If you read and listen to what the pro-Ukrainian liberals and democrats said BEFORE Maidan, then it turns out that they hate everything Russian with base animal hatred and politics has nothing to do with it.
What is the main motive for the American-European invasion of Donbass by the hands of the Ukrainians? After talking with pro-Ukrainian Ukrainians in social networks, I realized that the main thing is animal hatred of everything Russian. I emphasize. Not to everything Russian, and not to Putin or the communists, but to the Russian. Of course, they would like to attack Moscow or Crimea with tanks, but this is fraught. Therefore, we chose the weakest Russians - the population of Donbass.
And here is what a former Russian official, an ethnic German pro-Ukrainian Alfred Kokh, wrote. This is the title of the article:
Ukrainians, throw this heap shit"
A lot of crap, of course - the residents of Donbass. Here is a quote from his article:
Image
All this talk about some incredible industrial potential in the Donbass - bullshit … All these factories shitnot worth …
… And you don't need to kill anyone. And there is no need to perish. And Putin, laden with this rubbishand new freeloaders - it will overstrain. And without any war - just turn into a bunch shit … As it happened once with the USSR in the late 80s
What is interesting is that he is a public person, an intellectual, a politician, a former Russian statesman, and he uses the words "shit", "garbage" and "shit" in a public article. Whoever takes the path of Ukrainians, for some reason, is vulgarized and degraded to the level of a garbage heap.
But let's not condemn him without understanding it. Maybe he is offended not at all Russians because of animal hatred, but only at the residents of Donbass, who are really objectively guilty of something. After all, he pours mud on not only Donbass and Crimeans, but also Putin and the USSR, that is, maybe this is a political position, and not Nazism? Maybe he became like this after the Maidan, when the Donbass people supported the treacherous invasion of the hordes of bloody Putin into Bandero-ucropia?
Let's pay attention to how he congratulated Russian women almost 2 years before Maidan, on March 8, 2012 on Echo of Moscow
In 1945, the bloodiest war in human history ended. For Russia, it meant the loss of about a third of the male population. The nation gave its women (who already dragged the country on themselves throughout the war) the opportunity to have a man from what was left: from the disabled, rear rats, guardians, smershevites, thirteen-year-old adolescents, decrepit old people, etc.
A demobilized healthy man was such a rarity that a real hunt was going on him. In this hunt, women were ready for anything: parasitism and drunkenness of the "beloved" man. The man turned into lazy, always drunk redneck, with horseradish at the ready.
Boys who grew up in such an atmosphere no longer perceived the girl as a Beautiful Lady … Having become a little older, these young men began to be three hours late for dates with their girlfriends, deliberately demonstrate their disdain for them, and when they married, they saw their main prowess in the fact that they do not divorce them.
So they tell each other bluntly: I haven’t fucked her for five years! Let her say thank you that I still live with her. And all because I am a noble person.
A drunken treasure lying on the couchwas perceived as the norm: well, a person was not lucky in life - his superiors did not like him. It began to be believed that if the head of the family, instead of spending time with his wife, stuck out all weekend in the garage (fishing), then such a woman was lucky: look - she does not drink and does not walk. And on this very fishing (in the garage), this uncle already instills in his son: you cannot give freedom to women. If anything, it’s not superfluous in the face.
The Russian man does not bear comparison with anyone: not with a Chechen, not with a Chinese, not with an American, not with a Jew
Having traveled around the world and looking at other peoples, I can say with confidence: nowhere, in any land, is there such a bestial attitude towards women as in Russia.
Everywhere: in the East, in the West, in the Islamic world - a woman is cherished, respected, helped, loved.
Everything in nature is interconnected: having got rid of the need to participate in competition for a woman, The Russian man has degraded and turned into an uninteresting waste of civilization - into a narcissistic, touchy, cowardly bastard.
And now I can say this firmly, based on my own observations: The Russian man is the vilest, most disgusting and most worthless type of man on Earth.
The Russian government is deceitful and disgusting - because the men who personify it are deceitful and disgusting.
Lovely Russian women! Don't let the scum! Tell them bluntly that they are disgusting and disgusting. Even if they are Russian men. Love only the noble, courageous, kind, hardworking, caring and honest. Even if it's Chinese or Zulu. Give us children from real men. And then we will be saved.
Alfred Koch is German, he is good like all non-Russians, especially Germans. But after all, the German male population perished in the same war, and also German women had to choose from what was left. There is no difference. Bandera men in western Ukraine were also killed in the same war. Therefore, Bandera women had no reason to pamper their Bendera people. And so on. But, the Germans, Western Karainets and the rest are good, and the Russians " lazy, always drunk redneck, with horseradish at the ready ". This means that the only difference between the rugged ones is that they are rude. This is animal hatred.
Further. It is not clear from his words, but Russian men, who are liberal-democrats - do they have no ancestors from the time of the war? Their ancestors came to Russia after the war, and that's why they are so good? Where did they come from? Have you come from Mars?
For example, Boris Nemtsov is a liberal democrat, but the bapp changed like gloves. Three famous wives and one emerged after death, which he called "Christ", which is a cynical sacrilege:
Nemtsov is a blasphemous Orthodox Jew. And another woman was with him on the bridge when he was killed. That he does not respect women so much then? Is he also Russian? He, too, "a lazy, always drunk redneck, with a horseradish at the ready"?
Nemtsov is a blasphemous Orthodox Jew. And another woman was with him on the bridge when he was killed. That he does not respect women so much then? Is he also Russian? He, too, "a lazy, always drunk redneck, with a horseradish at the ready"? Where is the logic? Where is the logic?
Once again, Koch's quote:
Nemtsov is a Jew. Although, the surname is German. But, "to hell with the advantage" just like the "Russian drunken redneck" fucked all the bapps around. So, after all, the Russian has caught up with the Jew? Where is the logic? Where is the logic?
On Bandreroucropia's "independence" day in 2015, Mr. Koch defiantly bowed to the relics of Stepan Bandera in Germany:
And this is nothing new. Bandera taught the Germans about fascism before. In Babi Yar, there were 1200 Ukrainian punishers and only 300 German
And, the funny thing is, such Kochi were high-ranking officials in Russia in the dashing 90s. They ruled the people they hated as now in Banderoucropia.
Hitler's attitude to the Aryans was exactly the same as that of the biblical Cain to Abel! He had a desire to kill his brother, and Hitler also had exactly the same desire to destroy the Slavs, in whose veins Aryan blood flows
From time immemorial, a small people, the Shors, have lived on the territory of Western Siberia, there are only a little more than 12 thousand of them left. When the Shors realized that the local authorities treated them in much the same way as the American colonialists treated the Indians, they filed a complaint with the UN
Have you ever seen people who determine the degree of correctness of their actions by a number of external clues like the numbers they see, combinations of letters or other signs that accompany the moment of their choice?
