Video: Moon and Flood
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
The Flood is a real event in the recent past
We learn about the former global flood from the Bible. At the same time, scientists deny its reality. What is the reason for the disagreement? The problem is the Bible's presentation of the Flood. It says, briefly β¦ suddenly, rain began to pour on the earth, which lasted 40 days, water began to arrive all over the earth, and as a result, even the highest mountains were under water. The flood lasted a whole year, and then all the water that caused the flood disappeared somewhere.
Naturally, such a description of the flood does not correspond to any known natural disasters, and therefore scientists easily rejected this information about it, classifying it as myths.
But I did not do this and began to study the problem of the flood, proceeding from the assumption that everything said about it in the Bible is the truth. At the same time, he suggested that the contradictions in the description of the flood with the data of science are a consequence of a misunderstanding of the text of Scripture. Let's see what happened in the end with this approach to this problem.
And so, the main question is, where did so much water come from for the flood and where did it all go? Let us turn to facts and logic to explain the reasons for the flood. Then we must immediately say that such an amount of water on earth cannot come from outside, this is a fact, otherwise the flood would have continued to this day.
Conclusion, the flood could only be caused by the water that is on earth. And this is possible if the water was suddenly redistributed, that is, a giant tide occurred on the earth. There are no other options.
The next question immediately arises, what caused this tide? On earth, the tides are caused by the moon + the sun, but they, as we see, are small. This means that some other massive cosmic body flew close to the earth and thereby caused this flood-tide. It still does not work β¦ if it were so, then the tide would be short-lived, some days, and not a whole year, as the Bible says. Dead end? No, let's continue looking for the reason further.
Here the data on the moon is suggestive. Scientists say that the Moon could not form from a gas-dust cloud while in its modern orbit, because the Earth would have attracted all the dust and gas during its formation and the Moon would not get anything. What conclusion follows from this fact? Only one β¦ The moon was formed in a different place than near the Earth. How, then, did it end up in its current orbit? Let's continue looking for an answer to this question.
In the past, our Sun was surrounded by a cloud of gas and dust, from which all the planets were formed. In the orbit of the future Earth, conditions have developed for its formation, and this process has begun. At the same time, in this orbit, but on the opposite side from the sun, these conditions also developed and there began to form β¦ the Moon. Also, in this orbit, Anti-earth could have formed, which may now be located at a point strictly opposite from the Sun in relation to the Earth. It turned out three planets in the same orbit, but opposite each other, Earth, Anti-earth and the Moon. This is not unusual, the farther from the sun, the more planets can form in one orbit, if the structure of the gas and dust cloud allows.
Why is there now one planet in its orbits? The fact is that such a scheme of two or more planets in one orbit is not stable and these planets sooner or later begin to approach each other due to mutual attraction.
What happens when they come together in the end? The answer is in space β¦ it's the asteroid belt. In this orbit, such a convergence of the two planets took place, which ended in the fact that they were torn apart by the forces of gravity, that is, they did not collide with each other, and at some distance they began to collapse due to the action of these forces. We could observe an example of such destruction when comet Shoemaker-Levy approached Jupiter. With the destruction of these two planets, the asteroid belt was formed and the entire solar system was filled with these asteroids. When they hit other planets, numerous craters were formed.
Then in other orbits with other planets the same thing should have happened. Instead of planets, only asteroids would fly around the Sun and it would be surrounded by rings of them, like the rings of Saturn.. This is exactly what would happen. But some powerful, intelligent forces intervened in this process. What did they do? On the example of the Earth and the Moon, it looks like this β¦ they installed some kind of technical devices that change the force of gravity of the planet. When the Moon approached the Earth, these devices were turned on and on the earth they reduced the force of gravity. Further, by changing the force of gravity of the Earth and the Moon, they made it so that the Moon was close to the Earth without destruction and they began to rotate together around a common center of mass.
The force of gravity on the moon was eventually increased with the help of technical devices, and on the earth it was reduced, so that the force of gravity became the same as on the earth as on the moon. And the most important moment in this story, β¦ The Moon, at the same time, was much closer to the Earth than it is now.
To explain further events in space that led to the flood, it is necessary to briefly explain the internal structure of the planets. And it is not what science tells us.
When planets are formed from a gas-dust cloud, they are warmed up due to chemical reactions between oxygen and other chemicals. elements, as well as due to the radioactive decay of various isotopes and heavy metals, in particular uranium.
This released heat melts the inner part of the planet, so magma appears in it. Then the core of the planet begins to form from this melt. Metals, being several times heavier than other rocks, sink closer to the center of the planet and an iron-nickel core appears. How is this known? It was said above that the two planets collapsed and formed an asteroid belt. It is from there that stone and iron-nickel meteorites, which were formerly part of the planets, fly to us. Accordingly, nickel-iron were part of the core of these planets, since they are much heavier than the stone parts.
An important point β¦ uranium and other radioactive heavy metals are almost three times heavier than iron, so they sink closer than it to the center of the planet. Thus, in the planets another smaller nucleus is formed in the iron-nickel core β¦ which can be conditionally called uranium. In this small nucleus, a strong heating of the substance occurs due to the radioactive decay of uranium and other atoms, as well as due to the fact that little is removed of the released thermal energy.
What this gives us for understanding the causes of the flood will be seen from further analysis of the facts. To do this, let's go back to the earth-moon system. As mentioned above, the Moon and the Earth were transferred to an orbit of rotation around their common center of mass. At the same time, the moon and the earth were facing each other on one side, as the moon is now to the earth. Why is that? Otherwise, with a close distance between them, there would be huge tides on the earth every day. And when the moon is above one point on the earth, the tidal wave does not move. It should be noted that with a reduced gravity, the Earth should have expanded somewhat due to the pressure of gases (plasma) in the core, which led to a decrease in the speed of its rotation around its own axis. This must be taken into account when calculating the parameters of the antediluvian orbit of the earth-moon system.
But the following happened to the earth's crust, the moon began to unevenly attract different parts of the earth's crust and on the earth β¦ the so-called continental drift began. The ancient continent of Pangea split into pieces, which began to move to the point of the earth above which the moon was always located.. This drift caused the formation of mountains and all kinds of faults on the earth.
Here it is necessary to pay attention to scientific nonsense. We are told β¦ here convective currents of magma rise from the heated core of the earth and, when moving under the earth's crust, cause the drift of its various parts and, as a result, the split of the continents.
Apparently they consider us mentally retarded. Let me remind you that convection exists where there are large flows of thermal energy. For example, the water in the kettle on the stove is intensively mixed due to the fact that it heats up at the bottom and actively cools at the top, that is, there is a large loss of thermal energy, which causes convection.
There is no such heat loss on earth, the earth's crust conducts less heat than a similar area of a thermos flask. There is no sufficient heat loss, and there are no convective magma flows. The existing theory of continental drift is worthless. Geophysicists seem to be haunted by the laurels of astronomers, who were carried away by their unbridled fantasies so that they began to compose whatever came to hand, ignoring common sense. See article on β¦ << Galactic deception>>.
In addition, I was not lazy and made simple calculations about whether magma could cause continental drift if it still flowed under them. Alas, the force required to overcome the strength of the earth's crust is much higher, the available force from the viscous friction of magma against the base of the earth's crust.. cross section. Next, we take for the calculation a strip from the mainland with a width of 1 m, multiply by this average size of the width of the mainland and get the area of such a strip. Then we also multiply the meter strip by the thickness of the mainland and multiply the resulting area by the specific strength of rocks. We get the force necessary to destroy the rocks of the mainland for a strip 1 m wide. We divide this force by the area of the base of the mainland (strips 1 m wide) and find out the necessary friction force on an area of 1 m2 from the sluggishly flowing magma. It turns out to be very large, no friction of magma can create such a force. Conclusion, only the attraction of another celestial body led to continental drift β¦ there are no processes on earth that could cause it.
Therefore, the fact of continental drift confirms that the Moon was much closer to the Earth earlier.
Another fact that also confirms the location of the Moon close to the Earth. This is the reduced gravity on Earth to ensure that the Moon is in this position. What evidence is there for this? Fossil remains of dinosaurs. Their size did not allow them to exist on earth at the current gravity. Look at the elephant, at its slow movements, it is difficult for it with several tons of weight, and in the Argentinosaurus one vertebra weighs about a ton. The force of gravity would simply crush such a dinosaur, since the muscle strength is not sufficient to resist it. You should also pay attention to the article, which is here on, the title β¦ << There are no forests on the land>>. Those huge trees about which it speaks, too, could exist only with a reduced gravity.
Another moment, with a significantly reduced gravity on the earth, the problem of holding the atmosphere appears.. It was also solved with the help of some devices that created a protective field around the Earth, and it kept the atmosphere.
Now we turn to the global flood, what caused it. Let's turn again to the internal structure of the planets. The small uranium core available to the Moon, as well as to other planets, has warmed up to millions of degrees due to the lack of heat loss. Such as a nuclear reactor in a thermos. In addition to heavy metals, there is also hydrogen in the center of the planets, which has been there since the formation of the planets from the gas-dust cloud. When hydrogen is heated to millions of degrees, a thermonuclear fusion reaction begins, in which tremendous energy is released. When it started on the Moon, it had a thermonuclear nuclear explosion. The blast wave from this explosion reached the surface, from which the crust of the Moon was covered with cracks from which magma flowed onto the surface of the Moon and flooded almost all of it. Now on the Moon we see these continuous lava fields.. This explosion led to the shutdown of some of the technical devices that increased the force of gravity on the Moon. Further, the Moon, with a changed gravity due to the disconnection of some of these devices, could no longer be in a close orbit with respect to the earth and began to gradually move away from it. At the same time, the Moon naturally could no longer be above one point on the earth and a huge tidal wave moved along the earth after the moving Moon, which caused global floodThat is, the highest part of this tidal wave covered even high mountains, as the Bible says. Along the way, this tidal wave destroyed the glacier, which was on the ground at that time. Mammoths that got in the way of this water mixed with ice (mudflow) instantly died, not even having time to chew the grass, some are found with grass in their mouths. After the water left, the ice, mixed with the ground and did not have time to melt, ended up on the surface of the earth, forming vast areas of permafrost up to a hundred meters thick on it, which could not be the case with the usual cold on the ground. It's just that the earth cannot freeze to such a depth from the cold because of the increase in the temperature of the earth's rocks with depth. This layer of permafrost was left by a glacier destroyed by a tidal wave during the last Late Valdai glaciation of the earth. And because of this, all the fauna of that archaeological period of the earth and which existed at a reduced gravity at that time perished.
The moon was moving away from the earth gradually and therefore the tidal wave, decreasing, went around the earth more than once, and because of this, the flood lasted a whole year, as indicated in the Scriptures. During this year, part of the earth was either under the wave or freed from water for a time when the wave followed the moon. That is why a dove brought a fresh olive leaf to Noah, which could not have happened if the whole earth had been under water for a year. The intensity of the wave also depended on the trajectory of the Moon; directly under the Moon, the wave height was maximum. In places far from this trajectory, the wave intensity was minimal, which allowed the ark to rise smoothly in the water and not collapse at the same time.
What about the rain that rained for 40 days? Let's remember that the force of gravity on the Earth and the Moon was then changed and that it was the same on them.. Hence the conclusion β¦ the moon, like the earth was then inhabited, there were oceans of water on it. With the explosion of the core of the Moon, the huge flows of lava that poured out as a result of this explosion evaporated these oceans of water. At the same time, the force of gravity on the Moon, due to the shutdown of its changing devices, decreased and the evaporated water of the oceans of the Moon was pulled by the Earth, which caused it to rain for many days, which is mentioned in the Bible..
Water from the Moon changed the level of the oceans on Earth, before the flood it was lower, which is confirmed by the coastal ledges formed from the waves of the surf and which are now found at a depth of tens of meters under water, as well as flooded settlements.
In addition, the Earth from such an uneven impact on it of the Moon began to rotate with the precession of the axis, which ultimately led to its tilt. Previously, the Earth's axis of rotation was perpendicular to the plane of its orbit around the Sun. What fact confirms this? Finds of fossilized tropical vegetation beyond the Arctic Circle, which would not have been able to grow in that place in the conditions of a six-month polar night.
This is how many amazing events the Moon has caused. After the explosion of its core, the Moon was gradually taken to its current orbit around the Earth and its rotation around its axis was slowed down, with the help of devices that change the force of gravity on the Earth and the Moon, and then they were turned off completely and the force of gravity on the planets returned to normal. For a person, she became uncomfortable, it is difficult to walk, her legs swell and other problems due to the high force of gravity. On the moon, the small force of gravity did not allow preserving the atmosphere and, accordingly, life. This is such a sad outcome of the flood.
Now it has been determined that the Moon continues to move away from the Earth by some centimeters a year. This also confirms that the Moon used to be much closer to the earth and naturally could not form in such a low orbit from the Earth..
The satellites of other planets in the solar system, which formed with them, were also placed in other parts of their orbits. artificiallyinto their orbits around the planets in order to prevent their destruction anymore, as happened in the asteroid belt.
The moon continues to influence the earth, causing, in addition to the tides, also earthquakes on it. Scientists are all looking for the cause of earthquakes. They build their stupid theories about continental drift, which is caused by non-existent magma flows. They are trying to explain the cause of earthquakes by this drift, and the continental drift has ended, since the Moon can no longer attract lithospheric plates with the necessary force. But its gravitational force is enough to move individual blocks of the earth's crust, which causes earthquakes. I checked this with the appropriate calculations, which I will not give either, because they are somewhat complicated. Calculations have confirmed that the Moon's gravitational force is sufficient to cause movements and earthquakes. Let the scientists themselves try to make such calculations on a computer, taking into account changing the shape of the earthdue to the attraction of the moon and the sun This will help predict earthquakes.
Conclusion. The global flood, which is said in the Bible, really happened on earth. Many facts presented in this article confirm this. Therefore, you should not treat the Bible as a collection of myths, because the information from there helped us understand some of the events that took place in the solar system.
I will add my observations. I specifically looked for traces of the flood on the ground. For this, he explored the high (10m) steep bank of the river. At the very bottom of the layers of dark clay, broken tree trunks and layers of chips protruded in some places. Also, from this layer, the water washed the bones of animals that were on the shore. All this confirms the fact that a giant tidal wave was passing over this place. Above, above a thick layer of clay, there was a layer of light clay, in which there was nothing. This suggests that the first tidal wave destroyed trees and animals, which ended up at the very bottom of the layer of dark clay. The subsequent wave brought lighter clay and now without any remains. In this area, when wells are dug, various artifacts are often found at a depth, in addition, not all water in wells, due to the abundance of organic remains of antediluvian flora and fauna at a depth, is suitable for drinking., You have to dig a well in another place β¦.
I believe that the mystery of the Flood has been solved.
Recommended:
Why did the USSR and the USA fight for the moon?
A couple of years ago, Roscosmos rejected the American program to create an international manned near-moon station and refused to participate in it. They say that such projects are far from being a priority for the Russian space industry. Russia is again ready to return to the question of the exploration of the Moon and circumlunar space, which is already, for a minute, more than 50 years old
Are flights to the moon resumed? Pros and cons
Manned flights to the moon are needed to prepare an expedition to Mars. As on Mars, the Moon has weak gravity, there is nothing to breathe, nothing protects against cosmic radiation. It is impossible to completely recreate these conditions on Earth, and our satellite, to which it takes only three days to fly, is the nearest suitable test site
The Americans have not been to the moon. Evidence and rationale
Each nation individually and all mankind as a whole strives only forward to conquer new horizons in the field of economic development, medicine, sports, science, new technologies, including the study of astronomy and the conquest of space. We hear about big breakthroughs in the field of astronautics, but were they really? Did the Americans land on the moon, or was it one big show?
Flood in Moscow in 1908 in old photos and postcards
Moscow was not flooded as often as St. Petersburg, and there were practically no serious destructive floods. Still, there are unique photos of streets filled with water
Moon-Moon
The Curious Droid Youtube channel released the movie Why the Russians Didn't Send a Man to the Moon. Simple videos from YouTube havenβt annoyed me so much for a long time. The authors analyzed all the events in the USSR related to the lunar program, without even bothering to doubt the "achievements" of the United States