Angkor fake and real

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Do you know the feeling of bitterness and resentment experienced by a child who has been waiting for the arrival of Grandfather M'O for a whole year. Rose, what to receive a coveted gift, and instead of a gift, he is forced to say a rhyme, standing on a stool, and solemnly handed a caramel?

I think that you now perfectly understand how a person who has dreamed of adventures in the jungle inspired by the films about Indiana Jones and computer games, the heroine of which is Lara Croft, and instead finds himself on an unfinished construction of the early twentieth century, feels.

Yes Yes! Exactly. Big deception breeds big frustration. A couple of years ago, my classmate returned from China, and to the question: - "Well, how?" - sounded frenzied: - "On….ovo"!

No sane person would ever believe that the "Great Wall of China" was built some thousand years ago. What is shown to tourists is not even a reconstruction, but a design that is quite modern. What is passed off as a wall that has not been restored is just a shaft of heaped stones. The wall has no military significance and could never have been, under any circumstances. Moreover, for several weeks in China, my friend did not manage to see a single antiquity. The entire thousand-year history of China is a soap bubble. There is nothing older than the late nineteenth century.

Now another friend of mine, Sergei Isofatov, has returned from Cambodia, and his disappointment from what he saw is as deep as in the case of my classmate's trip to China. All the photos that I will show below are clickable and were taken by Sergey Izofatov. Low bow to him for that!

No adventures, risky transitions through the impenetrable jungle, cutting your way with a machete. No wild animals, snakes and scorpions. Moreover, no natives with bows and poisoned arrows. Everything is mundane and prosaic. They brought it to some kind of construction site, they say, the ruins …

Where are the ruins? This is a warehouse of unused building materials! And fresh, recently sawn blocks, they are a maximum of a hundred years old!

Angkor carnival maps

Scientists know how to determine the age of a stone, at least they say so themselves, but no one is yet able to determine the age of its processing. There are no such techniques. Therefore, stones sawn at the beginning of the twentieth century with the help of quite modern tools can be safely passed off as antediluvian, no one can check it!

Amazing is the fact that wooden details have been miraculously preserved in the door and window openings! Do you believe that in the hot and humid climate of Southeast Asia, wood pieces can last for centuries?

I do not believe. Moreover, then a very delicate question arises about the "opening" of this most famous "temple" complex of Angkor Wat. If we assume that the wooden elements of the window frames and doors were installed recently, then how could the "discovery" of an ancient city unknown to science take place, if someone recently lived there?

These pictures clearly show that these blocks were processed in a very primitive, rough manner, which clearly contradicts the general level of construction

And here is the time to remember how the ancient, mysterious Angkor Wat, "lost in the jungle", appeared to the world in general.

I have already written about the greatest falsifications of "Egyptology" and "Sumerology". The father of the first pseudoscience Jean-Francois Champollion:

The founder of Sumerology - Henry Austin Layard:

If Chaompollion's biography is rather "sleek", then Layard's life is a secret hidden in darkness. It is only known that he was closely associated with the Freemasons, and was in the intelligence service of the British Empire. Thus, no one will reproach me for assuming that all the pseudosciences, which hundreds of thousands of minds are now engaged in around the world, and which study NOTHING, fairy tales about the white bull, are planned provocations of the British special services, carried out by order of higher individuals - progressors using the Masonic Order of Britain.

Now we can easily and joyfully study the history of the "miraculous discovery" of Angkor.

Meet Anri Muo - Discoverer of the "ancient Khmer pearl". It was he who gave the world Angkor Wat. To begin with, look at all three portraits of the "enlighteners", and answer the question: - "What do these people have in common?"

Whoever understands will say that Karl Marx and Albert Einstein would look quite organic in this company. Regarding Muo's connections with the Freemasons, I will not fantasize, I will only voice a well-known fact: - The money for Anri Muo's expedition to Cambodia was allocated … You will laugh … THE GOVERNMENT OF BRITAIN !!! Oh how !!!

Is it worth reminding that whoever pays for the girl's restaurant is the one who dances her. Muo "found" what he was ordered to find, that's all. Here are two conflicting sources:

In addition, researcher Anatoly Tyurin claims that in the area where the temple complexes of Angkor are located, there is nothing close to the jungle, which is capable of hiding and absorbing something there. And one more funny fact in general gives out all the absurdity of the discovery: At the time when Muo "got lost in the thickets", just a few kilometers away, life was raging in the capital of the local prince who governed the province. A? What !?

There are enough facts to assert that the "discovery" is a fake. People lived in Angkor Wat before, and still live today, and no one has ever lost it. With the unleashed company of the birth of the science "Khmerology", its construction began. It is obvious. The question arises of what actually appeared to Muo's gaze! I would argue that over the course of hundreds of years, ordinary Cambodian guys have continuously changed the appearance of what they actually discovered by chance. Everything that seems mysterious and incomprehensible to a person, he immediately deifies, and begins to beat his forehead against the ground, to pray, in a new church.

The fact that the Khmers at one time came to the ruins of an incomprehensible structure does not cause doubts, it is a pity that there are no methods yet to determine what the structure looked like before it was adapted for their own religious needs.

Who can reliably assert the time of the creation of the bas-reliefs? There are a lot of people who wish, but who of them is not mistaken, there is no answer. If on the walls of the Reichstag in May 1945 there was an inscription: - "We are from Bryansk", this does not mean that the Reichstag was built by the Bryansk guys! So who can guarantee that the bas-reliefs are not the fruit of the labors of the Hindus - monks who settled on the ruins that they themselves once found?

The carving is incredibly skillful, and we know for certain that this level of skill was achieved by European stone cutters in the early twentieth century. Everything is adding up, don't you think? Simultaneously with the "restoration" of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, in Cambodia, the French colony, by the way, exactly the same work was carried out, quite in accordance with the level of those technologies. True, adjusted for style.

And no early Middle Ages are seen in this. Quite normal, modern fittings.

Don't go to Dzh. Davidovich here either. The child will say that this is a common mortar.

The stone cutters have nothing to do with this either. Great artistic plaster.

This was done not by a stone cutter, not by a plasterer, but by a stone chisel. Very primitive, not the slightest reason for ooh and ooh.

But perhaps enough. charm is over, let me charm you. Look, where have you seen this?

Aha !!! Has it gotten warmer? Here I am about the same. Here we see a single technology for the whole of Mesoamerica. And this immediately gives rise to a reasonable assumption that the temples of Angkor were not originally temples. If the Khmers lived in Peru and Bolivia, they would decorate all the smooth, polished megalithic structures with their Hindu paintings. In other words, if it were not for the monks, with their zeal for decoration, we would now see in Cambodia something like this:

This is Ollantaytambo, the Temple of the Sun

Again the temple … At least a number of them on the head amuse. Those who come after us, airports and chemical plants will also be called temples of the Sun, Moon, Jupiter, or Vladislav Tretyak. We look further:

Fun? Compare with the picture taken at Tiahuanaco:

Researcher Andrei Yurievich Sklyarov, claims that these clips were made of iron, a court for the chemical analysis of micro-inclusions in stone.

But Researcher Sergey Izofatov claims that he saw such paper clips in Angkor Wat with his own eyes, although he was not allowed to photograph them.

This story is generally mysterious. Sergei said that he was accompanied by a special service officer, and that is why he was able to see something that is not shown to tourists. Believe it or not, the Cambodian "dovetails" were cast from a metal that is similar to … ALUMINUM in weight and appearance !!!

Is this possible? I have no reason not to trust my friend. It's hard to believe that it is aluminum. First, it was opened quite recently, in 1825, and was practically not used until the twentieth century, due to the extreme high cost of production and low consumer qualities. Before the development of electrical engineering and aviation, metal with such properties simply did not find application. Even if you believe in a miracle, and assume that the ancient Khmers could obtain aluminum on an industrial scale, then the assumption that such a soft metal would be used in building structures made of monolithic granite is already too much. You can then generally strengthen the stone walls with a banana peel. The effectiveness is comparable.

What then? Forged aluminum? But it was invented only at the end of the nineteenth century, and they learned to produce it industrially in the mid-twenties!

There is only one conclusion. If it were forged aluminum, which is used in aircraft construction, then the "reenactors" of Angkor Wat would not only have to create decor corresponding to the local religion, but also move blocks weighing tens of tons, which, of course, should not be. Two options remain: falsification and deliberate injection of misinformation, or the true legacy of those who actually built the "temples".

However, back to our "temples":

Nothing out of the ordinary, right? Skillful yet handmade.

This is more interesting, but a simple comparison of the "columns" reveals their origin. Yes, this is machining on a simple lathe, but the work is also pretty rough if you look closely. The hand of a person with a chisel is not a mechanism, and it is simply impossible for even one person to repeat exactly two parts on one machine using one drawing. What and with brightness these … how to call them then?

The thought comes to mind that the stone cutter of the early twentieth century was trying to repeat something, the purpose of which he himself did not understand. Just a decorative dungeon grill? I do not believe. Every thing has a purpose, even if at first glance it is not understandable.

But this is a completely different matter:

Such a fake is not possible to this day! This directly links Angkor Wat with Mesoamerican structures. There is only one technology, no doubt, and this is something that did not lend itself to alteration. We can safely say that this was done by the real builders of the so-called "temple".

And here is the same "pancake" technology that is so widespread in our Urals and Siberia. As you can see, there are not so many real traces of antiquity, but they are, and they are so convincing that they do not require comment.

Here the reenactors did not have enough chaos in their heads, what to put on …

Agree, without a hint, it is impossible to pinpoint the location of the photo shoot.

This is what distinguishes the remake from the antediluvian structures called temples. The absence of any decor or inscriptions, and flawless polygonal masonry without mortar. Those who built Machu Picchu, Teahuanako, Angkor Wat and Gornaya Shoria had no intention of decorating them. And there is no need to decorate the instrument. It is human nature to paint weapons, tools and buildings. For THOSE builders, everything was subordinated exclusively to functionality, calculation and logic, which is not available to us. But to suspect them of sentimentality clearly would not occur. They treated their structures in the same way a worker treats steel scrap. The main thing is to work effectively. And no emotion!

This is what is required exclusively for weak people who believe in gods, in the supernatural, consumed by passions, and the urge to stand out, show their "coolness". Before us is the very case when a sign from a Mercedes is hung on the "Oka".

With his "discovery", Henri Muo hastened the process of oblivion of a truly amazing structure. The purpose of which is a secret sealed with seven seals. This implies a natural conclusion about the true goals and objectives of those who organized such fakes and continues to cover up. I mentioned the organizers of the Masons, it is worth focusing on those forces that are making every effort to maintain and cultivate myths about the true history of mankind.

This

A supranational organization, which was created supposedly to preserve cultural heritage.

The organization is non-governmental, but try to break at least one of its prohibitions! For example, take our beautiful Lenin Mausoleum on Red Square in Moscow. How many years have there been talks about whether to demolish it or not. And what's the point! Try to demolish the UNESCO protected site! The piquancy of the situation is that THEY poke their fingers at us and call us savages because we keep a mummy in the center of the city, and THEY included Lenin's Mausoleum in the list of objects protected by UNESCO!

And try how to start excavations at the location of the ancient megaliths on the territory of Russia? Dulu! All significant sites are located on the territory of national parks and reserves, which are also supervised by UNESCO. It turns out that the governments of the countries have no right to dispose of objects on their own territories! So much for the preservation of cultural heritage. UNESCO has announced that Angkor Wat is a temple complex, and don't even think to contradict it. Anyway. Let's go further.

Personally, I do not even have any doubts that behind the facade of falsification of Angkor Wat and Angkor Thom, the secret of secrets is carefully hidden, about who we are, where we are from, and who was before us on this planet. I have no doubt that the Mesoamerican monuments would have been wiped off the face of the Earth by those "defenders" from UNESCO, if they had such an opportunity. But what are they hiding?

On this issue, Sergei Izofatov and I developed a complete understanding. There can even be no question that these structures were originally built as temple complexes. In fact, these are exclusively man-made structures. Their purpose is extraction, processing, enrichment, perhaps something else, unknown to us so far. Some kind of process is closely related to metals and water. It is possible that we are talking about the use of the above, as a raw material, or catalysts, and maybe as a means for converting some kind of energy. Be that as it may, many factors make megalithic structures in common all over the world.

These are traces of valuable metals in the immediate vicinity, confirmed even by laboratory analysis of soil excavated near the pyramid of Cheops in Egypt by an expedition led by A. Sklyarov. Curiously, the samples not only contained a lot of iron, gold, silver and platinum, but also a metal such as ruthenium, which does not exist in pure form in nature.

Also, all structures of this nature are necessarily located near or above the flowing water! This suggests that water could be used as one of the components, for example, for dissolving or cooling, and as a raw material for structuring, for example.

There is another common feature in most of the megalithic ancient buildings. It is the presence of things like rock crystal, volcanic glass, tektites, mica, feldspar, and quartz. This suggests that such industries used approximately the same principles as modern electronics. And the rocks themselves, from which all this was built, diorite, granite, basalt, all of this, by and large, are also crystalline structures.

Hence the conclusion: - it's time for electronics engineers to turn on their brains, and actively put forward their versions, and not write the next versions of video games for teenagers.

And here's another version of Sergei about stairs:

He says the stairs at Angkor Wat and the Mexican pyramids are identical, and most importantly, not functional. It is extremely inconvenient to walk on them. Most likely, their purpose was completely different than the movement of people up and down. This is also a design feature of the installations, the ruins of which have come down to us in such a deplorable state. Perhaps these are some kind of waveguides.

And as a result - a general feeling of what he saw in Southeast Asia, in the Sayan Mountains, in Altai and the Krasnoyarsk Territory:

Once there was an extensive network of megalithic structures that served as industrial enterprises for the extraction and processing of minerals. Production wastes are dumps, which currently represent deposits of calcareous rocks, as well as formations called by modern science "outlier rocks". Yes, these are remnants, but not natural, but technogenic.

Each separate release of waste material is a separate "pancake", petrified suspension, which accompanies the workings in the same way as waste heaps indicate the locations of coal mining enterprises.

All this, of course, is only a version, but you have to start somewhere. How much can you blame everything on the aliens? It is necessary to involve specialists in the field of construction technologies, geology, electronics, and a host of other areas in the discussion. Very often, common thoughts are visited by amateurs in one area, but professionals in another, who are not directly related to each other.

Remember the story about the policeman who could not start the motorcycle, and the boy from the sandbox asked him ten times: - "Uncle! Did you pour gasoline"? And only when the engine was disassembled into cogs, the policeman discovered that someone had stolen gas from the tank of his motorcycle. Through the mouth of a baby …