600th miniature

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

You were not new

Love to a humble GIRL?"

(Eugene Onegin. Tatiana. AS Pushkin)

For those who are fond of the secrets of the past, it will be extremely interesting to read the Gennadiy Bible, in order to realize that this book has been corrected many times and adjusted to the official version of history.

The thing is that an attentive researcher, analyzing the text, will find a lot of absurdities in it, since the art of falsification and lies in general requires not only talent, but also attentiveness.

The Gennadiyevskaya Bible is the first in the history of Slavic Cyrillic writing, a complete set of biblical books of the Old and New Testaments translated into Church Slavonic, which became the basis for printed editions of the Bible in the East Slavic lands. It was prepared in the Novgorod scriptorium with the participation of Dmitry Gerasimov on the initiative and under the leadership of Archbishop Gennady of Novgorod. The work on the codification of the Slavic Bible was completed by 1499.

I will not talk about what the churchmen themselves claim, who say that this Bible was edited in the 17th century. I'll just show you the place where the blasphemy is hidden in relation to the ancient faith of the Russian people.

As you know, before Nikon's reform in Russia, the name of Christ was written with one "I" - Jesus. After Nikon's reform, the European spelling of the name of the Savior Jesus was adopted. So in the entire Gennady Bible, on all pages except one, the name of Christ is written with one "I" and only on one page appears "Jesus", and the priests claim that nothing was ruled in this place.

I was interested in this episode and this is what was found there. But first, a quote from the modern canonical Bible, telling about the genealogy of Jesus Christ from which the Gospel of Matthew begins:

"David the king begat Solomon from the one behind Uriah" (Matthew 1: 6)

There is something to take hold of your head. To begin with, Uriah is a masculine name. It turns out that David gave birth to King Solomon from a woman who was married to a certain Uriah? Today, no one knows who Uriah is or where he came from. They searched for centuries, and then just gave up, they say it has always been like this.

But we with the reader, all the same, we will search and carefully look at the Gennadiy Gospel, in order to bring to the light of God the falsifiers from history.

Look at the intro to the miniature, reader, which was specially made for you by scientists from Moscow State University. You see in the name of Uriy in front of the Slavic letter "U", a small letter "o" is inscribed. The big one simply did not fit, and therefore the small one was entered.

So, in Russia, before the Romanovs, the letter "U" was written either as a handwritten Greek Gamma, or as a combination of "OU". It depended on the school of scribes. Here, the letter "I" is written through the Izhitsa, which is enough to erase the leg, and you get "U". This is exactly what the forger did, but he ran into a problem.

The point is that in order to read this letter as U, you need to put an "O" in front, and there is no place there. Or use another spelling - Greek Gamma. In the entire Gennady Bible, this is the only place where the letter "U" is written as "OU", since Greek Gamma is used everywhere on all pages. And only in this part of the text there is "OU". Note, however, that the "O" did not fit and was inscribed with a small circle between the letters. However, this did not stop priests and historians from interpreting the written name as Uriah.

What is actually hidden under this explicit revision?

The point is that there are still some samples of the Gennadiy Bible from 1499, where there was no revision. And there the text is completely different, clear and understandable:

"But David is king, begat Solomon from Irene."

And no Uriah is close! Solomon's mother, Queen Irina, the wife of King David, whose mosaic is perfectly preserved in the Hagia Sophia of Istanbul.

Readers familiar with my works know that King Solomon is Suleiman the Magnificent, the builder of the biblical temple of Solomon - Hagia Sophia in modern Istanbul and the time of his life is 1494-1566, that is, the 15-16th century.

This means that he is a relative of Jesus, since the text under discussion is taken from the Gospel of Matthew, from the place where the genealogy of Jesus Christ is described.

But already in the Ostrog Bible there is no Irina, but Uriah is recorded with an incomprehensible woman without a name, who became Solomon's mother.

Let me remind you that it was from the Ostrog Bible that the canonical Bible of the Russian Orthodox Church was created. In it, Solomon is a Jew and lives in such ancient times that the Queen of Sheba (and this is Princess Olga - Prekrasa Sobakina about whom I wrote earlier) was stupefied by his sawn-off shotgun, giving birth to a son from him.

That is, Old Testament David is the Pope of Suleiman. The epic tells us his name - Selim the Terrible, the ninth sultan and 88 caliph, who lived in 1465-1520. And the grandfather of Solomon-Suleiman was Bayazid the First.

And now I explain on my fingers: the real years of the life of Isus Isus - Andronicus Comnenus, it is 1152 to 1185. And Solomon is not his ancestor, but his descendant, of course not direct. Turkish sultans are a genus of the Komnins. And the Russians, according to Nikola Paolo, are people of Turkish nationality!

That is, what is described in the Torah and the Old Testament took place not before the birth of Jesus, but after him.

And here is what the Bible says.

Genealogy of Jesus Christ, Son of David, Son of Abraham.

Abraham begat Isaac; Isaac gave birth to Jacob; Jacob begat Judas and his brothers;

Judah begat Perez and Zarah from Tamar; Phares gave birth to Esrom; Esrom gave birth to Aram;

Aram gave birth to Aminadav; Aminadab begat Naasson; Naasson gave birth to Salmon;

Salmon gave birth to Boaz from Rahava; Boaz begat Obid by Ruth; Obed gave birth to Jesse;

And here is our paragraph.

Jesse begat David the king; King David gave birth to Solomon from the one who was behind Uriah (Irina - approx. K.);

Solomon gave birth to Rehoboam; Rehoboam gave birth to Abia; Abiya gave birth to Asu;

Asa begat Jehoshaphat; Jehoshaphat begat Jehoram; Joram begat Uzziah;

Uzziah gave birth to Jotham; Jotham begat Ahaz; Ahaz begat Hezekiah;

Hezekiah begat Manasseh; Manasseh begat Amon; Amon gave birth to Josiah;

Josiah gave birth to Joachim; Joachim gave birth to Jeconiah and his brothers, before moving to Babylon.

After moving to Babylon, Jeconiah begat Salafiel; Salafiel gave birth to Zerubbabel;

Zerubbabel gave birth to Abiud; Abiud gave birth to Eliakim; Eliakim gave birth to Azor;

Azor gave birth to Zadok; Zadok gave birth to Ahim; Achim gave birth to Elihud;

Eliud gave birth to Eleazar; Eleazar gave birth to Matthan; Matthan gave birth to Jacob;

And finally, information about Jesus:

Jacob gave birth to Joseph, the husband of Mary, from whom was born Jesus, called Christ.

Tell me, reader, how difficult is it for you to look into the directory of the rulers of Byzantium in order to find the real place of Andronicus Comnenus - the prototype of Jesus Christ who lived at the end of the 12th century? Take Suleiman the Magnificent and rewind the rulers until 1185 - the year of Andronicus' crucifixion on the cross by the Angel Isaac Satan. And then everything will fall into place.

Do you even understand what Qatar has just told you about, you foolish child? The fact that all these saints are simply the kings and rulers of Byzantium (Kievan Rus) and Great Rus. And the forgers reversed the Old and New Testaments, making the Gospels later. In fact, the opposite is true. First the Gospels, and then the Old Testament or Torah. This is the most important lie of "Is the Torah I", not science, but mythology.

It was not without reason that I said that there is one more revision on this page of the Gennadiy Bible. Namely Jesus is written with two "I" - Jesus. So they began to write only after the Nikonian reform. That is, the one who ruled the name of Irina on Uriah and Jesus on Jesus lived no earlier than the 17th century! After all, until that time, no one in Russia knew any Jesus. Everyone knew Jesus!

So about what ancient Torah and the Old Testament does all this historical and religious cesspool, lying to the last degree of obscenity, interpret to mankind? And this is called the Russian faith and Russian history? Yes, you are out of your mind, laymen! Listen to the Old Believers, who do not know any Old Testament and do not consider it a spiritual book, calling it all Judaizing Lutheranism.

Well, do not believe us, take it yourself and compare the genealogy of its rulers according to reference books about Byzantium and you will clearly find yourself on Christ-Andronicus in the middle-end of the 12th century.

And at the same time you will learn about his brother who fled to the suljuk. This is a half-brother from another mother - then in both Russia (Kiev and Great), where the Slavs ruled, there was polygamy (harem terem). A descendant of this brother will conquer Byzantium-Constantinople and give him the name of Jesus: Is-Istanbul, that is, the capital of Jesus.

Two words about Irina.

Having remade Irina into a man, Uriah tried to hide a lot.

If you look at the map of the world, there are a huge number of topographic names with the name Irina: Ireland - the land of Ira, Iran - Persia, Irkutsk, even paradise is called Iriy. And the oldest temple in Istanbul is called the Temple of St. Irene. And in the wives of the kings of One Irina.

I said earlier that Irina is the name of the Mother of God, because “Mary” is not a name, but the word “mistress”. That is, Mary the Mother of God is simply Madame Mother of God named Irina.

The meaning of this name is peace, harmony, peace. That is, heavenly bliss or IRIY. Irina is the mistress of paradise.

Therefore, the spread of the name Irina, which belonged to the Mother of God throughout the earth, is NATURAL and DISTRIBUTED, like Mary.

Well, let's summarize what has been said.

The quoted quote about Uriah-Irina is part of the Gospel of Matthew, which chronologically links it to the Old Testament books, placing the Gospel after them, which contradicts the established facts. Moreover, the specified place is not included in the list of Gospel readings, and in the Middle Ages this place was not read at all in the church, as extremely controversial. That is, it was not included and to this day is not included in the so-called Aprakos Gospels. And this says that the churchmen themselves cannot explain this in any way, considering this state of affairs to be an "ancient tradition", they say, "it has always been this way." No, it was not! This happened after the folsification of the 17th, and possibly later, century.

Therefore, I declare with confidence that the Gospel of Matthew was falsified at a later time, and together with it the RABEL OF JESUS, which is blasphemy. This Gospel was rewritten anew, adjusting it to the lies of the Torah. The people who did this understood perfectly well that the saints of the Old Testament were the kings of Medieval Russia, from whose family Jesus was. In this regard, in contrast to his image, a new image of the weak-willed martyr Jesus, now cultivated by the priests, was created. That is, worship began not to the Resurrection, as a symbol of the immortality of the soul, but to the Crucifixion, as a symbol of execution, that is, the most common SATANISM, in which the teaching of the really living Christ is substituted for the teaching of Jesus - a fictional legend based on real events of the past.

You ask, how did this substitution become possible?

This will be the second part of this work.

When reading Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin, you need to be extremely attentive to his texts, since the poet is many times smarter than his critics and the Pushkinists themselves. In my works, I have more than once cited examples in which Pushkin tells about such cases that modern historians are ready to grab their heads.

This is the 600th miniature, whatever one may say, but an anniversary one, and therefore I would like to tell the reader that something is especially interesting and remarkably memorable. And since I belong to the Russian literary workshop, considering myself a Slavophile, I decided to talk to the reader about our language.

But first, I’ll ask you a question, reader, how carefully did you read Eugene Onegin? And I will ask the readers at what age did Tatyana write a letter to the Pushkin hero?

I foresee many options, and therefore I will begin the story in order, naming the age of some of the participants in this novel.

Let's start with Onegin

The first mention of his age sounds like this:

- "a philosopher at eighteen years old" going to the ball.

At the balls, Onegin "killed eight years, losing the life of the best color." Well, then: "Having lived without a goal, without work until twenty-six years." So, at the time of the meeting between Tatyana Larina and Eugene Onegin, he was 26 years old.

And what about Tatyana, she was how old she was at the time of writing the letter?

We listen to Pushkin and look at Dahl's dictionary.

- British Muse of Fables

The young woman's sleep is disturbing."

Dahl reports that a child under 3 years old is called an infant, from 3 to 7 - a child, and from 7 to 15 a boy, that is, a teenager.

That is, at the time of writing the letter of recognition, Tatyana was still a GIRL, an undeveloped teenager who had read love stories and fell in love with an “adult uncle,” who quite rightly turned her off.

Don't believe me? And for whom did Pushkin write these lines?

Who is not bored of being a hypocrite, To repeat one thing differently

It is important to try to assure

What everyone is sure of for a long time

Still hear the objections

Destroy prejudice

Which were not and are not

The girl is at THIRTY years old!

What the reader, gasping for air, you are surprised by the normal orientation of Onegin, who does not have a penchant for pedophilia?

Tell me what you would do at the age of 26 if a child turned to you with the words:

"That is the will of heaven: I am yours!"?

But Onegin, by that time, already had, be healthy, what experience of communicating with women who:

"Privately gave lessons in silence."

And yet he acts like a real man and a noble man. Realizing that there was a girl in front of him, he read her very carefully and gave good advice, which she would later use:

“Learn to rule yourself;

Not everyone will understand you like me;

Inexperience leads to trouble."

O! I see now the faces of the ladies who are ready to tear apart the Qatar and shoot mine ashes from the cannon. Have mercy, air-conditioners, my dears! It's not my fault that you were taught Russian literature outright fools in school and subsequent courses. I understand that the habitual "all men are bastards" is a talisman for any woman, as for any person "the devil has beguiled." But, after all, you cannot turn away from the facts! Re-read the novel yourself and understand that Onegin was just at his best and his example can be taught in a school where completely different customs now live.

Yes, of course, in the 18th century, girls were betrothed to future husbands very early, but at the age of 13 they did not become wives. They were taken at 17 and older.

That is why Onegin was taken aback when, at the ball, 4 years later, he saw Tatiana, a socialite of 17 years! (13 + 4 years apart = 17).

Is it really the same Tatiana?

That GIRL … Or is it a dream?

The GIRL he is

Neglected in a humble lot?"

Do you hear Pushkin, dear ladies, who honor Tatiana's letter for the perfection of feelings - GIRL !!!

I don’t know, perhaps the weaker sex at the age of 13 comes the apogee of love experiences and a riot of feelings. But, at 13, I was an amazing goof who drove a bike. And they did not pay any attention to Tatyan, Marin, Len, Svet and the whole other list of female godparents of Orthodoxy, and at the same time Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism and Catholicism. I also did not pay attention to the names of women adherents of voodoo and African tribes of Thumbo Jumbo. In general, I had nothing to do with women, because I divided them into aunts, grandmothers and sneak.

Dear readers, now that you know the main secret of the novel "Eugene Onegin", I recommend that you read it anew, because the semantic content arises extraordinary and Pushkin's story takes on a completely different outline. And I also propose to listen attentively to every word of the great poet, check with the explanatory dictionary, so as not to look like a fool, using his expressions learned in school, to the place and out of place.

Using the example of Eugene Onegin, I told how the meaning of the teachings of Jesus was changed. Everything is the same as with Pushkin, when they said white to black and vice versa. And only an attentive observer will notice what a GREAT language brings to us, knowing no lies and always telling the truth. A language that we have forgotten how to understand, relying on the wisdom of interpreters who are not of the slightest value for the truth about our Russia, whose son was Jesus Christ, the Byzantine emperor Andronicus Komnenos, known in Russia as Andrei Bogolyubsky.

Gentlemen, we are Russian people, and our language is unusually full of secrets. On the basis of this language, ALL languages of the peoples of the world were created without exception (not primitive, of course). Refusal from it leads peoples to degradation and destruction of their national identity.

As an example, I can cite Ukraine, where a law banning the Russian language was recently adopted. Today, many do not understand what is actually conceived in this territory, with this people.

Let me explain on my fingers the whole danger of what is happening.

Today, while a few broad patriots have begun to understand that with the introduction of the law on education, the extinction of the Ukrainian language, which is essentially just a dialect of the Russian language, will begin. This language (hereinafter referred to as Mova) had a nourishment from the Russian language, but due to its originality, it is a common language, despite attempts to create its literary form, which has not stopped for more than 150 years. Born at the junction with Polish, an established language, he absorbed many Polonisms, while remaining a branch of the Russian language. As soon as the Poles left, the imbalance in the language began to level out and Polonisms were replaced in more understandable Russian words.

You can freely switch from Russian to MOV, they are related, but in Polish, even in Galicia, few people speak.

In addition, the Ukrainian language does not support many spheres of public life, such as science, education, medicine. For example, the word dismemberment is forced to translate as "SHIFTING OUT." There are even more dashing examples. These words do not take root in any way, because apart from sarcasm they do not evoke any other feelings. Considering that in the Ukrainian language almost 80% of Russian words, even if not pronounced correctly, when the Russian language leaves, either Polonisms or English words should take their place. For example, the word “helicopter” was never translated into MOV, and therefore the rotorcraft was named “helicopter”.

Listen to how the Nazi Irina Farion roared, interfering with speaking in the Verkhovna Rada in Russian:

"Little Russian slaves fell to their knees before the English language, and Anglomania took over the country like alcoholism or political prostitution."

For all her abnormality, she speaks the truth. First, it turns out that in Ukraine there are still Little Russians and they are not Ukrainians, but slaves, while Farion herself is obviously a lady. And not just a lady, but as the Poles say - a lady kurva.

And secondly, even for her chicken brains, it comes to the fact that English has begun to supplant the nightingale.

Today, they do not say that in Sweden, from the moment the English (or rather American) language entered the cities, they STOPPED TO SPEAK THE SWEDISH LANGUAGE, replacing it with American slang. Of course, this is not quite an American language yet, but the chewing of phrases and about 40% of English words is already clearly visible. The Swedes stopped speaking Swedish, and the language itself went to the periphery, to farms and villages, that is, to where it came from. That Swedish, that Mova is simply not able to withstand the global English language. There are very few Swedes and Ukrainians in the world, and they cannot cope with the task of preserving the language.

By the way, in the Baltics the same thing: the parliament and the elite speaks the national languages of the Chukhonts, and the people are divided into Russian and English. The local languages themselves have died down in the outback.

Here's something similar will happen with the move. The Bandera movement, having decided to oust the Russian language, is clearing the way not for the language, but for the English language. It will take about 20 years and in Lviv they will speak either in a terrible symbiosis of Polish, English and the remnants of the Russian language, which the new nationalists will pass off as a primordial and ancient language, or they will switch to one of the forms of Esperanto, since grammar, spelling and so on are already lame of the current Language Society, will be ordered to live long. The language will have nowhere to take its strength - it has no roots, which means it will have to borrow from its neighbors.

Today there is a strong impression that in Ukraine, where, in addition to Russian, Ukrainian and many other languages, people understand each other regardless of the language of communication, but the most incomprehensible are on Hrushevsky,in the government area of Kiev.

I urge you to preserve the Russian language, which is capable of revealing incredible secrets, as the reader was convinced by reading this miniature. Is it really necessary to look for a clue in Western languages in order to understand that the Poles are just modified glades? Or, in order to reveal the secret of MEGALITES, contact a US university? After all, it is written in black and white: MEGA LITS, that is, mega CASTING. That is to say, concrete and not just concrete, but geopolymer, from which the pyramids of Giza are built, by formwork.

As soon as there is an awareness of the earthly origin of these structures, there comes a moment of truth - all this is ours and not as ancient as it is portrayed. Not only that, everything has its own specific engineering goals. And when I figured it out, I realized how brilliant the ancestors were, who understood God and his nature, and how stupid we are, who have slipped into the swamp of ignorance and mysticism. I will definitely write a paper about megaliths, the methods of their manufacture and the purpose of these wonderful engineering structures made of artificial stone. You will open your mouth in amazement. However, this is a topic for a different work, but for now that's all.