evidence of the malicious falsification that Nikolai Mikhailovich, recruited by the Masons in his youth, committed in history.

After the bustle of the city, sometimes every person wants to plunge into a natural oasis, to feel their unity with Nature. And although there are not so many such places in our cities, they are becoming favorite places for recreation. How nice it is to escape from the noise in a city park or square. The favorite resting place of many Ulyanovsk residents is Karamzin Square. And what do we know about our fellow countryman? What kind of person was he? How did he live, and what inspired him to work? Let's try to understand and analyze, guided by both the facts from the biography and the works of this person. Let's see what he gave to his descendants and what role he played in the history of his region and the history of the country as a whole …

We know little about the writer's childhood and adolescence, since Karamzin did not leave behind any autobiographical notes. This is a man whose life was hidden and mysterious.

Nikolay Mikhailovich Karamzinwas born in the reign of Catherine II, December 12 (old style - December 1) in the family of retired captain Mikhail Yegorovich Karamzin. This was a poor noble family. The surname "Karamzin" goes back to the Turkic "Kara-murza" ("kara" - black, "murza" - prince, lord; from him the nickname of the Karamzins has been preserved). The exact place of birth is not known for certain: researchers name as his small homeland either the village of Mikhailovka in the Simbirsk province (now the Buzuluk district of the Orenburg region), the Znamenskoye estate in the Simbirsky district of the Kazan province, or the village of Bogorodskoye in the Simbirsk province of the Kazan province, or Simbirsk. Be that as it may, Karamzin spent his childhood in the village of Znamenskoye in the Simbirsk district and in Simbirsk, where the Karamzin family lived from autumn to spring. He inherited his quiet disposition and inclination to daydreaming from his mother Ekaterina Petrovna (nee Pazukhina), "he loved to be sad, not knowing what", and "could play with his imagination for two hours and build castles in the air." Although Ekaterina Petrovna was much younger than her husband, she died early, leaving three sons - Vasily, Nikolai, Fedor and daughter Ekaterina. Kolya was then three years old. A year later, in 1770, the prescribed mourning ended, and Mikhail Yegorovich married a second time to Evdokia Gavrilovna Dmitrieva, the aunt of the poet Ivan Ivanovich Dmitriev, who later became Karamzin's closest friend. From this marriage, Mikhail Yegorovich had several children. Evdokia Gavrilovna died in 1774.

The family doctor, a German, was both an educator and a teacher of the boy. From early childhood, Kolya read books from his mother's library, mainly French novels, when they were read, home education ended. In the eleventh year of Karamzin's life, their neighbor Pushkin drew attention to him, as to a pretty boy, and began to educate him in a secular way: to teach him the French language, to pamper, to accustom him to secular techniques, to caress. This lasted no more than a year: the father, according to L. I. Later, Karamzin's teaching continued at the noble school in Simbirsk. In 1778 he was sent to Moscow for further education at the private boarding school of Johann Schaden, located in a German settlement. Mainly liberal arts education was given there. During these years, Nikolai Karamzin perfectly mastered the German and French languages.

In 1783 (some sources indicate 1781), at the insistence of his father, Karamzin was assigned to the Preobrazhensky regiment in St. Petersburg, where he was recorded as a minor. In the same year, his father died, and on January 1, 1784 Karamzin retired with the rank of lieutenant and left for Simbirsk, where he joined the Golden Crown Masonic lodge (Golden Crown), a student. “I was by circumstances involved in this society in my youth,” he wrote.

Freemasonry was created as a certain mechanism for governing society with the help of secret organizations. Freemasonry is always a mafia. Freemasons participated in organizations of various names and declared principles, often the most noble ones were used. But the real activity of the Freemasons is always secret and hidden, and never corresponds to their declarations. Masons considered and still consider themselves the elite, and they consider all the uninitiated to be profane and a crowd, although they themselves are always profane and fooled people. Secret Masonic organizations and their masters are the true cause of all revolutions and all world wars. Remember, as the investigator Maxim Podberezovikov said from the film "Beware of the Car:" No good deed can be accompanied by lies and deceit.

The one who entered took an oath: "… I promise to be careful and secretive; to keep silent about everything that is entrusted to me, and not to do or undertake anything that could reveal it; in case of the slightest violation of this obligation of mine, I subject myself to I was cut off, my heart, tongue and inner were torn out and thrown into the abyss of the sea; my body was burnt and his dust was scattered through the air. " "Fear to think that this oath," the statute said, "is less sacred than those that you give in the popular society; you were free when you uttered it, but you are no longer free to break secrets, it binds you; endless, whom you called You are a witness, confirmed it, be afraid of punishments combined with perjury; you will never escape the execution of your heart and you will lose the respect and trust of a large society, which has the right to declare you treacherous and dishonest. " The text was sealed in its own blood.

It is interesting that the Simbirsk Lodge, which Karamzin joined, was special. ON THE. Motovilov wrote in 1866 to Emperor Alexander II that this lodge, along with Moscow and St. Petersburg, concentrated in itself all the poison of Jacobinism, Illuminatiism, regalism and atheism. After graduating from Kazan University in 1826, Nikolai Alexandrovich, "soon met with the Simbirsk provincial leader of the nobility, Prince Mikhail Petrovich Baratayev, and soon became close to him to the point that he revealed to me that he was the grandmaster of the Simbirsk lodge and the great master of the Illuminati St. Petersburg lodge. me to join the ranks of the Freemasons, assuring me that if I want to have any success in the public service, then, not being a Freemason, I cannot achieve that under any guise. " In response to the refusal, Prince Baratayev "vowed to me that I would never be successful in anything, because not only Russia, but the whole world is entangled in networks of Masonic ties." Indeed, N. A. Motovilov not only could not get a suitable place of service, but was also subjected to severe persecution. "There was no slander, ridicule, secret tricks and tricks that political sectarian human malice would not subject him to."

But not everyone was hooked. In 1781, the freemason Novikov tried to involve A. T. Bolotov, however, received a decisive refusal. “No, no, sir!” Andrei Timofeevich pondered about this proposal. “He did not attack such a fool and simpleton who would let himself be blinded by your razdabars and stories and would stretch out his neck to you to put a noose and a bridle on it, so that you then ride it and involuntarily force everything to do whatever you want. It will never happen and never get rich, so that I would let you tie your hands and feet … . So there were people who understood everything at that time …

The city of Simbirsk had long-standing Masonic traditions. If all over Russia lodges began to open at the very end of the 18th - early 19th centuries, then in Simbirsk the first Masonic lodge "Golden Crown" appeared in 1784. Its founder is Ivan Petrovich Turgenev, one of the most active figures of Moscow Freemasonry, a member of Novikov's "Friendly Scientific Society". Turgenev was the Grand Master of the Lodge, and the managing master was the Simbirsk Vice-Governor A. F. Golubtsov. At the end of the 18th century, almost the only Masonic temple in the name of St. John the Baptist was built in Simbirsk. This temple was built specially for the meetings of the members of the "Golden Crown" lodge by the Simbirsk landowner V. A. Kindyakov in his estate Vinnovka (now within the city limits). Kindyakov was one of the few provincial subscribers of N. I. Novikov. Karamzin's close acquaintances, I. P. Turgenev and I. I. Dmitriev; brothers of the "Key to Virtue" lodge, which was headed by the prince-Decembrist M. P. Baratayev. In the church … liturgies were not served, but meetings of the Simbirsk Masonic Lodge "Golden Crown" were held, in which the young Nikolai Mikhailovich Karamzin was a member. This gloomy temple was a stone structure up to 16 meters high, round in plan, with a dome and four porticos (they depicted Masonic symbols - an urn with flowing water, a skull and bones, etc.). It was crowned with a wooden figure of the patron saint of the order. It was protected by the Freemasons of all times. The ruins of the temple were preserved until the early 20s of the XX century.

When Karamzin was in the second Masonic degree, he was noticed by Turgenev, who had arrived in Simbirsk, and invited him to go with him to Moscow. The young man readily agreed. “One worthy husband opened my eyes, and I realized my unhappy situation,” N. M. later confessed. Karamzin in a letter to the Swiss philosopher and freemason Lafather. IP Turgenev, in turn, wrote to Lavater: “I am extremely flattering to be the reason for your favorable judgments about the entire Russian nation, a nation that is worthy in many respects to attract the attention of such a respected husband as you. Russians are really beginning to feel that high calling, for whom man was created. They are approaching the great goal of being human."

In Moscow I. P. Turgenev brought Karamzin together with Novikov, who was glad to acquire "a gifted worker and all his wishes and orders of an unrequited executor." This is how this collaboration began. Novikov was a born organizer. "Grandiose" plans were constantly boiling in his head. And he knew how to implement them. He knew how to captivate people with ardent eloquence. But not only eloquence attracted people to him, but the unusual path that he opened before them. Novikov is a practitioner, owner and even a businessman. So, for example, the son of the Ural driver, who became a millionaire and became a millionaire, G. M. After the arrest of Novikov and the confiscation of his books and printing property, Pokhodyashin died in poverty. But until the last minutes, he considered meeting with Novikov the greatest happiness in life and died, tenderly looking at his portrait. A. M. Kutuzov also gave all his property to Novikov for a common cause, and after the arrest of Novikov, he died in Berlin in a debt prison from hunger …

With the money of "fraternal" (Masonic) donations, a house was bought in Krivokolenny Lane, where a printing house was located and many "brothers" lived (according to other sources, this house was bequeathed to the "brotherhood" by the deceased I. G. (I. E.) Schwartz, famous freemason and close friend of Novikov). In the attic of the third floor, divided by partitions into three lights, together with the young writer A. A. Petrov settled Karamzin. All this testifies to the great trust of seasoned Masons to young Karamzin. F. V. Rostopchin argued that the Moscow Masons greatly appreciated the new young brother. Petrov was older than Karamzin, and his literary tastes developed earlier. He had a talent for criticism, which was facilitated by a sharp, mocking mind and a developed sense of irony, which the "sensitive" Karamzin clearly lacked. Only a few translations and nine letters to Karamzin remained from Petrov. After an early death, his archive was immediately burned by his brother, a cautious official. S. I. also lived in this house. Gamaleya, A. M. Kutuzov and the half-mad German poet, friend of Schiller and Goethe, Jacob Lenz. Karamzin was pleased with his new position and the attitude of the Freemasons towards him. According to the testimony of the informed D. P. Runicha, "he was with many of them in very close relationships. Life cost him nothing. All his needs and desires were prevented." Soon, the freemason I. I. Dmitriev, “this was no longer the young man who read everything indiscriminately, was captivated by the glory of a warrior, dreamed of being a conqueror of a black-browed, ardent Circassian woman, but a pious disciple of wisdom, with a fiery zeal for perfecting a man in himself. The same cheerful disposition, the same courtesy, but meanwhile the main idea, his first desires were striving for a lofty goal. " Karamzin was more and more imbued with Masonic ideas: "Everything that is national is nothing before the human. The main thing is to be people, not Slavs. What is good for people cannot be bad for Russians; and what the British or Germans invented for the benefit, benefit of man, then mine, for I am a man! ". Oh, how these lines remind our reality …

For four years (1785-1789) Karamzin was a member of the "Friendly Scientific Society". And in May 1789, just before his departure abroad, Karamzin allegedly left the box. Moreover, he allegedly "suddenly breaks with Novikov and Gamaleya and leaves, practically flees to Western Europe, towards a revolutionary storm." But could this really be? The fate of Motovilov tells us the opposite, but he only just refused to join the box … It is impossible to believe that Karamzin could so easily break the oath in which he pledged "to remain faithful throughout his life." After all, he should have remembered the words of the master: "You must know that we and all our brethren scattered throughout the universe, having become today sincere and loyal friends to you, at the slightest treachery of yours, in violation of your oath and alliance, we will be your worst enemies and persecutors … Then we will take up arms against you with the most severe revenge and we will fulfill our revenge."

A. Starchevsky, mentioned Gamaleya's participation in the development of Karamzin's travel plan, and F. Glinka even referred to the words of Karamzin himself, who told him that he was sent abroad with the money of the Freemasons. "The society that sent me abroad issued travel money for every day for breakfast, lunch and dinner." But during interrogations, his older "brothers" kept the secret. So Prince N. N. Trubetskoy said: "What belongs to Karamzin, he was not sent from us, but went as a sculptor with his own money." He just didn’t explain where Karamzin suddenly got the money. It is not for nothing that Karamzin's archive mysteriously disappeared just at this time. This happened to his papers at least twice (not counting the fire of 1812): after Novikov's arrest and before his death. Did he destroy his own papers or gave them to the "brothers" for safekeeping?.. Karamzin himself explained the availability of funds for the trip by selling to his brother a part of the estate that he inherited from his deceased father. But in 1795, when the Pleshcheevs' fortune was shaken, Karamzin "again" sold the estate to the brothers. The question is, what did he sell in 1789? And did he sell? So with what money did he go abroad?..

Yes, the whole life of the writer is shrouded in secrets. In 1911, the editor of the Russian Archive, P. I. Bartenev, wrote in his journal about the collection of unpublished papers by Karamzin, which were in the possession of his grandsons Meshchersky in the Dugin estate of the Sychevsky district of the Smolensk province. Modzalevsky described the album of Karamzin's daughter Ekaterina Nikolaevna Meshcherskaya. The album was lost during the revolution. It is interesting that the huge archive of the Meshcherskys, who owned the Dugino estate in Smolensk until the revolution, has survived. In the Central State Archive of Ancient Acts there are more than two thousand papers with personal correspondence and accounting accounts up to the revolution. But there are no Karamzin papers. There are only two or three documents that are indirectly related to the writer. How can it be that the accounting accounts are preserved, and the Karamzin papers disappear? If they burned down, then why did the others survive?.. As a person who appreciated the ancient and new handwritten memory so much, for some reason he did not leave us his own! Probably, the archive could somehow interfere with the created image of Karamzin …

Freemasons prepared their pet for great deeds, he became the first candidate for the highest orders of the Order, had to learn the theoretical degree of Freemasonry, join their constitutions, statutes and other documents in the secret archives of the Order, travel to Western Europe to meet with the leadership of international Freemasonry. Russia was then a "province" of the world Masonic brotherhood, and Karamzin had to travel through all the Masonic centers of Germany, England, France and Sweden.