The inertia of science on the example of telekinesis

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The ability to influence the mechanical movement of physical objects by the power of consciousness is called Telekinesis. It is argued that many people possess the gift of telekinesis from birth, while others are able to obtain this ability through training.

Teaching telekinesis is included in the program of a large number of bioenergetic schools and trainings.

Legends and myths about a person's ability to directly influence objects have long remained just fairy tales. But, starting from the 19th century, unique people began to appear in Europe, whose abilities transferred the phenomenon of telekinesis from the category of myths to the category of scientific incidents that still do not have an unambiguous explanation.

In the middle of the 19th century, the spirit Daniel Home was known, who conducted spiritualistic seances in England, in which, along with evoking spirits, transforming the body and other miracles, he demonstrated the techniques of telekinesis (in the West this phenomenon is called psychokinesis). The demonstration of levitation was especially popular with the audience. Many scientists of that time tried to unravel the secret of the "tricks". One of them was the famous exposer of charlatans, the Englishman William Crookes. But numerous experiments have not confirmed the version of the fraud. Before the surprised scientist, Home, being tied, made various objects hover over the table and move around and even play the accordion on his own.

Telekinesis was not uncommon in spiritualism sessions. Flying utensils, writing utensils, and even participants in such sessions rose into the air or moved around the room with the help of an unknown force.

Since about the beginning of the twentieth century, interest in telekinesis has declined. To revive again sharply in the late 50s.

In our country, the phenomenon of telekinesis is closely associated with the name Ninel Kulagina. A native of Leningrad, born in 1926, she lived almost half of her life, unaware of her gift. It opened by accident in the early 60s, and after a few years the "Kulagina phenomenon" became known far beyond the borders of the Soviet Union. Various experiments carried out by the Academy of Sciences, time after time, confirmed the absence of fraud, military laboratories tried in vain to register the known field sciences.

In 1968, a series of documentaries about Ninel Kulagina was released and shocked the Western public.

In addition to the ability for telekinesis, Ninel possessed pyrokinesis, i.e. s could heat an object simply by placing her hand on it. True, all the experiments were not easy for a woman. In order for objects to begin to move, Ninel sometimes needed a fairly long period of time to concentrate. And the process itself took a lot of effort.

By the end of the 80s, Ninel Kulagina lost her gift, and until her death in 1990 he never returned to her.

Nowadays, many non-state funds and parapsychological institutions are engaged in the phenomenon of telekinesis in Russia. More than 10 author's methods of teaching telekinesis have already been created, hundreds of books and thousands of scientific articles have been written. But the most active topic of telekinesis is being developed in the United States. At Princeton University, back in the 70s of the last century, the Princeton Institute of Anomalous Phenomena was opened, which tries to explain the phenomenon of telekinesis from a scientific point of view. True, in addition to empirically obtained methods for the development of this ability, even American researchers have not made much progress in studying the very mechanism of the phenomenon of telekinesis.

NStarting in 1977 in Leningrad, now St. Petersburg, at the Institute of Fine Mechanics and Optics under the leadership of Doctor of Technical Sciences Gennady Nikolaevich Dulnev, a series of experiments was carried out with Ninel Sergeevna Kulagina, who had an unusual ability to move objects at a distance. The purpose of the experiments was to objectively register the phenomenon of telekinesis, and also to try to reveal the physical nature of this phenomenon.

At the same time, specialists from the Institute of Radio Engineering and Electronics of the USSR Academy of Sciences, headed by Academician Yu. B. Kobzarev - the founder of domestic radar. Yu. B. Kobzarev attached particular importance to these studies and set the goal of unraveling the physical mechanism of phenomena associated with the appearance of electromagnetic and other physical fields around living organisms. Until that time, the phenomenon of telekinesis had never been so thoroughly studied, and what was observed was most often perceived by the scientific community in about the same way as the performances of magicians are perceived.

According to the classical definition, telekinesis (or psychokinesis) is the ability of a person to act on physical objects with the help of mental efforts alone. In academic circles, the study of such phenomena at that time was considered a pseudoscience, because the orthodox physical theory did not allow anything of the kind. And if some facts both appeared and began to contradict the theory, then, as they say in academic circles, so much the worse for the facts themselves.

As a result of all the experiments done, it was found that the phenomenon of telekinesis cannot be directly caused by changes in magnetic, electric, acoustic and thermal fields. Moreover, all these fields, to one degree or another, accompany the phenomenon of telekinesis. The mental influence of N. S. Kulagina on a laser beam. It was clear to the researchers that the abilities of N. S. Kulagina is directly related to the activity of her brain and therefore the studied effects were called the K-phenomenon.

All observations and calculations were included in the official report, which was sent to the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Nobody knows what happened to this report. No official replies or comments from the Academy of Sciences came to the report. There is evidence that Yu. B. Kobzarev called Moscow the leading Soviet physicist, Academician Ya. B. Zeldovich and shared his views on the phenomenon under study: "The impression is that there is one way to explain - to admit that volitional tension can affect the metric of space-time …".

Zeldovich, in turn, replied that Kulagina certainly uses strings, and Kobzarev simply did not notice all of her manipulations. Probably it was difficult to wait for another answer from Moscow. At the same time, we note that back in 1965, the Academy of Sciences adopted a decree prohibiting in its subordinate institutes to question or criticize Einstein's theory of relativity. That was the time.

In 1978, the director of the Institute of Precise Mechanics and Optics was summoned to Moscow to the Central Committee of the CPSU and asked to report on the results of all experiments with the participation of N. S. Kulagina. After carefully listening to the director of the institute about the research conducted, he was asked what his personal opinion was about all this. The director's answer was very short: “The K-phenomenon is not a mistake or a hoax, but a physical reality. And what to do - so it is necessary to change the existing paradigm. On this and parted.

They say that the knowledge of the truth goes through three stages: "this cannot be," "there is something in this," and, finally, "it cannot be otherwise." True, between the first and third stages, according to the academicians themselves, it can take up to 50 years.

Throughout human history, there has been a constant struggle between the two teachings of idealism and materialism. One of the teachings considered the world of ideas to be the basis of all that exists, and the other - the world of things, while each claimed to be absolute truth. Initially, idealism (according to Plato) explained all natural phenomena by the activity of many omnipotent pagan gods. It was an idealistic paradigm. Materialism (according to Democritus) was associated with the objective laws of nature. This paradigm did not depend on human consciousness and was interpreted as an objective reality.

Over the course of time, idealism was replaced by materialism and vice versa. So, in fact, the era lasted until the Middle Ages, which can be called the era of natural-philosophical dualism or the separate existence of two seemingly fundamentally different, essentially antagonistic concepts. However, the peaceful and equal coexistence of materialism and idealism ceased with the emergence of monotheism ….

Religion has contributed to the struggle for truth. In the Middle Ages, the materialists began to be brutally persecuted by the church, which contributed to the flourishing of idealism, and then the roles changed and the idealists began to be persecuted by the supporters of the materialist ideology who came to power. During the Renaissance (XV-XVI centuries), science began to give its voice in the struggle for truth.

At the same time, going through all the historical vicissitudes, science, constantly adjusting and reconstructing to the existing paradigm, created its own natural-philosophical base. In the end, the materialistic point of view seems to have won, which means that the world around us exists objectively and does not depend on consciousness. That is, the essence of the paradigm, which was finally formed by the middle of the twentieth century, is that a person and his spiritual world are completely expelled from the circle of phenomena considered by science.

With the emergence and formation of quantum mechanics, science began to lose its objective character, in it a significant role, as an active participant in natural phenomena, began to be played by man and his consciousness. It seems that the time has come for a new paradigm and its basis will be philosophy, which can be called the philosophy of idealistic materialism.

The formation of this paradigm of the 21st century will require not so much new experimental and theoretical discoveries (there are more than enough of them already done), but a thorough understanding of the already accumulated scientific baggage, the development of the ability for a holistic perception of the world and special training of the gray body - the human brain.

The study of the structure of science itself - science of science - makes it possible today to assert that any science is formed on very rigid principles that make up the natural-philosophical basis of science. The natural philosophy that exists today, which originates from the times of Plato, Euclid, Democritus and Aristotle, has not changed. For example, Aristotle is the inventor of logic, the laws of which are indisputable in modern science. Although other logics are known, only Aristotelian is used.

American scholar Paul Feyerabend (Austrian by origin) argues that there are alternative systems of knowledge. Feyerabend in his research comes to the conclusion that all existing systems of knowledge are nothing more than ideological attitudes, accepted as the only ones possible only by the will and for the sake of the social interests of the scientists themselves.

Many physical processes and phenomena are prohibited not by nature, but by scientific postulates that this is fundamentally impossible. Thus, scientists monopolize the right to truth. In addition, in modern technocratic society, there is often not a scientific truth, but the commercial interest of various social groups. Moreover, this interest can have a parasitic form.

Feyerabend believes that scientists should have long recognized the relativity of their worldview base before society and recognized the legitimacy of the existence of other, alternative systems. So, in our case, the transition to new alternative technologies is a transition to another, alternative system of worldview and the creation of a new paradigm. The transition to alternative technologies will necessarily be accompanied by the creation in society of alternative academies of sciences, universities, schools, etc. It is impossible to prohibit such an approach; on the contrary, it is necessary to begin a large-scale study of such alternative worldviews and their practical results.

Returning to the K-phenomenon by N. S. Kulagina, we can state the presence of a non-physical paraphysical effect on objects. Today it is no longer possible to deny the paraphysical effect, since in the scientific world there are entire institutions engaged in the study of paranormal phenomena. Having established the fact of a paranormal phenomenon, science asks about the agent of such an influence and looks for it among the physically known fields.

But, having made the appropriate calculations, it becomes clear that none of the existing physical factors could produce such an action. In this case, we are dealing with a psychophysical factor of influence on material objects, where the existing methods of classical science record not the effect itself, but only its consequence. The psychophysical impact is not physical. This impact occurs at the topological level of reality, outside of space and time.

Since the end of the 80s, a number of public organizations, foundations and schools have appeared in Russia, which, using new approaches in science, began to develop such alternative non-traditional psychophysical technologies that could be effectively used in modern industry, agriculture, medicine, energy etc., and, above all, be gentle on the environment.

At the same time, the leaders of these organizations and schools understood perfectly well that the modern scientific society is not ready to perceive and comprehend the philosophical and theoretical calculations used by these schools and, moreover, to explain the results obtained in the process of their practical detail. Therefore, the practical implementation of psychophysical technologies was carried out in two ways.

The first way is when only a specific result was required to solve a practical problem. In this case, no one was interested in the nature of the processes taking place; technology was needed to ensure a given result. For this, as a rule, a pilot project was carried out, based on the results of which a decision was made to introduce the technology.

The second way is an attempt in the language of modern science, using a set of various, sometimes simply absurd scientific hypotheses, to explain the reasons for the phenomena discovered experimentally and to describe the corresponding mechanisms. At the same time, from the very beginning it was clear that the proposed hypotheses had nothing to do with the nature of the phenomena.

This approach, despite its duration, made it possible to demonstrate and certify the proposed technologies in a number of leading research institutes in Russia and abroad, and to begin the experimental implementation of technologies in many industries, medicine and agriculture. For a number of applied industrial, agricultural, medical and scientific projects, the developers of such unconventional technologies received government recommendations and support for their implementation.

Official academic and applied science is officially avoided to unambiguously recognize most of the results obtained with unconventional alternative technologies. So, for example, a distinctive feature of a number of alternative technologies is that the principles of their impact on physical and biological objects of reality go beyond the "existing" (or rather, generally accepted at present) fundamental laws and concepts.

In practice, for a scientific observer, the registered changes caused by direct mental impact or equipment created on the basis of new technologies are associated with the action of superweak physical agents. For example, the magnetic field emitted by equipment is one hundred thousand times weaker than the earth's magnetic field. Such a field strength, according to "modern science", in principle cannot lead to the observed changes in physical or biological objects.

Such phenomena are interpreted by scientism as paranormal, since they stubbornly “do not fit” into the existing “laws of the universe”. Not finding an agent of action, the official sciences turn away from explaining the observed facts, thereby negating the possibility of using the observed phenomena in practice for their own benefit, not to mention universal human tasks. But, whether they like it or not, there are more and more such facts.

To date, experience in adapting psychophysical technologies to the tasks of medicine, agriculture, industry, etc. showed that in the overwhelming majority of branches of the world economy there are no competitors for psychophysical technologies. When introduced, these technologies can be both industry-substituting (i.e., capable of completely replacing individual industries in the system of the national and world economy), and industry-forming.

At the same time, these technologies invariably remain balanced, gentle and environmentally friendly. Individual production projects are hundreds of times more efficient than a number of existing production facilities. All this makes it possible to make psychophysical technologies a unique tool for solving a number of economic, political and social problems of the world level.

The most important feature of psychophysical technologies is that they do not need expensive stages of scientific research and development. Immediately after demonstration experiments, technologies (in the form of appropriate equipment) can be transferred for use in production, moreover, the scale of such use is practically unlimited.

Experience in adapting psychophysical technologies to the tasks of production and scientific research has shown that the time required to obtain specified changes or achieve production goals is measured in several months or even weeks.

And even at the end of 1998, few people paid attention to one of the sermons of the Head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope John Paul II, who, addressing Catholics and people around the world, called for the immediate recognition of metaphysics and the transition to its technologies already in the XX century, in Otherwise, the Pontiff warns, civilization will inevitably die.

To this we can add that numerous historical studies and materials show that the psychophysical nature of our World and the Universe did not cause the slightest doubt among our ancestors (as it does not raise doubts among all peoples, except those that were nurtured by the rationalistic science of modern times, which persisted in his narrowly materialistic point of view). Nowadays, scientific circles are forced to admit the existence of paranormal phenomena, if not as a challenge to the consistency of their worldview, then at least as a fact.

In this regard, the appearance in the world scientific and philosophical environment of the works of the Russian academician Nikolai Viktorovich Levashov is not accidental. Official publications in the press, information on the pages of various sites and personal experience of working and communicating with many people who know N. Levashov unequivocally convinces that Nikolai Levashov and his school have alternative knowledge and appropriate equipment to do the following:

• to carry out the most unique, unparalleled medical operations and train specialists in medicine of a universal profile;
• change the phenotypic characteristics of plants;
• change short-term synoptic parameters of the atmosphere and ocean, namely the trajectory of tropical hurricanes;
• change the climatic parameters of the state of the atmosphere, for example, humidity and heat fluxes, which immediately affects the total yield of all crops;
• change the voltage on planetary lithospheric plates in order to reduce the risk of earthquakes;
• restore the ozone layer or tighten the ozone holes;
• to reduce the level of anthropogenic pollution and scattered radiation on the soil and in water areas and, thereby, to carry out the reclamation of agricultural land taken out of economic circulation. There is reason to believe that the equipment used by Levashov's school can stop the uncontrolled operation of the fourth emergency power unit of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant;
• change the trajectory of comets and space objects that are dangerous for earthly civilization;
• remotely determine the contours of underground leakage of hydrocarbons in the places where the main pipelines are laid or in the places where any pollutants are stored.

There are other areas of human activity where Levashov's knowledge showed serious practical results. Levashov's basic toolkit is the psi-field generated by the human brain.

Constantly rebuilding his brain and his essence, Levashov managed to create qualities that allowed him in his research activities to get out of the five human sense organs. He learned to change the brain functions of other people, expanding their abilities and capabilities, turning them into professionals in their field.

The practice of Levashov's work can be attributed to psychedelic work, where psychophysics is the toolkit. In carrying out his practice, Levashov is based on the organismic concept of understanding the World (the whole World is one organism) and the psychophysical picture of its structure.

(For more on the mental school, see Mirror wash of the soul, volume 2, Chapter 10)

You can argue for a long time how Levashov does this, but he teaches this, instilling high spiritual morality in the students of his school. At Levashov's school, it is generally accepted that the development of high morality in students should precede the acquisition of knowledge. Most people who have undergone such training begin to put spiritual values in the foreground, material values are transferred by them to the background.

The educational process of the school is built in accordance with the rule that the acquisition of knowledge is not a standardized and formal transfer of the "baton". Sensitivity, readiness for knowledge should arise in the soul of each student by themselves. Learners seeking knowledge acquire knowledge according to their ability to understand.

Levashov considers the harmony between creativity and responsibility for this creativity to be a very important aspect of education. N. Levashov tirelessly warns students about the immanent danger of effective knowledge.

When a person is given the power to heal diseases, increase productivity, solve complex technical and scientific problems, etc., such a person is inevitably exposed to various kinds of temptations. Until he has full and clear understanding and knowledge, there is a danger that such a person could become the most serious threat to society.

Therefore, one of the rules of the school is that the listener must first achieve virtue, acquire understanding and gain knowledge, and only then build his worldview in accordance with the acquired knowledge. All subsequently acquired practical skills and abilities then become a natural and logical application. Now only in Europe and the USA, Nikolai Levashov's school numbers more than three thousand people, among whom are the children of high-ranking politicians and famous businessmen.

It is clear that the results of practical work demonstrated by N. Levashov and his school were obtained on a completely different - alternative foundation of human knowledge. This naturally arouses the envy of many hierarchs of modern science who are responsible for one or another fundamental direction.

Involuntarily the question arises, what to do with dozens of academic scientific and applied institutes, which took budget money to solve certain pressing problems, but did not give real results? At the same time, nearby, on the next street, a collective unrecognized by the academic society - a school - works for its own money, successfully solving the same problems. Today, the proof of the correctness of the theoretical calculations of Levashov and similar alternative schools is their practical activity.

In the words of modern orthodox science, everything that Nikolai Levashov does cannot be, but the results of his work suggest otherwise. For example, at the end of 2006, two American astrophysicists received Nobel Prizes for discovering the effect of inhomogeneity of the relict radiation in the Universe, and N. Levashov proved and wrote about the inhomogeneity of the Universe back in 1993.

Levashov not only owns the technique of telekinesis, but also gave a scientific explanation for this. The latest discoveries of N. Levashov in the field of biology have removed the curtain from many inexplicable phenomena, such as the "tunnel" effect of cell division, the "phantom" of DNA, and much more.

By now, a person had enough five senses to fully master the ecological niche assigned to him in nature. But the process of cognition continues. Having created unique devices, a person expanded the capabilities of his same five senses, began to see and feel further and deeper.

But, a philosophical question arises, can we understand the complete picture of the World, relying only on our five senses? There is no new information outside the niche assigned to a person. Although the person has already faced the fact that there is something there. Thus, astrophysicists studying the motion of celestial bodies discovered that in order for celestial bodies - planets, stars and galaxies - to move in their orbits, according to the laws of celestial mechanics, the mass of matter must be ten times greater than that which they observe. This phenomenon, or rather, the manipulation of the amount of matter, astrophysicists called "dark matter" and - no explanation.

For his part, N. Levashov argues that the human brain is a powerful tool, they should only be able to use it correctly. As a result of long and painful searches and experiments, N. Levashov personally created his own brain and at the same time not only remained alive, but also acquired new abilities, which made it possible to look at the World around us in a completely different way, beyond the limits of the five senses, giving explanation of the strange phenomenon of "dark matter".

So he came to the conclusion that visible matter makes up only 10% of the mass of matter, both in the "small" Universe, and in the large one. And it is precisely free primary matters that determine the behavior of matter visible to an ordinary eye. All this he stated in his cosmological monograph "Inhomogeneous Universe" - a book in which he gives his understanding of the laws of the universe.

The central place in the works of N. Levashov is occupied by cosmological ideas about our Universe or the macrocosm. He declares: “The concepts of the nature of the Universe reflect and determine the level of development of human thought and technology, and also determine the future development of civilization as a whole,” and also: “With incomplete or erroneous ideas of man about the nature of the Universe, his activity leads to the destruction of the ecological system, which, ultimately, can lead to the destruction of life itself on the planet."

After Nicolaus Copernicus (1473-1543) put forward the assumption that the universe is spherical, no one was able to go further and answer what our universe really is and what are the laws of its creation. Nikolai Levashov not only answered these questions, but also described the structure of many other universes, as a single whole entity, describing even the forms in which the universes gather.

From the point of view of N. Levashov, our space-Universe is of enormous size according to earthly ideas, but of course in all directions. Our space-Universe is only one spatial "petal", with its own properties and qualities, which, together with many other "petals" -universes, forms a spatial six-ray. In each of these "petals" -universes, there are billions of billions of civilizations that create their own hierarchies - associations of civilizations. And all of them together created a single hierarchy of the six-ray.

The six-ray line arose as a result of an explosion that occurred in the area where two matrix spaces meet. At the same time, the ejected primary matter of the same type at the moment of the super explosion were completely harmonious with each other. The spatial six-ray is only one of the innumerable spatial "nodes" of the so-called matrix space. These spatial "nodes" are located in spatial "honeycombs", when each of the six-rayed beams is similar to an atom located in a crystal lattice, if the latter had a honeycomb structure.

The so-called matrix space can be compared to a Möbius strip created from cosmic space “honeycombs”. The matrix space itself, in which one six-ray similar to ours - only one insignificant “atom” of this space, is only one of many layers, a cosmic “pie”!

Moreover, it should be taken into account that between the "petals" of the spaces-universes of the six-ray, free primary matters are in motion, which make up 90% of the mass of matter not only in our space-universe, but also in the six-ray.

Considering the structure of the Universes, Levashov notes: “In all earthly religions, the Lord God creates the Universe … but exactly in the form as people imagine it, who look into the night sky and observe stars and planets on it, and other phenomena within sight. And “for some reason” the Universe created by the Lord God exactly corresponds to precisely these ideas of man!”.

In this regard, we note that Levashov's school is nothing more than a school for training demiurges, where the word demiurge means a person who realizes his high mission - to create universes.

Having created our idea of the macrocosm, Levashov turns to the description of the internal structure of matter - the microcosm, moreover, drawing practical conclusions from this and outlining the directions of development of future natural science.

Much credit to N. V. Levashov in front of world science is that, being engaged in the fascinating processes of psychedelic work, he did not drown in this completely, closing himself only on the practical side of the matter, but found explanations and described the possible mechanisms of many natural phenomena, giving a fundamental picture of the structure of macro and world worlds surrounding person.

with illustrations …