Einstein is a plagiarist ?! He is the same "Jewish star" as Kazimir Malevich, the author of the painting "Black Square"

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

What is plagiarism?

Lawyers say: plagiarism is the deliberate appropriation of authorship for other people's works and ideas.

Most often observed plagiarism of works is expressedin the publication by a person of someone else's work under his own name, as well as in using someone else'sa work (literary or musical, for example) or a fragment of it without attribution … That is, an obligatory sign of plagiarism is the appropriation of someone else's authorship.

In addition to plagiarism of worksalso takes place and plagiarism idea, principle, concept … On the one hand, ideas, principles, concepts, plot and methods are not subject to "copyright" for the reason that one and the same idea can simultaneously occur to not one person, but several at once. On the other side, external expression of an idea(its text design, for example) is already object copyright, and copying this text, as well as the very essence of the idea (!) without attribution is illegal - plagiarism.

So thanks to PRarranged in the media world Jewry, the name of Albert Einstein is known to literally every schoolchild today?

So WHAT IS A. Einstein famous for ?!

Albert Einstein (March 14, 1879 - April 18, 1955) - theoretical physicist, one of the founders of modern theoretical physics, 1921 Nobel Prize Laureate in Physics, a public figure-humanist. He lived in Germany (1879-1893, 1914-1933), Switzerland (1893-1914) and the USA (1933-1955). Honorary Doctor of about 20 leading universities in the world, a member of many Academies of Sciences, including a foreign honorary member of the USSR Academy of Sciences (1926).

At the same time, Albert Einstein is truly a cult scientist. His cult was created by the media and it still rests on the claims that:

1. Albert Einstein - belongs to the formula:

In fact, this formula was derived by an English scientist Oliver Heaviside, who investigated the processes of absorption and emission of electromagnetic waves by a physical body and introduced the concept of "electromagnetic energy flow".

It was during the study of these processes that Heaviside derived this formula attributed to Einstein, where E is the energy of an object, m is its mass, c is the speed of light in vacuum (airless space), equal to 299792458 m / s.

O. Haviside.

Heaviside Oliver (Heaviside, Oliver) (1850-18-05 - 1925-03-02) - English physicist and mathematician. Born May 18, 1850 in London. He did not have a university education, worked for the telegraph company in Newcastle. In 1874 he was forced to leave his job due to progressive deafness, and conducted his scientific research in his own laboratory. His main physical works are devoted to electromagnetism and mathematical physics. In 1892, Heaviside took up the theoretical aspects of the problems of telegraphy and the transmission of electrical signals. Heaviside has priority in the following scientific discoveries:

1) creation of vector analysis;

2) creation of operational calculus (theory of Laplace transformations);

3) simplification of 20 Maxwell's equations with 20 variables and their reduction to two equations with two variable vectors of electric and magnetic fields. Hertz did it independently. For a number of years, the equations of electrodynamics in a new form were called the Hertz-Heaviside equations, the young Einstein called them the Maxwell-Hertz equations, and today these equations are only named after Maxwell;

4) in 1890, fifteen years before Einstein, Heaviside received the famous formula E = mc ^ 2;

5) predicted the presence of a special layer of ozone in the atmosphere (ionosphere), thanks to which ultra-long-range radio communication is possible;

6) predicted in 1895 radiation, later called "Vavilov-Cherenkov radiation". The last one, Cherenkov, was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1958 (together with two more Soviet theoreticians I. E. Tamm and I. M. Frank);

7) introduced the delta function (Dirac) into physics;

8) thirty years earlier than Dirac, he substantiated the magnetic monopole.

In 1891, Oliver Heaviside was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, but did nothing to come to London to "go through the formalities." Instead, he wrote the following lines:

“But in order to arrange everything without flaw,

Bring us three pounds from your pocket

And come to the city, and in this way

We will admit you to the Society and what we do with you

And if you don't want to do this,

Then do not come to us, but do as you know!"

In this act, Heaviside's attitude towards all kinds of scientific titles was manifested. A source.

We must pay tribute to other physicists, who were among the first to see that energy and mass of light-carrying particles are related … In the work of the 1906 Nobel Prize laureate, English physicist Joseph John Thomson (1856-1940), written and published back in 1881, the concept was first introduced "Electromagnetic mass" … J. J. Thomson was convinced that to the inert mass of a charged body around which an electromagnetic field is formed, electromagnetic mass, inherent in the electromagnetic field itself.

The idea that there is mass in the electromagnetic field was also in the work of Oliver Heaviside, published in 1889. Considering the problem of absorption and emission of light, he gets exactly the same ratio between the mass and energy of electromagnetic radiation in the form E = mc ^ 2.

In 1900, A. Poincaré published a work in which he also came to the conclusion that light as a carrier of energy must have massdefined by the expression:

where E is the energy transferred by the light, v is the transfer rate.

In the works of M. Abraham (1902) and H. Lorentz (1904), it was first established that, generally speaking, for a moving body it is impossible to introduce a single coefficient of proportionality between its acceleration and the force acting on it. They introduced the concepts longitudinal and transverse mass, used to describe the dynamics of a particle moving at near-light speed, using Newton's second law.

So, Lorentz wrote in his work: “Consequently, in processes in which acceleration occurs in the direction of motion, the electron behaves as if it has mass m1, and when accelerated in the direction perpendicular to the motion, as if it has mass m2. Therefore, it is convenient to give the names "longitudinal" and "transverse" electromagnetic masses to the quantities m1 and m2. (Kudryavtsev PS Chapter Three. Solution of the problem of electrodynamics of moving media // History of physics. Vol. III From the discovery of quantum to quantum mechanics. - M.: Education, 1971. - S. 36-57. - 424 p.). A source.

According to this idea of the Dutch scientist Hendrik Lorenz (1853-1928), it turns out that the formula E = mc ^ 2 inaccurate, she hides in itself behind the multiplier m sum of masses m1 + m2, or rather the sum of different energies E1 and E2formed by the mass m1 and the translational speed of a particle of light and mass m2 and the speed of its rotation around its axis!

I must say when Einstein and Co. destroyed the logic of common sense and gave the scientific world a sensation: "Energy is the equivalent of mass", to talk about any masses of particles that form electromagnetic fields has become bad manners in the scientific environment! Then, relativists were already talking with might and main about "massless particles", about a "special form of matter" and about a "physical vacuum".

2. Albert Einstein is an outstanding physicist, awarded the Nobel Prize for his outstanding contribution to the development of world science

Einstein received the Nobel Prize for his study of this particular case: "The kinetic ENERGY of photoelectrons does not depend on the intensity of the incident light, but depends on its FREQUENCY" … In Stoletov's work, it is literally written like this: “The discharging effect, other things being equal, is proportional to the ENERGY of active rays falling on the discharged surface. The discharging effect is possessed, if not exclusively, then with tremendous superiority over others, the rays of the highest refraction (ultraviolet), missing in the solar spectrum (λ <295 10^-6 mm). The more abundant the spectrum with such rays, the stronger the effect … "

A source

I will only note, since I am well acquainted with the history of physics, that the "Second Law of the Photoelectric Effect" was postulated back in the Middle Ages by a French scientist René Descartes (1596-1650) in the study of an optical phenomenon well known to literally every person called Rainbow.

When R. Descartes was looking for an answer to the question why white light, when passing at a certain angle through a drop of water, breaks up into seven colors, he came to the idea that "The nature of COLOR lies only in the fact that the particles of subtle matter, transmitting the action of light, tend to ROTATE with greater force than to move in a straight line …" (Rene Descartes. "Meteora", chapter VIII, p. 333-334. Quoted from the book "HISTORY OF PHYSICS" by Mario Llozzi, publishing house "MIR", Moscow, 1970, p. 117).

Rene Descartes.

When in a quarter of a millennium (in 1888-1890) the Russian scientist Alexander Stoletov investigated the phenomenon of "external photoeffect", accidentally discovered in 1887 by the German scientist Heinrich Hertz (1857-1894), he found that light of different wavelengths at the same radiation intensity has different kinetic energies.

Light with the shortest "wavelength" - ultraviolet - caused the strongest photoeffect: falling on the surface of a negatively charged body, ultraviolet literally knocked out electric charges from it. Yellow light in Stoletov's laboratory setup caused the weakest photoelectric effect, and the red light did not cause the photoeffect at all (The Third Law of the Photoeffect).

The results of the experiments of Alexander Stoletov right at the same time, at the end of the 19th century, could be easily explained using the above hypothesis of Descartes, which the patent scientist A. Einstein hastened to do. Only he did it "in Hebrew": he replaced Descartes in the hypothesis "Particles of fine matter" (ether) to some "Quanta of light" and then declared that “… you cannot create a satisfactory theory without abandoning the existence of some environmentfilling all the space."

This Wednesday called ether well, I really did not give someone peace! Someone very powerful was afraid that new discoveries in this direction of natural science would shake the foundations of the modern world, which would entail a world outlook revolution and the establishment of a New World Order on the planet, perhaps even! That is why A. Einstein was needed with his "general relativity" and "special relativity", which cause rejection in some physicists, and in others - a "twist of mind".

Nevertheless, one of the conclusions of Alexander Stoletov, who studied the "external photoeffect", reads: “The discharging effect, other things being equal, is proportional to the ENERGY of active rays falling on the discharged surface. Albert Einstein clarified in 1905: "The kinetic ENERGY of photoelectrons does not depend on the INTENSITY of the incident light, but depends only on its FREQUENCY".

And before them already for a quarter of a millennium, the scientist Rene Descartes in his work "On the origin of the rainbow" substantiated difference ENERGY of photons transmitting different light wavelength, different FREQUENCY (speed) of their rotation around its axis !!! What was then ignored by the scientific world: "The nature of COLOR lies only in the fact that the particles of subtle matter, transmitting the action of light, tend to ROTATE with greater force than to move in a straight line …"

Here is the whole “quantum theory of light” in one “bottle” for you (“quanta” are “particles of subtle matter”, and here is an explanation of the “Second Law of the Photoeffect”, for the formulation of which the Nobel Committee awarded the scientist A. Einstein!

If the thinnest etheric matter, which Einstein and Co. hastened to remove from "modern physics", is uniform, and the propagation speed indignations it is the same (≈300000 km / s), then only speed difference light-carrying particles around their axis (in different parts of the spectrum) and determines the presence of different kinetic energies! Moreover, as follows from Stoletov's experiments, the shorter the wavelength of light, the faster the rotation of "particles of fine matter" in this wave, and the higher the total energy they have.

Therefore, when we talk about the "vibration frequency" in relation to light, we are greatly mistaken, imagining the "vibrations" of a certain particle, and even transverse!!!

Meanwhile, shear wave hypothesis arose almost immediately after a new phenomenon was discovered in physics called POLARIZATION OF LIGHT.

In 1678, the Dutch scientist Christian Huygens (1629-1695) discovered birefringence in a quartz crystal. In 1808, the French military engineer Etienne Malus (1775-1812) discovered that light reflected at a strictly defined angle from the surface of a window glass or from a water surface has the same property as light transmitted through a crystal of Icelandic spar. Malus named such a light polarized, and he gave the following explanation for his discovery: "Corpuscles in sunlight are oriented in all directions, but when they pass through a birefringent crystal or when reflected, they are oriented in a certain way.".

I hope the reader has noticed that the idea of Etienne Malus clearly echoes the idea of Rene Descartes, who outlined in 1635 hypothesis about the rotation of particles of "subtle matter, transmitting the action of light" … Malus developed Descartes' hypothesis, saying that corpuscles (particles) of light usually have different spatial orientation, but only those with the same spatial orientation pass through the polarizer. This means that Etienne Malus, giving an explanation for "birefringence", assumed the presence of light in particles spatial asymmetry … And it is possessed by all bodies rotating around their axis.

This is the simplest and most logical explanation of the results of the study of the photoelectric effect, made by the Russian scientist Alexander Stoletov. In addition, it is in excellent agreement with the assertion of the "quantum theory", which appeared in the twentieth century, that light is the movement in space of "portions" of energy, the so-called "quanta".

Why, then, did Einstein and Co., who had in fact accomplished a revolutionary revolution in physics, then have to switch to a kind of EZOP LANGUAGE? And darken, darken, darken …

Here's a simple example:

What's happened PHOTON?

We open any encyclopedic reference book and read:

V. A. Atsyukovsky:

“The theory of relativity has created a new form of thinking: the seemingly obvious truths of 'common sense' turned out to be unacceptable! By revolutionizing the thinking of physicists, Theory of relativity was the first to introduce the “principle of non-visualization,” according to which it is fundamentally impossible to imagine what the Theory claims.

Physically, the processes turned out to be a manifestation of the properties of space-time. Space bends, time slows down. True, unfortunately, it turns out that the curvature of space-time cannot be directly measured, but this does not bother anyone, since this curvature can be calculated …

Legends have been created around the Theory of Relativity and its author Albert Einstein. They say that the theory of relativity is truly understood by only a few people all over the world … Indulgent lecturers introduce a wide audience to the mysteries of the theory - "Einstein's train", "twin paradox", "black holes", "gravitational waves", "Big Bang" … It is remembered with respect that the author of the Theory of Relativity loved to play the violin and that he, a modest man, used ordinary soap to shave …

To those who doubt the validity of any particulars, Theories are usually explained that Theory is too complicated for them and that it is best for them to leave their doubts to themselves. Criticism of the Theory is equated with attempts to create a "perpetual motion machine" and is not even considered by serious scientists. And nevertheless, the voices of the doubters do not cease. Among the doubters, there are many applied people who are accustomed to dealing with visual processes. Practical problems arise before applied scientists, and before solving them, applied scientists must imagine the mechanism of phenomena: how else can they start looking for solutions? But their voices are drowned in the general praise of the followers of Theory.

So what is it Einstein's theory of relativity?

The theory of relativity consists of two parts - "Special theory of relativity" - "STR", which considers relativistic phenomena, i.e. phenomena that manifest themselves when bodies move with speeds close to the speed of light, and "General theory of relativity" - "GRT", which extends the provisions of "SRT" to gravitational phenomena. At the heart of both the one and the other are postulates - positions taken without proof, on faith. In geometry, such statements are called axioms.

At the base of "SRT" there are five postulates, not two, as the supporters of the Theory claim, and at the base of "GRT" five more are added to these five.

The first postulate of "SRT" is the provision on the absence of ether in nature (which is the basis of the Universe - the very ubiquitous subtle matter from which everything in nature is created in general, including the atoms of chemical elements. Comment - AB). When announcing his "SRT" Einstein wrote literally the following: "… you cannot create a satisfactory theory without abandoning the existence of a certain environment that fills all space."

The second postulate is the so-called "Principle of relativity", which states that all processes in a system in a state of uniform and rectilinear motion occur according to the same laws as in a resting system. This postulate would be impossible if the ether existed: it would be necessary to consider the processes associated with the movement of bodies relative to the ether. And since there is no ether, then there is nothing to consider.

The third postulate is the principle of the constancy of the speed of light, which, according to this postulate, does not depend on the speed of movement of the light source. This can be believed, since light, being a wave or vortex structure, can move with its light speed not relative to the source, but only relative to the ether in which it is currently located. But the conclusions from this situation will already be different.

The fourth postulate is the invariance (invariance) of the interval, which consists of four components - three spatial coordinates and time multiplied by the speed of light. Why at the speed of light? And not why. Postulate!

The fifth postulate is the "principle of simultaneity", according to which the fact of the simultaneity of two events is determined by the moment the light signal arrives at the observer. Why exactly a light signal, not sound, not mechanical movement, not telepathy, finally? Nor why. Postulate!

These are the postulates.

"General theory of relativity" - "GR" to these postulates adds five more, of which the first in this five and the sixth in the general order extends all previous postulates to gravitational phenomena, which can be immediately refuted, because the phenomena considered above are light, that is electromagnetic! Gravity is a completely different phenomenon, not electromagnetic, and has nothing to do with electromagnetism!

Therefore, it would be necessary to somehow justify such a spread of the postulates, I suppose. But it is not substantiated, because there is no need for it, because it is a postulate!

The seventh postulate is that the properties of scales and clocks are determined by the gravitational field.

Why are they defined like this? This is a postulate, and it is tactless to ask such questions.

The eighth postulate states that all systems of equations with respect to coordinate transformations are covariant, i.e. are converted the same way. The rationale is the same as in the previous paragraph.

The ninth postulate pleases us with the fact that the speed of propagation of gravity is equal to the speed of light … See its justification in the two previous paragraphs.

The tenth postulate says that space, it turns out, "is unthinkable without ether, since the General theory of relativity endows space with physical properties".

So that's it!

Einstein guessed this in 1920 and confirmed his clairvoyance in this matter in 1924. It is clear that if “GTR” had not endowed space with physical properties (if we were talking about absolutely empty space in the case of “physical vacuum”), then there would definitely not be aether in nature. But since Einstein's "general relativity" endowed space with physical properties, it has the right to be, despite the fact that there is no ether in Einstein's "SRT", and in it he has not earned the right to exist (see postulate No. 1).

Like this! The author found a good "coincidence" between the first and tenth postulates ?! (Such a contradiction in a person's views on the same subject of study is called in medicine "cognitive dissonance", which is considered a mental disorder. Commentary - AB).

The logic of Einstein's "general relativity" is based on the fact that gravitational masses bend space! Well, because they bring their "gravitational potential" into it! This potential, according to Einstein's logic, bends space. Curved space makes the masses gravitate. The hero of fairy tales, Baron Münghausen, who once pulled himself out of the swamp along with his horse by the hair, was probably the teacher of the great physicist.

And the "Theory of Relativity" is doing very well with experimental evidence, which I had to deal with in detail, about which those who wish can read the author's book "Logical and Experimental Foundations of the Theory of Relativity" (Moscow: MPI Publishing House, 1990) or her second edition "Critical analysis of the foundations of the theory of relativity" (Zhukovsky, publishing house "Petit", 1996).

Having carefully studied all the available primary sources, the author, to his amazement, found out that there is and has never been any experimental confirmation of either "SRT" or "GRT"! They either ascribe to themselves what does not belong to them, or they are engaged in outright manipulation of facts!

As an illustration of the first statement, the same Lorentz transformations can be cited … You can also refer to the "principle of equivalence of gravitational and inertial masses". For classical physics from its very birth considered them to be always equivalent. The theory of relativity has brilliantly proved the same thing, but the result has appropriated to itself.

And as a second statement, one can recall the works of Michelson, Morley (1905) and Miller (1921-1925), who discovered the etheric wind and published their results (Michelson, however, did not do this immediately, but in 1929), but the relativists did not seem to notice them. They did not recognize them, you never know who measured what! And thus they made a scientific forgery.

You can also recall how the results of measuring the angles of deviations of light rays from stars during a solar eclipse are processed: from all possible methods of extrapolation is selected that will best give the result expected by Einstein. Because if you extrapolate in the usual way, then the result will be much closer to Newtonian. And such "trifles" as the warping of gelatin on the plates, which was warned by the Kodak company, which supplied these plates, like air currents in the shadow cone of the Moon during a solar eclipse, which the author discovered, who looked at the pictures with a fresh eye, as the solar atmosphere, about which did not know before, but which, nevertheless, exists, all this has never been taken into account at all. Why, if the coincidences are already good, especially if we take into account what is beneficial and not accept what is not.

Today there is no more reactionary and deceitful theory in the world than Einstein's Theory of Relativity. It is sterile and incapable of giving anything to applicants who need to solve urgent problems. Its followers are not shy about anything, including the use of administrative measures against their opponents. But the time allotted by the history of this "Theory" has expired. The dam of relativism, erected on the path of the development of natural science by interested persons, is bursting under the pressure of facts and new applied problems, and it will inevitably collapse. In other words, Einstein's Theory of Relativity is doomed and will be thrown into a landfill in the near future."

A source

I want to continue this popular science story with material from my recent publication “Okay, let's say there were no Aryans, but where did the ancient Romans go ?! Became Italians ?! , which explains, from what selfishness the Jews needed to expel the ether from the Temple of Science, and why such a stir was raised around the ether ?!

I began my story by quoting an article by a blogger with a nickname Evil Douglas:

But the most important thing is what scientists do not say and what the so-called priests are silent about (only I am talking about this today), ETHER is that "Kingdom of Heaven" in the worldview of Christ the Savior

That is why there is so much excitement around AIR! And that is why the representatives of "God's chosen people" did everything to throw out any idea about them from the Temple of Science!

It is from this omnipresent "Kingdom of Heaven", located in the very depths of the microworld and which is the foundation of the entire endless Universe, and affects people, their genetic structure, that Spiritwhich is Godendowing us with different gifts and talents, as described in the Gospel:

Curiously, in the Gospel of Matthew in the direct speech of Christ, it is quite clearly said, albeit in the language of a parable, that in the Universe everything great consists of small, this small consists of even less, and everything is based on the smallest particle is an "atom of matter" (not matter, but matter! The Jews have deceived everyone here too!), which is less than all other particles existing in Nature ("less than all seeds").

Following the language of parable, Christ once again explained to people that in the Universe everything is created from these "smallest seeds" that form the "Kingdom of Heaven". This is who Albert Einstein stole the idea of a "quantum theory of light" from! From Christ the Savior himself from his description of the "Kingdom of Heaven" !!!

Thus, we see that the teaching of Christ contained natural science part, from which the powers that be in the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" and the Jews serving them have been striving for a long time to get rid of, but not in religion, but directly in the science of Nature!

And although the "Holy Roman Empire" officially ceased to exist in 1806, the "Power of Darkness" that led it, as Christ called it, did not go anywhere with its claims to world domination, with its ambitions and plans to reform world science so that religion and science could never come to a "common denominator".

The "Power of Darkness" managed to reform the world science and rid it of any idea of Ether only after the introduction of Jewish scientists into it. This happened at the end of the 19th, at the beginning of the 20th century. Christ's "The Kingdom of heaven" or ether, as it was called differently, was literally replaced by empty place in the Universe, which was given the Latinized name to impart "scientific" "Physical vacuum", which literally translates from Latin "natural emptiness"! Then this emptiness was nevertheless given some physical properties, like "Magnetic permeability of vacuum", so as not to look like idiots at all!

A. Einstein is for physics - what K. Malevich's "Black Square" is for art.

Well, Albert Einstein (Einstein), who most of all put his hands to the elimination of the ether from physics, eventually became, according to the Jews, a genius of all times and peoples!

Why was the ether thrown out by Jewish scientists from the Temple of Science?

Obviously, first of all, so that people, reading in the Bible the words of the apostle addressed to the Corinthians: "Do you not know that you are God's temple, and the Spirit of God dwells in you?" (1 Cor. 3:16), could not in any way understand that "Spirit of God" - not an abstraction, which is supposedly absolutely incomprehensible, but this is the most real natural phenomenon, how light different spectral frequencies, or how music or sound with a different set of frequencies and amplitudes.

Moreover, the "reform" of the science of Nature - physics was carried out by Jewish revolutionaries with the same super insolence, with which after 1945 the leaders of "world Jewry" imposed on the whole world the myth "about the Holocaust of 6 million Jews".

And although many years have passed, mankind still cannot get rid of either the imposed myth "about the Holocaust of 6 million Jews" or the results of the "reform" of physics by the Jews, during which they perverted the very fundamental basis of the science of Nature!

So today it is necessary to build the correct science of nature by scientists - "alternatives", among whom I personally know two - cited above Vladimir Akimovich Atsukovsky, the author of "ETHIRODYNAMICS", and Petr Petrovich Gariaev, one of the authors of "WAVE GENETICS".

So we still live on a global scale under the "POWER OF DARKNESS", which controls humanity through the artificially created omnipresent "WORLD JEWISH".

However, the end of "Power of Darkness" is near! Humanity is slowly but surely waking up from the darkness …

Continuing the topic, I recommend the reader to read these three articles:

1. "We have read the Bible! Blagin, we must not make people look like fools!"

2. "The Holocaust is predicted by Christ the Savior, and it will be a blessing for society".

3. "Who will save the Jews when the world finds out what they have done?"

March 8, 2018 Murmansk. Anton Blagin