Fake history of mankind. Our civilization is 200 years old

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The author offers his hypothesis of the origin of humanity.

At the moment, there are two main directions in alternative history. Researchers Alexei Kungurov and Andrei Sklyarov became their apologists. These two bright outstanding personalities even managed to create their own schools with associates, followers and students. Thanks to their efforts, an incredible breakthrough took place in historical science, a real revolution, unfortunately unnoticed by the overwhelming majority of our citizens. And, oddly enough, this breakthrough occurred not through the efforts of the scientific historical community, but thanks to the efforts of single enthusiasts without scientific titles and often far from historical science, but possessing an inquiring mind and a heightened sense of justice. At first glance, they did not do anything special, they just drew our attention to a number of facts that do not fit into the harmonious picture of the history of mankind. But in fact, these facts are fundamental in understanding the structure of the universe and the place of humanity in it. And in the light of these facts, the official history looks at least ridiculous. I am grateful to them for the fact that they changed my consciousness and I came to an understanding of what will be discussed below. All my life, like many others, I asked myself the questions: who we are, where we are from and why. For the first time, the monumental edifice of Darwin's theory of evolution was shaken in my mind when I learned about the existence of UFOs, but it finally collapsed after I came across the articles of the aforementioned apologists of alternative history six months ago. From that moment on, the world around me appeared in a completely different light.

The average man will say: to become a historian you need to study for a long time, read a lot of books on history, be in the service, have an academic degree, travel on expeditions and attend symposia. Yes, this is so, but, as we all see, the official historical science has turned into an elite closed club, in fact, the mafia, which is interested in preserving the existing situation and in every possible way prevents the creation of a real picture of the origin and development of mankind, hushing up facts that do not fit into the paradigm of which have accumulated a lot in recent years. There was such a paradoxical situation that individual citizens, who did not want to put up with this lie and hypocrisy any longer, tried on the toga of a historian.

The historian's tool is education, a broad outlook, a critical mindset, strong logic and life experience. And believe me, many people have such a tool, but only a few are able to use it at the right time in the right place. They are the ones who lead the rest.

Doubts about the infallibility of the official history arose in people long ago, but only with the advent of the Internet and satellite maps, these doubts acquired the status of facts and became available to everyone who is fond of this topic. Researchers of the past began to grow and multiply like mushrooms after the rain, and this is good. Today the history of our civilization is an incredible mixture, an exotic cocktail of versions, hypotheses, guesses and real facts. Atlantis, Hyperborea, megaliths, pyramids, underground cities, hollow Earth, giants, dwarfs, unexplained artifacts, floods, dinosaurs, mammoths, a global predictor, Vedas, Vimanas, copyright holders and much more are mixed here. I think the time has come to put in order at least a little this incredible amount of conflicting information. I will try to do my bit in this difficult matter.

I want to present to the viewer my hypothesis of the emergence of humanity, which is somewhat different from all existing at the moment and, as I think, has a right to exist. I hope someone will find it interesting. In my conclusions, I was guided by ordinary human logic, common sense and life experience.

So what is the essence of my hypothesis?

Andrey Sklyarov and Alexey Kungurov in their numerous and interesting works have brilliantly shown that modern civilization has nothing to do with artifacts. I completely agree with them and disagree with the mentioned authors only in their conclusions:

1. Andrey Sklyarov considers artifacts to be the handiwork of higher civilizations that have visited the planet in the past.

2. Alexey Kungurov speaks about the advanced knowledge and technologies of our ancestors, which were lost as a result of the global cataclysm.

I think that artifacts have nothing to do with us, nor with higher civilizations, nor with our distant ancestors, but are part of our FALSE HISTORY.

I am sure that the whole history of mankind (and not its individual episodes, as many authors believe) from beginning to end is a LIE, which is supported by official historical science. And humanity has existed on this planet for only TWO HUNDRED YEARS! We simply do not have a history - we did not have time to acquire it. I think that about two hundred years ago we just woke up in our cities with already formed memory, professional skills, ready-made industry, agriculture, technology, social infrastructure, language and culture. And most importantly, with a ready-made story that has only one task: to hide the TRUTH. And the TRUTH is that we have a CREATOR. The fact of its existence and what is its purpose in relation to people and is intended to hide a FALSE STORY. Now many who read these lines will twist their fingers at their temples and will be right: it is impossible to believe in such a thing. But let's not rush, our conversation will be long and difficult.

I believe that the reality in which we exist is so incredible that human consciousness, which has been in the chains of Darwin's theory of evolution since school, simply rejects it.

Reality is a capsule of space and time with a set of strict physical laws that we cannot change. What are the basic laws of our reality? These are: 1. The law of universal gravitation. 2. The law of conservation of energy. They govern our life and development. Logically speaking, our reality can have two options:

1. It is unchanged from the moment of our appearance on this planet, and then we are able to at least roughly determine our age.

2. It changes and with it our memory, and then our past is conditional and we are able to study only a part of it that is available at the moment.

I will consider the first option.

The appearance of people on this planet can also have two options:

1. Reality was created simultaneously with us.

2. Reality was created before us and we were placed in it later.

We can study reality in two ways:

1. Analyzing human memory.

2. Exploring the world around us.

If we start from human memory, then it consists of the memory of generations, i.e. the cumulative memory of our grandfathers, great-grandfathers, great-great-grandfathers, etc. into the depths of the centuries. As a research tool, human memory is weak, but we can squeeze something out of it. The main method of research remains the study of the material world around us, and here there are more than enough facts. What do we see around us? A huge number of things that are simply impossible in our reality, let's dwell on the most obvious:

1. Megaliths, Underground cities, Pyramids and Polygonal masonry … Their incredible weight, methods of construction and methods of stone processing make us assume that builders have tools and technologies that are impossible in our reality for the manufacture and methods of moving such weights. Taken together, these facts contradict the physical laws of our reality.

2. Our Cities … Yes, I consider our cities to be artifacts, because I think that people have nothing to do with their creation. The most striking example of this in our country is St. Petersburg.

3. Artifacts from stone and metals. Our museums are filled to the brim with exhibits whose origins no one can explain within the framework of existing technology. A. Kungurov perfectly showed this in his wonderful works.

4. UFOs stand apart on this list. Their existence makes us assume that someone or something penetrates our reality from the outside and is able to change its properties.

I believe that all artifacts were created by the CREATOR as an option:

1. Before the appearance of people on the planet and with a purpose unknown to us.

2. Simultaneously with people as part of a FAKE STORY.

As for the cities, either they were created simultaneously with us and for us, or they were created before us, again with an unknown purpose, and then people were already created for cities.

So, let's move on to the main question: where did I get the term 200 years, speaking about the age of humanity? I started off with a few time markers:

1. The first time marker is an ordinary brick from which our cities are built, I believe that it is in it that the answer to the main question is hidden: how old is mankind?

And what is special about this brick, you ask: an ordinary building material? And you will be wrong. Yes, the material is ordinary, but only for our time. How many years do you think a brick can stand in our climate? There is no research on this topic - historical science was not interested in it, it dated the buildings by other methods. I think, based on life experience, that 300-500 years, the tolerance is great, but we do not need great accuracy. So, few people think about the fact that the entire territory of Russia (like the rest of the planet) is built up with a huge number of brick buildings 200 years old and older. The bulk of the buildings are concentrated in cities, but the countryside is also densely built up with bricks. These are temples, churches and estates located both on the territory of settlements and simply in an open field. Many buildings are in a dilapidated state and are the best suited for determining the age and quality of bricks.

We see that the quality of the brick is excellent and cannot be compared with the modern one. Recently, there has even been a flourishing business of selling antique bricks from demolished old buildings. I don’t think that modern brick will have the same bright future. We take these structures for granted, as our historical heritage, without thinking that these structures are impossible in our reality. Why? Here's why. To a person who has never encountered the production of bricks, it seems that this is a simple matter, since we see bricks and their fragments everywhere throughout our life. But no! So we come to the cornerstone, or rather the brick of our history. WHERE DOES THE BRICK COME FROM 200-500 YEARS AGO? Everyone can go online and read how a brick is made to understand: WITHOUT ELECTRICITY AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT, MASS PRODUCTION OF BURNED BRICKS IN OUR CLIMATE IS IMPOSSIBLE! Yes, you can burn ceramic dishes on wood, some bricks, for example, for stoves, but not the huge volume that we see. And cities, estates and temples stand. And they are great! The reality is this: about 200-500 years ago, on the territory of Russia (as well as throughout the planet), from nowhere, an unthinkable number of buildings made of baked bricks appeared and people have nothing to do with this. This also includes buildings made of granite. Example: St. Petersburg.

2. The second time marker is a cataclysm as a result of which the first floors of buildings were brought in by the ground. For some reason, human memory does not store this event, although, apparently, it happened relatively recently. If the age of the bricks from which the buildings are built is about 200 years (as an example, St. Petersburg), then this event is younger and we do not remember it, and we just don’t remember it, but we cannot even offer intelligible versions. We remember the biblical events of 2000 years ago, and the unprecedented cataclysm of 200 years ago, which occurred on our land, is not reflected in any oral sources. Strange, isn't it? Hypotheses about heavy rains, mudflows, tsunamis are hardly appropriate. There is no mention of this in the allegedly historical chronicles. Nowhere is it said that the premises of the first floors were cleared of dirt, and this is a huge amount of work, given that the only transport was a horse-drawn one and only a shovel was a tool. I have the following explanation for this: at the time the people appeared, the cities already stood in their modern form, with the first floors sunk into the ground but clean inside.

3. The third time marker is our graveyard. There are monuments on the graves 200 years ago

made of granite, marble and the like of concrete, processed by tools unknown to us according to

unknown technologies. All tombstones created by humans are immediately visible for their poor quality. I believe that approximately at this turn the border between the real and

Fictional history.

In the following articles I will try to show you examples of what white threads our HISTORY is sewn with.