On the air Murmansk: "There is no ETHER for some, but it IS!"

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Consider this a preface to a serious topic. Then the conversation will turn to something completely different (about "SUPERIOR MATTERS"!).

On October 10, 2018, an egregious incident occurred. A certain Sergey Morozenko published on the site "Kramola" an opus on the topic "Fake history of mankind. Blockade of Leningrad. Potbelly stoves".

Sergey Morozenko

Your unique claims Sergey Morozenko made exclusively on logical manipulations … At first he threw in a few false theses under the guise of self-evident:

1. In the besieged city there was no factory production of bourgeois stoves. 2. After the central heating was turned off, the demand for potbelly stoves should have exceeded the demand for food. 3. With the onset of cold weather, a black market for stoves, like any strategic scarce product, was inevitable. But this fact also was not reflected in the history of the blockade.

Then S. Morozenko said that none of this happened(he exposed his own false theses), and on the basis of these statements made a monstrously blasphemous conclusion: "The blockade of Leningrad is a historical mystification of the Creator, presented to us by fictitious documents, photographs, newsreels, material traces of the war and the induced memory of millions of people who" survived "the blockade. But, creating such a global picture, HE, for some reason, did not bother with working out small details (like a stove stove in this case). Didn't know that the devil is in the little things?"

I know this Jewish-Jewish method of manipulating consciousnessas I have already encountered it. It was also used at the beginning of the twentieth century in science to mislead everyone about AETHER - the world environment in which heat (including from stoves), light, radio waves and even news spreads!

Then, in the same way, a similar manipulative stuffing was made. knowingly false thesesand then a group of Jewish scientists proved that the assumptions "about the etheric wind near the surface of the Earth" were not confirmed in the course of experiments, which means that no ether exists! Ether is an illusion and self-deception!

This kind of manipulative psychological magic tricksespecially strongly affects people suggested, and such, alas, in our society is the majority. Their attention is immediately drawn to indicated object, and they begin to think exclusively in the line of thought imposed on them, like, for example, Yuri Parshin, who wrote me a comment on my article "Sometimes these" children of the devil "who tell lies are simply dangerous to read or listen to!:

I replied to Yuri Parshin: "There were really no iron stoves in the tens of thousands of apartments and houses in Leningrad … because the houses had from the construction (!) built-in brick ovens, which served both for heating the home and for cooking!Here is the proof and complete exposure of all the false theses of Sergei Morozenko, on which he bungled his crazy theory, denying the historical fact of the blockade of Leningrad by the armies of the Nazi Vermach from September 8, 1941 to January 27, 1944 ".

"House on the corner of the embankment of the Griboyedov Canal and the Square of the Victims of the Revolution, damaged by an aerial bomb." June 15, 1942

I hope now it is clear, "why in the numerous photographs taken in besieged Leningrad, one cannot see the pipes of stove-stoves sticking out of the windows?" They are not visible in the windows because on the roofs of houses (where they are supposed to be!), There were chimneys of stoves installed in Leningrad apartments from the moment the buildings were built!

If everything is already clear, how such manipulationrepresenting the most real a mockery of the human mindthen let's talk about ETHER, which flesh until the 19th century existed in science and the ideas of scientists, but was deduced from natural science at the beginning of the 20th century.

For centuries ether was presented to scientists and philosophers as world environmentin which the light spreads. And according to the ideas of the legendary Christ, by the way, ether is the "Kingdom of Heaven", formed by particles that are "smaller than all seeds." He also said that in this "Kingdom of Heaven" everything great arises from the smallest, just like the leaven, which is put in three measures of flour to make bread, multiplies the volume of the dough.

Help from Wikipedia: 1. "Ether is the abode of the gods in ancient Greek mythology." 2. "Ether is the subtlest fifth element in ancient and medieval natural philosophy, physics and alchemy."

Well, wow, everything is as I said in my own words above!

To deprive humanity of any philosophical understanding of luminiferous ether, in which the Gods reside, as the ancients were sure, and in order to stop talking and reasoning about the ether in scientific theories, Jewish scientists first committed a series of fraudulent psychological manipulations, as Sergei Morozenko did recently with stoves in besieged Leningrad. And then they themselves exposed their knowingly false manipulative statements, which allowed Albert Einstein, widely publicized by that time, to declare in 1905: "the introduction of the luminiferous ether into science … is superfluous" (Collected scientific works. M.: Nauka. 1965. V.1. P. 7-8. Zur Elektrodynamik der bewegter Korper. Ann. Phys., 1905, 17, 891-921).

Help from Wikipedia: "Ether theories - theories in physics, assuming the existence of ether as a substanceor a field that fills space and serves as a medium for the transmission and propagation of electromagnetic (and possibly gravitational) interactions. Different theories of the ether embody different concepts of this environment or substances … Since development (by Einstein) special theory of relativity, the concept of ether is no longer used in modern physics. " A source.

Even in this short reference text from the Hebrew Wikipedia, there is an insolent manipulative lie: the ether was supposedly supposed "as a substance" …

I will note that after the "cancellation" of the ether, all of humanity was foolish with the term "special form of matter"which was actually invented to explain electricity. The author of this term is an American politician, diplomat, inventor, writer, journalist, publisher and freemason Benjamin Franklin(1706-1790). In "modern physics", created at the beginning of the twentieth century, this term began to be used both to explain the nature of light, and to explain the nature of all magnetic phenomena! Well, for the explanation of electrical phenomena too, of course. In one of his works, Benjamin Franklin wrote: "Electricity is a special form of matter, made up of particles smaller than those of ordinary matter."

Note! The author of the term, who lived in the eighteenth century, clearly distinguished, in the style of ancient scholars, that there is in nature ordinary substance, (which is formed from atoms of chemical elements, as we now know), and is mattercomposed of particles smaller than the size of the particles ordinary substance"Particles of electricity - electrons, exactly correspond to this definition. These are subatomic particles, they are part of the atoms of chemical elements. In this case, the dimensions of electrons are many times smaller than the size of atoms of a substance, electrons are always mobile, in addition, they have rotation around their axis, and in motion in orbits around atomic nuclei, they create so-called "electron shells" around them.

And if electricity was thought to be the thinnest matteras early as the eighteenth century, why ether, in which both electrical and magnetic phenomena arise, at the beginning of the twentieth century, someone had to assume how substance?! Well, sheer absurdity!

Here's an exposure of one ether manipulation.

So, ether is not a substance! Ether, as the ancients imagined, is the primordial, subtlest, omnipresent and all-pervading matter, the foremother of all that exists: and all matter, and space with billions of galaxies, and time!

Let's take a look now at how at the beginning of the twentieth century it was made at first manipulation, which misled many physicists, and then was experience set, to check. knowingly false postulate about ether, and then pass a murderous verdict on the airwaves!

But first, about an honest scientist, a genius of the 17th century, a Frenchman René Descarte(1596-1650). He was an adherent of ancient philosophy, for which the Catholic Church contributed all of his works to list of "extremist books" … Convinced of the impossibility of the existence of emptiness in nature, Descartes did not just fill the world space in his view "Subtle matter, which God has endowed with continuous movement", but even outlined on paper, as he imagines, on the scale of the Cosmos, the forms of this continuous movement of the ether.

Vortexes of subtle matter (ether) in Space

This hand-drawn drawing by Descartes is an application to his hypothesis explaining the formation and movement of celestial bodies … by the vortex movement of particles of matter (ether). Note! In the center, Descartes depicted our Solar system … (Oeuvres de Descartes, v. IX.).

Descartes also owns a completely correct definition of the mechanical properties of particles of light, now called photons! He anticipated the quantum theory by three centuries, giving a more correct idea of luminiferous particles than Albert Einstein gave in the twentieth century, who raped everyone's consciousness with the formula " E = mc2"! I will try to talk about this later.

Then there was the experience of the Danish scientist Hans Oersted, who, one might say, accidentally discovered in 1820 what everyone had been looking for for a long time, but could not find - the connection between electricity and magnetism (electromagnetism). At the same time, Oersted discovered that an electric current, moving along a wire, “forms vortex around the wire. Otherwise, it would be incomprehensible how one and the same section of the wire, being placed under the magnetic pole [compass arrows], carries it to the east, and, being above the pole, carries it to the west. Exactly whirlwinds it is common to act in opposite directions at two ends of the same diameter. Rotational movement around an axis, combined with translational movement along this axis, necessarily gives a helical movement … "(Translated from the Latin work by G. Kh. Oersted by Ya. G. Dorfman. Reproduced from the publication: Amper A.-M. Electrodynamics, M., 1954).

From this explanation, applied by Oersted on 4 sheets to his discovery, it follows that it was he, and not someone else, who discovered in 1820 the vortex nature of the magnetic field! Although the very name "magnetic field" appeared much later! Initially, it was given to iron filings, fancifully lined up in concentric circles around a conductor with a current, by the English scientist Michael Faraday, a brilliant self-taught experimenter.

Misconceptions in physics, which eventually led to the "cancellation" of the ether, began with the experience of the Scottish scientist James Maxwell, a mathematical genius. Maxwell once admitted the idea that the world ether is motionless, and if so, it is possible to determine the speed of the Earth relative to the motionless ether. It is written in the history of physics: “Soon Maxwell realized that he had made a logical mistake in his calculations, and did not publish the results of his experiment. And shortly before his death, 14 years after the creation of his famous "Electromagnetic Theory of Light", in 1879, Maxwell wrote a letter to a friend on this topic, it was posthumously published in the journal "Nature".

And a little earlier, in 1871-1872, the British scientist George Airy conducted a series of precise experiments with an astronomical light source, concluding from them that the orbital motion of the Earth completely entrains the ether. That is, there is no motionless ether! Ether is continuous movement.

It would seem that the next step of scientists was to check the results of the experiment of D. Airy, which confirmed the hypothesis of Rene Descartes about cosmic ether vortices, having discovered that the movement of the Earth carries away the ether, setting it in motion. However, the next historical character who went down in the history of science, the American physicist Albert Michelson, became obsessed with the posthumous letter of J. Maxwell, where he said that he was trying to stage an experiment to determine the speed of the Earth with respect to a stationary ether. Around 1880, Michelson invented a high-precision optical instrument, which he called interferometer … With the help of this device, Michelson decided to try in 1881 to measure the dependence of the speed of light on the motion of the Earth relative to the stationary ether. The result was negative. The interferometer did not show any "ether wind". But he could not show, because the postulate of the stationary ether was false. It was Maxwell's mistake, which was then caught by the fighters against the ether!

In 1887, Albert Michelson made a new, more accurate interferometer and together with Henry Morley decided to repeat the experiment to determine the "ether wind", based on the postulate that the Earth moves through a stationary ether. For a year, Michelson and Morley watched their setup, but did not find any shifts in the interference pattern. The device showed a complete ethereal calm!

On the basis of this experiment, which could not be crowned with success, because it was put on a false postulate about "stationary ether", Einstein and Co. declared then: "There is no etheric wind, and therefore ether does not exist!"

15 years after his statements: "the introduction of the luminiferous ether into science … is superfluous", which caused the broadest criticism from sane scientists all over the world "and which his" Special Theory of Relativity "(SRT) needed, Einstein realized that with his new" General Theory of Relativity "(GTR) he had reached a dead end, therefore, to justify it ether was needed again! Einstein had to compromise, to keep both theories, to spread literally schizophrenic delirium.

Thus, in 1920, Albert Einstein declared: “We can say that, according to general relativity, space has physical properties; in this sense, thus ether exists … According to general relativity, space is unthinkable without ether; in such a space, not only would there be no propagation of light, but no standards of space and time (measuring scales and clocks) could exist, and, therefore, no space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether cannot be regarded as a weighty medium endowed with any qualitative characteristics, consisting of parts that can be traced over time. The idea of movement does not apply to him.". (Einstein, Albert: "Ether and the Theory of Relativity" (1920), republished in Sidelights on Relativity (Methuen, London, 1922). A source.

As you can see, on the one hand, Einstein admitted in 1920 that there is ether, and there is no way without it! On the other hand, he stated that "the idea of movement does not apply to him!" And what, then, is peculiar to him? - it is reasonable to ask a question.

Further, according to the history of science, despite the awkward recognition of the ether by Einstein, necessary for the correct interpretation of his general relativity, his followers considered it necessary exclude broadcast from science at all, and in its place they set up a "physical vacuum" invented by them! Where is the concept "natural emptiness" did not work, they began to use the term Benjamin Franklin, which he coined to explain the nature of electricity - "special form of matter".

So through the erroneous or false postulate about "stationary ether" through which the planet Earth (and all other planets too) flies, due to the fact that the "etheric wind" was not detected, a statement was made from a high scientific tribune that there was no ether exists at all!

I propose now to return to the hypothesis René Descartesexplaining formation and movement of celestial bodies … vortex motion particles of ether and recheck it.

According to Descartes' hypothesis, the planets move around the Sun not because they received by some miracle in their "mature age" a push (impulse) that prompted them to move in circumsolar orbits, but because The solar system is a giant etheric vortex on the scale of space, and where a funnel is supposed to be (in an ordinary whirlpool), we have a powerful thermonuclear reactor - the visible Sun. The planets, respectively, were born and raised inside this giant ethereal vortex, and from it they received their orbital motion from the very moment of their inception … directed at all planets in the same direction.

This is the cosmological concept. Is it possible to prove her loyalty?

Yes. Easy!

If René Descartes is right, then the law of planetary motion in circumsolar orbits should not be in any way connected with by the masses planets! Not at all!

That is, orbital speeds of planets must obey a single mathematical formula, in which there is no binding to their mass or to their linear dimensions … And how much they differ among the planets of our solar system, you can see from this picture!

The planet Mercury is very tiny, the planet Jupiter is a real giant, even the Earth against Jupiter is a dwarf, and in general, the movement of the planets around the Sun should be described as simple by the ethereal vortex formula?!

Can this be or not ?!

Let's refresh in our memory our school knowledge from the field of astrophysics and just physics and remember about a contemporary of Rene Descartes - about Johannes Kepler (1571-1630).

In addition to the fact that Kepler gave the world an idea of slightly elliptical orbits of planets, he deduced three laws that were named after him "Kepler's laws".

According to Wikipedia, Kepler's hackons are three empirical correlations, intuitively selected by Johannes Kepler. Kepler's first law is the law of ellipses. Kepler's second law is the law of areas, indicating that the force governing the orbital motion of planets is directed towards the sun. Kepler's third law is a harmonic law: the squares of the orbital periods of the planets around the Sun are referred to as cubes of the semi-major axes of the planets' orbits … And this is true not only for the planets, but also for their satellites!

a1 and a2 are the lengths of the semi-major axes of their orbits.

* * *

So, Johannes Kepler's third law proves right Rene Descartes hypotheses, according to which the formation and movement of celestial bodies is caused by the vortex motion of ether particles rotating around the Sun.

The regularity discovered by Kepler in the motion of planets around the Sun is indeed has no reference to either the mass of the planets or their sizes!

Kepler discovered that period of planetary motion in elliptical orbits around the Sun is rigidly connected with the length semi-major axes of their orbits! Moreover, with remoteness planets from the Sun are also rigidly connected orbital velocity planet, which increases as the planet approaches the Sun (due to the movement of the planets in an elliptical orbit) and decreases as the planet moves away from the Sun.

Everything points to the existence of a gigantic etheric vortex, at the epicenter of which is the Sun visible to us, which, possibly, glows only because there, in the epicenter of the vortex, the highest mechanical stress of luminiferous matter takes place.

* * *

We pause here, the theater curtain goes down (apocalypse in Greek), thunderous applause and standing ovation are heard !!!

Bravo to Johannes Kepler! The existence in the Cosmos of a gigantic etheric vortex in the place of our solar system was proved mathematically (!) Even during Descartes's lifetime

Let's summarize all of the above:

Jewish scientists who "canceled" the ether and wrote modern physics in "Aesopian language" are swindlers

A. Einstein.

If there is no ether for some, then others there is ether!

October 14, 2018. Murmansk. Anton Blagin

Comments:

Sergey S: Anton, hello! I read your articles with great interest. Here I read the last one from this day on the page of the magazine KONT. "Sleepers" (outright traitors, recruited and bought by Western services frost) woke up completely and went on the offensive on a wide front. Now, this is how openly and impudently "sleeping" speak at different levels, from the Chairman of the Accounts Chamber A. Kudrin to blogger S. Morozenko. I have revised the titles of his articles on the Proza.ru page, according to which the following assumption can be made.

There are not many combatants left in the Great Patriotic War, and they are unlikely to react to such attacks of frost. Their (frosty) hour has come, and the "front" command was the signal for active actions on the information front.

Agree, the sixth priority of generalized controls loses to the first in terms of impact on the consciousness of people and society as a whole, where the foundations of a worldview are laid. Here, as in mechanics, we win in strength - we lose in distance, and vice versa. The style of articles by Morozenko and others like him, where the events of the not so distant past of our history are questioned, will have an indelible negative impact on the just emerging worldview of youth, which poses a serious threat to her (youth) in the future. And your work, like the work of others people of the word is now extremely important and urgently needed. And the masters of the word need to work on the first (and ideally on the first four) priority of generalized management tools, influencing the worldview in such a way that it contributes to the manifestation of conscience, an increase in the level of morality of young people and responsibility for their own destinies, their families of future generations. And the most important thing, in my opinion, is to remain balanced, try not to show emotions, because our deed is righteous and Victory will be ours.

Alexey Ch: Anton, remind readers of this documentary about Zionism, created in the USSR in 1973:

I'm freaking out, this is my year of birth! Anton, I wish you all the best, be with us. They are not even shy!

Wanderer: minor inaccuracies of the article: to assert that "Kepler's laws are three empirical relations, intuitively selected by Johannes Kepler" is incorrect; Kepler, like Descartes, was an excellent mathematician and he discovered his laws by processing astronomical observations of the motion of planets, and especially Mars, by the first-class Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe. For the then level of observational astronomy, Brahe's measurements were the most accurate, which largely determined Kepler's success. So, no empiricism and no intuition, but first-class mathematics and an equally first-class array of accurate measurement data, as well as refined logical discourse combined with amazing performance.

Your considerations about the ether have the right to be, especially since in this matter you are not a thinker of the last caliber - Aristotle, with his famous expression "… nature abhors a vacuum" … Such people would be worth listening to!

Sergei: everything is designed for modern youth, who are accustomed to having heating at home, centralized, and even if it is called “autonomous”, it is also centralized, because gas or electricity is not taken out of nowhere, but is supplied centrally. The only autonomous heating is a stove and a mountain of coal, and it has its own autonomy period.

Anton Blagin: You wrote: “The author again counts on the stupidity of modern youth, who does not know that having the simplest equipment, she can repeat Michelson's experiments with the highest accuracy, but not with an optical, but with a radio interferometer. At least in the basement, at least by the sea, at least at the top of the Himalayas …"

Word stupidity in your comment, apparently, the key!

So, at least try to measure the "etheric wind", and no one will find it, because there is no stationary ether! Smart people, after reading my article, realized that the Earth moves around the Sun, being in the channel of a giant ethereal vortex revolving around the Sun. Plus, the Earth itself carries away the ether and creates a small etheric "whirlpool" around itself. Therefore, trying to detect the "ethereal wind", assuming that the Earth is rushing through the motionless ether, is, to put it mildly, idiocy!