StopHam?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

What do a pretty business girl, bulldozers and a four-time Olympic champion have in common? Until recently, I also thought that nothing. However, the latest events, which I had warned about for a long time, have formed a complete picture, and such a common thing has been discovered that only a blind person can not see it.

Of course, you probably know a lot of other examples from our current daily life. I just want to encourage thinking and observant people to see connections and draw conclusions. Those who are still sleeping, it's up to you, good night …

Once I drew attention to the shameless program of a charming host called "Revizorro". After what he saw, he could not restrain himself and invited the readers to imagine that a lady comes to their house with measuring equipment, and she goes straight to the toilet, to the bathroom, to the kitchen, does something there, and the operator with a camera is filming all this. When the owner asks what you have forgotten here, she replies that she is a journalist and that she does not have a search warrant, but some kind of "editorial assignment." The owner loses the power of speech from such impudence, and then hears angry tirades from the uninvited guest about how badly he (or his wife) cleans the house: they cannot take the trash heap on time, the floors are not washed, they are preparing some kind of nasty stuff that can be poisoned … And tomorrow, all the poor fellow's colleagues already know about this, because his apartment was shown on central television, and even with the presenter's comments and his own indistinct chatter, they say, you have no right.

It may be objected that "Revizorro" does not visit the private apartments of honest citizens, but hotels and restaurants. However, even without looking into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, it is obvious to any sane person that with such an impudent approach, a number of not only ordinary human norms are violated, but also laws written by people. Which ones - see for yourself or read other articles dedicated to the debriefing of our wonderful presenter - Lena Flying. I mentioned her here only for the beginning …

Because it’s not about whether the program is bad or good, whether we are being bullied in restaurants or not, but about the fact that it turns out that you can do as the blonde Revizorro does. Television shows. To our home, or to a restaurant, or to an office, we, of course, do not want to get such a madam with equipment, but to look from the outside - and that, very cool and instructive.

The second brushstroke that forms a clear picture was the demolition of more than a hundred buildings, called "stalls" in the press, although the stalls are actually small booths two by two, which are now very quickly set up in Moscow and which, as the all-knowing journalists write, are bypassed the city's treasury in one and a half million rubles. Everyone, of course. So, as everyone knows and has heard, two- and three-story shopping malls were demolished, which I myself probably would never have entered, in which, perhaps, the buyers were weighed, or maybe not, which belonged to bandits, or maybe - decent people, I don’t know, but who stood in the center of Moscow, which means they had every right to stand there. Only the rights were given to them by the previous authorities. And this was their trouble. By the way, next to my house, not far from Sukharevskaya, one neat little shop was quietly leveled with a bulldozer in the summer, and the second was removed with an excavator just yesterday. Probably, they were clearing a place that can now be paved with tiles. Since there is nothing more to occupy these places. Although, no, I'm wrong: you can put five or six stalls multiplied by one and a half million.

What am I talking about? Not about, of course, how poor the former shopkeepers are and what a bastard government. I mean that today it is already possible. You can call black (official document) white (fraudulent paper) and demolish, demolish, demolish …

And if without food (after all, you have to patriotically crush imported crap with skating rinks so that the poor and indigent, living and so hungry old people do not get it) and without shops (who needs them, if all the food and imported clothes will soon be trampled in righteous anger and tear them apart?) A Russian person will still live for several years, then without a roof over his head - it is unlikely. It means that they are reasoning correctly with the tacit approval of the sleepy herd of power, it is time to demolish the roof. And they take it down.

They began to deprive people of housing even during the construction period of the new Khazaria … sorry, Sochi, they say, the land under your house is terribly needed by the state for sports achievements, and now they continue there and not only. For example, in the center of Novosibirsk. How do bulldozer drivers, builders, riot policemen and cops (or should we say “penta” now?) Do not understand that it will come back to haunt and respond, and that not today or tomorrow, their own houses will be recognized by the next leadership as unauthorized construction and demolished, as it is now fashionable, at the expense of the tenants? And they don't understand. They think (if they know how to do it at all) that what is happening are not coils of an intensifying tornado, but just separate manifestations of the “law”.

But about the law a little later, but for now the third and last stroke on our canvas.

Imagine that you have a car, you are driving in the center of Moscow, or rather, you are standing in another traffic jam, together with your wife or husband, and then a polite young man comes up to you and says not to stand there. Why is he telling you this? Because he is conscious and very alert, which is what he wishes for you. But you, perhaps, would like to leave, but it doesn’t work. Then the interlocutor takes and pastes a wonderful picture advertising his social movement right on your windshield. From which both you and passers-by can learn that you are a boor, and he is a stop. I repeat: you did not leave your car anywhere at night, its siren does not work, which prevents people from sleeping or just concentrating, you do not prevent anyone from entering the highway, you are just sitting in the car that is parked.

Lyrical digression. Personally, I don't digest cars organically. I was rocked in them as a child. I see plenty of idiots behind the wheel every day. They cut off, pour puddles on passers-by, drive through pedestrian crossings at red lights and do a lot of other things. At one time, I lived for quite a long time in Denmark, where this also happened sometimes, but extremely rarely. I thought like we all were in the 90s: these are our ill-mannered drivers and what kind of Danes are good and correct. However, in a conversation with local friends, who, with some stretch, could be called Copenhagen punks, I found out to my surprise that the casket was opened very simply: Danish drivers were brought up. At one time, when they had an initial accumulation of capital and many moved from two-wheeled bicycles to the wheel of four-wheeled cans, hooligans (or civil rights activists) walked the streets with paint bolons or long nails. And if, for example, someone was reckless and drove in front of them at a red light, well, you know, the mark on the side of the car remained for its entire iron life. By my arrival, the reckless drivers simply died out. Although in some places there were cars with multi-colored wounds …

To be honest, I am still very impressed with this approach. By the way, if one of your neighbors in the same Denmark sees today that you have parked a car in front of your house with at least one wheel on the sidewalk, he will automatically call where he should be, and you will be very significantly fined.

So, yes, of course, you can and should fight the impudence of motorists. Here's just how to feel the line beyond which you, breaking the glass to the bastard, in front of your eyes rammed a child at a pedestrian crossing, as mom taught, turns into a boor, filming his pseudo-righteous showdown with the four-time Olympic champion in gymnastics, who just sits with his wife in the car and politely invites you to come to your senses and not stick a hard-to-peel sticker on his windshield?

And the answer, as it usually happens, is very simple. He's on the surface. It is versatile and easy to understand. But now it is being trampled, demolished and glued, so that none of us even think of it.

We are encouraged to obey the laws. Moreover, the key word here is not "law" at all, but "obey." But how else to react to laws written by some, rewritten by others, interpreted by others and violated by all? After all, it is often simply impossible to understand them without preparation. To interpret them, people study for five years in institutions and eventually become (with a few exceptions) unemployed lawyers. But what is written can always be corrected, changed, reversed. What is being done, what I just briefly talked about.

Laws are not just written by people. In our case, the laws are written off from the "enlightened West." Where only today literally a few begin to see clearly and with enthusiastic amazement come to an understanding of the very, the only universal answer to the question "How to be?" The answer, which has long been known not only to our distant ancestors, but also to our immediate grandfathers and grandmothers: do not do to another what you do not wish for yourself. In other words, act according to your conscience.

The trouble with the "original" from which our laws are written off is that in the English language the word "conscience" is absent. In dictionaries, the word conscience appears under this meaning, but believe a philologist with two higher educations and relatively considerable experience in tutoring: this is not "conscience." Like any borrowing, it breaks down into components, of which con is just a Latin prefix with the meaning "with, together, together", and the root science today is known to many (albeit in a slightly modified vocalization) as "science" from the combination of sains- fiction, i.e. science fiction. There is also an obsolete meaning of the word science - just "knowledge". So here's the proof on your fingers: conscience = con + science = co + knowledge = consciousness. No moral aspects, no torments of Raskolnikov - either he fell into knowledge (the law) or not.

And while we - nice leaders, executive builders, the right cops and persistent anti-hams - do not realize who and how we are helping with our "vigilant" deeds, the flywheel of the man-made "law" will spin faster and faster, helping the elite to build private prisons, create private armies demolishing museums. Consciousness is enough for that. If the people awakened by the "common message" do not wake up, then very soon, sooner than you think, some Moscow Kremlin will follow unauthorized buildings in the form of shops and your houses …

And surely now someone from those who have read to the end is already sighing: "Hurry …".