Atlas of Abraham Ortelius 1570

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

… I found an old map of Ortelius 16c, which did not appear in his atlas, there is also something from NH. (NEW CHRONOLOGY)

Ortelius created a map that he called

EUROPE OR OLD CELTICA.

This old Celtica is located from Spain to Crimea or almost to Don Tanais.

Instead of France - Gaul, which, accordingly, is part of Celtica. Well, Celtica according to TI (traditional history) is Celtica.

Rome, Byzantium, London are present on the map, but there is still no Madrid and Paris, instead of Paris - Lutetia.

In Italy in the north we see the presence of the Galov-SIS ALPINE.

There are no Russian toponyms on the map, neither Kiev, nor Novgorod, nor Moscow, and the Volga river is described as Ra and Atel. Moreover, Ra is seen as eastern-Kama and Ra -western.

Instead of the Baltic Sea, we see the "Swedish Sea" and Sweden itself does not yet exist, such is the paradox.

there is no Rus on the map, but there are already Rusko / Odyn names, for example, at the tributaries of the Danube River

-Herasus, in place of the Prut

-Ordesus, in the place of Seret

-Ararus

The Istrus / Danube River was not called Istrus, otherwise there are too many of these RUS on the map.

…. in general, this topic falls under the CHANGED NAMES topic, but Ortelius's atlas for 1570 is so informative in terms of the New chronology that I decided to single it out as a separate topic.

So on the ARSHBA website -

there is a luxurious quality atlas of Abraham Ortelius for 1570.

I drew attention to this fact, the Norwegian football team from the city of Trondheim has some strange name RUSENBORG. Where could this be? Almost all old maps have an unambiguous name for the city - Trondheim with variants. And only in the atlas of Ortelius was TRUNULHEM NIDROSIA found. It is from here that the Norwegians remember what RUSSIA and RUSSIA are since they called their football team that way. And also above OstofiORD and VARDal.

So three in a row our names, the main of which is ROSIA.

NKH (NEW CHRONOLOGY) clearly and unambiguously says that the HORDE existed ALL OVER THE WORLD, so the names of the HORDE in one form or another should remain and they certainly exist. to draw unambiguous conclusions, but if Ortelius is also here, then it becomes already difficult for the Tradists to keep silent or talk nonsense.

… the strongest impression is made, of course, by looking at the map of Ireland, there is a lot of things left from the old Horde world. For example, the city of ARDASTAN is already in the top ten. According to TI, no ARDASTAN in Catholic Ireland could have been in the 16th century, or in any other.

The names of the ORD are simply off scale. Ordynsky Stan in Ireland, hang yourself traditionally.

…That's not all.

To the north we see the cities of ASEROV, BALASKHIN, BOLOCHEK (VOLOCHEK?), RASRAIN,

… on the next map from the atlas we see a piece of England and Brittany.

On Brittany there is Rossov, the island of Roston / Rocton ?, in England there are the cities of Radst and Ports, almost like in Germany, Pomerania or in Saxony, a bunch of cities with Russian endings -EV, OV. And also different FORDS are Heilford and Bidford.

I will express my opinion that all these FORDS / FORTS / FJORTS / PORTS and NORDS are all elements of the ORDYN LAND camouflage.

on this map, brain removal continues, because there are toponyms that are not compatible either geographically or chronologically with the reality imposed on us.

-SKIFIKUM PROM.-Scythian cape?

-ROSIA

-CASTROPOL

-VILLA ARTAM

-MONFORTE

-PORTE

-TORDO

and all sorts of HORDES. But SKIFICUM in Spain in Galicia? Where did it come from, who brought all this? Well, except for the Cossacks-Horde, there is no one else.

Our Spain is rich. Well, Mavro Orbini said that the best provinces were occupied by the Slavs.

But that's not all, there is such a state of Andor, in the Pyrenees on the border of France and Spain, a small state, so Ortelius could not show everything that is there, so we will use a modern map.

Andora and surroundings.

Yeah

-ORDINO

-TARTER-TARTAR

-LA PORTA

So Kesler did not answer me where the PORTS are in the interior of the continent, without seas, without rivers. However, of course, there is a river there, but there is definitely no port-harbor.

… well, now the most important thing in Ortelius's atlas is ETRURIA. The most famous Etruria, which was the progenitor of the culture of both the Romans and the entire Western world. TI tells us that Etruria, I prefer to say Etrusia, because the Etruscans lived there, and not Etruts, so it is more correct from the point of view of the Russian language. then he took it and disappeared without a trace, only unreadable letters, architecture, sculptures, other images, the culture of metalworking, the culture of clothing, the culture of public order and much more remained. All this remained, but the people disappeared.

But why, then, did the Dutch cartographer Ortelius not forget to include this "ancient" definition of the area in Italy in his maps? For example, in his atlas further in Morea in Greece, the famous Sparta will not be mentioned, how can you imagine Antiquity without Sparta? But Etrusia did not forget to include.

Apparently at the time of Ortelius, the Russians lived for themselves in this very Etrusia, and so the city is a suitable RUSSINA. Hardly Italians lived in RUSSIN, they would call the city ITALINA, or the French, they would call the city FRANCHISE, whatever. RUSSIAN should live in RUSSINA.

The river is suitable for La RUSA. So the Traditions will have enough to play the fool about the chronology of countries and peoples, all this was quite recently, during the time of ORtelius.