What is the betrayal of the Great Maize

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The betrayal of his country by Khrushchev never received condemnation from his party comrades, from which one can make an unequivocal conclusion that everything he did was precisely the real, real goal of the Bolsheviks.

Unlike Stalin, who was exemplarily spat upon by his fellow party members, and Stalin's projects, from which "our Western partners" sickened, were demonstratively curtailed under their applause and consigned to oblivion.

Khrushchev, in his activities to destroy the state, which is a civilizational rival of the Anglo-Saxons, did not invent anything new, but simply returned to the origins of the October Revolution, returning to Russia a role that was clearly voiced by professional revolutionaries even before the revolution, and from whose authorship they are now so aggressively denying: "To be a bundle of brushwood in the flame of the world revolution" - that is, not to be at all.

If we consider Khrushchev's coup in historical retrospect, then one can notice one interesting feature of coups and revolutions in Russia in general: they were all carried out exclusively in this way and when it was beneficial to Great Britain, and later to the United States.

Starting with Poor Paul, who was attached with a snuffbox exactly at the moment when the shadow of the alliance of Russia and France hung over Britain, and expeditionary corps of French and Russian troops went to Egypt and India, and ending with Nicholas II, who had to give up the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles, which for the Anglo-Saxons it was not by their concepts.

So the events of 1953-56 were in no way out of the general range of this pattern.

What would have happened if Khrushchev and the comrades headed by him had not broken the Red Empire, which had gained momentum, the foreigners themselves say clearly and bluntly:

"US presidential candidate Stevenson assessed the situation in such a way that if the growth rates of production in Stalin's Russia continue, then by 1970 the volume of Russian production will be 3-4 times higher than the American one."

In the September 1953 issue of the National Business magazine, in an article by Herbert Harris, "The Russians Are Catching Us," it was noted that the USSR is ahead of any country in terms of growth in economic power and that at present the growth rate in the USSR is 2-3 times higher. than in the US.

There and then, the Americans noted with horror that an increase in the standard of living and the strengthening of the institution of the family in the USSR would inevitably lead to a demographic explosion, as a result of which the population of 1/6 of the land by the end of the century would be half a billion people.

But the Japanese billionaire Heroshi Terawama was the most accurate:

Think for yourself, decide for yourself …

Agree, they don't just turn into five-year-old children. Children of five are transformed by forced lobotomy. And the worries of US politicians are not so easily stopped suddenly. In general, sharp political turns, the beneficiary of which is a geopolitical adversary, do not happen by accident.

There are three options:

first- Khrushchev is a foreign intelligence agent;

second- the entire Communist Party since 1953 (and up to the present time) is an NPO with the status of a “foreign agent”;

third- the Bolsheviks, with their main idea of withering away (destruction) of the state, is originally a Western virus that infects weakened state organisms, which they managed to strangle in the period from 1929 to 1953, but which nevertheless survived and inflicted revenge with the return to power of the true Bolsheviks in the person of Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Gorbachev and other professional Marxist Russophobes.

I personally prefer the third option. And any new discussion with these October guys, as well as every fact of recent history that opens up, confirms these preferences.

Marxist-Leninists really and with all their hearts have always wished and continue to wish the death of Russia, sincerely believing that "it will be better for everyone." Moreover, in their practice, the Bolshevik-Leninists are much more inventive than the liberal brothers. I propose to talk about what entertainers they are in the next note.

Let us compile a short list of the “exploits” of “our glorious Communist Party” under the leadership of the “Knight of the Order of the Corn”, which comrade Leninists shamefacedly call “individual shortcomings” and “personal voluntarism,” which multiplies the ranks of the infamous traitors to the Fatherland.

They are clearly identified at least by such an indirect sign as permanent residence of the heir to the "king of the corn", who fled to the shores of the Potomac as soon as it became possible in order to have time to spend daddy's 30 pieces of silver.

All of the following acts, I repeat, have not been identified and condemned as a betrayal of national interests by any of the official party bodies that are now alive and have a great appetite for the Bolshevik-Leninists.

World revolution performed by Nikita Sergeevich

Under Khrushchev, the absurd practice of "gratuitous aid" to the countries of Asia and Africa began, announcing the "construction of socialism", which was de facto a primitive but effective export of resources - the forerunner of the current "flight of capital from Russia", which (both then and now) was carried out and continues to be carried out with the main goal - so that there are as few resources as possible left in Russia itself.

At the same time, Khrushchev, as best he could, weakened the USSR's ties with those allies who could really help improve the well-being of Soviet citizens and strengthen the USSR's position in the international arena. And first of all, with whom he spoiled relations as best he could, it was China:

Deliberate destruction of the USSR economy

and the promotion of nationalism as a forerunner of separatism

The war of the Bolsheviks against the USSR under the leadership of Khrushchev began immediately after the death of Stalin - in 1953 - with the liquidation of the Gossnab. Khrushchev transferred the management of material and technical supplies to the union republics, already then - in the 50s, laying the ground for the collapse of the USSR along ethnic lines.

Khrushchev tore up industrial ties competently. Likewise, his faithful followers will do this during the re-catastrophe. In general, the identity of the actions of Khrushchev then and Gorbachev-Yakovlev in the 80-90s in the destruction of the state suggests the existence of uniform methodologies for all Marxist-Leninists, no matter what time they create their revolutions, where their main result is always the same - ruins and devastation.

I will specifically and separately dwell on the deliberate, deliberate and planned destruction of the economy, with a listing of the destroyed projects and the damage caused, but first - about sabotage using the nationalism just defeated during the Patriotic War.

Khrushchev transferred the promotion of nationalism of the titular peoples in the republics of the USSR to the industrial level in the literal sense of the word - instead of branch ministries, economic councils were formed and the entire vast country was transferred to the territorial principle of provision.

The cherry on top of the nationalist separatism cake was a particularly reverent attitude towards the national cadres of the Union republics, who were admitted to the most prestigious Russian universities out of competition and subsequently had priority in distribution and promotion.

Add to this the privileged supply of the non-Russian republics, and the picture of the cave-like Russophobia of Khrushchev and his fellow Bolsheviks will appear before you in all its glory.

The Bolshevik-Leninists knew what they were doing, therefore day and night they nurtured the national arrogance of the Soviet outskirts, gradually fostering their contemptuous attitude towards the Russian outback in general and towards every Russian person in particular

It was their carefully sown and generously fertilized seed of Russophobia that gave such violent shoots in the 90s, which led to the physical destruction of Russians in the Asian republics and the Caucasus, the deprivation of their civil rights in the Baltic States, and, finally, to the genocide of Russians in the territory of Donbass.

And of course, it is impossible, remembering the traitors of the Fatherland, led by the Great Kukuruznik, not to say about the Second Brest Peace, which was signed by comrades Leninists in exactly the same way as the first - against the background of the Victory in the Patriotic War:

The Second Peace of Brest-Litovsk - the tacit surrender of the USSR to the Anglo-Saxons took place shortly after the accession of Nikita I to the throne - at a summit meeting with “our Western partners”.

The Soviet delegation was headed by the Prime Minister of the USSR Nikolai Bulganin and the Chairman of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU Nikita Khrushchev. The United States was represented by President Dwight Eisenhower, England - by Prime Minister Anthony Eden, who recently succeeded Churchill, and France - by Prime Minister Edgar Faure.

As conditions for improving relations, the enemy put forward a reduction in the armed forces of the USSR, condemnation of Stalin's activities at the head of the country and, what is most interesting, the lifting of the ban on abortion, which had been in force in our country since June 27, 1936, and refused to accept any obligations until the Soviet side fulfilled those expressed their requirements.

“We cannot expect that within a few hours or days all the problems of the world that need to be resolved have been resolved…. However, we can intelligently create a new spirit that will enable future solutions to problems,”Eisenhower said.

All American requirements were fulfilled by the Soviet side. Until the end of 1955, the USSR reduced the number of its armed forces by 640 thousand people, in 1956 - by another 1.2 million, and in 1957 - by 300 thousand people. 63 divisions and brigades, part of military schools were disbanded, and 375 ships were put on storage. An extensive shipbuilding program was also curtailed, and the ready-made cruisers were scrapped.

Let's add to this such complex military-ideological sabotage of comrades Bolsheviks as the liquidation of the military base in Port Arthur (China). This again fits perfectly into the postulates of October, according to which, until 1917, there was and could not have been any heroism of Russian weapons, and all heroism materialized exclusively and only with the first red people's commissar, Comrade Trotsky-Bronstein.

And of course, in order not to get up twice, following the order of "our overseas partners", on February 14-25, 1956, the XX Congress of the CPSU was held in the meeting room of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. On February 25, at a closed morning session, Khrushchev made a closed report "On the cult of the individual and its consequences" …

Brief summary:

Modern Marxist-Leninists (and here they are completely in solidarity with the liberals) are scared to the shit that Russia will adopt the Stalinist experience of building the national economy and then Russia's geopolitical opponents will not have a single chance, and professional revolutionaries will have to work, which they will not never did at all. More precisely, they did it, but exclusively in the GULAG system and under the close supervision of harsh guards.

They are also afraid of real revelations, like traitors to the Motherland, who managed to sell it several times: first, immediately after the revolution, when they took out the treasures of “accursed tsarism” that have not been re-counted for their sponsors in the United States, and laid the country itself for the next half a century. conditions of enslaving concessions.

The second time - within the framework of the process of exposing the "personality cult", which, in fact, turned out to be a process of routing the economy and social structure of the USSR. And the third time - already in the late 80s - early 90s - in the process of the wholesale sale of the Motherland organized by the Central Committee of the CPSU under the leadership of Gorbachev-Yakovlev, and taking up the "honorary" banner of the national traitor Yeltsin.

Recently, the main excuse of the Leninists - "It was not we who plundered the country, these are the oligarchs, who knows where they came from and who knows how they got access to state resources." The excuse for a party that possessed an absolute state monopoly on the BCE - on politics, on the economy, and on ideology, you must agree, is ridiculous.

But even if you believe this - here are just a few figures from Katasonov's book, at the sight of which comrades Marxist-Leninists begin to blush and turn pale and again stutter about "certain party shortcomings":

In the year of Stalin's death (1953), the gold reserves of the USSR amounted to 2,049.8 tons (p. 243). In 1991 - 484, 6 tons (p. 244) “… over the last two years of the existence of the USSR, more than 790 tons of gold were exported. In total, over the years of perestroika, more than 1.5 thousand tons of gold left the country”(p. 289).

Let me remind you - all this - until 1991 … They robbed for a long time, thoughtfully, cheerfully and with a twinkle. But revolutionaries are cunning people, spit in their eyes - God's dew. It's not us, it's the oligarchs … Yeah … until 1991 - the oligarchs … And after that they are talking about intelligence, honor and conscience … Moreover, they demand to shoot a millionaire or two "wrong" Russians who do not agree with their methods.

On October 25, 1996, the chief bourgeois himself, Billy Clinton, conducted a kind of reconciliation of who lost the wealth of the peoples of the USSR: “For the last ten years, the policy towards the USSR and its allies has convincingly proved the correctness of the course we have taken to eliminate one of the strongest powers in the world, as well as the strongest military block … For four years, we and our allies have received various strategic raw materials for many billions of dollars, hundreds of tons of gold, precious stones, etc."

As they say, no comment.

But that's not all. The most interesting thing is ahead, namely, the genocide of the Russian population after 1953, well planned and competently organized by the Bolshevik-Leninists.

Russian genocide under the red banner

Do you think I now habitually call the seating in the camps of the party nomenklatura and the shooting of "commissars in dusty helmets" as genocide? You won't wait. For it has already been proven 100,500 times that in terms of targeting and the number of repressions, the thirties are drawn only to the genocide of the bureaucracy and the Red Banner bandits, which he really was.

And the real, real, unthinkable genocide of the Russians began just after Stalin's death. And it was happening in the very heart of the USSR - in the Russian outback, where, in contrast to the union republics favored by the Bolsheviks-Khrushchevites, there was a "deliberate creation of living conditions calculated for the complete or partial physical destruction of this group."

Here one can recall the struggle against "great-power chauvinism", which in fact is a struggle for the utilization of the Russian national identity, the elimination of "unpromising" (mainly Russian) villages, the destruction of the horse population, an attempt to destroy household plots altogether as a form of land use (the so-called Second dispossession).

The Orthodox will add to this a new campaign of "militant atheism", the closure and destruction of churches (more than 3,500 churches were closed from 1958 to 1964).

By the way, about panel housing construction and its author - Nikita. Yeah, right now! This fake about Nikita the builder, launched by fellow Leninists, has taken root so well that no one even tries to argue with him. But nevertheless, a lie, repeated many times, does not become true.

And the truth is that Nikita easily appropriated other people's merits, starting from space and ending with "panels", the author of which - Vasily Ilyich Svetlichny, back in 1951, received the Stalin Prize "for the development and implementation of industrial methods for the construction of multi-storey residential buildings."

Another thing is that this technology became widespread after the death of Stalin, which does not make it Khrushchev's for a single second, as well as the royal rocket project and Kurchatov's nuclear one.

But I would start with something else, with two more than curious facts, about which both talkative communists and liberals are silent at the same time, lazily spitting phrases through their lips, thereby betraying their kinship with their heads in matters of attitude towards the Russian population, in particular, and towards Russia - generally.

Construction of industrial enterprises - Stalin's and Khrushchev's. Feel the Difference:

In 1939, when it became clear that the war could not be avoided and the terrible Stalinist People's Commissar Beria would have to fight on its territory (here the liberals and the communists are again completely in solidarity), the construction of 2,000 industrial sites was organized, to which the evacuated factories moved in 1941.

And here the point is not even that building 2,000 industrial sites in such a time is an unsolvable task both before and after "this terrible man." The question is where Lavrenty Pavlovich built them. And the construction took place in the Urals and in Siberia, that is, in the heart of Russia - the only competent correct step of the imperial model. For only the priority development of Russia itself could give rise to the centripetal force so necessary for the empire.

Comrade Khrushchev no longer allowed such liberties. Construction in Russia under him was carried out only if it was impossible to build in another place. In any other version, the projects were brought to any of the union republics, and if possible - even abroad. Anyone, if only not Russian …

And now the second fact, about which the faithful Bolshevik-Leninists are also silent, about the Stalinist project for the revival of the Russian countryside, which included the "Plan for the transformation of nature."

The starting point of the plan was the decree of the Council of Ministers of the USSR and the Central Committee of the CPSU (b) of October 20, 1948, and in the 51st the first results were counted. There was a real breakthrough in animal husbandry: the production of meat and lard increased by 1, 8 times, pork began to produce twice as much as in 1948, milk - by 1, 65, eggs - by 3, 4, wool - by one and a half.

Food prices have been dropping by an average of 20% every year. There were even discussions about making bread generally free.

And in the early 50s, the authorities were going to start massive investments in the agriculture of the RSFSR. And above all, raise the Non-Black Earth Region

It was planned to start just in 54th. They were going to allocate money generously.

“We had to go to the Oryol or Yaroslavl regions, I don’t remember exactly. Not immediately, but after the roads are drawn to the villages. Of course, there were enough of urban ones, but they tried to select those who were born in the countryside. They explained to us that the detachment would help build cattle breeding and some other complexes, and we will stay there. They promised good "lifting" ones. Many such Komsomol detachments were organized then, in 52-53,”recalls labor veteran Lidia Timofeeva.

They planned to start with the construction of a network of roads; they were going to eliminate national misfortune number two once and for all. And young people from the east of the country were supposed to join the ranks of the toilers of the village of Kalinin, Smolensk, Pskov, Novgorod and other regions, who suffered the most during the war.

Alas, Russian villages by our Bolshevik guardians - in full accordance with their paradigm "Russia is just a bundle of brushwood" - declared "hopeless", and resources were literally thrown to the winds of Kazakhstan. Result: by 1959, compared with the 53rd, the sown area for grain and other crops in the Non-Black Earth Region, the Central Black Earth Region of the RSFSR, as well as in the Middle Volga Region were halved.

“The plan for the reconstruction of the Non-Black Earth Region in all respects looked much preferable to the virgin land project. From a social point of view: 80-82 percent of the resources were allocated for the construction of roads, housing, schools, and other infrastructure, while 40 percent of the country's population lives here. And from the point of view of the economy, it was more profitable in terms of growth in the production of grain, fodder crops, vegetables. We have planned the construction of facilities for the storage and processing of agricultural products, which are also jobs,”says Academician Dubenok.

Who is more profitable? - I would like to ask the academician. He was more profitable for the Russians, since he recreated the backbone of the Russian nation - the Russian village, revived the Russian outback, which would inevitably lead to an increase in population and expanded reproduction of the people, which is the base of the Russian empire.

But the academician forgot that Bolshevism, representing the interests of the Shvonders and Sharikovs, was pulled out of the small and uninteresting marginals and implanted into the Russian state precisely in order to in no case allow the Russians to raise their heads.

Stalin "forgot" about this, and therefore the combined forces of domestic liberals and communists are still foaming at the mere mention of Stalin's projects. But Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Gorbachev have not been forgotten, so their affairs are not condemned or questioned by anyone from the above-mentioned public.

Although it is precisely their actions then, in the early 50s and then, in the 80s and 90s, that ideally fit the definition of genocide - genocide of the Russian nation, that is, the artificial creation of conditions in which the reproduction of the population is not possible.

“There is no need to look for intent where everything can be explained by stupidity,” commentators from the Leninist fan club simply plead with me. No, comrades, for stupidity everything that happens looks too systemic and too organized. But it fits perfectly into the deliberate destruction of the empire and the genocide of the Russians.

However, let us continue the description of the infamous "exploits" of the true Bolshevik-Leninists, surprisingly preserved after the Stalinist purges and continued the genocide of the Russians as soon as it became possible

After Khrushchev banned the household plots of collective farmers, taxes were introduced on fruit trees, each head of livestock, collective farm markets were closed, peasants cut their livestock due to taxes for the year, reduced the production of vegetables several times, cut down orchards.

It is impossible to prove now, but a simple analysis of the rate of spread of the Colorado potato beetle in the USSR in 1958, its lightning-fast appearance simultaneously in Belarus, the Non-Black Earth Region and Vladivostok, suggests either the presence of Colorado beetles with jet propulsion, or sabotage, the scale of which is such that it would be impossible carried out without the approval of the highest party leadership of the USSR.

Exactly the same thoughts arise at the most superficial acquaintance with the history of the distribution in Russia of the agro-killer - the hogweed Sosnovsky, who quietly and imperceptibly during the reign of Khrushchev was replaced by the absolutely harmless Siberian hogweed, on which Stalin insisted on breeding.

But this "terrible tyrant" Stalin suggested investing in the Russian outback and planting medicinal plants, and from the mid-50s a completely different song began - the Bolshevik-democratic shooters over the Russian peasants).

Wishing to finish off the Russian agrarian sector as accurately and quickly as possible, the Bolsheviks, under the leadership of Khrushchev, destroyed the MTS, a uniquely effective organization for the mechanization of agriculture.

At the same time, production artels were destroyed, that is, completely in accordance with the academic definition, the genocide of the Russians was carried out by "deliberate creation of living conditions calculated for the complete or partial physical destruction of this group."

In the cities, as expected, interruptions in the supply of the population with meat, bread, flour, cereals, and butter began. Many food products, such as honey, have completely disappeared from the commodity circulation.

In fact, a food crisis began in the country, social tension arose in the cities, which the Bolsheviks habitually resolved by intensifying repression, which culminated in the execution of workers in Novocherkassk

The Bolsheviks fighting for the cause of the proletariat are using machine guns at the proletariat in the 30th year of Soviet power…. Forgive me, gentlemen-comrades, but this can only happen if the Bolsheviks are fighting not for the proletariat, but for something else … Do you know for what?

When grain supply interruptions began, and in 63rd, when only about 70 million tons were filled into the elevators (of which less than 50 million tons of wheat), it became very bad. And on January 28, 1964 (my birthday, by the way) the first dry cargo ships with grain sailed from the USA to the USSR. Khrushchev completed the Anglo-Saxons' homework.

Khrushchev's Russophobia was so frenzied that in the end, to the applause of his comrades, he began to simply cut off territories from Russia, transferring them to the union republics saturated with nationalism.

The transfer of pieces of the Orenburg and Omsk regions to Kazakhstan, and the Crimea to Ukraine is the clearest example of this Russophobia and a reminder that the "corn-worker" had not fallen in the struggle for power with his own kind, he would have found who to give which "Kemsky volost" to …

Let us summarize the above-described actions of “our esteemed comrades”, who are baking day and night supposedly about the welfare of the working people:

1)The Russian village was destroyed, which from time immemorial pulled out Russia on itself, being the backbone of the empire, the permanent and only supplier of both daily bread and soldiers, whose courage and endurance is still admired by the whole world.

2)Food independence has been destroyed and ideal conditions have been created for the food expansion of “our overseas partners”.

3)The remaining population is crowded in metropolitan areas, where it is an ideal concentrated target for both a nuclear attack and conventional weapons.

4)At the expense of Russia, the absolutely unjustified privileged development of the union republics and national cadres, to which Russians did not belong anywhere, was carried out. Ideal conditions have been created for borderland nationalism, the collapse of the USSR along ethnic lines and the disdainful attitude towards the Russian nation on the part of yesterday's "allies".

Instead of an afterword - or why am I writing this

Primarily to separate the goats from the lambs. At least a few people who have understood who is "hu" is already a force that does not allow so easily once again unite the population into a herd of rams and lead them to slaughter with a cry about the need to "destroy to the ground."

As soon as you hear calls to destroy, know that this is the enemy, no matter what flag he is waving at this time.

Secondly, I want to show once again that true goats are not changed by years or circumstances, and they will always be:

a)to ascribe to themselves other people's victories, b) attribute their crimes to others.

Not a single modern fan club of Marxist-Leninists recognized the destruction of the Russian village as genocide, and the act of Khrushchev and his accomplices as national treason. And this means that they consider everything they have done to be correct and are ready to repeat it at any time, as soon as they reach power.

People, be careful!