On the mission of Russian civilization

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2024-01-07 16:23

About the current state of society

If you look at today's Putin, then he is not a leader (not a national leader), since throughout his tenure as head of state and head of government he has avoided giving direct and unambiguous answers to questions about the prospects for politics and its provision with heterogeneous resources. society.

When Putin is asked today: Where are we going? What kind of society are we building? What should be the ideology of the future? He answers - patriotism.

But it does not answer the question "Whose patriotism?", Because the domestic oligarchy, domestic liberals, and other strata of society have different and, at the same time, mutually exclusive ideas about patriotism and expectations in relation to politics, this (their) patriotism expresses.

Accordingly, society is split, there is no and cannot be a certain abstract universal patriotism that unites everyone, and politics is characterized by the words "for those who do not know which harbor to sail to, there is no tailwind." We have already considered this issue earlier in the article:

Putin is the supreme breeder of the Russian Federation, if not personally, then in the circumstances suggested by history: at least as long as the current constitution prohibits state ideology and subordinates the country's credit and financial system to the global supranational usurious community that monopolized banking …

In addition, both society and the state authorities are unable to say anything about the essence of one problem, which Andropov pointed out:

“There are flaws in any society. If we talk about the socialist, then its biggest drawback is the absence of a system, and most importantly, the absence of objective criteria for the selection and promotion of personnel.

Under capitalism, there is a natural selection of leaders on the basis of competition, if we exclude a relatively small percentage of inheritance from big capital. We have a lot of subjectivism, assessments are given according to pronounced slogans and even political demagogy."

Accordingly to this uncertainty in Russia, personnel policy is built everywhere on the principles of the tribal system: i.e. promotion to positions is conditioned by clan affiliation, and not by moral, ethical and business qualities.

The social need for the government to be righteous and, as a result, competent and capable, cannot be realized in such social conditions.

Therefore, the claims of patriots, expressed to Putin on the theme that he does not ruthlessly cleanse society (and above all the state apparatus) of the fifth column, did not subordinate the Central Bank to the state, etc. - are unfounded.

In order to do this and much more, it is not necessary to support Putin with jokes in social networks on the topic "This country cannot be defeated!" and rating in opinion polls, but public initiative and willingness to participate incorruptibly in government and business management on the basis of a clear vision of the future, knowledge and skills that allow the dream to come true.

Stalin had such support.

But now this, as a sufficiently massive social phenomenon (for the beginning of the process of transformations), does not exist. Dependent sentiments are widespread (Putin must … and then a list of who and what he "owes") and nihilism (yes, they are all going to the "south" …).

In accordance with the state of psychodynamics of society, Putin and his associates act in line with the policy of returning society to the rule of the ideology of idealistic atheism - in its worst version - a version of idolatry.

All these crowds of worshipers of the "belts of the Mother of God" and the relics of the bones of saints are nothing more than adherents of idolatry, from which Christ wanted to free people.

1 Take heed that you do not do your charity before men so that they may see you: otherwise you will not have a reward from your Father in Heaven.

2 Therefore, when you do alms, do not trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, so that the people may glorify them. Truly I say to you, they are already receiving their reward.

3 But with you, when you do alms, let your left hand not know what your right hand is doing.

4 that your charity may be in secret; and your Father, who sees in secret, will reward you openly.

5 And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites who love in synagogues and on street corners, stopping to pray in order to appear before people. I tell you the truth, they are already receiving their reward.

6 But when you pray, go into your room and, having closed your door, pray to your Father, who is in secret; and your Father, who sees in secret, will reward you openly.

7 But when praying, do not speak unnecessarily, as the Gentiles, for they think that in their verbosity they will be heard;

8 Do not be like them, for your Father knows what you need before you ask Him.

Gospel of Matthew ch. 6, v. 1-8

But it is impossible to return to the past. For Putin, such a policy has no alternative, also because it allows him not to quarrel with the church mafia.

Alone, acting in the regime of "supreme breeder" in a historically established social environment, he cannot give society an image of the future attractive to all peoples of Russian civilization.

Nevertheless, in the year of the centenary of the Great October Revolution, Russia is silently realizing its concept of globalization. On planet Earth, sooner or later, there will be a single civilization: this is predetermination due to the biological unity of mankind and socio-cultural factors - the exchange of information and mass production and non-production exchange of products on a global scale.

Globalization is objective, the ways of globalization are subjective

Those who, through a regional civilization called the West, exercise global governance, also understand this. They also understand that throughout the 12 thousand years of post-Flood history, there has been a struggle on Earth over which concept of globalization will dominate the planet.

The West, having pulled ahead in technical terms, is confident that this will be a satanic "civilization of the Antichrist", the formation of which is programmed by the Bible. And, accordingly, the rest of the world is being imposed on Western values devoid of righteous ideals.

Biblical projectenslavement of humanity on behalf of God exists in several versions:

• liberal-bourgeois, which, by virtue of the declaration of the principle of religious tolerance, "protects" all the traditional so-called "Abrahamic" religions ("Judaism", "Christianity", including "Orthodoxy", "Islam" - in all their branches, not inclined to revolutionary transformation the world);
• Marxist pseudo-socialist, revolutionary-terrorist, intriguing, in which the keepers of the tradition are the successors of the cause of L. D. Bronstein (Trotsky);
• convergenceist, assuming the preservation of crowd-"elitism" in forms that incorporate the personal "freedoms" of bourgeois liberalism and the state-planned nature of the economy of pseudo-socialism based on Marxism, a high level of social protection of the individual by curbing the consumption race and solving biosphere-ecological problems by the planned economy (adherents of this version are guided by an evolutionary-reformatory transition from what is historically real to a certain ideal, which at present is not fully defined by them in theories, since “descendants are no more stupid than us and will do everything themselves, in accordance with the specifics that are not predictable for us circumstances ");
• an Islamic world caliphate, the purpose of which can be twofold, depending on the circumstances and success in its implementation: - either to solve the same problems that the Marxist version could not solve in the 19th and 20th centuries,but under the cover of a different ideology and other rituals of social magic; - either create the prerequisites for "world de-Islamization" - the elevation of the Koran to the rank of "world evil" and the prohibition of unauthorized access of the common people to its text and translations, similar to how it took place after the Second World War with respect to "Mein Kampf": for people to be deprived of the information necessary for their independent assessment of the historical past, and treated these and other phenomena on the basis of ready-to-use opinions developed for them by especially trusted professional “historians”.

“The suppression of individuality brings people into a human herd, as was the case in the Dark Ages of the Earth, when the Christian Church actually fulfilled the task of Satan, having embittered and made many people murderers …

Unfortunately, the main religious book of the most technical and powerful of the past civilizations - the white one - was a Bible filled with evil, betrayal, tribal strife and endless murder …"

Ivan Efremov, "Hour of the Bull"

Chinese project- due to its own traditions of crowd-"elite" character and adherence of the ruling "elite" to Marxism (with some "Chinese" specifics) and the atheism of Chinese culture throughout memorable history, unable to solve the problem that the Chinese called the "yellow danger paradox", because, like the biblical project, it was initially doomed to an attempt to be realized within the limits of God's permission.

In fact, China in the past abandoned its own project of globalization in the 15th century (the creation of an ocean-going fleet and expeditions led by the eunuch Zheng He were a prerequisite for this) and is now making an attempt to correct this mistake.

However, for success, the moral and ethical basis of the new project of globalization in the Chinese way must change so that China does not offer other peoples its crowd-“elitism” instead of their historically established crowd-“elitism”.

Japanese project- currently passing "embryonic period". He inherited from the past the problems that hinder the success of the project: crowd- "elitism" based on the principles of "bonsai" applied not to ornamental plants, but to people and society, idealistic atheism, apart from the nationalistic nature of the ancient Japanese religion Shinto and Buddhism, which came to a country from China and carrying a specifically Buddhist crowd - "elitism".

And also Hinduism and Buddhism in India.

For a long time, the West represented Russia as its lost part, and such views were shared by the pro-Western "elites" of Russia before October 1917 and after August 1991.

But since the middle of the twentieth century, the situation is different - the West and its masters have finally become disillusioned with Russia: “Novodvorskaya, who recently left for a better world with a presidential pass in the form of condolences, declares:“The Russian nation is a cancer of humanity … I am quite ready for that. that you will have to get rid of every fifth person (that is, like Chubais, she was ready to get rid of 25-30 million Russians) (…)

Lyudmila Ulitskaya (…) repeats: “I have said this more than once, we were very lucky: Albert Schweitzer had to buy a ticket, leave Bach and go to treat dirty, sick savages. We do not need to go anywhere, it is enough to leave the entrance - and now we are in Africa”; (…)

Viktor Shenderovich teaches friends: “Our problem is that we also count nonhumans as people - and we evaluate them in the human nomination … We mistakenly believe that we belong to the same biological species with them.

For example, the Jew Yevgeny Grigorievich Yasin and the Russian Dmitry Konstantinovich Kiselev from television belong to different biological species. So, we must take urgent measures to preserve our species in adverse conditions. How to be here?

And here is what Goebbels said: “The Slavs, being ethnic bastards, are not suited to be carriers of culture. They are not a creative people, they are herd animals, completely unadapted for mental activity"

And what is typical - no criminal prosecution of these and other "intellectuals" under Art. 280 and 282 are not present, and in the conditions of the tyranny of liberalism there can be no. But in the 21st century Russia declared that it is not a “lost” part of the West, but a self-sufficient regional civilization, which has its own mission in the development of a global civilization.

Russian project- Bolshevik, suggesting the transition of multinational humanity to conciliarity and the dictatorship of conscience through the development of national cultures in a direction that ensures that everyone attains an irreversibly humane type of mental structure by the beginning of youth.

Civilizations differ not in the way of life, not in “values”, but in ideals: the difference is that “values” can be traded, but ideals cannot be traded; a way of life can be imposed, but ideals cannot be imposed.

Anyone without any pseudoscience will agree that the ideals of the West and the East are not equal. The ideals of Russian civilization and the West are also not equivalent. So, at the present stage of development on the planet Earth there are three politically self-sufficient civilizations: West, East and Russia.

Moreover, Russian civilization not only revealed the destructiveness of the concept of Western globalization, but also formed an alternative-encompassing concept of globalization - the Russian version of globalization, which it is ready to propose to the world as a new global agenda.

On July 7, a meeting of the leaders of 20 developed countries was held in Hamburg, which served (as all political observers now write it) only as a background for V. V. Putin and D. Trump - the leaders of Russia and the United States.

But before this meeting, two important events took place in the world, which determined the results of the meeting of twenty. Speaking at the Margaret Thatcher Security Conference in London, Kissinger explicitly defined Russia's "imperial ambitions" to gain recognition "in Europe and beyond at the same time."

At the same time, Kissinger drew special attention to the danger of Russia's leadership in creating a "new world order." That is, the threat to Russia in his understanding is primarily associated with the project of globalization, which can be generated and implemented by the Russian civilization.

The second event took place on 07/04/17 three days before the G20 summit in Hamburg. At a press conference in Moscow, Xi Jinping made an important statement: “Our partnership was strategic, but now it is comprehensive.

When there are three politically active regional civilizations on the planet (the indigenous peoples of Africa, Australia and America are passive in terms of global politics), then the question naturally arises: "With whom and against whom will they be friends?"

Consider possible options in connection with the war in the Middle East: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria.

1. West in alliance with the East against Russia? - unreal. Syria, learned from the experience of Iraq and Libya, asked for help against ISIS, created and supported by the West, not from the West, but from Russia (in general, wherever the West intervened, there was devastation and rejection of the West if the locals managed to avoid genocide);
2. West in alliance with Russia - against the East, both Muslim and non-Muslim? - unreal. Russia's proposals to the West to unite and create a united front against ISIS are rejected by the West, because ISIS, among other functions assigned to it, is an instrument of the West in a "hybrid war" against Russia.
3. Russia and the East are against the West. This is the most viable option, and Xi Jinping's statement takes on special significance: the joint potential of Russia and China is a good argument for sobering up the aggressive aspirations of the West, all the more so as the de facto full sovereignty of the peoples of both civilization states is restored when they build a policy based on objective laws all six groups. And therefore it is inevitable.

Sovereignty in its entirety is the realization by society in relation to itself of the full management function

Accordingly, the sovereignty of the state is a consequence of the sovereignty of society, and not vice versa.

The complete control function includes the following steps:

1. Identification of the environmental factor that "puts pressure on the psyche" and thereby causes the need for management.
2. Goal-setting in relation to the identified factor.
3. Solving the problem of the stability of the control object in the sense of the predictability of its behavior under the influence of the external environment, internal changes and management in the process of developing a concept for achieving the intended goals.
4. Implementation of the concept in life is the organization of management in accordance with it.
5. Monitoring the flow of the management process and adjusting the concept and current management.
6. Achieving goals and freeing up resources, or (in the event of a collapse of management) return to step 1.

The key to mastering the full control function is the ability to realize item 3: control of an object whose behavior is unpredictable is impossible.

The prerequisites for gaining the fullness of sovereignty are the increase in the process of reproduction of generations in the share in social statistics of those for whom the norm, starting from adolescence: mastery of the methodology of cognition and creativity; conscience and shame are active in the psyche; the will is developed and subordinated to the dictatorship of his conscience.

And Russia has long since embarked on the path of reviving the global sovereignty of all peoples in its entirety, although the “unconcerned reed”, being slaves and hostages of the “spirituality” of past eras, does not notice this, and complains about the hardships of life and the wrongness of Russia …