Peter Oreshek is too tough

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Under the sand bar

Lop-eared oblique, Fell under a sharp scythe, A scythe woman with a scythe.

How do you like a joke, reader? Any foreigner will go with his brains while he realizes why everyone is oblique here. And if we explain that the woman with the scythe is Death itself, then the epileptic from the German is guaranteed.

In thirty-nine books of the "Old Testament", in four "Gospels", "Acts of the Apostles", "Epistles" and "Revelations", in full accordance with the scrupulous naturalistic style of these writings, the main anatomical organs, physiological substrates and fluids are repeatedly mentioned. Here is a summary of the number of their mentions: The belly, or "womb", is mentioned 105 times; female genital organs (bosom) - 19 times; jaws - 19 times; tongue - 40 times; vomit - 5 times; bone marrow - 2 times; legs - 295 times; blood - 326 times; sperm (seed) - 7 times; hands - 522 times; urine - 8 times; liver - 14 times; heart - 925 times; feces - 24 times; back - 13 times; eyes - 477 times; nostrils - 12 times; pus - 4 times; teeth - 54 times; tears - 40 times; breasts - 21 times; neck - 28 times; knees - 37 times; bile - 12 times; hips (loins) - 92 times; kidneys - 8 times; mouth - 32 times; ears - 176 times. In smaller quantities, but the following are mentioned: nails, sweat, thighs, skull, omentum, nipples, tongue, cheeks, saliva, afterbirth, menstruation, stomach, abdominal fat, penis (ud, stogno).

The only organ that is never mentioned in any context in the Bible is the brain. It is out of the question, not only as a generator of reason and thinking, but even as a simple anatomical substrate. In the peculiar reality of the "old" and "new" testaments, the brain simply does not exist.

Today's priests give a simple explanation to this fact, referring to the authority of Christ himself, they say, the brain is the heart, only in a figurative sense. In general, the interpretation is quite free - why not give out the bladder for the brain? Frankly, if I am pressed, then apart from him, I have nothing to think about and do not dream. However, the reader is familiar with this state. Either a careless childhood, when I was in diapers without thinking about my own brain.

The state of affairs with the lack of a brain in the Bible is easy to explain - this book was compiled from carefully selected books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old Believers and adapted to the Torah in the 17th century. Of more than 200 books (count the "Library of World Literature" of the Soviet edition), the Bible includes only those books that suited the Apostolic Christians - the official church known today. The victorious march of this church began after the Great Troubles in Russia, when generic Christianity was practically destroyed. This is the first time many readers hear about such a division, because the Bible teaches us not to turn on the brain. I explain: Christ himself never created churches in his own name, for him it was done either by relatives (clan or royal Christianity), or disciples (apostolic Christianity). For a more complete understanding: Old Believers and modern Christians. The latter turned out to be more aggressive and destroyed their predecessors, distorting the whole essence of the teachings of Christ, creating from him the image of a Jew and the son of a Jew. This is not true, but the most common falsification and forgery. Jesus is the son of the Russian princess Maria theotokos and the sevastocrator of Byzantium Isaac Comnenus. His teaching is not a separate religion, which they are now trying to represent by faith, but a naturally arising and consistent philosophy from the ancient Russian pantheon. Today IzToriKi (followers of the official version of the Torah) claim that there was paganism in Russia. Another lie - the Russians believed in one God named Rod. All other figures of the pantheon are modern saints and saints.

This is how the image of Christ was distorted, and I want to talk with the reader. However, I warn you, the brain will be useful to you, because much of what you hear here requires analysis and attention. So look away from the version of the Bible and listen to the old opera - the Commissioner of Qatar.

In general, the whole "antiquity" of Christ appeared at about the same time as the "antiquity" of the monuments of Leningrad (you will excuse me, reader, but I studied in this city and it is Leningrad or St. Petersburg for me)). The planting of antiquity takes place during the time of False Peter. I wrote that the Bronze Horseman was not delivered to Peter the Great - the Russian tsar described by Dumas as a prisoner of the Iron Mask. In St. Petersburg, there is a falsified monument on a falsified stone, consisting not of a solid block, but 3 parts. The monument itself is not so much to Peter as to Catherine. This is an uncle and niece from the Anhalt clan. So uncle is not Peter. Peter was replaced during the Grand Embassy. The uncle bore the name Isaac and St. Isaac's Cathedral is the cathedral of his saint, completely unknown in Russia.

Falsification in St. Petersburg in everything. For example, the fact that this city was supposedly built by Peter and Menshikov. Today maps of Great Tartary are open and those who wish can be convinced that at the mouth of the Neva, in the place of modern St. Petersburg, there is a completely different city - the Russian ORESHEK. This is later, he will be transferred to the island and declared Noteburg. In fact, Peter did not build Peter from scratch - there was already a great city there. By the way, take a look at the map of Odessa at the same time. Old maps on the site of modern Odessa indicate a completely different city - OCHAKOV. This then its name, by analogy with St. Petersburg, will be given to a small town 62 km from Odessa. In fact, the conquest of Ochakov is the conquest of Odessa and there has never been any Duke Richelieu as the author of urban development. There is a monument to a completely different person, simply named so.

But let's go back to St. Petersburg and start looking at the monuments. And let's start with the Pillar of Alexandria on the Palace Square.

The most active part in the installation of the Alexander Column was taken by Lieutenant General A. A. Betancourt, an architect and engineer, organizer of construction and transport in the Russian Empire. The author of the technology of laying the foundation of St. Isaac's Cathedral.

We read the encyclopedia and understand that Betancourt worked on the creation in several stages.. Well, this is quite divine, the Creator, too, the world sculpted more than one day. In December 1829, the site for the column was approved, and 1,250 six-meter pine piles were driven into the base. By July 1832, the monolith of the column was on its way, and the pedestal had already been completed. Now is the time to begin the most difficult task - placing the column on a pedestal. This part of the work was also carried out by Lieutenant General A. A. Betancourt. In December 1830, he designed an original lifting system with the help of which a monolith was installed in 1 hour and 45 minutes. So far, everything seems to be logical - a person works in the sweat of his brow and turns on his brains. But then the unimaginable begins!

See the same encyclopedia, the column was installed in 1834. At the same time, with the hundred thousandth parade of the Russian army, the opening of the column took place. With the army, historians clearly went too far - the Chinese square in Beijing, known as the largest in the world, can accommodate only 40,000 soldiers. I often walked along the Palace Square - there is no room for 100,000.

Okay, let's forgive these liars for the error of 60,000 people, they won't lie, they won't live - this is their lot. But I decided to inquire about the personality of the general-builder. And here it came up! Before presenting, I draw the reader's attention to the dates of construction: 1829-1834. By the way, these are the years of rampant cholera in Russia and all public events were then prohibited.

Get ready, reader, for the FIRST crack in your brain!

Augustine de Betancourt and Molina (full name Augustin Jose Pedro del Carmen Domingo de Candelaria de Betancourt and Molina) was born on February 1, 1758 - died on July 14 (26), 1824.

Well, reader, will you read it yourself or will you leave me the task of determining the number of years that the general lay in the grave before he began to build the column? According to my data, it turns out 5 years before the start of construction and 10 years before the end of construction. What do you think?

By the way, it's the same with St. Isaac's Cathedral. Jose Pedro could not lay the foundation of St. Isaac's Cathedral, because he was in those places from which they do not return.

I wonder when this column was installed at all? Let's try to look for at least some mention of her. And here's luck: a painting by the German artist Bertuch, Friedrich Justin. I put it in the screensaver for the miniature. As you can see, there is no angel at the top of the column, but a simple cross is installed. But what is surprising is that Bertuch died in 1822 in Weimar, that is, 12 years before the opening of the column. Not only did she stand there during his lifetime, she also had a different look on the pommel. Yes, business! I seem to be starting to understand why they came up with the Russian mat! Oh, how you want to "get rid of" historians!

Okay, the reader and I are Russian people, let’s endure until more serious facts.

And here they are.

Before the cross, depicted on the column, there was OCTAVIAN AUGUST. This can be clearly seen in an 18th century engraving by an unknown Flemish master. Unfortunately, the figure is depicted from the back, but I saw something imperceptibly familiar in it. Yes, of course it's him !!! How did I not guess right away ?! But I looked at him hundreds of times and even took pictures. But more on that later.

So, Peter is not Peter, but the Russian city of Oreshek. But what if we imagine that the column stood there even before the Romanovs, who rewrote Russian history under their rule, spreading lies and destroying the truth about Russia?

The annals mention that even Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible said that his family came from the Roman emperor Augustus. It turns out that before the Angel, it was the Roman emperor Octavian Augustus who stood on the Pillar of Alexandria until the very end of the 18th century. At the beginning of the 19th century, the column was empty. And it began to be called the Alexandrian, by analogy with the August Pillar, which, by the way, is mentioned in Russian chronicles. Therefore, to this day, the column is called a pillar, because it is a pillar! Do you know the difference between a pillar and a column? The pillars were placed on the graves of ancestors or in memory of them. This begs the question, who could have installed the pillar to his ancestor? It seems to me that the one who installed it is the founder of the city of Oreshek - the Russian tsar.

An amazing thing is the memory of an operative. Now I have not served in this area for a long time, but it is enough to meet a person who, at least for a moment, interested me in my work, I remember this meeting to the nearest minute. But this is a person, a person with character traits and behavioral features. But the monument is more difficult to calculate. For a long time I was tormented by the thought of where I saw him! On the Pillar of Alexandria, in the early 80s, definitely not - with me there was already an angel there. Illumination comes unexpectedly. Hold on to the table, reader! Yes, this is Odessa Duke Richelieu !!! Only the trident was taken from the hand and the scroll was inserted. Wanting to check, I found a portrait of Duke himself. There can be no doubt that Obama is more like Isadora Duncan than Duke is like his monument!

But who does Duke Richelieu look like? Now, it's time to turn to antiquity - at the monument in Odessa the face of Octavian Augustus, great-grandfather of Ivan Vasilyevich the Terrible. Find these sculptures on the Web yourself and check the images on the coins. August it!

The reader will be surprised, because antiquity and Grozny are separated by centuries. These are vraki - there was no ancient antiquity, but there were two Rus - Byzantine, she is Kiev and Great Russia today). Moreover, they existed at the same time. So Tsar Ivan is a descendant of the Roman dynasty of Byzantium, about which he himself writes in a letter to the English queen. And she does not dare to contradict HIS LORD.

Modern Rome is not Rome at all, but the city of Tibur, which became Rome when the popes from Avignon moved to it. No Apostle Peter is buried there, and all papal palaces were built in the 17-18 centuries, like the Colosseum. This city is a decoration, like its prototype Jerusalem in modern Israel. In fact, Rome is Byzantium (from Troy, Illion, Yorosalem, Constantinople, Istanbul, Jericho, Kiev, etc.). True Second Rome. The first was in Egypt, from where the Roman dynasty of Russian tsars came from, the pre-Romanov period. It was in this dynasty that Mary the Mother of God was born in Great Russia, who will become the mother of Jesus - the Byzantine emperor Andronicus Comnenus (in Russia it is known as Andrei Bogolyubsky). All this antiquity is nothing more than Byzantine art and the Russian tsars, who founded a powerful state after the fall of Byzantium, always remembered this. They remembered and erected monuments to their ancestors, dressed in the clothes that were adopted in that Rus. Later, the history of Byzantium will be dragged into Italy, as Roman, and Kiev to the Dnieper, as Kiev. In fact, both cities existed earlier. And Kiev on the maps of Tartary is called Sambat - a Khazar town on the steep slopes of the Dnieper-Sambation. This is a Jewish city and most of the "Ukrainians" are not Slavs, but the Khazar Jews who converted to Orthodoxy. In Kiev, Jews were baptized, not Slavs.

This is what happened in Oreshka: there were many antique statues in the city, and the city was earlier. Peter did not build it in the swamps. The city existed earlier, it was simply renamed.

And what do we know about the construction of St. Petersburg? Yes? as a matter of fact? nothing. All data on this grandiose case refer to the work of the Freemasons.

Someone Samson (Semyonovich or Ksenofontovich) Sukhanov with his team clothed the city in granite in two decades, the embankment, canals, building foundations, but this is millions of tons of stone. And what is the scope of the sculpture? He made antique columns, monuments and statues three pieces a day. The sculptures were cast in large quantities. Straight mnogostanochnik, some sort. Genius, to be sure! But here's an interesting fact - not a single memory of contemporaries, about the activities of a unique architect, sculptor, scientist. In terms of scale, Leonardo da Vinci could have overturned it from the pedestal! No, I can’t resist the mate: “Fuck-tibidoch, cross of manganese, through table salt! Some kind of crap!"

The first mentions of such a significant master appeared only at the beginning of the 20th century; in the 19th century, historians did not hear anything about him.

Excuse me, who do we owe the antique sculptures in Russia at all? Surprisingly, among the idols dressed in a toga and Roman armor, there was once again one ingenious master, whom no one has ever seen again. So to whom do we owe Russian "antiquity"? Meet, gentlemen - V. P. Yakimov.

We owe the talent of V. P. Ekimov to the appearance of the most famous sculptural groups of Russia, cast in bronze:

The Bronze Horseman in St. Petersburg;

Monument to A. V. Suvorov designed by M. I. Kozlovsky in St. Petersburg.

Duke statue in Odessa;

Fountain "Samson Breaking the Lion's Jaws" in Peterhof;

Copies of the bronze "Gates of Paradise" by Lorenzo Ghiberti, decorating the Kazan Cathedral in St. Petersburg;

Statues of commanders M. I. Kutuzov and Barclay de Tolly at the Kazan Cathedral on Nevsky Prospect in St. Petersburg (I also wrote about them - there are faces of Caesar and Cassius);

Monument to Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow;

And Yekimov, it turns out, was a teacher of Claude, also a Russian sculptor (Anichkov Bridge, for example). But Claude does not remember a word about his teacher. About others - as much as you like, but about the "great maestro" at least hint, you scoundrel! What disrespect for the teacher! Or maybe they just never met?

And what about Montferand? Didn't he build anything the same? Absolutely right. Montferand is not an architect or even a modern designer. He is a draftsman, and not of the highest class. In architecture, he is roughly like me in painting - God forbid me to paint - the sower of Ostap Bender, coming out from under my brush, will drive Kisa crazy before he opens the last chair.

And Falcone? Well, this is generally a separate song! I wrote that this man had never done anything like that. The Bronze Horseman is a converted sculpture of St. George the Victorious. No wonder that the bike goes around that an arm and a head broke off during the casting. Thus, the sculpture was altered by turning the head and changing the position of the hand.

St. Petersburg cadets have different customs. For example, on Hercules in the garden, from year to year, when graduating from a sailor, they put on a vest and solder a policeman who has been sleeping next to Hercules since the founding of the Admiralty. There is also such a custom: graduates of one training course clean the genitals of the Bronze Horseman with GOI paste. In general, we were amazing boobies when, on a summer night, I climbed Petr with my friend! I testify: the head is welded exactly, and the seam is poorly cleaned. I won't say about the hand, the cops began to catch us and I, getting confused in bell-bottoms, dumped through the Alexander Park, holding my cap with my hand!

This I mean that Falcone did not create anything, but only remade, and not he, but if you believe the story, his mistress-student. He brought her from Paris! And this is with our samovars ?! By the way, there and with the Thunder-stone on which Petruha stands, there was also an unpleasant story. You can read about her in the collection "Around and around Peter".

If you look at old engravings, you can see that the Champ de Mars was depicted before its official opening. For example, there was a monument to Mars. Now this monument stands on Suvorovskaya Square. It says that this is not Mars, the god of war, but the commander Suvorov.

The monument to Minin and Pozharsky is also interesting. He is also from Nut-Peter. It was installed in the place where the Tsar Cannon had previously stood. These are strange Russian heroes in Roman togas with a shield on which the patrimonial pattern of the Byzantine emperors.

By the way, in St. Petersburg there is another monument to Peter the Great, in the Mikhailovsky Castle. Just don’t believe the inscriptions on the pedestal - the face of Alexander the Great is at the monument.

Kutuzov at the Kazan Cathedral is Cassius, and Barclay de Tolly is generally Nero.

Sphinxes on the Neva are also interesting. Although it is claimed that they were brought from Egypt, it turns out that they are copies made from the originals brought from Egypt, but from local granite. And the real ones simply crumbled from the St. Petersburg weather - they are the most ordinary geopolymer concrete, only polished. By the way, the pyramids were also built by formwork from the same concrete. There have never been hundreds of thousands of slaves pulling the megaliths.

In general, so dear reader, old Peter, with all his columns and porticoes, was already there at the time of the arrival of "Peter" with his henchmen. And there were an incredible amount of statues, but the first Romanovs, like Ukrainians, simply destroyed them. The stone ones were broken, and the metal ones were sent to the warehouse. There they awaited their fate. Most likely remelting. But Catherine the Second of the German women came to power and proposed the simplest thing that Zadornov suggested: to break only heads and hands, and leave monuments, So Yaroslav Galan in Zapadensky Lviv, removed at the beginning of independence from the square of the same name, was attached Bandera's head and slightly straightened his coat … True, they gilded the sick person.. Everything is fine - the idol is standing, at least while it is.

Since then, ancient idols, taken from the epic of Russia, which Russia put to the real heroes of antiquity, and not those invented in the Vatican, and then with the Romanovs, were brought to Russia, have stood in Russia.

That is precisely why the brain is not mentioned in the Bible, that the apostolic Christian does not need it. They have already thought of everything for him. And what difference does it make to him that behind the Duke sticks out in the square, if Christ himself turned out to be a circumcised Jew, Suleiman the Magnificent - the builder of St. wholesale baptism. And he did not realize that Christ is not the Lord, but the Teacher for us, and God is not a punishing uncle in heaven, but our FIRST FRIEND and FATHER, ready to always come to the rescue and never put his children on his knees? It is not clear to historians and their henchmen that the image and likeness are not just words, but real things - a person not only resembles the Creator in appearance, but also a TRINITY - in him, as in God, there are three components: body, soul, Holy Spirit. The latter, the Creator breathed into man. But what a person does not have is Sophia. Hagia Sophia is not the temple of a little-known saint who had three daughters: Faith, Hope and Love. It is a temple to what happens when the Trinity is organic and works in unison. Do you know the translation of the word Sofia reader? Most likely not, unless, of course, you have not familiarized yourself with my work on this topic. Sophia is WISDOM, and HOLY SOPHIA is the WISDOM OF GOD. This is what a person lacks, because in the absence of the desire to move their brains, you can only earn a bump on your forehead, but not wisdom.

But all this is open and accessible, just visiting museums and reading books, you need to at least comprehend what you see. Otherwise kerdyk: the deceased general will set up the pillars, and August-Richelieu will lead the crowd of mummers on the day of Laughter in the city of Odessa. Why don't you even know the meaning of the word Odessa ?! Well then, listen: the right hand is the right hand or the right hand, and the Right hand is the right hand, the right hand. That is, to the right of the Crimea. That's just not Tatar, but Russian and not Potemkin Tavrida too. Ltd!!! Yes, I see you and Crimea you don’t understand! How everything is started, reader.!

"Steepness, steep mountain above the coast or ravine" - does that tell you anything? Well, think faster, mamkino's child! That's right, this is the KREMLIN! Or in Tatar KYRYM (l). Remember the Crimea, which is finally Russian again - steep cliffs over the coast and the sea surface. Moscow and other kremlins also stand on the mountain over the rivers. And they will stand forever. It is necessary for them, our pride, to wait at last, when not the Vatican is linden, but their walls - a Russian shrine, the people will honor.

Well, and finally, find out when Leningrad was actually founded (St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Petrograd, ORESHEK)

In the Novgorod land, Prince Georgy (Yuri) Danilovich founded the Oreshek fortress in 1323.