Table of contents:

USA started a war against Russia
USA started a war against Russia

Video: USA started a war against Russia

Video: USA started a war against Russia
Video: Was King David Real? 2024, May
Anonim

Russia 2018 and the USSR 1940 have a lot in common. Both then and now the world froze on the eve of the inevitable world war for the global redivision of the world. Both then and now at the head of the country were politicians who had the greatest experience in government in the world. And then, and now, Russia is biding its time, playing giveaway and striving not to become an aggressor. Both then and now there is the same mobilization task: "Either we will pass this path in 10-15 years, or they will crush us."

Many skeptics say: today's people are not the same as they were in the USSR. Rotten folk. With that it was possible to win the war, with this it was impossible. This is not true. This is the replacement of reality with propaganda clichés. And then the people were all, and now. And then the NKVD had something to do, and now the FSB is. Nevertheless, if tomorrow the war is real, for survival, the people will again stand in line at the military registration and enlistment offices. Even if he is not needed there and the outcome of the war will be decided by the missilemen. So both then and now everything is not simple with the mobilization ideology. Then collectivization and dispossession did not like, now they do not like privatization, but when the enemy invaded, everyone makes a choice. The majority choose the trenches, the minority choose to serve the enemy. Everything is unchanged.

Due to the fact that a person avoids the traumatic reality, the awareness of the outbreak of war always comes with a delay. They are gradually drawn into the war. It is customary to divide the pre-conflict stage and the conflict itself, although in fact these are different stages of the same process. The accumulation of conflict potential in the form of rhetoric is already a sign of war. To think that war is when border guards shout into the phone that they see tanks crossing the river and infantry filling the foreground, and district commanders are dazedly watching clouds of bombers floating in the sky somewhere to the rear of armada of bombers - all this is a misinterpretation of war. War is the very intention to harm you. The way a desire is fulfilled is deeply secondary.

Now Russia is faced with the phenomenon of proactive escalation of the conflict on the part of the United States. Many people do not want to believe that this is a war. I would like to believe that these are just frightening gestures, that everything will resolve, like a false pregnancy. But this is a mistake - nothing will dissolve. The USA can solve its problems only by force. Confidently and adamantly, the American ruling class is moving towards the armed phase of the global conflict, where the conflict with Russia is only a fragment. But the fragment is central.

The stage of ridicule and irony, the exchange of barbs, the advancement of ultimatums has already passed, the stage of dehumanizing and dehumanizing the enemy has begun. Following this stage, a sabotage war begins, flowing into an all-out war, where clashes between armies are only part of an all-out war and not always the main one. Yes, forceful steps reinforce success, but the main thing is done before that. The main thing is to cut off the enemy from the key resources of the war - alliances, money, an attractive image, raw materials, technologies.

How should we relate to what we have learned about the next wave of sanctions initiated by the US Congress? Is this bluff or reality? Is this war or bargaining? Answering these questions is essential in order to choose the right policy. Let's take a closer look at the conditions set to us.

The US Congress passes the Six Clause Act.

1. Creation of an anti-Russian agency in the status of a nationwide center to combat the Russian threat. Annual budget $ 250 million.

2. A ban on settlements with the largest systemic Russian banks, primarily those with a state block of shares. Such repressions do not concern private traders such as Alfa-Bank, due to the complete loyalty of the management of such banks to the Americans. That is, the Americans have clearly outlined their agents in Russia.

3. A ban on operations with Russian Eurobonds. We will not only be banned from selling government bonds in dollars, but also in euros. Offensive on all fronts.

4. Recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. This is to cut off all the inclinations of the Europeans to somehow bargain with the Americans on the issue of easing sanctions against Russia.

5. A ban on transactions with Russian federal loan bonds in dollars for American investors.

6. The beginning of a propaganda campaign to compromise Vladimir Putin under the general title "Intensification of the search for Putin's assets around the world."

The ban on Aeroflot flights in the United States is a small enough touch to make it stand out. But he also exists.

That is, Russia was designated as an enemy and a department was created to constantly fight it. Personalized the Leader of their enemy - Vladimir Putin. The whole attack goes against him. This is in addition to the fact that the fight against Russia is a constant task of all American departments, from the Treasury to the Pentagon, all 12 months of the year. Here the form of war is sanctions. This is the task of the new department. Americans are a systemic people, and they decide everything systematically. There is a control function - there is a structure for it.

Any process is a goal and a package of tasks to be solved to achieve this goal. The Americans created a structure for solving several tasks of waging war with Russia through the mechanism of sanctions as one of the means of war - NATO and the media were not discounted.

The United States and Britain are tying together the requirements for Russia in a single package. Either Russia lets the so-called "UN inspection", which is looking for traces of chemical weapons production, into its factories, which the Anglo-Saxons will choose, or sanctions come into force in 90 days. And then the complete and unconditional isolation of Russia in the world. What's the point?

In fact, it is a choice without a choice. This is reconnaissance in force … Whatever decision Russia makes, it reveals weaknesses and leads to one outcome: retreat and defeat. If Russia lets the inspection in, it means that it has succumbed to the pressure and it must be increased further, because it worked. We will receive ten new ultimatums. A commission of "UN inspectors", even if it is brought to the Uryupinsky bakery, will find there a white powdery substance, "highley olycle" resembling a poisonous agent, and will demand to expand access to other factories, collecting the necessary intelligence information along the way and at the same time issuing convictions, samples of which have already been printed and sent to members of the inspection. That is, according to the results of the inspection, Russia ANYWAYwill receive isolation, justified by the verdict of the commission.

If Russia does not let anyone in anywhere, it will receive the same isolation, but this time for not letting in the inspection and thus placing itself outside the world community. The sponsor of terrorism and everything else has already been designated.

In parallel, there is a powerful company looking for "Putin's treasures": castles, treasures of chests with piastres, photographs from airplanes of some villas, vineyards, copies of bank checks with numbers and names of bank branches highlighted with a felt-tip pen, powers of attorney of third parties to other third parties. Some photos of confused chefs and surprised cellists. Two months of such hysteria - and everyone will be sure that Putin is richer than Rothschild. The spoons, however, are not ours, but the sediment remained. The argument is simple - "everyone knows about it." In a word - "highley like".

The manner of negotiating behavior in this case on the part of the United States is the "Terminator". Such a character with an iron head, which is useless to hit. Behavior style - hitting. Ultimatum. Power model. There are certain manipulative strategies that destroy this model, but if the opponent wants to fight and not negotiate, he will just fight and go to fight. And you can't do anything about it.

Do the "American" wars want, in contrast to the Russians, who, as you know, never want war? Let's look at the talking heads of the American ruling class. They voice to the "city and the world" what this class wants to convey to everyone.

There are two classics of the genre known to the general public (the others are less known): Zbigniew Brzezinski and George Friedman, head of Stratfor, a propaganda center designed as an analytical one. And if everyone read Brzezinski in one way or another, at least in the form of a couple of well-known quotations, then less is known about Friedman's works than about himself. And here there is something to think about.

In the 90s, Fridman published a rather interesting book entitled The Next 100 Years: Forecasting the Events of the 21st Century. It formulates all the insights of the American establishment regarding Russia. And all their true intentions, the manifestation of which we see now. A word to the author:

That is, the American elite black and white questioned the principle of the unity of the Russian state within its borders (Russia is a single national state without any "if") and formulated the question of how the West should not allow Russia to return to its historical borders. By all means, including the military. That's the way it is and nothing else.

It is also absolutely directly stated here: for the United States, not China, but Russia is priority number 1 and the main political enemy, the destruction of which is the most important historical task. As long as Russia exists even within its current truncated borders, the United States cannot live in peace. The very existence of Russia threatens the United States in an intolerable manner.

I would also like to draw your attention to these words of Friedman: " Considering that Russia is currently gaining energy again … "Firstly, this is the opinion of a biased, but rather a professional analyst. And if our enemies believe that under Putin Russia has become dangerous for them to gain energy, then all domestic Russian critics of Putin who deny and ridicule the strengthening of Russia under his rule should pay attention: Friedman does not agree with them. He would be glad to agree, but he cannot. And therefore he is alarmed beyond measure.

Secondly, if for the enemies the fact of Russia's strengthening has become a terrible reality, then those who disagree with this cannot be analysts. They can be spiteful critics, but not analysts. Their opinion is taken into account at the elections, but can in no way be taken into account as an adequate assessment of reality. And this despite the fact that there are a lot of problems in Russia and some of them naturally (because of the liberals in the government) are exacerbated. But many are being resolved - and this is the basis for continued internal stability - despite the problems.

But the main problem for Russia remains the leap in modernization. Russia implements it in the conditions of outright war. There is no exchange of strikes between armies so far. Everything else is in stock.

Friedman writes: “… In response, the US invaded the Islamic world. But the country did not set itself the goal of winning. It was not even clear what exactly victory would mean. The goal of the United States was simply to destroy the Islamic world and turn its member countries against each other so that an Islamic empire would never arise again.".

With regard to Russia, the same goal is pursued - simply to destroy the Russian world and set up the center and national outskirts of it against each other, so that the Russian Empire will never arise again

That is, the United States, embarking on a new round of the sanctions war, is by no means bluffing or bargaining. A bluff differs from a lie in that a lie is something that cannot be, and a bluff at a certain stage can be realized. The only question is where this line really is. This is the whole point. The United States will not retreat - they have nowhere to retreat. They realized a fatal mistake when they underdeveloped Russia in the 90s. They are now cornered like a rat by the crisis of global capitalism. They still have the strength to throw. But what scares them is that the forces of the recently defeated Russia are arriving, while the forces of the recently defeated US are waning.

The return of Crimea by Russia showed that the triumph of the West's victory turned out to be false. Russia has already taken a step - returned Crimea. AND THE WEST COULD DO NOTHING! If Russia is not blown up, the next step will follow at any moment. And one more. Until Russia returns to the borders of the USSR. And therefore, the United States is acting from an extreme position of strength. From the position of the Terminator. Therefore, they hit Russian finance and technology - the most vulnerable sectors associated with the liberals in the West. It's a relaxing hit. He must cause a coup. An invasion will follow.

There are many articles in the press where the risks and dangers of the US new course are weighed for Russia. One way or another, they exist, although not fatal. However, so far no one has written about what the weakness of the position of the Terminator is for the United States itself. And it exists and it is essential. It is based on two points:

1. The risks for such a position have not been read, and

2. The lost opportunities have not been calculated.

In Russia, Putin has comprehended this. In the United States, only Kissinger and a narrow circle of his associates comprehended these dangers. But they are now in the minority. The neocons decide everything. They do not accept these two points and impose their course on America. And this course is war. This is not an attempt to scare or bargain. This is precisely a war to destroy the enemy state. It requires a military response. First of all, the attunement of society and the command to wartime thinking. The appearance of peace is over and with each passing month the war will go on increasing. Soon, the United States will completely cease to reckon with the damage it inflicts on itself. During this time, a broad coalition of anti-American forces will develop in the world, the basis of this coalition will be the BRICS and the SCO. Turkey, Pakistan, Iran will be added. New anti-American alliances will begin to develop non-dollar trade, realizing that they are in a common danger.

In any case, the US plan is aimed only at the fact that the citizens of Russia, deprived of access to working ATMs and foreign exchange payments, will sweep away the power and call on the liberals, who will divide Russia into 11 parts and will forever solve the Russian question in favor of the West. All the invasions of Russia over the past 1000 years, with which the conquerors came, were based on the same idea. And their calculations were never justified. And now again the war and again with the same hopes. History really teaches some people nothing.

Recommended: