AIDS and HIV - the biggest lie of the 20th century

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Why was the AIDS virus invented? How to explain the epidemics of this non-existent HIV virus in African countries. Why is Africa starving at all when American farmers are paid extra to stop producing more food?

The story of the AIDS virus, which doesn't actually cause AIDS. How so? And so: in 1996, there was a fundamental study by Professor Peter Duesberg entitled "Inventing the AIDS virus" with a foreword by Nobel Prize winner Kari Mullins (Peter H. Duesberg "Inventing the AIDS virus"). Peter Duzberg, professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California at Berkeley, published it with his own money because the PRI refused to do so. Professor Duzberg is one of the very few people in the world who, in line with his duty, has studied retroviruses all his life - that is, the family of viruses to which the "AIDS virus" belongs. There are 700 pages in Duzberg's book. It's a thick book, but so interesting that it reads like a detective story in one gulp. Professor Duzberg shows step by step how the legend was created that a small retrovirus is the source of great misfortune, for which quite certain people are in fact responsible. In fact, the "AIDS virus" is a saprophyte, that is, like, say, the microbe "Escherichia coli", it is present in the body of any person, namely in the nasopharynx. Why do people with AIDS die? - from this retrovirus? - No, they die from a mass of various complications caused by completely different, very specific microbes and fungi. So why, then, is the retrovirus blamed? - Say, it is he who causes reduced immunity? Professor Duzberg shows that the retrovirus is in everyone's nasopharynx and does not cause any AIDS in anyone - that is, that the slandered "AIDS virus" is part of the normal human microbial flora, and, therefore, is useful for the body.

Are you aware of the fact that not a single wife of an AIDS patient has contracted the infection while having sex with him? Why don't you know? Probably PR? How is this possible if the disease is infectious? Where did all these stories come from, how someone, somewhere, got a needle in a hospital and got infected, while receiving millions of dollars in compensation. Don't you think that these are all easily adjustable things? Yes, that's a lie! It's a lie - that a person got infected from a needle prick.

The current situation is: yes, there is a Syndrome of Lowered Immunity, which, by the way, has always been, but only in recent decades has become catastrophic. The obvious fact is that not a single person has died of AIDS caused by a small retrovirus. The virus is slandered. People die from pneumonia and cancer associated with lowered immunity, and the retrovirus, the "AIDS virus", has nothing to do with it. Then what, you ask, causes a decrease in immunity? - And the answer to this is simple, listen carefully and shake your head: Reducing human immunity is a general trend of modern humanity associated with catastrophic poisoning of the human environment over the past decades. Toxic substances and factors have swept over modern mankind, or, as they say, civilization. These toxic factors include polluted ones: air, water, food - everything that is outside and gets inside a person or even comes into contact with him, such as even synthetic clothes. The fact that they are trying to hide is that we, city dwellers, have Low Immunity Syndrome. Yes, to some extent all of us, city dwellers, have AIDS - Reduced Immunodeficiency Syndrome. But why then only a few die? And here the risk factor plays a role, that is, the fact that some people subject themselves to much more intoxication than others: these are drug addicts, drunkards, leading a riotous and promiscuous lifestyle, that is, the group that is highlighted in official statistics …

But how to explain that half of Africa is sick with AIDS, that is, has an immunodeficiency? It's very simple: Africa does not have its own agriculture, it is a global dependent. They do not sow or plow, but only eat and multiply. Their culture has not yet matured to the agricultural level. They are only able to eat what grows on trees. In the past, natural causes governed the number of Africans. Now civilization does not allow them to die just like that, it makes them die of immunodeficiency. The scheme works like this: as you understand, Africans have no money to pay for something. Thus, in order to make a profit, American corporations make such a roundabout move: PRI intimidates the world public with stories of famine in Africa and forces the government, that is, the American taxpayer, to fork out for food for Africans. American corporations, on the other hand, take money, and as humanitarian aid, of course, they do not supply high-quality products to Africa, but they fuse them with low-quality, expired, non-nutritious, at best empty, and simply contaminated food, saturated with malignant chemistry, according to the principle of donated They don’t look a horse in the mouth”. So what American corporations are doing is just genocide.

You say, but then Africans would still starve to death. - This is the wrong way of asking the question: in Africa, natural factors have always regulated the population, but natural factors do not give any profit to American corporations - this is what causes AIDS in Africa. That's right, Africa is a direct global case of the targeted poisoning of people across the continent with toxic substances distributed as counterfeit products and drugs. Who controls the quality of products supplied to Africa? - No one. Now you understand why PIARU needed a small retrovirus? - To write off the responsibility for the quite obvious fact of killing dozens, and maybe hundreds of millions of people, as well as for the obvious catastrophic state of health of a modern person.

An interesting fact, Professor Duzberg emphasizes that the consequent deterioration in the health of people with immunodeficiency (it will be more correct to say so), and not AIDS, is caused by the start of taking medications intended specifically for its treatment, which - in particular, the main drug "AZT" - are extremely toxic for the human body. That is, death from AIDS is actually death from chronic intoxication of the body caused by environmental factors, water, food, air and individual intoxication factors for each person, as well as the drugs themselves used to treat it - the language does not dare to name them medicines.

How else is this proven? - The fact that there have accumulated documented cases of complete recovery from "AIDS" of people who have already been thrown into the ward of the dying by official medicine. (Roger? S Recovery from AIDS Bob Owen. Roger's Recovery from AIDS. Written by Bob Owen, subtitled How One Man Overcame a Dreadful Disease - you can find this book online).

Tim O Shee, from The Doors of Perception: Why Americans Will Believe Almost Everything

Per. from English John Galepeno

Addition:

The whole fight against AIDS, all the prevention, all the advertisements and distribution of condoms, all the mass events and the hype in the media about AIDS are absolutely meaningless and will certainly not bring any result. And even if we create a situation in which there are no risks of HIV infection at all - there will be no sex, no drugs - HIV tests will still give a positive result in a given percentage of those tested. Because these tests do not detect this virus, but respond to many different diseases and normal health conditions. LIST OF REASONS CAUSING ERROR POSITIVE RESULTS FOR HIV ANTIBODIES, published in the journal "Continuum". 1. Healthy people as a result of obscure cross-reactions 2. Pregnancy (especially in a woman who has given birth many times) 3. Normal human ribonucleoproteins 4. Blood transfusion, especially multiple blood transfusions 5. Upper respiratory tract infection (cold, ARI) 6. Influenza 7. Recent viral infection or viral vaccination 8. Other retroviruses 9. Vaccination against influenza 10. Vaccination against hepatitis B 11. Vaccination against tetanus 12. "Sticky" blood (in Africans) 13. Hepatitis 14. Primary sclerosing cholangitis 15. Primary biliary cirrhosis 16. Tuberculosis 17. Herpes 18. Hemophilia 19. Stevens / Johnson syndrome (inflammatory febrile disease of the skin and mucous membranes) 20. Q-fever with concomitant hepatitis 21. Alcoholic hepatitis (alcoholic hepatic diseases) 22. Malaria 23. Rheumatoid arthritis 24. Systemic lupus erythematosus 25. Scleroderma 26. Dermatomyositis 27. Connective tissue disease 28. Malignant tumors 29. Lymph ohm 30. Multiple sclerosis 31. Multiple sclerosis 32. Renal failure 33. Alpha-interferon therapy in hemodialysis 34. Organ transplantation 35. Kidney transplantation 36. Leprosy 37. Hyperbilirubinemia (increased bilirubin in the blood) 38. Lipemic serum (blood with high content of fat or lipids) 39. Hemolyzed serum (blood in which hemoglobin is separated from red cells) 40. Naturally occurring antibodies 41. Anti-carbohydrate antibodies 42. Anti-lymphocyte antibodies 43. HLA antibodies (to antigens of leukocytes of classes 1 and 2) 44. High level of circulating immune complexes 45. Samples subjected to high temperature treatment 46. Anti-collagen antibodies (found in homosexual men, hemophiliacs, Africans of both sexes and people with leprosy) 47. Serum rheumatoid factor positivity, anti-nuclear antibody (both have been found in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases) 48. Hyperga mmaglobulinemia (high antibody levels) 49. Falsely positive response to another test, including the RPR (Rapid Plasma Reagent) test for syphilis 50. Anti-smooth muscle antibodies 51. Anti-parietal cell antibodies (gastric parietal cells) 52. Anti-hepatitis A immunoglobulin M (antibody) 53. Anti-Hbc immunoglobulin M 54. Antimitochondrial antibodies 55. Antinuclear antibodies 56. Antimicrosomal antibodies 57. Antibodies to antigens of T-cell leukocytes 58. Antibodies that have a high similarity to polystyrene used in test systems 59. Proteins on filter paper 60. Visceral leishmaniasis 61. Epstein-Barr virus 62. Receptive anal sex (September, 1996, Sengers, California) Such a huge number of conditions that give a positive reaction to a supposedly specific test indicates its absolute unreliability and the impossibility of using it for diagnostic purposes. Every doctor who prescribes HIV testing must be aware of his responsibility for causing irreparable moral damage (leading to serious consequences) to people who test positive. And there is no need to be intimidated by the diseases listed in this list. But you need to understand a simple thing well: if you are diagnosed with such a disease, and during testing you turned out to be HIV-positive, then the point is not that you have AIDS, but that HIV tests gave a positive result in connection with this disease … But even more, I want to draw your attention to the fact that many points actually boil down to points 1 and 48 - you are healthy, you just have an increased overall level of antibodies, and HIV tests respond to this positively. Don't worry about a positive HIV test for a second. And the manufacturers of these tests themselves are well aware of their complete unreliability. And therefore, none of these tests are considered 100% reliable. On the contrary, in the annotation for each test it is written that it cannot be the only basis for making a diagnosis, and its result must be confirmed by additional testing. In addition to avoiding responsibility, this is also an increase in the production and sale of the tests themselves. But this is not enough! You know that HIV testing is voluntary. But it still requires your consent, certified by your signature. And in the "Informed Consent Form" you have to sign literally the following: "I hereby declare that I will not make any claims against the medical facility and staff, including prosecution for the issuance of a false positive result."

All positive HIV test results are known to be false positives, a deliberate deception.

And with such a piece of paper you are purely psychologically prepared for the fact that when you realize that you have become a victim of deception, then you will not be offended, forgive everyone, and blame only your former naivety for everything. I don’t want to write here in more detail about these tests, but there is, in principle, nothing supernatural and requiring an academic mind to understand that we are being foolish.

Every year, thousands of pregnant women become victims of the HIV hoax, who, in violation of the principle of voluntary HIV testing, are practically forced to do this testing. Watch the "Conspiracy Against Pregnant Women" compilation video convincingly showing the fallacy of the HIV / AIDS theory.

Movement Against the HIV / AIDS Scam:

Video: opinion of foreign experts

People are hiding data on the falseness of the hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS, which leads to death. There are hiding data about the uselessness and toxicity of drugs that supposedly should kill the "elusive virus" (HIV) and thereby prolong the life of an AIDS patient. In the entire history of medicine, there has not been such a monstrous deception of a huge number of people, including patients and doctors, as a fictitious epidemic and panic associated with AIDS. The HIV / AIDS theory can be considered the biggest scam of the medical mafia …