Table of contents:
- Fact times: not hard at all
- Fact two: features of the battle
- Fact three: hooks and shields
- Fact four: pages are (not) needed
- Fact five: a tournament is not a sport
- Fact six: climbing is very difficult
- Fact seven: who is the war, and who is the mother
- Fact eight: an intimate question
- Fact nine: expensive and rich
Video: TOP 9 modern destroyers of knightly armor myths
2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55
When they talk about the Middle Ages, the first thing they remember is the knights. In world history, no other era has such a vivid attribute and symbol. Only the pirates of the New Time can compete with the knights in popularity. Unfortunately, the true image of the knight has been rather strongly distorted by romantic literature, as well as by modern mass culture.
Fact times: not hard at all
Contrary to popular misconceptions, knightly armor is not heavy at all. Romantic literature and modern cinema have perverted the reality of full plate armor quite strongly. At the peak of its development (when the armor became really full and contained a large number of protective elements), the armor weighed 20-25, less often 30 kilograms. This is less than the weight of modern firefighting equipment and the full combat gear of an infantryman.
The weight of the armor was evenly distributed over the body, moreover, the suspension system helped to reduce the load on the shoulders and back. Nor should you think that plate armor impeded movement. The plate structure and movable rivets helped the fighter move in much the same way as without armor. Moreover, most knights, even in tournament armor, will calmly climb onto the saddle without anyone's help.
Note: although there were still “ladders” in the saddle at tournaments. In the end, suddenly, there’s a war, and you’re tired!
Fact two: features of the battle
Unfortunately, modern historians and designers do not know how exactly the cavalry battle took place during the war. It is quite obvious that the main stake was made on the first "entry" into the enemy formation with the use of spears. However, the details of exactly how this happened are still unclear.
At the same time, other interesting details are known from written sources. When the spears broke, and the battle formations mixed, the knights switched to swords. Unlike a spear, there was almost no chance of piercing armor with a sword. There was no talk of any "fencing" here. The knights simply beat each other with blades, like metal sticks. In addition, the knights quite often tried to go from behind in order to grab the “colleague” by the helmet and pull it from the saddle under the horse.
Fact three: hooks and shields
The sword is an important and symbolic thing, covered with a halo of romanticism. Nevertheless, the main weapon of the knight was still a spear. Until Europe was finally captured by firearms, heavy knights with spears were the most terrible weapon. The cavalry strike was unstoppable. A spear strike at a speed of 30-40 km / h pierced any armor. However, he also often injured the knights themselves.
That is why special hooks-stops began to appear on the plate armor, on which the spears were laid before the attack. The hook, chest plate, and warhorse were transformed into a single attack system.
By the way, another interesting feature is that the knight's shields have been constantly decreasing from century to century. The more perfect the armor became, the smaller the shields were made.
Fact four: pages are (not) needed
Even the poorest knight had a squire. The main task of an intelligent squire was to take care of his master's equipment. An intelligent squire is a third of a knight's success in battle. The page oiled chain mail, checked armor and weapons, looked after clothes. He also helped the knight dress before a tournament or fight.
However, practice shows that you can dress in battle armor on your own, without the help of a person from the outside. However, it takes longer, and most importantly, tiresome. Still, even 20 kilograms on the shoulders is 20 kilograms on the shoulders.
Fact five: a tournament is not a sport
Knightly tournaments became a sport only towards the end of the Middle Ages. It was originally something of a teaching. The main skill of a knight is the ability to stay in the saddle. Unfortunately, horseback riding and cycling are not the same thing. This skill "atrophies" very quickly. Therefore, representatives of the military aristocracy regularly fought. If there was no war, they organized tournaments.
At the first tournaments, the knights did not fight one on one at all, but fought all at once. Such fights consisted of two stages - equestrian clash with spears and close combat with swords in the saddle. At first, even tournament equipment did not exist. Of course, the injury rate at this time was especially high.
Fact six: climbing is very difficult
Many people know from childhood that a knight who has fallen out of the saddle cannot get up on his own. And indeed it is. However, the knight cannot get up at all, not because it is hard for him because of the armor, but because falling from a horse is another adventure. In addition, the blow with a spear even on tournament armor is very heavy. Very often the knights received something like a shell shock. Unfortunately, tournaments have always been very dangerous. Much more dangerous than modern American football and boxing combined.
Fact seven: who is the war, and who is the mother
The knights were nowhere near as noble as classical romantic literature shows them. You need to understand that according to their morals, they were presented to the military aristocracy of any power, they were very harsh people, accustomed to risking their lives from an early age. At the same time, they did not perceive the war as a misfortune. This was an absolutely normal part of their life, moreover, the only purpose of the knights as a class of society.
And the most important thing was that the war always made it possible to make good money! Robbery and looting were almost never condemned in feudal society.
Fact eight: an intimate question
There is a popular misconception about how knights went to the toilet. There is an opinion that medieval fighters simply did everything right in armor. This is a bold theory, however, how everything actually happened, we, unfortunately, do not know. Considering that in addition to armor, the knight was also wearing clothes, it is unlikely that he "walked by himself." Most likely, knights, like modern pilots, tried to visit the toilet before and after important moments. It is quite obvious that in battle, when fear, rage and adrenaline clouded the mind, the urge to pee is the last thing that worried a person.
Fact nine: expensive and rich
Do not believe those who say that the knights did not wear beautiful armor in battle. Of course, when a knight went to war, his helmet was not decorated with a tournament figure, and the horse was not covered with a heraldic blanket. However, each knight still tried to decorate his equipment to the best of his financial capabilities. After all, luxury is not only beautiful, it (as strange as it may sound) can save your life. A well-decorated battle armor is the best evidence that a person in it is very rich, which means that it makes sense to try not to kill him in battle, but to take him alive. The practice of hostages and ransoms in the Middle Ages was absolutely normal.
In addition, the knights often did not feel any hatred towards each other, because they were all representatives of the same class. In fact, one corporation, whose companies periodically clashed and sorted out relations.
Recommended:
What is the modern Russian army like? Myths and facts
The US Armed Forces have approached today's aggravation of the international situation fully armed - with a set of the most advanced concepts of warfare, with an experienced command staff, with fundamentally improved control methods. Is the Russian army the exact opposite?
How they pierced the armor of the knights
Even for modern man, the outfit of medieval knights often makes an indelible impression. It was much stronger in the "darkest" era
Destroyers of education control universities and prepare "digital" federal state educational standards
Regular readers of Katyusha are well aware of the history of the confrontation between the liquidators of the Russian / Soviet traditional educational system and conservative educators. The position of the latter can be safely called patriotic, while among the "innovators" there are quite often methodologists-variators, administrators of the HSE and RANEPA and other members of the Council of the Jewish Museum of Tolerance
Why does armor look like new in museums?
If you study the exhibits of historical museums, it is easy to notice that almost all of them look quite presentable, without any damage, and some are generally like new. In this regard, a version appeared that the exhibition copies are a fake, made in our time
Andrey Zhukov. Scientists against myths. Collection of Voldemar Dzhulsrud. Part 2. Documents against myths
Andrey Zhukov: "On June 5, 2016, a forum" Scientists against myths "was held in Moscow. About a dozen reports were presented, mainly related to myths in historical science. I am usually not interested in the fight against pseudoscience.