Mysterious square holes in ancient megaliths around the world

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

A selection of mysterious square and rectangular holes in ancient megaliths around the world. There is sometimes some order in their arrangement on stone blocks and even on the walls of quarries, but, more often, they are scattered chaotically, as if they were traces of shelling by square bullets.

The clear signs of ancient structures of non-human origin are usually considered to be the large weight of the raised and laid stone blocks and the traces of high-tech high-precision cutting tools. But, I noticed a less obvious sign, but very characteristic of all ancient structures of "divine" origin. These are rectangular holes in blocks of unknown origin and purpose all over the world (Pyramid Egypt, Machu Picchu, China, India, Ethiopia, etc.).

The fact is that if you really need to make a hole in a solid material, it is easier to make a round one with a tubular drill. Twist yourself a pipe with notches at the end or add abrasive to the drilling site. No special effort, it's just a matter of time. There are examples of manual pipe drilling on the net. They are easy to find.

It will not be said under Sklyarov, but the most surprising thing about this topic is that the classic square holes were painted by Auguste Montferrand on a blank for the Alexander Column (AK later) on page 52 of his album released in 1836:

At the bottom right edge of the workpiece, 3 rectangular holes are clearly visible. The height of the workpiece is about 4 meters, therefore the size of these holes is 20-30 cm. I don't see any sense in making these holes. All the same, they will be chipped when rounding the workpiece. The holes in Baalbek are most similar to the St. Petersburg square holes:

By the way, the height of this megalith in Baalbek is visually equal to the height of the workpiece for the column in St. Petersburg.

An interesting question arises. Is Auguste Montferrand the personality of our civilization or not? If ours, then how did he know what the preparation for the column looked like during an alien civilization that built the megalithic complex of Baalbek? How did he know about these rectangular holes? Either ancient megalithic objects were already known 200 years ago, or Montferrand is not one of ours. Either "not ours" enlightened him in some way. Whether in a dream, in sessions of spiritualism, or directly in physical communication.

My version - Montferrand with these details in the drawings hints to smart people that he draws bullshit under duress. Under the threat of death, he was forced to take over the construction of the AK and Isaac, and he invented all sorts of things they did in their drawings so that those who are interested in the truth would understand that this is bullshit. And the rest of the haters of the truth will find what they need. Look - they are turning a column for you with sticks. What other proof is needed? No aliens and highly developed technological civilizations. Sticks and ropes.

Details about Montferrand drawings

I enter the abbreviation. PO - Rectangular holes

Here are some more photos of PO from Baalbek:

As you can see, no system is observed in the arrangement of these holes. Scattered all over the place.

Another interesting picture

The POs are completely randomly located, resembling the entrance holes of random shelling with bursts of square bullets.

Baalbek is a city in Lebanon where the largest bricks in the world (known to me) are actually used in construction. Weight is about 1000 tons. The most famous of them is the South Stone. Everyone loves to be photographed on and around him.

On its surface there are holes of two sizes:

Less well known is the second unfinished brick from the Baalbek quarry, from which someone later chopped off several small blocks:

These megaliths of Balbek are known to the civilized world for more or less the last 150 years since the appearance of photography in the middle of the 19th century. But, in the summer of 2014, there was a breakthrough. German and Lebanese archaeologists finally decided to look under the South Stone, began to dig and dug at least 2 more bricks of even larger size, weighing up to 2000 tons:

And this is not the most interesting thing. It turned out that the famous South Stone was most likely cut off from the bottom of the rock by a horizontal cut. The cut line was exposed when the soil layer was removed under the stone:

In the underground part of this megalith, there was also a square hole:

On the lower newly dug block, there is also such a hole, but already in the horizontal plane:

Anastasia Semechko, who took these photos and measurements in August 2015, told me in personal correspondence that these large square holes are the same size. She did not measure with a ruler, but she looked closely, and by eye they are the same.

WHO WILL BE IN BAALBEK, MEASURE THESE HOLES WITH A RULER AND REPORT THE RESULT OF MEASUREMENTS TO ME AND SKLYAROV

This discovery of underground megaliths of Baalbek is described in more detail here

On the edges of the quarry near Aswan in Pyramid Egypt, there are not rectangular holes, but rather potholes:

Here's a more general plan to make it clearer:

By the way, on the other wall, to the right of the one on which these indentations are, square protrusions protrude. I don't know if they are related. But, it seems that the protrusions coincide in shape with the potholes and can be joined.

The famous unfinished cracked Aswan obelisk from above is covered with similar rectangular potholes:

Here is a 600 ton megalith in underground Jerusalem:

The blocks underneath also have rectangular holes. And from them the petrified boards stick out. Or maybe not boards. But it seems so.

Here is the software in Ollantaytambo (Peru). The holes are also chamfered:

Hole width approx. 10 cm.

Here is another interesting through hole in the same area of Machu Picchu, or rather in Sacsayhuaman:

Most likely, the hole was made after the masonry was ready. Because the hole goes not only along the bottom block, but also along the top bottom. If it had been hollowed out before the upper stone was laid, then it would have been enough to make a groove only in the lower one. And if they drilled after the stones were laid, then there is no difference when drilling in one or both at once.

And if they drilled afterwards, then why is it not round, but rectangular with rounded corners?

Shallow holes can be imagined as being gouged or gouged out with a hammer and chisel. And such a long hole is easier to drill and not gouge.

Later, Anastasia Semechko sent me her photo of another through hole, which is most likely the opposite exit of this minitunnel:

Who is Anastasia Semechko? O! This is exactly the one that stops the galloping horse, enters the burning hut. When the all-great and three-saint infallible more than one and a half meters Andrei Sklyarov began to bullshit against me and be rude about the width of the rear end of the Southern stone in Baalbek, Anastasia, unfamiliar to us before this incident, resolved the dispute in my favor by taking measurements on the spot online. More details here - he who does not read is a fool.

She also photographed a blind hole with sharper edges in Sacsayhuaman:

Here is her photo of a similar hole in Pisak, made in two adjacent blocks and dug by a third

Here is the software at the top of the obelisk in Aksum (Ethiopia) (obelisk height 24 meters, weight 160 tons):

Here are other views for interest, the lower part with a virtual door and a virtual handle is especially interesting:

Aksum has an interesting underground structure made of fairly well-worked blocks. There, the use of the technology of fastening blocks with metal ties is striking. Moreover, the shape of the screeds is characteristic not so much for more or less close Egypt (where this technology is also found, but the notches have a different shape), but for Tiahuanaco in Bolivia. (Information from here

Rectangular are no longer potholes, but holes in the "Solar Gate" in Tiwanaku (Bolivia):

This is in Rakchi (Located at an altitude of 3.5 km above sea level in the department of Cuzco in Peru):

Temple of Apollo in Delphi (Greece):

Agrippa's pedestal in Athens:

A great variety of software and on the preserved part of the ancient temple of Hadrian in Rome:

Be sure to click to enlarge.

Both on the wall and on the columns. As if he had been fired upon with square shells. Interestingly, there are also such holes on the back of the columns? Where did the shelling come from?

The official version - "The holes in the columns and the wall are not a sign of antiquity. Lovers of profit were looking for hidden coins in them …". Only it is not clear why it is necessary to pick such even square holes?

Maybe someone knows some other explanation for the appearance of holes on this temple of Andrian?

PO in the caves of Huashan Mountain in eastern China:

On one of the five Huashan mountains, the world's most dangerous route is laid along the boards along the cliff and with insurance. Along the route, there are also square holes along the rock:

And under the boards is a hole closed with a rectangular stone plug (I put a red question mark next to it). Software done, but not used in any way!

And here is the sacred room where they must get to in order to receive some kind of benefit from the gods:

Longmen is a complex of Buddhist cave temples in the Chinese province of Henan.

The caves stretch for a kilometer along the slopes of the Xianshan and Longmenshan mountains, between which there is a river. The exact number of works of art hidden in the thickness of the rock is unknown. According to official estimates, there are 2,345 grottoes and depressions with 43 temples, which contain approx. 2,800 inscriptions and about 100,000 religious images.

In addition to well-visible large holes, there are also small ones on top (framed):

The size of the large holes is about half a meter.

It is interesting that the software is not only on the rock mass, but also in the brickwork above the rock:

Maijishan, "Wheat Mountain" - one of the largest Buddhist cave monasteries in China in the form of an anthill 142 meters high. Located in Gansu Province, Maiji District, Tianshui City District:

There are 194 grottoes in the mountain: 54 - in the east, 140 - in the west. They are carved on the southern slope of the mountain, at an altitude of 80 m from the foot. Inside there are more than 7200 clay and stone sculptures, over 1300 sq. M. frescoes that were created from the 4th to the 19th century.

In addition to sculptures, more than 2000 items of ceramics, bronze, iron and jasper, ancient books, documents, paintings and works of calligraphers were found here. The tallest sculpture reaches 16 m. From one cave to another you can get only along a wooden path that runs over the cliff.

The Pont du Gard (French Pont du Gard, literally "bridge over the Gard") is the tallest surviving "ancient Roman" aqueduct in the French department of Gard. Built 2000 years ago (according to the official version), allegedly, with the help of sticks and ropes:

pictures are clickable!

The aqueduct is all explored by software:

More close-up:

The paintings of medieval catastrophists depict the ruins of the majestic buildings of an extinct civilization. Anatoly Venustov noticed in the comments that some of the drawings also depict some strange wooden structures stuck in stone blocks, most likely in these mysterious holes:

Take a look at this photo of the Ponyugar Arch:

In the protruding top blocks, square holes extend within the block at an angle of approximately 45 degrees, crossing 2 adjacent faces. And boards or metal profiles were attached in the lower block.

But, on the oldest aqueducts, there are also round holes and also of unknown purpose:

This is an aqueduct in Segovia (Spain). By the way, pay attention - the arch rests on nothing. If the stones of this long structure disperse from an earthquake or hypothermia, the keystone will fall down and the whole structure will crumble. But this damn aqueduct is 2 thousand years old.

Vaduhan_08 believes that a metal hook was driven into the holes to hang the block in order to fit the bottom surface of the block to the shape of the surface below. This version is suitable for a Finnish dam. But not for the Segovsky aqueduct. He has the usual rectangular blocks, with the exception of a very small number of complex shapes. And the holes are on the side, not the top.

Another sign of high-tech ancient structures is the lack of a binder solution between the bricks. This and other gigantic aqueducts were built without the use of a binder solution (cement, for example). You will be surprised, but the word "cement" itself is Latin (check at least on Wikipedia, if you don't believe it)! Latin is the language of the ancient Romans, if anyone does not know. But, for some reason, the Romans did not use cement in such a mega-structure. In our time, the whole world uses and the Romans for some reason refused.

Something else interesting is asserted here:

Read more about my study of divine aqueducts here

Jordan. Petra:

Links to this study:

All my research is incomplete, they are all dynamic, that is, I can make new changes at any time and I do it very often. At the same time, my conclusions may be reversed. So, I recommend revising any research periodically. I write the date of the last update in red at the beginning of the study.