The Nobel Prize is a tool of masons, Russophobes and parasites

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-01-16 18:34

The activities of the Nobel Committee are not only unfair, but also dangerous, because the Masonic committee not only takes an active part in the formation of a false elite from the mafia-Jewish clan, but deliberately plunges world science into a state of crisis …

It is useful to recall the history of the emergence of "the world's most prestigious award". The personality of its ancestor, the Swede Alfred Nobel, is exhaustively characterized by the line of VG Boyarinov's poem: “It was he who made a business on earth out of dynamite…”. A. Nobel - the third son of Emmanuel Nobel was born in 1833. His father moved to St. Petersburg in 1842, where he started developing torpedoes. In 1859, the second son, Ludwig Nobel, began to do this. Alfred, forced to return to Sweden with his father after the bankruptcy of a family business, devoted himself to the study of explosives, especially the safe production and use of nitroglycerin. Thus, the entire Nobel family gravitated towards the manufacture of weapons.

In 1862, the first successful test of a substance was carried out - the future dynamite or "Nobel's safe explosive powder", a patent application was filed. In Sweden, A. Nobel opened the Nitroglycerin plant, which became the foundation of his own industrial group for the production of explosives, then a whole network of factories was created in Europe.

Several explosions occurred at the factories owned by the Nobel family, in one of which Alfred Nobel's younger brother Emil and several other workers died in 1864.

From the production of dynamite and other explosives and from the development of the oil fields of Baku (Partnership "Brothers Nobel"), in which Alfred and his brothers Ludwig and Robert played a significant role, Alfred Nobel amassed a significant fortune.

In 1880, DI Mendeleev publicly clashed with Ludwig Nobel, the owner of a mechanical plant in St. Petersburg and the head of the oil "Partnership" Br. Nobel "" (brother of Alfred Nobel, who was also a shareholder of "Partnership") - the largest producer of kerosene in Russia. In this production, gasoline and heavy residues were considered useless waste and destroyed. And it was these junk residues that D. I. Mendeleev proposed to turn into oils, which are three to four times more expensive than kerosene. This dealt a blow to the Nobel oil empire, as their Russian rivals could successfully compete with them.

M. Gorky, who visited the Nobel plant many years later, wrote: "The oil fields remained in my memory with a brilliantly made picture of a dark hell …" and calculation ".

V. I. Rogozin supported D. I. The controversy took place at a time when L. Nobel played an important role in the appointment of Baku city governors, which, naturally, made it difficult for the progressive Russian industrialists.

The last years of A. Nobel's life were marked by a number of scandals: when organizing a market for the sale of smokeless gunpowder, A. Nobel sold his patent to Italy, for which the French government accused him of theft, his laboratory was closed. Then there was a scandal in connection with his participation in speculation in an unsuccessful attempt to lay the Panama Canal. Contemporaries called A. Nobel in the press "millionaire on blood", "explosive death merchant", "dynamite king".

In 1888 (eight years before his real death), an erroneous publication of A. Nobel's obituary appeared in one of the French newspapers (newspapermen confused Alfred with his older brother Ludwig, who died on April 12) with censure of the invention of dynamite. It is believed that it was this event that pushed A. Nobel to the decision to establish the prize, so as not to remain in the memory of mankind as a "villain of the world scale."

In November 1895, in Paris, A. Nobel signed a will, according to which most of his fortune was to go to the Nobel Prize Fund, which amounted to 31 million crowns. In his will, A. Nobel stated his will as follows: to award prizes to those who have brought the greatest benefit to mankind with interest from his capital. The prizes were supposed to be awarded in five areas: medicine, physics, chemistry, literature and peacemaking.

Few people know that there was also a special prize for the brother of Alfred Ludwig Nobel for Russia, since he lived in Russia for 56 years out of 66 years. In 1889, the Russian Technical Society and the "Oil Production Partnership" Br. Nobel "" established a gold medal and a prize named after "Ludwig Emmanuilovich Nobel". From that time to 1917, a gold medal and prize were awarded every five years for research and development in the field of science and technology.

At the end of March 2007, the revived Ludwig Nobel Prize was awarded in St. Petersburg. The first laureates were poet E. Yevtushenko, writer Ch. Aitmatov, pilot-cosmonaut A. Leonov, grandmaster A. Karpov, choreographer V. Vasiliev, head of the Rehabilitation Center V. Dikul, head of the investment and construction department of OAO Gazprom Y. Golko, Vice-President of SPASUM UNESCO St. Petersburg V. Skvirsky (Industrial and Construction Review, No. 100, April 2007).

Thus, if before the revolution the Ludwig Nobel Prize was awarded for scientific and technical achievements, now the category of those awarded has expanded in such a way that it is awarded for general services to the democratic regime. That is why the list of prize winners is so strange, among whom there is not a single scientist. The presentation of the prize turned into a kind of democratic get-together of the "creative" intelligentsia.

And the work of the Committee for the awarding of the well-known Alfred Nobel Prize is also full of injustice. Although the capital underlying the future Nobel Prize was paid for with Russian oil and the labor of Russian workers, engineers, scientists, Russians became laureates in the rarest of cases.

The absence of DI Mendeleev, the genius creator of the Periodic Law, among the Nobel laureates, is the most disgraceful fact in the history of the committee and the most striking characteristic of its activities: when the prize is awarded, the scientific merits of the applicant are not decisive. Doctor of Geological Sciences A. Blokh in the article "Nobeliana" by Dmitry Mendeleev "(" Nature ", No. 2, 2002) writes that Dmitry Ivanovich three times (1905, 1906, 1907) was nominated for the Nobel Prize, but the prize was not awarded to him on the pretext that the discovery had been made by him a long time ago. And the entire world scientific community, as if imitating the Nobel Committee, cares about hiding the merits of Russian scientists: in all countries of the world, Mendeleev's Periodic Law is usually published abroad without mentioning the name of its author.

The role of Russian and Soviet scientists during the entire period of existence of the Nobel Prizes was deliberately underestimated and hushed up by the "world scientific community". The Russophobia of the Nobel Committee was also manifested in the awarding of prizes in 2009: the teams of laureates in biology and chemistry "forgot" to include Russian scientists - the authors of the developed ideas.

As of 2009, only 19 citizens of Russia and the USSR received 15 Nobel Prizes - significantly less than representatives of the USA (304), Great Britain (114), Germany (100) or France (54).

№	Year	Direction	Laureate	Justification
1.	1904	Physiology and Medicine	I. P. Pavlov	"For work on the physiology of digestion"
2.	1908	Physiology and Medicine	I. I. Mechnikov	"For work on immunity"
3.	1956	Chemistry	N. N. Semyonov	"For research in the field of the mechanism of chemical reactions"
4.	1958	Literature	B. L. Pasternak	"For significant achievements in modern lyric poetry, as well as for the continuation of the traditions of the great Russian epic novel"
5.	1958	Physics	P. A. Cherenkov I. E. Tamm I. M. Frank	“For the discovery and interpretation of the Cherenkov effect”.
6.	1962	Physics	L. D. Landau	"For the pioneering theories of condensed matter and especially liquid helium"
7.	1964	Physics	N. G. Basov A. M. Prokhorov	"For fundamental work in the field of quantum electronics, which led to the creation of emitters and amplifiers based on the maser principle"
8.	1965	Literature	M. A. Sholokhov	"For the artistic power and integrity of the epic about the Don Cossacks at a crucial time for Russia"
9.	1970	Literature	A. I. Solzhenitsyn	"For the moral strength with which he followed the immutable traditions of Russian literature"
10.	1975	Economy	L. V. Kantorovich	"For his contribution to the theory of optimal resource allocation"
11.	1975	Peace Prize	A. D. Sakharov	"For fearless support of the fundamental principles of peace between people and courageous struggle against abuse of power and any form of suppression of human dignity"
12.	1978	Physics	P. L. Kapitsa	"For basic research and discoveries in low temperature physics"
13.	1990	Peace Prize	M. S. Gorbachev	"In recognition of his leading role in the peace process, which today characterizes an important part of the life of the international community"
14.	2000	Physics	Zh. I. Alferov	"For developments in semiconductor technology"
15.	>2003	Physics	A. A. Abrikosov L. Ginzburg	"For the creation of the theory of superconductivity of the second kind and the theory of superfluidity of liquid helium-3"

Note that A. V. Abrikosov was a US citizen at the time of the award ceremony.

The awarding of the Nobel Prize to immigrants from Russia was and is of a purely political, anti-Russian or anti-Soviet character. The prize was awarded to the destroyer of the Great Power of the USSR M. Gorbachev, who is now treated kindly by his western friends in every possible way - in the West he is treated and fed by giving lectures, the theme of which should sound like this: "How I destroyed the Soviet Union." And B. Pasternak received the prize not for his good poetry, but for the mediocre, sharply anti-Soviet novel Doctor Zhivago.

Another example from the field of literature. This is how the "poet" Joseph Brodsky writes about his former homeland - Russia:

Behold the view of the Fatherland, engraving.

On the lounger - the Soldier and the Fool.

The old woman scratches her dead side.

This is a kind of fatherland, splint.

The dog barks, the wind carries.

Boris asks Gleb in the face.

Couples are spinning at the ball.

In the hallway there is a pile on the floor.

Such a "correct" attitude towards Russia could not be ignored by the Nobel Committee - I. Brodsky was awarded the title of laureate. Undoubtedly, an important role was played by the fact that I. Brodsky emigrated and did not have Russian citizenship by the time he was awarded the prize.

The great Russian writers L. Tolstoy and A. Chekhov were not honored to receive the prize, but although talented, but significantly inferior to them, I. Bunin was noted by the Nobel Committee - perhaps because he emigrated from Russia. As V. F. Ivanov noted in the book “Russian intelligentsia and freemasonry. From Peter the Great to the present day ":" Many Russian writers belong to the Freemasons and are dependent on the Masonic order. " Calling a number of surnames of writers belonging to Freemasonry, he believes that this also includes "in all likelihood, Bunin, who, with the assistance of the Freemasons, received the Nobel Prize, which, as a general rule, is given only to Freemasons."

A striking example of the literary preferences of the Nobel Committee is the awarding of the Literature Prize in 2004 to the Austrian writer E. Jelinek, who suffers from a hereditary mental disorder. Her work, according to critics, is a mixture of pornography and sadism. Let us emphasize these words - "according to the reviews of critics", because the general public, as a rule, does not read works awarded with a high prize.

The 2009 prize was awarded to the German writer G. Müller, the author of the books: "A hot potato is a warm bed", "A woman lives in a bun of hair", "A stranger's gaze, or Life is a fart in a lantern." Apparently, the Nobel Prize in Literature should be renamed as: "For services in the debilitation of the population."

Even L. Radzikhovsky ("The Nobel tip of the iceberg") is naturally forced to remark very mildly: "The shrinkage of scientists and writers (and even, oddly enough, politicians) in comparison with the first half of the twentieth century is an undoubted fact."

To the question "Why aren't Russians given the Nobel?" economic considerations are often cited: since the fund is formed as annual interest from the basic Nobel capital allocated in financial institutions, mainly American, the Nobel Committee cannot ignore this. It is not for nothing that the number of American laureates is substantially greater than that of non-American laureates. Let's continue this thought by asking the question: in whose hands is the American money? It's no secret that the financial institutions of the United States are in the hands of Jews, which is why the percentage of Jews among American, and not only American, Nobel laureates is so high.

SA Fridman writes about this in the book "Jews - Nobel Prize Winners" (Moscow, 2000). By the way, in the book of S. Friedman it is indicated that Ferdinand Frederic Henri Moissan, who replaced DI Mendeleev in 1906 in the list of laureates, was a Jew. He made a very private discovery - he isolated free fluorine.

Here are the data on the national composition of the laureates, taken from the article by L. Radzikhovsky "Swedish Simkhas Tora" (newspaper "Jewish Word" No. 41 (214), 2004). As noted in the article, of all 220 laureates currently living: 82 Jews, 62 Anglo-Americans, 15 Germans, 11 Englishmen, 6 Chinese, etc.

Here is another abbreviated quote: “As you know, Nobel Prizes have been awarded since 1901 (in economics - since 1969). So, of the total number of laureates, Jews make up: in physics - 26% (among American laureates - 38%), in chemistry - 19%, (among American laureates - 28%), in medicine and physiology - 29% (among American laureates - 42%), in economics 38% (among American laureates - 53%)."

L. Radzikhovsky enthusiastically calculates: "This amazing result becomes simply crazy when recalculated" per capita "". Noting that “Jews with their 26% constituted about 0.5–0.26% of the world's population in the twentieth century”. Total: their "Nobel density" - 1 laureate per 100 thousand people! " For the Anglo-Saxons and Germans, this density, according to L. Radzikhovsky's calculations, was 1 laureate per 1 million.

And the article begins with the words: “So, this year the Swedes have surpassed themselves: out of 12 Nobel laureates, seven are Jews! If we take only science - 6 out of 10 … One would think that the Swedes celebrated the Torah holiday in this way … "Explaining:" Simhas Torah "-" The Feast of the Torah "is a Jewish holiday dedicated to the completion of the reading of the Torah in synagogues, which coincided in 2004 year with the date of the award of the Nobel Prizes.

Based on these statistics, the author concludes: “The Jews, the“people of the Book,”who have studied the Talmud for thousands of years, are, of course, ideally adapted to intellectual activity. Therefore, they willingly go into science, among them the percentage of scientists (including Nobel laureates) is much higher than among most European nations. Note that this statistics betrays L. Radzikhovsky's extreme concern over the national issue and clearly indicates that this issue is important for the Nobel Committee as well.

And here is how V. Bobrov explains the awarding of the Nobel Prize to A. Einstein, the famous plagiarist V. Bobrov (“On His Deeds”, “Duel” No. 43, 1998): “… actively pushing Einstein into the Nobel laureates and his immense praise as supposedly the greatest genius of all peoples and times - all this is a kind of curtsy … for the participation of a physicist in the Zionist movement for many decades."

A typical example of the selection of candidates for the Nobel Prize was given by L. Landau: “It is unfair to give one club to Cherenkov such a noble prize, which should be awarded to the outstanding minds of the planet (reference - Pavel Andreevich Cherenkov discovered a new effect that received his name). He worked in the laboratory of Frank-Kamenetsky in Leningrad. Its boss is a legitimate collaborator. Their institute was advised by the Muscovite I. Ye. Tamm. He just needs to be added to the two legitimate candidates "(quoted from the book by Kora Landau-Drobantseva" Academician Landau ").

The traditional activity of the Nobel Committee is to distribute money and fame to its people. Thus, the prize for activities in the field of ecology was awarded to a member of the US Jewish community, former US Vice President A. Gore, whose contribution to the conservation of nature was limited to filming a mediocre film.

The pinnacle of the Nobel Committee's cynicism is the awarding of the 2008 Peace Prize to the former President of Finland M. Ahtisaari, who is the author of the project to create an independent Kosovo, that is, to tear away Serbia's ancestral lands. Rewarding a person for a gross violation of international law is a mockery of humanistic moral principles, of the civilized norms of life of the human community.

The motives for awarding the Nobel Peace Prize to the president of the most belligerent state in the world, the United States, Barack Obama, have become mysterious to the public. The wording of his merits by the Nobel Committee is shocking: "For extraordinary efforts in strengthening international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." B. Obama became a laureate just nine months after taking office, and was nominated much earlier, that is, he simply did not have time for “extraordinary efforts”. This impudent mockery of public opinion, characteristic of the world's dominant financial system, clearly shows who is the owner of the Nobel Committee and determines its policies.

The words "Nobel laureate" for people who understand the situation do not sound proudly for a long time. Often, prizes are awarded for insignificant and simply dubious research, the Nobel laureates appointed by the "greats" become heroes of incidents. So. J. Stiglitz, laureate of the prize in economics, used mathematical formulas to prove that the global economic crisis that the world is experiencing today is, in principle, impossible. Here are the words of another Nobel laureate - A. Einstein: “There is not the slightest chance that nuclear energy can ever be used. This required that the atoms decay at our will …”(1932) This was said only thirteen years before the explosion of the first atomic bomb.

As Doctor of Technical Sciences F. F. Mende writes in his article "Are Nobel Laureates Wrong?" The goals they pursue are to seize the dominant position in a given branch of knowledge in order to gain access to material resources. Their tasks also include the fight against dissent, the maximum conservation of the existing state of affairs in science and the suppression of any new ideas that could damage their dominant position."

"A typical example is the grouping … of Academician VL Ginzburg … It controls all the main scientific publications on physics in Russia … In the struggle for power and money, groups of this type resort to the most humiliating methods …"

Doctor of Physics and Mathematics A. Rukhadze (Events and People, 1948–1991, Moscow, 2001) spoke about the personal qualities of the late Nobel laureate V. Ginzburg: “What did I dislike about V. Ginzburg? First of all, its national orientation. Once he said that "other things being equal, he will naturally take a Jew to himself" …"

Although criticism of the Nobel Committee is constantly growing, the reputation of the Nobel Prize as the most honorable in the world is carefully guarded by both "scientific" clans and engaged media. And the highest scientific administration, keenly following the "general line", worships the "Nobel Prize". A completely anecdotal example of loyalty is demonstrated by Academician N. Dobretsov in his article “Medicine for the RAS” (“Rossiyskaya Gazeta”, dated May 18, 2007) - discussing the activities of the Novosibirsk Academgorodok, he writes: “We have only one Nobel laureate so far - this is an academician Alexander Vitalievich Kantorovich, mathematician and economist. But, according to the estimates of various specialists, there should be at least six of them. " What "experts", by what formulas, have calculated this mysterious number six?

For thinking people, the words "Nobel laureate" do not sound proudly, because the Nobel laureate means only belonging to a certain mafia-nationalist clan, nothing more.

Here is another quote from an article by F. F. Mende: “The award of the Nobel Prize transfers a scientist to the category of revered, deified and untouchable. This process of canonization even during his lifetime overtook even the church, where they canonize only after death. Is it possible to consider that the existence of such a phenomenon in science as the awarding of Nobel prizes, benefits it? I think that many will agree that this process itself is far from objectivity and fairness."

The activities of the Nobel Committee are not only unfair, but also dangerous, because the committee takes an active part in the formation of not just a false elite, which, hiding behind the high title of the laureate of the "most prestigious prize", occupies high places in the leadership of science, economics, and politics.

The omnipotence of the Nobel clan led to the fact that world science was plunged into a state of crisis, which manifests itself in a decrease in the level and effectiveness of scientific research, which often rolls by inertia, not responding to the rapidly changing situation in the world, not solving the urgent, vital tasks of mankind.

Under these conditions, science has ceased to fulfill its main function - to provide humanity with truthful knowledge about the world around it.

The omnipotence of the Nobel clan in world science strangles really talented scientists. In these conditions, who will save humanity from economic collapse, from an impending environmental catastrophe?

V. I. Boyarintsev, Doctor of Phys. -mat. sciences

A. N. Samarin, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences

L. K. Fionova, Doctor of Phys. -mat. sciences