Big Bang - Artificial Universe

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Astrophysicists claim that the universe was formed as a result of the Big Bang of a particle the size of a ball, but how this particle appeared, no one said. Right. Because there is no answer to that. Religious believers or ministers of the church will say that God created the universe. And in some ways they will be right, since this is the best example to protect yourself from lies when you do not know the real reason. Well, who created God? Where did He come from, etc.?.. If the particle existed before the explosion, then it could be "observed" in time? And when it appeared, no one knows either - any question will give rise to a new one, and this will continue indefinitely.

It turns out that the force that created the stars, created the planets of life and mind is more primitive than a person, than a brain, than nature? The brain surpassed the Creator and revealed the secret of his creation. Really ?! It turns out that the Americans, who forcibly took away the lands of other peoples, told us the truth that had been hidden from the researcher for many millennia?

Ancient Hindus, Maya Indians, Aztecs, Chinese natural philosophers knew no less than today's astrophysical scientists; they had their own view of the world and not as narrow as that of the current researcher. And the West, through whose fault all this monstrous lie began, managed to do one thing - to create an artificial universe. Ancient astronomers, exploring space, proceeded from the love of wisdom, thirst for knowledge and curiosity - today there are many scientists serving progress and capital. It remains only to recognize the power of American specialists and give up the search for the secrets of the origin of our life. And this recognition is already manifesting itself in the form of "Darwinian" competition and the expanding consumption of goods and services. But all these results slow down or stop thought, slow down the development of spiritual and intellectual growth!

It is easier to imagine that the universe is a product of a big bang than it is to realize all this. We are also a grain of the universe. And if we believe in the Big Bang theory, then our love, tears, joy, experience - all this is a particle of an explosion - all this is an accident and a coincidence.

Now the question is: why did this bunch of superdense energy suddenly explode for no reason? What influenced him? Or do astrophysicists lack the imagination to invent the root cause of the explosion and chaos? After all, if he was outside of time, if no processes were taking place in him, then there could be no impulse in him, and no reaction should have followed. But if (as astrophysicists claim) there are no obstacles for neutrinos, then they could escape from it and interact with something else. Again, it turns out that space-time was born earlier.

Explaining the birth of the Universe by this theory, scientists pose a number of curious questions. From the argument: the explosion of matter created space-time, the question follows: where did it appear if there was nothing? When did it appear, if time did not exist? For an impulse to occur, time must be born earlier. Eternity and immobility will reign outside of time, and action cannot take place in immobility. On the argument: the exploded matter possessed a superdense mass, the question follows: how could the force of density be measured if nothing existed? How can you display some indicators (density, mass, energy), in nothing? We must assume that the explosion gave rise to laws, but then by what laws was matter measured before the explosion? Since the potential Universe was in a clot of matter, what forces created its superdensity? If gravity - then again it turns out that the law of gravitation and time were born earlier. In the end, I just want to ask: what kept the shape and stability of the potential Universe if there was nothing: no time, no space, no gravity?

Any person who is able to see and observe will not be able to lose sight of the balance reigning around him: light - darkness, summer - winter, life - death, land - water. Our existence is possible only through the interaction of different potentials. If there is always day, we will burn, if it is night, we will freeze.

You can see how the water molecule (H2O) is arranged: two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Both hydrogen and oxygen are flammable substances, but together they form a completely different structure. Can such a formula be formed by chance?

The balance of power, the harmony of the world was noticed by the people and peoples of antiquity, when the atom had not yet been discovered, there were no telescopes, there were no special instruments for measurements and calculations. In ancient Chinese natural philosophy, the forces passing into each other are called Yin - Yang: feminine - masculine, hard - soft, cold - hot, etc. In India, in religious and philosophical teaching, these forces are called Purusha and Prakriti. Purusha according to mythology is a masculine spirit. Prakriti has an opposite side and is a feminine foundational element. But the name is not so important as the meaning, but it says that everything is based on interactions.

Continuing the conversation about the interaction of forces, we can draw some conclusions. For example, we are used to thinking that positive is always good and negative is bad. But it’s not like that. Following from the question posed, you need to determine what is cold and hot? Most likely, cold will be a negative element, and hot will be positive, but this is if you look at it at first glance. In extreme heat, everything containing cold (water, ice, snow, ice cream) is a salvation from overheating and a means of replenishing the loss of energy. During cold weather, a warm hearth is the best place to keep warm. It turns out that cold, like heat, can be a positive element. This means that everything depends on the attitude towards the required element. Any of the two forces can be turned towards oneself both negatively and positively.

More specifically, you can discard all interacting forces and leave two: positive and negative. In the process of interaction between the two parties, something in between is born and work is being done. We can observe these interactions endlessly, they happen everywhere as usual and imperceptibly: man - woman, fire - water, anode - cathode, etc. What follows from this, we all know very well. It is easier to say: only in the interaction of two forces, two charges, something else can occur or arise. And if a person, as N. Berdyaev asserted, is a microcosm, then it is not difficult to answer how life originates.

Let us reproach astrophysicists for their own contradiction, they say: "The universe came about as a result of the Big Bang and still continues to expand, stretching in all directions." And then: "The Universe is infinite, its extent is inaccessible to any eye of a human invention." But how can infinity have a beginning? Or could the beginning be endless? Any beginning always has an end, and infinity must exist forever. If the Universe is infinite, then it will be easier to imagine it in the form of a closed chain - eight or zero. Representing the Universe as infinite, we will not be able to embrace it with our thought. Our thought will be as endless as we think about infinity.

There is no place for Life or Reason in the physical and mathematical model of the Universe. This makes it easier to depict so that it is easier to fit the results. But while spiritualizing our essence, we cannot proceed only from purely scientific data. We either believe in the presence of God, or in the Reason that created this whole World.

In the material world, everything is measured. By measuring motion, we get the highest speed of a particle of light - a photon. A living organism is incapable of achieving this speed, which means that we are not able to cognize outer space. But what about the spirit world? What he? Can you measure it? And does he even exist? In some religions or in the heads of free-thinking people, the spirituality has a deep meaning. In Hinduism, Buddha reincarnated many times and, in the end, went into divine nirvana. The topic of reincarnation is almost as popular these days as the topic of global warming.

In ancient times, it was believed that the Earth is supported by elephants. At the end of antiquity, this version was rejected, but the Earth still remained the center of the World. During the Renaissance, the power of science found out that the Earth is a ball revolving around the Sun. Today, with the advancement of technology and electronics, the universe has been placed in a computer. It was declared completely "declassified" and explained in the language of formulas and numbers.

But order cannot be established out of chaos. Random actions will not create a masterpiece.

For example, to bake a cake, we need the main ingredients: flour, water and a heat source. Additional: salt, oil, fruit, tremors, eggs, sugar. Next, you need to carefully measure everything and, in strict sequence, knead the dough and bake a pie. Having mixed and made everything by random measurement, we will not succeed even for the thousandth time. Excess water will make the dough gooey, excessive salt will make food nasty, etc.

An example with nature:

The modern Sahara was once a blooming savanna, but due to the careless use of green areas, it has turned into a lifeless desert. Is this not proof of the consequences of disorganization and randomness? Could such a desert remain after a powerful bomb explosion? In my opinion, using the notorious theory, it is easy to justify the use of nuclear weapons, and its power was cynically demonstrated in the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (1945). And today, when nuclear weapons have become a symbol of scientific achievements, the Big Bang serves as a good cover for the cruelty and deceit of people.

In conclusion, I will refer to the authority of the outstanding Russian and Soviet scientist V. I. Vernadsky (1863 - 1945). According to his research, in any geological epoch there were no traces of the direct origin of a living organism from a dead one. And if you rely on the Big Bang theory, you need to agree that the living came from the dead; and then our World acquires a semblance of a mechanism. But the Universe is not a mechanism once life and reason originated in it, but explaining it only in technical language is the same as weighing morality and measuring conscience.

IN AND. Vernadsky is not popular among the scientific world, and indeed in modern society; since his deep study of the biosphere is capable of refuting the Big Bang theory. Then the Big Bang can become not big, but small, shaking only part of the Universe - awakening the forces capable of creating life. And this explosion will be just one of the manifestations of motion that never stop in the Universe.

The universe has no beginning and no end, this version is more pleasant than the Big Bang theory. And let people move in search of truth for another hundred, two hundred, thousand years, than they accept a dogma that can slow down the search.