Husbands in oblivion, and men in oblivion
Husbands in oblivion, and men in oblivion

Video: Husbands in oblivion, and men in oblivion

Video: Husbands in oblivion, and men in oblivion
Video: Why Are So Many Business Leaders Psychopaths? 2024, May
Anonim

Where to "find" them, courageous and persistent, capable of resisting evil, who could bring order to the family, in the region, in the city, in the country.

In one of my articles, I talked about the fight between my teenage son at school and the dramatic subsequent events in relation to classmates, but the issue of raising young growth should be considered deeper and more globally, both for the entire generation of adolescents and for the country as a whole. Upbringing, or rather the formation of men from boys, is a long process and requires the transfer of the male worldview, the implementation of male skills and the development of the physical data of a man. The school cannot be engaged in the upbringing (and even more so the formation of the world outlook) of boys for a simple reason - the team of teachers in the school consists of women alone. But I'm not going to talk about teachers yet. I'll start with the closest person, my mother.

What can a loving mother (especially a single mother) give her son? Material support, constant care and care, sports sections, various trips, museums - galleries and mother's boundless love (at best). Whom the mother sees in front of her, trying to join the upbringing process. First of all, an unreasonable child who needs her care (and for life) and secondly - her "blood", the most dear to herself, especially when she cherishes her maternal hopes around the child.

But what part of these hopes is occupied by the son's unconditional love for another woman (for example, his future wife), or entering into a fight with a group of gopniks, while protecting a complete stranger, or the years of her son's life in Zonovo, or the order of a “parquet” general about wandering around Chechen mountains, etc. (after all, these are real situations for any normal man). Surely not a single mother of her son for such extreme - options will not be able to cook, and will not. And the boy needs a living example in everything.

Will a woman be able to teach her son to hammer a nail with two blows, go to the toilet and not splash the walls of the toilet bowl, protect the weak in front of the strong, bite her lip from the inside when tears come in her eyes, teach her to be responsible for her loved ones and for everything that happens around her, satisfy her burning desire to just fight with someone. No, it cannot, because it is not given the fulfillment and understanding of these things by its nature. A woman thinks in other categories. The natural desires and actions of the son, for the mother, may seem more than strange. A seventeen-year-old son is not at home at eleven in the evening, mom rushes from window to window, dad goes to bed and says to mom: "Go to bed, everything is fine, he will come." This is from the area of managed family relationships, but ask any mother a question: "For what could she sacrifice her son's life?" There will be no answer, because question to the wrong address.

The situation with school teachers in educational activities becomes more complicated. First, they are under the constraints of all sorts of instructions, departmental bureaucratic "troubles" and an exhausting amount of work. Second, they try every day to cope with the poorly managed "motley" mass of children (often in overcrowded classrooms). Thirdly, teachers are also women and in their attempts to somehow influence the retention of general discipline, they sometimes admit inadmissible methods of influencing children, showing them base vices in relationships. Harassment, denunciation are encouraged, methods of threats and intimidation are used: by the police, commissions, exams, etc. Those. Intimidated, executive male bioospecials are "molded". Therefore, women teachers should not be allowed to raise boys for the above reasons (information, general education disciplines, a woman, as a rule, serves better than a man). With all this, at the same time, men were ousted from school education, thanks to the inadequate general educational policy of the state, here you can add both the destruction of the institution of the family by the state and the creation of a submissive, cowardly generation of biorobots through schools.

So where do real men come from then. Whose back you can stand in difficult times, plus see him as a worthy father to your children. And most importantly, where to "find" them, courageous and persistent, capable of resisting evil, who could put things in order in the family, in the region, in the city, in the country.

And it is useless to look for them, they need to be raised and educated, but with the connivance of the peasants, which generation of boys have already been "disfigured" in childhood. If we consider the upbringing of a boy as a man and a warrior, then here it is necessary to focus on three components. Physical fitness is strength, endurance, reaction, the ability to take a punch, stretching all muscle groups, etc. Mental maturity is technique, combat experience, strategy, combat tactics, the ability to navigate depending on conditions (stronger enemy, rain, darkness, enclosed space), but the main thing is SPIRIT.

But on this component it is necessary to dwell in more detail, tk. it is precisely this quality that the overwhelming majority of men lack, which is often the decisive victory factor in a duel and in everyday life. What is the SPIRIT, the inner core of a man? Endurance, confidence in one's righteousness and in one's own strengths, the ability to make the right decision quickly (including for those close to you), responsibility for every word and every action, the ability to defend someone (even to the detriment of oneself), the ability to get out of difficult situations as a winner or lose with dignity. You can still add to this list, but I tried to take the main one. This is the strength of the spirit that must be instilled in boys from early childhood and not at a desk. Not every father can instill such qualities in his son, especially since I'm not talking about mothers.

The inner core of the boy is formed under the influence of external factors, and if the school makes negative adjustments with its "upbringing", then the load on the father or close guardian in this case increases, but the process of the teenager's mental transition to male maturity must certainly be completed to the army. Further, young men may have other "educational disciplines", such as the formation of the consciousness of a husband, family man, father, or defender of the fatherland, or an informal leader of something, but the core of the spirit should be ready at that time. By the way, the state system of correctional camps was created not in order to correct the "stumbled" youngster, but in order to "break" him not an obedient SPIRIT.

You may not be a fighter, but you must be a man. Children from infancy absorb everything like sponges and try to imitate their elders in everything. If a son sees before his own eyes a daddy - a heifer and an authoritative mother, giving everything completely to her child, will he become the head of the family, breadwinner and father - a teacher. I'm sure not. And will it turn out from him a husband who devotes himself, in addition to his family, to the needs of the fatherland. Probably not either. And to what extent can he then be considered a man?

It is very important that the copying of relations in the family between mother and father will be transferred in the future by the children to their families, because they do not see other relationships and any shown to them are normal and correct for them. Which mother thinks at every word, at every action about her influence through her son today on the arrangement of his future family, on future grandchildren (this also applies to fathers to the same extent). I have repeatedly heard from women: "There are no men now, all men have died out."And with all this, every woman wants to have a worthy husband and from him healthy and developed children, without delving into the question of where the desired husband should come from and how the parents of her chosen one "worked" in due time. But after all, according to the logic, "a successful husband" does not fall from the sky, he must be created by someone over the course of many years. But young people do not think about it, and there is simply no one to tell them. Moreover, the pre-wedding tradition of acquaintance with the lifestyle of the groom's family and the bride's family gradually died. The intertwining tangle of generations has its own imprint on every baby. I am already talking here not only about upbringing, but also about genetic inheritance, because every child is a physical part of a mother and a part of a father. It is later that stronger genetic codes prevail in the child, and physical and mental health initially passes from the father and mother.

We have come to the conclusion that good or bad men (as well as wives) do not "appear", but are created by the older generation, that is, us here and now in the process of raising our children and grandchildren. But the fruits of our labor will be "reaped" by the next generation, as we now "reap" for the generation of our parents. Those who have complaints about their parents' generation about their personal life dissatisfaction should pay attention to their daily “exhausting” work on “polishing” their children, preparing them for the role of professional wives and husbands, as well as mothers and fathers, respectively. This is our measure of responsibility to the people around us and to future generations.

In light of the above, for those who want to delve into this topic, I propose to consider this version of the concept of a family. A family is neither six nor seven I, it is a seed, what kind of seed (tribe) you are, i.e. what kind of family you are from. The family in the historical and cultural heritage of the Russian people, and indeed of all Slavs, was not just an important, but the only important object under which the functions of the state were built. Be it the issues of territorial, security, life support, health, education or upbringing, their solution was "sharpened" for the interests of the family. Those. part of the responsibilities in the management of the Clans were delegated to the state. People with no land, no economy, no family, did not fall into the service area of the state. (Now everything is turned upside down, the institution of the family has been deliberately destroyed, the state has lost the function of serving the basis and unit of society. Many are forced to leave their homeland and break age-old ties in search of a decent existence.)

I will clarify the meaning of the word husband (since in the pub they talk about politics mostly men). A husband is a status, this is a rank, this is sublime, only GOD is higher for the wife and children. In a deep understanding, he is an IDEA, he is a SPIRIT. The spirit of the family, the spirit of the Family. Accordingly, the husband's mission is to serve the sublime: ideas, fatherland (state), people, i.e. divine beginning. Fatherland is the canons of our fathers, our morality, culture, language, traditions. The main priority for a man in the family is his parents, and both his own and his wife's. Regardless of the relationship, children are shown respect for their elders and help them in every possible way. The family memory and the preservation of the continuity of generations by the husband is passed on through his children to his grandchildren and great-grandchildren.

Now about the mother. Woman is matter, this is EARTH. Like mother earth, a woman gives birth from a seed (from a male seed). The seed turns into fruit. Those. a woman is a life-bearing woman, identified with the word Motherland. Motherland. Motherland is my home, my land and everything connected with it, my family, my Rod with all the departed ancestors. The wife is the MOTHER at home, at home for children, at home for the whole Kin and for everything that is connected with the comprehensive concept of HOME. A woman marries her husband, serves her husband, is protected by her husband, but as a MOTHER and as a guardian of the house, her main priority is still children. The woman is the successor of her husband's clan, she is the main one in the house and the children serve her. The state should serve children.

Based on this version of the worldview and the structure of the family, it follows that the family is a single indivisible organism with the established functions of each, passing into the past and future ad infinitum. The researcher of Russian history and the Russian language Vitaly Sundakov proposes to adopt this version only for those who consider themselves to be involved in Russian morality, tradition and culture (the rest can still arrange their personal existence in the momentary material plane).

On my own behalf, I will add that some of the readers will not accept this article for comprehension, some will look for paragraphs for criticism in it, and a small part will take it into service to take into account the preparation of young people in families when creating new unions of newlyweds and adjusting educational processes when communicating with children. So that insignificant part that is able to understand everything and preserve the nation's gene pool is currently the most important and significant. A morally and physically decaying nation will not die as long as there is a source of a genetic type, as long as there are people who know how to make streams and rivers from a source.

Recommended: