1000-ton South stone in Baalbek was sawn off from below, but not completely
1000-ton South stone in Baalbek was sawn off from below, but not completely

Video: 1000-ton South stone in Baalbek was sawn off from below, but not completely

Video: 1000-ton South stone in Baalbek was sawn off from below, but not completely
Video: Joseph Geobbels: Master behind Nazi Propaganda #history #shorts 2024, April
Anonim

I wrote a note a long time ago that the famous South stone was sawn off from below. This was revealed during excavations in 2014.

Image
Image

At the LAI forum, the participants of the expedition to Baalbek clarified that the megalith is not completely separated from the lower part of the rock below it. In fact, the bottom edge of the brick is about half a meter connected to the rock.

The first to draw attention to this was the participant of the expedition under the nickname chi (Maria Dudakova):

The southern stone was not even cut off completely from the bedrock. Same as the second stone

And after a few more messages, she even posted a photo of the junction of the base with the megalith:

Image
Image

Photo from our previous trip. On the question of the "separation" of the Stone of the South from the bedrock. The question is closed.

Moreover, she wrote this even before the new excavations in the summer of 2014. And citizen Svetel, who lives in Lebanon and herself often visits that quarry herself after excavations, wrote her clarification already in 2016:

I would like to put an end to this question. After new excavations, this has already become obvious - South Stone attachedto breed

Why didn't I know this before? Because in the photographs, the cut at the edge of the megalith is so clearly not visible in order to clear the junction with the base. Of the 20 meters of the total length of the brick, less than a meter of a few tens of centimeters remained unfinished.

If the cut was through, then it was possible to assume that the stone is solidified concrete, poured onto the lower surface. Although this is extremely unlikely, but still.

Why is it unlikely - because the whole point of concrete technology is to cast the megalith at the place where it should be installed, so as not to drag hundreds and thousands of tons somewhere, but to create them at the place of their application. "Needed where was born". And the object itself, consisting of these giant megalithic bricks, is located a kilometer away from the quarry. Unfortunately, fans of the concrete version are so dumb they don't get it.

But, if we assume that the ancient builders were also schizophrenics and made a senseless casting of the megablock, and then dragged 1000 tons to the installation site per kilometer along the hilly terrain, then the fact that, in fact, the megalith is not completely separated by a cut from the rock completely physically eliminates the concrete version. The southern stone was once one whole with a rocky base underneath.

Source link:

  • How was the 1000-ton stone in Baalbek sawed off from the rock?
  • Sklyarov is indignant: his subjective feeling is more accurate than the result of measuring with a ruler. The southern stone at Baalbek is a truncated prism, not a parallelepiped. How awful!

Recommended: