Brain death and how are organs legally excised from living people without anesthesia?

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Until 1968, a person was considered dead only after his breathing and heartbeat stopped for a certain period of time. The current term "brain death" simply did not exist.

When surgeons realized that they had the opportunity to take organs from a person who was clearly “close to death” and transplant them to another patient, in order to prolong his life, they opened a kind of Pandora's box.

At first, through trial and error, they found that it was impossible to perform such miraculous surgical operations for organ transplants from a truly dead body, even if the blood circulation stopped just a few minutes ago, since irreversible changes in the organs begin a very short period of time after the circulation has stopped. …

And then, in order to justify their experimental methods, there was a need for some kind of solution, as a result of which the term "brain death" arose.

It takes a lot of effort to get to your organs

For an organ to be suitable for transplantation, it must be healthy and taken from a living person.

Once a post-brain death (DCM) or post-cardiac arrest (DOC) donation is confirmed and permission is obtained from grief-stricken relatives, the "organ donor" is often subjected to several hours, if not days, of painful procedures used to preserve the container body from "Spare parts". An "organ donor" is forced to endure extremely painful and endless chemical procedures in preparation for organ harvesting. A "donor", in the literal sense of the word, becomes a storehouse of organs for the sole purpose of preserving them until a compatible patient is found who needs a transplant.

Donation after circulatory cessation (CBC) is permitted on neurologically healthy donors who do not meet the criteria for neurological or pre-circulatory death. These conditions are associated with some of the most controversial donation-related cases expected with the mandatory use of duodenum in the event of an unavoidable death or death from heart attack in hospitals throughout the United States.

The truth about terrible procedures and the DEATH of "DONOR"

When the organ is removed, the patient is given a paralyzing agent, no anesthesia is applied! Removing multiple organs, on average, requires 3-4 hours of surgery, during which the heart continues to beat, blood pressure remains normal, and breathing does not stop as the patient is connected to a ventilator. The organs are excised, and then the heart stops, just before it is removed.

It is well documented that heart rate and blood pressure increase when an incision is made. This is the same reaction that the anesthesiologist often observes when the pain reliever does not work. And, as mentioned above, organ donors are not anesthetized.

A growing number of nurses and anesthetists are protesting against this practice after observing the behavior of the alleged "corpse." His movements are sometimes so frantic that it is impossible to continue harvesting organs. As a result of their own experience and the testimony of colleagues, many doctors refuse to work in this area.

Hospitals in New York routinely harvest organs from patients even before they finally die, according to one lawsuit. In it, the New York Organ Donor Network is accused of forcing doctors to admit brain death of patients while they are still alive. Plaintiff Patrick McMahon, 50, believes that one in five patients continues to show signs of brain activity when surgeons pronounce him dead and begin removing organs.

“They're pretending to be God,” said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator, saying he was fired just 4 months after taking office for disclosing this practice. The donor network is making "millions and millions" by selling organs to hospitals and insurance companies for transplant, he said.

"Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin, intestines, valves, eyes - all this is a lot of money."

The Air Force combat veteran and former nurse add that budget-constrained hospitals tend to rush to acknowledge a patient's brain death as that frees up extra bed space.

This 2012 Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuit cites a 19-year-old car accident victim who was breathing and showing signs of brain activity when doctors gave the green light to harvest organs from his body.

Representatives of the Donor Network, including director Michael Goldstein, allegedly forced Nassau Institute Medical Center staff to declare the teen dead, claiming during a conference call, "The guy is dead, is it clear to you or not?" But McMahon said he was confident the nineteen-year-old was capable of climbing.

The lawsuit cites three more cases of patients who continued to cling to life when doctors issued a "notice" - the hospital's official statement that the patient had brain death, which, like the consent of the next of kin, is required to begin the transplant procedure.

The lawsuit says one of the patients was admitted to Kings County Hospital in Brooklyn a month later, again showing brain activity. The lawsuit states that McMahon protested, but was ignored by the hospital and the Donor Network, the patient was pronounced dead and taken for organs.

In November 2011, a woman who was admitted to Staten Island University Hospital after a drug overdose was declared brain dead and was about to be harvested when McMahon noticed that she was injected with a "paralyzing anesthetic" as her body continued to twitch.

“She was still in the brain when they started dissecting her body on the operating table,” McMahon told MailOnline. "She was injected with a stun gun, although there is no point in injecting a stun gun on a dead person."

McMahon said that he told the doctor who administered the drug to her, and he did not immediately find an answer.

“Finally, he said that he was ordered to do this because when they started to open the chest, she twitched and her chest interfered with the operation. A paralyzer only paralyzes, it does not relieve pain,”McMahon said.

McMahon added that the surgeons cut out everything they could. “They removed the eyes, joints. I saw it all while arguing with the doctors. They put plastic bones in place of the real ones."

According to the lawsuit, when McMahon continued to ask questions about the outrageous case, another Donor Network employee told hospital staff that he was "an unskilled troublemaker who constantly intervenes with trivial questions."

McMahon added that the staff members who harvested the most organs in a year receive Christmas bonuses. “If doctors work, giving out a lot of organs for transplantation, they will be entitled to a cash bonus in December,” he said.

The aforementioned veteran who worked with the Donor Network from July to November said that about 30-40 staff members travel to hospitals in an attempt to obtain signatures from relatives for donation.

Average prices for transplants in the United States: heart - $ 1 million, both lungs - $ 800,000, liver - $ 850,000.dollars, kidney - 275 thousand dollars.

More than 123 thousand people are on the transplant lists in the United States, 100 thousand of whom are awaiting new kidneys. However, the need for healthy organs far outweighs the number of donated organs. There were only 28,000 transplants performed in the past year, according to the US Transplant Organ Supply Network nationwide for 2014.

Since donors are often still alive when organs are harvested, the medical community should not demand that donors be declared dead, but adopt more “honest” moral criteria to allow organ harvesting from “dying” or “seriously injured” patients, with appropriate consent. as stated by three leading experts.

Such an approach, they said, would help avoid “pseudo-objective” claims that the donor is “really dead,” usually based on purely ideological definitions of death designed to expand the number of donor organs, and would allow doctors who harvest these organs to be be more honest with the public and ensure that donors do not feel pain during surgery.

These macabre comments were made by Dr. Neil Lazar, Director of the Medical and Surgical Intensive Care Unit at Toronto General Hospital, Dr. Maxwell J. Smith of the University of Toronto and David Rodriguez-Arias of Pais Vasco University in Spain, at the American Bioethics Conference in October in Toronto and published in a recent article in the American Journal of Bioethics.

“Since there is a general assumption that deceased patients cannot be harmed, the dead donor rule is a dangerous misconception,” they write.

“Ultimately, it’s not the signing of the death notice that is important to protect and respect potential donors, but rather the assurance that they don’t have to suffer and the assurance that their independence is respected.”

Instead of the so-called Dead Donor Rule (SDR), the authors propose “protecting donors from harm” (that is, receiving anesthesia so as not to feel pain during an organ harvesting operation), the need to obtain informed consent, and state that society “must be completely informed of the initially controversial nature of any criterion for registering the death of a patient."

These experts note that the development of criteria for the so-called "brain death", which is often used when registering death before organ harvesting for transplantation, was an "ideological strategy" aimed at increasing the donor pool, which turned out to be "empirically and theoretically incorrect." They also criticize recent attempts to create new, even looser definitions of death, such as death due to circulatory failure, which they say is just a "pretext" to declare a patient dead in order to obtain organs.

In a 2013 interview with Dr. Paul Byrne, an 80-year-old neonatologist exposing the dark side of the hospital business, it is clear that the concept of "brain death" is wholly and entirely fabricated for the sole purpose of legitimizing the killing of living people in order to profit from their organs.

People who often end up in hospitals as a result of car accidents and drug overdose or something similar are injected with paralyzing drugs, BUT NOT ANESTHESIA !!!

The medical staff literally break open the chest of these innocent people and cut out their organs, one by one, leaving the heart at the very end, only after which, naturally, they die.