Table of contents:

Primal Abyssal Attraction
Primal Abyssal Attraction

Video: Primal Abyssal Attraction

Video: Primal Abyssal Attraction
Video: Logical Fallacies 2024, May
Anonim

If you don’t find out where it all came from, how can you understand where it’s going.

What was in the beginning will always be

Hello! I have the audacity to bring to your attention a study of the question - where did the matrix of the reality around us come from.

And to a greater extent, our conversation will relate to human speech - in which I am firmly convinced visually and audibly stored information about all touches of the environment and circumstances, all life tunes - that determined our behavior, our lower and higher nervous activity. They made Homo sapiens the way they are - that is, they conditioned our human becoming, outlined the circle of our foundations and unwritten rules.

The lower and higher activities of the psyche are provided by a combination of conditioned and unconditioned reflexes. Moreover, an unconditioned reflex is always a backbone and a cornerstone in relation to a conditioned one. Roughly speaking, if there were no stage of waterfowl in the window of growth (evolution) of warm-blooded animals (and the human embryo passes all developmental milestones in nine months, including in the form of a fish), then it would be impossible to teach a child to swim. We are learning and capable of perceiving new things - only on the basis of the specific weight of the unconditional experience of "past lives" of our species. All the experience of "past lives" is stored only in the genetic memory and Speech. “The behavioral response of the organism is formed in the process of evolution of the species, it is genetically fixed (innate) and is carried out with the help of unconditioned reflexes of the nervous system. This is what the people generally call - "it is written in the family" … In this sense, genetic memory and Speech are identical - since both carry a certain store of information about "all touches of the environment and circumstances, all life revelations - what caused our behavior" … For example, we would not have created a huge state that has all the signs of class division into communities: scientists, military, workers - if our ancestors in the distant Paleolithic were not engaged in driven hunting for mammoths (requiring the participation and coordination of actions of many fellow tribesmen, as well as the division of labor), and hunted for example by gathering (when the competition for resources forced to limit the number of eaters). It is also necessary to understand that the lower activity ensures the survival of the individual, while the higher activity ensures the survival of the society, flock, tribe, species. To recognize and live in accordance with what is written in the family, to play along with the inexorable steps of evolution, or to try to play against the wind - this is the main interest of life. I hope that with this reading I will be able to make the layman fall in love with himself and his mediocrity. What would he gaze with high on the enlightened kreakl and European-educated mold, but he spits on them anyway, what are they for him, what are they for evolution? Just a lot of colorful garbage for the wind. Only he is a mediocre philistine, his Majesty the bourgeoisie is the keeper of the keys to the eternity of the "distant kingdom", only he is the core of the white civilization … I want every Uncle Vanya to proudly say "all people are different, only I am the same" and blessed his ordinariness and mediocre. And after we learn from what his hateful ordinariness is molded - from what elements, from what thick of circumstances, from what darkness of times - all the kreakli will have to pray for it. I am not saying all this in vain - lately, moderate commonality is under threat. All the forces of the liberal undead have taken up arms against the average European man in the street (with a common sexual orientation, common racial affiliation, common behavior). The reason for this bullying is its dangerous commonness (for whom it is dangerous and why it is so, we will consider below in the chapter "Basic Instinct"). Moderate ordinariness is in disgrace, the middle class is oppressed and humiliated in the "modern world".

At the same time, being divided into different races and nationalities, we all see and hear the world in different ways, we have our own perception of the world, our way of life, food preferences, different degrees of behavior - which differs in human species already in infancy (pre-speech) age … the secret that the sound of the same name will differ among different nations John, Hans, Ivan, Johan, Jean - all these are clear differences in the audibility of the world. But even more crushing differences between the visible and audible world are manifested in the deep layers of speech of different races - in its grammar and morphology. (In total, there are about 240 language families. All this linguistic diversity is reduced to several speech patterns of different structure (morphology).

1. Polysynthetic. These are the languages of the American Indians, in Europe the Basque language has retained a similar structure, its influence can be traced in the Celtic languages.

2. Monosyllabic languages consisting of unchanging elements. Such is the Chinese language and some of the languages of West Africa.

3. Agglutinative languages. This large group includes the Altai, Finno-Ugric, Caucasian, Dravidian and many Negro languages.

4. Inflectional languages. Indo-European languages belong to this type.

Here we have before us the differences in the structure of speech so basic and deep - that it's time to talk about the presence of four separate types of people on the planet. Differences in the perception of the world have nothing to do with the "subjective factor." According to these four types of speech, we can say that each type of people developed apart from each other - in different geographic, evolutionary and resource circumstances. The way of speech is just an audible imprint of these differences, it has absorbed all the rehearsals of the survival of four human species that are irreconcilable with each other. And as if in a mockery of the chimera of "universal values" - American scientists have identified a facial expression that is universal for many languages and cultures of the Earth (understandable to all races and nationalities) - it is responsible for negative emotions like "no, I do not agree" … "No face" As the researchers called this expression, it consists of three basic expressions of rejection - anger, disgust and contempt. It is equally understandable by a native speaker of English, Spanish, Chinese and deaf and dumb. A group of American linguists are trying to find universal properties that are present in all languages of the Earth. They suggest that it is easiest to identify negative traits - since the means for expressing aggression were formed in the communicative environment of human ancestors even before the emergence of language.

In view of the above, we will not talk here about the glorious universal values and the mythical unity of the species Homo sapiens - let's talk about the humanity of Europeans, and about the largest European cultural, historical and linguistic community - about us Slavs. This conversation is all the more justified - it was on our land in the interfluve of the Dnieper and Volga that the first ancient stone civilization of Homo sapiens (CHR) developed. It is all the more justified - because it is in our All-Slavic Speech that the greatest sound and vocabulary is …

But first things first - the appearance of the first Homo Sapiens - takes place in the current village of Kostenki, near Voronezh - and this is an indisputable archaeological fact. Yes, yes, it is not isolated finds of parts of the skeleton of C. R. and the first cultural layer of the settlements of Ch. R. and the first ancient stone cevilization. “Professor John Hoffecker declared the area on the right bank of the Don to be the ancestral home of all European peoples.

The journal Science published an article that the Cro-Magnon camp in Kostenki is at least 45,000 years old. Now anthropologists and geneticists call Kostenki the first place in Europe where our ancestors, immigrants from Africa, came. (on my own behalf, I will add that no camps were found on the way from Africa - therefore the persistent "resettlement from Africa" is a big question) It used to be that people of the modern type appeared in the European part of Russia much later, and they came from the West. But it turned out that near Voronezh, where there was a very harsh climate at that time, the Cro-Magnons lived for more than one thousand years, hunting mammoths, and only then settled in Europe. The well-known US archaeologist John Hoffecker, his Russian colleagues in archaeological research, Doctor of Historical Sciences Mikhail Anikovich, Candidates of Historical Sciences Andrei Sinitsin, Sergei Lisitsin and Viktor Popov, director of the Kostenki Archaeological Museum-Reserve, put their signatures to the journal publication. The discovery of a scientist from the University of Boulder (Colorado) and his Russian colleagues, drastically changing the traditional view of ethnogenesis and the subsequent history of the continent, caused a real stir among archaeologists.

Answering numerous questions about the significance of the discovery on the banks of the Don, John Hoffecker also noted. “The main thing is that it was here that Europeans acquired the most valuable new abilities of consciousness and practice, formed the beginnings of human civilization. Living mainly by hunting and gathering, local homo sapiens already knew many crafts and elements of artistic creativity. This is evidenced by the amazing finds of the lower layer of the excavation - silicon tools, bone and stone figurines of women and animals, which can be attributed to the most ancient works of art."

The assumptions of archaeologists are confirmed by the research of geneticists. Six years ago, an international team of scientists published the results of analyzes of the Y-chromosome, which can be used to track the migration of people over hundreds of generations. “Then this work produced a real shock,” recalls one of the participants in the study, head of the department of the Institute of Molecular Genetics Svetlana Limbovskaya. - We found that the genome of modern Europeans is 80% inherited from the first people, the inhabitants of Kostenka. And only 20% are we descendants of the next waves from Africa”.

One small question remains, is it really that those 50,000 years that mankind had since the settlement of Australia and Europe by a common ancestor was enough to form such dissimilar races as Europeans and Australians?

It seems logical that the races developed over hundreds of thousands of years at the level of the Neanderthals and earlier hominids, and passed into humanity thanks to the cross-breeding of local Neanderthals and a common ancestor, who came from Africa, who carried a recessive racial gene. " I probably agree - the idea of forming races on the basis of local troglodytes, as well as their "humanization" due to their own evolution and mixing with alien colonizers - the descendants of the Kostenkovites - looks pretty healthy. The only colonization that was documented and materially confirmed was the colonization of the "new time" and it came from Europe. And there is no reason to believe that at the time of the Etruscans, Sumerians and Egyptians it could have been otherwise. Colonization is when a person of the European type has always acted as a colonizer and cultural genus of various races (troglodyte) - there were just several waves of colonization, including in the Stone Age. As paleontologists say, the cevilization of Homo sapiens burst (almost instantly) into a cute two-legged troglodyte coterie that inhabited Europe by that time - it happened over a period of some five thousand years …

And we can with good reason call this first colonizer of Europe a Kostenkovite (after the name of the first site of a modern Homo sapiens).

“The genetic inheritor of the Kostenkovo culture is the Kostenkovo-Avdeevskaya culture, which existed until the Mesolithic era. This culture includes sites: Gagarino, 22 - 21 thousand BC. e., Lipetsk region; Zaraysk, 22 - 21 thousand BC e., Moscow region; Avdeevo, 22 - 21 thousand BC e., Kursk region; Yudinovo, 14 - 13 thousand BC e. The anthropological type of man is Caucasians."

So we have to plunge into an amazing and enchanting world … And this world, as you already understood, is not in the “distant kingdom”, and not in the distant and warm bontustans … right in front of your nose - in the middle of "boring and gray everyday life." I will acquaint the Man and the Slav with himself - with his insides as a fisherman and hunter of the ancient Stone Age, with his true (true, true, natural, self-existent) speech. And not just speech, but its interconnection with everyday behavior and such a close and distant time of the beginning of the civilization of CHR, and for this, linguistics alone will not be enough for us. We also need ethology of behavior, cultural studies of everyday life, linguistics, archeology of the Ancient Stone Age (Paleolithic). How deeply rooted are our ordinary, everyday life, behavior and speech rooted in those fabulous times?

Primal Abyssal Attraction

We don’t think about how we breathe, how we blink, how we speak, how we react to certain situations, we don’t think about habits and preferences - because we cannot think about everyday obsession - without falling out of the stream of life. In order not to fall out - you need to react quickly and not arbitrarily. However, our daily obsession is all echoes of the eerie primitive Abyss … How deep is the rootedness of the most mediocre man in the street? To what extent does she dictate her limits to the average person - which he is unable to cross? So the researchers found that people who do not observe the change of day for a long time (for example, speliologists or submariners) - are rebuilt to a daily cycle of 36 hours. That is, our biological clock - metabolism, sleep, wakefulness - returns to those fabulous times (perhaps even to the memory of the first trilobite) - when there were 36 hours in a day. When the slightly brackish waters of the primary ocean splashed on the planet, tinted brown by iron molecules … By the way, the salinity of blood and the characteristic red color (from the saturation of hemoglobin with iron) are nothing more than "remnants" repeating the composition of the primary ocean. Yes, yes, in the veins of all warm-blooded creatures, the waters of the primary ocean are splashing, we are completely composed of it. We are wholly composed of the primordial Abyss, we are wholly guided and confined by it. The success of the further development of a living species depends on the ability to be responsive to its eternal call. The reward for responsiveness is the spread of oneself in space and time - i.e. eternal life.

Let's talk about the vital - that at a stretch of hundreds of years it becomes essential for survival, and at a stretch of thousands of years it becomes the limit of survival, an obsession that completely determines: physiology, biochemistry, predispositions, inclinations, habits, unspoken rules and unwritten laws. For the species of Homo sapiens, this is even more interesting - because this limit of survival completely determined not only the appearance of Speech, but also became its living content, filled its words with captivating images of hunting for shaggy monsters, and images of death that lie in the dark. As for a man of the European type, thanks to archeology, we know that 40 thousand years ago - in the era of the Paleolithic and Mesolithic, an archaeological culture and the obsession of a hunter, a creator-discoverer developed. It is followed by a shorter cattle-breeding and agricultural period - 10 thousand years long (the Neolithic era). And the least influence on the behavioral obsession of the white person had the "new time" or "our modernity" - that is, the era of scientific and technological progress. This era is at most 300 years old … Hundreds of generations of successful transmission of hunting experience, and survival in the harsh glacial tundra - could not pass without a trace. The frantic current of words, images and unspoken rules-silences that made their way in millennial battles with shaggy monsters and bloodthirsty predators of the Paleolithic era - is this not a great heritage and experience that has no price! This current makes its way even today in the concrete piles of cities. A catcher-hunter is, first of all, a creator, a pioneer of the new, a catcher of ideas and technical innovations. This is the creation of gigantic communities of like-minded people - those who understand the conventional speech of creators, scientists, designers … In the speech of Homo sapiens, I distinguish a layer of primitive sound-images of hunting use - they can be attributed to the pre-glacial period of the life of Homo sapiens (Paleolithic era). And this Speech sounds so fresh and lively - as if we were driving mammoths just yesterday.

Let us touch the fabulously ancient obsession of a hunter of the ancient Stone Age … After all, only standing on the shoulders of these giants - on the shoulders of prehistoric ancestors-hunters, Homo sapiens managed to reach the stars, conquer the depths of the ocean and subdue the elements. I proceed from the simple idea that 40 thousand years of hunting and obsession with the cult of hunting prey could not but be deposited in a powerful layer in Human Speech and everyday behavior. This should penetrate us “to the marrow of our bones” and completely condition our life, be imprinted in biology, everyday habits, our values, food preferences, etc. The most stable and faithful impulses of a civilized society are to be found precisely in the obsession of the paleo-hunter. Generally speaking, the emergence of European civilization is connected with its true images, with its values.

Paradoxically, I am more and more convinced that the further in time the hour of the Human's birth is removed from us, the more it penetrates us to the marrow of our bones and draws us into its attraction - the Primordial cevilization of Homo sapiens. We will talk about this involvement. What do we know about that everyday obsession: habits, lifestyle, unspoken laws by which the society of Homo sapiens lives..? Our obsession is in how we eat, greet, how we build relationships in the family and society, what we talk about and most importantly - what we will never say - because it is clear by default. What and when, in what deep layers of time influenced our usual behavior and speech..? Because it is the everyday life with its daily vital need - food, and the methods of its production - that becomes the stimulus of species behavior, and in the case of the species Homo sapiens - also of human speech.

Basic instinct

We will proceed from the simple and sound idea that for every community of living beings there is a strictly defined limit of interaction with the environment (the limit of possibilities). This limit determines the survival of a given species, followed by its spread in space and time. What completely determines the life of living beings is food and methods of obtaining it. It would seem such an obvious and down-to-earth thing - like food … And for some reason it escaped the attention of researchers of social psychology and behavior, and the notorious sexual desire is assigned as the stimulus of all human actions and the "basic instinct" …? The fact is that the spring rut is a really strong phenomenon, but not long-term - as folk wisdom says, “love comes and goes, but you always want to eat”. So what determines this "eat" psychology and daily human behavior, or is it still the determining factor is sexual lust? Of course, during the spring rut and mating games, the Behavior of the creatures becomes insane and even suicidal. Contrary to the law of self-preservation, their outfits acquire a catchy and bright color, they deplete themselves, refuse food (it is not for nothing that the symptoms of falling in love fall under the exact description of mental disorders), and generally behave on the verge of self-destruction. But fortunately - the wave of the spring rut does not cover us for long. But what if the reproductive instinct took precedence over the instinct for food - and was not limited to a short time of mating games? What if the spring rut was stimulated artificially, with drugs or by creating special conditions - so that this obscurity of the mind - in the species of Homo sapiens - would last year after year - regardless of class and age? Every time we see a defiant style of clothing, and a slight deranged behavior - this is an incitement to awakening compulsive states of the spring rut. We find ourselves headlong into a cycle of competitive madness. And to stop this madness of the spring rut without spring and mating games without procreation can only complete depletion of sexual desire. And what do you think..? The sexual attraction of Europeans is really dying out. And numerous industries are only busy with constant warming up: expensive drugs, arrogant clothing styles, crazy parties, adult films. For the black magicians of our time with you, the marriage rush is an inexhaustible source of insanity, profit and power over the crowd. Before provoking the discord and breakdown of the foundations of the society of Homo sapiens, they introduce into society the bacillus of the sexual revolution, the hysteria of the spring rut. Covert work with our preconscious primitive gut is being carried out with might and main, and as a rule, it is far from in our favor. Thanks to Uncle Freud - it was he who opened a whole klondike of pussy problems, the fuss around which is an endless gold mine for businessmen, and endless devastation (of wallets and vitality) for ordinary people. I think that the omissions about the existence of another basic instinct - the extraction of food were deliberate - our attention was directed to the self-destructive side of sexual desire. After all, without exception, all crazy and arrogant styles of clothing and parties are fueled by living force from the reserves of sexual desire and procreation. Mass culture obliges you to go discharged in flashy outfits of "mating games", obliges you to be "slightly out of your mind" - and it doesn't matter if you are a child or an old woman who has long since passed reproductive age - but everyone has forgotten what it is for. Just as the spring rut is the pole of madness through which the disintegration of European civilization and the common Homo sapiens was launched by unclean cunning, so food conditioning should become the pole of measure and self-preservation of the Human species. And it is our task to straddle the primitive forces of these two poles for our own benefit and with our own hands. Food conditioning should balance the spring rut (and prevent complete devastation and destruction of the species.

And we have to land and say that the main limit and the basic instinct that cannot be leaped across the biological species is food and methods of obtaining it. You certainly did not expect such a sharp landing - from humanitarian broadcasts such as speech, culture, spirituality - to purely everyday matters: food and methods of obtaining it? After all, speech, as well as culture, is a kind of speculative, idealistic phenomenon - in general, not of this world … This is exactly how the modern and European educated people were taught to think by malachol humanitarians and clergymen … It is thanks to their efforts that everything connected with Human culture, spirituality and speech - shrouded in a strange fog of idealism and foolishness. For a long time no one is surprised that, for some time now, silly and seizure individuals have been appointed as ingenious creators. But as we now already know all this deliberate incitement of year-round madness - due to the complete depletion of the forces of sexual desire. And low-maintenance "creators" and silly "geniuses" - act as bacilli of warming up and maintaining a high degree of year-round spring-mating hysteria. And human culture and spirituality - it does not have to be strange, awkward, eschewed, otherworldly. And what they call ideals is nothing more than the biological (carnal) limit of the evolutionarily established ways of obtaining food. In this sense, any complexly organized creatures (for example, wolves) - approaching their carnal limit and not daring to cross it, can be called idealists. The wolf is an incorrigible idealist, he does not eat grass - because his species evolutionarily developed such a food condition and such a limit. But what are the ideals here? Ideals are outlined limits that creatures are not able to cross even in the face of the threat of personal death - in the name of the eternal life of the clan. Something - it doesn't look like the usual ideas about ideals..? Well, let's take a more complicated example - a wolf eats meat, but does not eat its relatives - although they are also meat, and although it can do it - there are, for example, little wolf cubs or weakened old people. But if the carnal limit of the wolf is on guard for the preservation of the species of wolves, then he should not do this. In this case, the wolf approaches its physiological limit - rotten meat, meat smelling of wolves or other predators disgusts him. What an idealist, however, our wolf … And what does education and other humanitarian nonsense have to do with it? That someone told the wolf cub that it was forbidden to eat the meat of other predators, that he received a divine revelation in the form of the 10 Commandments? No, he just smells disgusting meat of predators - and this is the physiological limit. Having physiological limits due to food, it is safe to say that wolves have the same ideals-limits that regulate sexual, family, social life. Indeed, the social life of wolves is very complex, and, as the priest would say, it is full of unwritten moral rules, and, as a humanist would say, it is full of ideals. So, the basis of morality, spirituality and culture in complex communities is the gag reflex, i.e. disgust. And here's another interesting thing - “There is reason to believe that the development of a feeling of disgust was closely associated with parochialism, with hostility towards outsiders, which we talked about. For example, it was shown that adherence to "one's" social group (in particular, patriotism) - correlates with the development of feelings of disgust. It was also shown that the fear of infection, fear of getting sick correlates with xenophobia, negative attitude towards foreigners. Initially, disgust could perform functions of a hygienic nature, but in the course of anthropogenesis, this feeling, apparently, was "recruited" to perform completely different, purely social tasks. An object of disgust must be discarded, isolated or destroyed, and one must distance oneself from it. This makes disgust the ideal raw material for developing mechanisms to maintain group integrity. As a result, our ancestors learned to dislike strangers, "not ours," "not like us." To emphasize intergroup differences, people today quite often use moral and ethical assessments, including those based on feelings of disgust”(Mark Hauser; Dan Jones. Moral psychology: The depths of disgust // Nature. 2007. V. 447. P. 768-771) (see: Is disgust the basis of morality?)

This material is just an attempt to wrest from the otherworldly embrace of humanistic and religious infirmity - such completely cognizable and pragmatic values as Human culture, spirituality and Human Speech, and return them to the framework of natural sciences and just common sense. My task is to deprive humanitarian topics of the aura of mystery and absurdity - to deprive the food base of the herd of humanitarian lewdness that graze in the clearing of Human culture, spirituality and Speech.

Praise is thicker than the people

As you know, any unconditioned (reflex) activity of social beings, be it bees, wolves or C. R. - is divided into personal and social. It is also known that social behavior (responsible for the preservation of the species) is the highest type of behavior. It is also no secret that the view of Ch. R. outstripped in the development of any Neanderthals and other troglodytes only due to the willingness to get along in the community and family. Such vital and useful adaptations as conscience, consciousness, empathy, estates and, of course, human speech that ensured the ritual and sound cohesion of fellow tribesmen - all these are carnal-conditioned species values of Homo sapiens. And as the pinnacle of the sublimation of successful species traits, this is, of course, Human Cevilization (the transition from Homo sapiens to Homo sapiens). We invented war chariots for travel by land, ships for travel by water - which allowed our species to spread across all continents. We have invented the perfect weapon to drive the dead-end troglodyte species with their Neanderthal "values" underground. Only by the sight of our weapons do we keep the two-legged common mankind from great slaughter and self-devouring. And only in our Speech, only in our flesh, is the original and unwritten set of rules of behavior of the type Conscious Man stored. Here I would like to give a rebuff to the toothless humanitarian babble about the "conflict of cevilizations." There is no material evidence to say that today there is something similar to a "conflict of civilizations." Simply because today there is only one default civilization - European, and it is known to be secular. Religious dogmas: Buddhist, Muslim, Judaist, Hindu - do not allow to create anything approximately resembling civilization (in the extreme case, these are only cultures-cultures). Therefore, it makes sense to talk about the enmity of civilization with its space and nano technologies and cultures-cultures with eternal shawarmyatniks, shalmans and hey girl, buy persimmon slush. I would like to say that high-tech laboratories called smelly shalman and dirty shawarmyat will help us solve the problem of wireless transmission of energy or cold thermonuclear fusion for those unhappy ones that dream of some kind of "conflict and mutual enrichment of civilizations" - then we'll talk.

Pre-cultural, pre-verbal, pre-semantic and pre-social archaism in our everyday life. Silent commandments of primary morality, spirituality, justice, order are knocked out by imperishable tablets in our biochemistry, in unwritten laws, values, predispositions and are passed down from generation to generation - as long as there is a species of Homo sapiens on the planet.

In the very thick of everyday life and everyday speech, the elements of the First Speech or Over Speech are found. The semantic source is a bunch of the most primary and most vital sound images for Human survival. The imperishable guardian and bearer of these unwritten laws, customs and foundations of Homo sapiens are not some initiated caste, but the very thick of the people. Mediocre majority speaking Slavic languages. And this is the case when the thick of the people from the beginning has its own laws, aspirations, aspirations, values, ideas of beauty and ugliness. These are just pre-speech laws, pre-semantic representations that speaks of their biological truthfulness, monstrous antiquity and exceptional urgency for the survival of the species.

This path of the formation of the civilization of the Chechen Republic, described above, determines the very selfless and pre-speech values of Homo sapiens.

But outside of this humanistic crust that fettered European humanity, powerful bursts of our dense species memory break out and break the calm and smooth surface of modern humanitarian and religious obscuration. All these humanitarian nonsense, ideals, beliefs today in one thing, and hundreds of years ago in another - I call humanitarian obscuration, a kind of interference in the behavioral stature of the Homo sapiens species. It is this worthless humanitarian and religious insanity that has determined for hundreds of years the modern turmoil and discord in the midst of a single species - Homo sapiens. And true speech, with its unwritten images and laws implanted in it, is precisely the force of attraction that is capable of overcoming the schism and humanitarian obscuration of our modernity.