Continuing the theme of losers' clubs

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

With this article I close ALL questions to me personally, the essence of which boils down to the following: "How do you feel about such and such a movement, direction, trend, to such and such a political party?" Sometimes the representatives themselves ask about this in order to interest me. To understand my answer without asking, you need to read the note about the impossibility of "knowing for sure" some things and a series of articles about the clubs of losers, as well as what is written under the PS sign in this note, that is, a transcript to its main content.

Here I decided to help all the clubs of losers known to me at the moment, but poorly indicated on the information field, to become more visible and more clearly define their position. For this I propose a draft of the manifesto. You can copy and edit for yourself.

I respect various such clubs, because they are guaranteed to protect the world from any ideological obscurantism that has flooded society. In order for all these would-be activists to improve the world to be firmly and reliably held within the framework of structures that completely profane any of their undertakings and close access to the real world, as well as access to real governance processes, they should unite. And in order to see each other well and understand who is who, it is advisable to post the correct manifesto on your pages, reflecting the REAL work of the movement, and not invented or desired. Thanks to this, it will be easier for them to find each other, unite and get carried away with imitative-provocative work, so as not to interfere with the rest and not to spoil our world with their stupidity. I propose a draft of such a manifesto.

Don't thank.

Losers Club Manifesto

1 Modern society is not arranged correctly

1.1 Today there are a huge number of unresolved problems, but people do not know how to solve them, or they are satisfied with the existing system of relations, and therefore they are inactive.

1.2 Only a few patriots realize that something needs to be done, but they are very fragmented and do not have a clear ideological platform on which to act.

1.3 The criminal-oligarchic regime of power will not deal with the issues of reorganizing society, since such a regime is convenient for them to achieve their parasitic goals.

1.4 There is no hope for any scientific ways of solving problems, since the Institute of Education and Science serves only the consumer system of relations and often acts "by order from above", but in no way in the interests of the development of society. Few enthusiasts in this area will not do anything, because they will never receive government support in the form of grants for their useful research. Everyone else who could help does not care, they are carried away by their own worries.

1.5 There is no hope that the situation will "settle down" somehow by itself and there is no hope that someone else will "settle" it.

2 You need to take the situation into your own hands.

2.1 Only we know how to fix the situation. Only our concept is the only correct one, but no other.

2.2 We have read diagonally about the main ideas of all existing concepts and can now safely say that none of them can offer what ours can - the idea of a real restructuring of society, devoid of utopianism, insanity and stupidity, as well as unreasonableness typical of all people.

2.3 Only we can take control of the situation and, applying our concept in practice, change society for the better.

2.4 Our ideas are modern, meet the realities of the surrounding world and contain the answers to all questions.

2.5 Our methodology allows us to solve any problem, but it is so strong that we have not yet been able to apply it to some minor everyday problems, this is not our level. We're going to change the world right away by avoiding the "small business strategy".

2.6 The power of our theory has been repeatedly demonstrated in the many hours of meetings of our club, where we have long and thoroughly theorized about the future, in long, very long discussions with unreasonable ordinary people who ultimately surrendered, intuitively realizing their inability to find a gap in our research, in disputes with members of other movements, whose ideological platforms were crushed under the onslaught of even a small part of our instruments. No one could stand the argument with us, and therefore we are the strongest. Therefore, only we can do something.

2.7 Instead of joining us, many people continue to persist in their unreasonableness and do not want to agree with us, although they understand that we are right.

3 The main problem of active and thinking people is that they are still scattered, trying to act independently of each other, not realizing that with this approach the resultant of their efforts turns out to be close to zero.

3.1 These people must accept our concept because there is no alternative to it.

3.2 Only after they study, agree and accept our concept, they have a chance to succeed in the task of changing the world for the better.

3.3 It will be difficult for many of them to turn off the wrong path they are following now, but our concept is able to help them, you just need to learn to think the way we want. Only this kind of thinking we call free and independent, only that which we propagandize. No other thinking will be free and independent, even if it was developed by a person freely and independently.

4 We will act tough, stubborn and persistent, eradicating all the fundamental problems of society at the root.

4.1 We will be hosting more video and audio chats where we will discuss problems and possible solutions.

4.2 We will disseminate information about our all-powerful (and therefore correct) theory, which will solve all problems immediately after it is accepted by some small critical mass of people.

4.3 We will with enviable persistence destroy dogmas and stereotypes of supporters of other movements, because their ideological platforms are wrong. Of course, we will not even understand their essence deeply enough, because our concept is already the only correct one, and it cannot be otherwise.

4.4 About once a year or two, we will gather at global meetings in order to again, for the umpteenth time, promise ourselves to start doing something real in practice, demonstrating the strength of our approach to other people, in order to once again whet our enthusiasm and distribute tasks, and then throw everything nafig in a month to wait until next year, lying on the couch.

5 Only our movement adheres to innovative principles of work, thanks to which all tasks are solved.

5.1 One of the main principles of our approach is such an important principle as "strategic delay". When planning to do something, we in every possible way and for a long time discuss the problem, and then we begin to solve it. Having done the smallest part of the necessary preparatory work, we abandon the project and leave it unfinished for one or two years. Then we return several times to the idea that “it’s time to do something with this already” and continue to wait. But why? This is the power of strategic delay: during this time, while there is a delay, we have time to think over everything carefully, weigh, study the positive and negative aspects of the task … and often so much time passes that later the project is no longer needed at all, it can be closed, even without starting! This ingenious move allows you to save resources, in particular, personal time.

5.2 The second principle is how we determine the amount of work that needs to be done before the delay in order to successfully simulate useful work. Having decided to do something useful at the next meeting, we assign roles and begin work. How to determine where to stop to implement the “strategic hold”? We take a quarter of what was planned for the next week, we do the first third of this immediately, but only at 10% of our readiness. Taking into account zero experience in solving real life problems, we can say that fifteen of what was done was done right - this is really what we are capable of. We blame the rest on strategic delay and put it on the table.

5.3 The third principle: we know exactly what we want and understand exactly the nature of things. The understanding is based on the fact that we personally have no doubts about our knowledge, and we are so confident in it that we can guarantee with absolute reliability that it simply cannot be otherwise. Our knowledge is consistent with reality and this is perfectly clear, otherwise our concept would not work in practice, and it cannot not work, because it is obvious.

5.4 Another important principle: we initially disagree with any alternative position, and every time someone starts criticizing us, instead of finding something useful in this criticism and taking advantage of this, we immediately begin to humiliate a person that is unpleasant for him. in words, knowing in advance what effect it will have on him. After the desired effect has been achieved, we communicate a previously prepared phrase that his behavior is typical of an unreasonable man in the street and that we did not expect anything else from him. This principle allows us to preserve the ideological integrity of our methodology, as well as to keep the emotional comfort from being in a state of complete self-righteousness.

6 Many people do not understand us because we are too smart and our concept is too complicated for them. All of them are not smart enough to grasp the subtle essence of our ideas.

6.1 It is this circumstance that explains why our movement is not as popular as others based on false concepts.

6.2 It is this circumstance that explains the fact that few people want to join us, wanting to remain in some of their illusions, and not in ours.

6.3 It is this circumstance that can explain all the troubles and problems of humanity, which, instead of following our principles, is engaged in some kind of nonsense.

6.4 This is what gives us the opportunity to consider other people underdeveloped, because if they were normal, they would have joined us long ago.

6.5 Only we can help people find the truth and become free.

Losers of all countries … unite already or something …

… so that it is easier to immediately identify you and you would not be confused anymore, but would immediately find your place and would not interfere with the rest.

PS for those who do not quite understand me. I do not create movements to improve the world, I have no concept (yet, except for the encrypted version of its first part in the form of a work of art, designed as a Forester's Message), and I not only wish, but would even like to forbid you to agree with me before until you correlate what was said with real life practice. And only on the basis of the comparison made, draw your conclusions. If you do not have a practice with which to relate what has been said, it is better to remain silent until it appears.

My attitude to different movements is made up of characteristics such as: the real strength of their methodology on practice, the ability to argue their position, including practical examples, the volume of management and production work done, confirming the real practical experience, managerial literacy (entirely and immediately: from solutions to personal and family problems beforeachieving more global goals) and, most importantly, attitude to God.

This does not mean that I have a bad attitude towards theory, it means that real assessments of the theory can be made only with the subsequent correlation of it with practice. At least, I think so, and so far no situations have arisen that would convince me of the need to use fundamentally different criteria.