Medics: Oops you didn't actually have cancer

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

After decades of misdiagnosing cancer with subsequent treatments and millions of crippled healthy people, the National Cancer Instittute and the influential JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association) have admitted they were wrong all along.

Back in 2012, the National Cancer Institute brought together a team of experts to re-evaluate the classification of some of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and then “overdiagnose” them and over-aggressively treat these conditions. They determined that probably millions of people had been mistakenly diagnosed with breast, prostate, thyroid and lung cancer when in fact their conditions were safe and should have been defined as "benign epithelial lesions." No apologies were made. The mass media completely ignored this. However, the most important thing was also not done: no radical changes in the traditional practice of diagnosis, prevention and treatment of cancer have occurred.

Thus, millions of people in the United States and around the world who were sure that they had a fatal cancer disease and who underwent violent and mutilating treatment for this, as if they heard “Oh … We were wrong. You didn't really have cancer.”

If you look at the problem only from the point of view of "overdiagnosis" and "retreatment" of breast cancer in the United States over the past 30 years, then the approximate number of women affected will be equal to 1.3 million. Most of these women do not even suspect that they have become victims and many of them refer to their “aggressors” like the Stockholm Syndrome, as they think that their lives were “saved” by unnecessary treatment. In fact, side effects, both physical and psychological, almost certainly significantly reduced their quality and life expectancy.

When the National Cancer Institute report was made, those who have long argued that the often diagnosed "early breast cancer" known as encapsulated mammary duct carcinoma (DCIS) was not inherently malignant, and therefore should not have been. be treated with lumpectomy, mastectomy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.

Dr. Sayer Gee, founder of the greenmedinfo.com project-archive of scientific medical works, has been actively involved in educating people about the problem of "overdiagnosis" and "retreatment" for several years. Two years ago he wrote an article "Thyroid cancer epidemic caused by misinformation, not cancer", which he substantiated by collecting many studies from different countries, which showed that the rapid increase in the number of cancer diagnoses the thyroid gland is associated with misclassification and misdiagnosis. Other studies have reflected the same picture in the diagnosis of breast and prostate cancers, and even some forms of ovarian cancer. It should be remembered that the standard treatment for such diagnoses was organ removal, as well as radiation and chemotherapy. The latter two are strong carcinogens leading to the malignancy of these harmless conditions and secondary cancers.

And, as is usually the case with studies that contradict established treatment standards, those studies also did not make it to the media!

Finally, thanks to the efforts of many honest oncologists, one of the most commonly diagnosed forms of cancer has been reclassified as benign. It is about papillary thyroid cancer. Now there will be no excuse for those oncologists who offer patients to treat these harmless, inherently compensatory changes with the help of total resection of the thyroid gland followed by the use of radioactive iodine, putting the patient on synthetic hormones for life and constant treatment of concomitant symptoms. For millions of people “treated” for “thyroid cancer” this information came late, but for many it will save many from unnecessary suffering and a deterioration in the quality of life due to crippling treatment.

Unfortunately, this event did not become a sensation in the mass media, which means thousands more people will suffer "by inertia" until the official medicine reacts to it.

Film:

THE TRUTH ABOUT CANCER Cancer is only a symptom, not a cause of disease

Oops…! “It turns out it wasn't cancer at all!” Admits the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

On April 14, 2016, in an article entitled “It's Not Cancer: Doctors Reclassified Thyroid Cancer,” The New York Times pointed to new research published in JAMA Oncology that should forever change how we classify, diagnose, and treat the common form. thyroid cancer.

“An international group of doctors decided that the type of cancer that has always been classified as cancer turned out to be not cancer at all.

The result was an official change in the classification of the condition towards benign. In this way, thousands of people will be able to avoid having their thyroid gland removed, radioactive iodine treatment, lifelong use of synthesized hormones, and regular check-ups. All this was in order to "protect" from a tumor that was never dangerous.

The findings of these experts and the data leading to them were published on April 14th in the journal JAMA Oncology. The changes are expected to affect the more than 10,000 diagnosed thyroid cancer patients per year in the United States alone. This event will be appreciated and noted by those who pushed for the reclassification of other forms of cancer, including certain masses of the breast, prostate and lungs.

A reclassified tumor is a small lump in the thyroid gland that is completely surrounded by a capsule of fibrous tissue. Its nucleus looks like cancer, but the cells of formation do not go beyond their capsule and therefore the operation to remove the entire gland and subsequent treatment with radioactive iodine is not necessary and not crippling - this is the conclusion made by oncologists. They have now renamed the mass from “encapsulated follicular thyroid papillary carcinoma” to “noneinvasive follicular thyroid neopolasm with papillary-like nuclear features, or NIFTP”. The word "carcinoma" is no longer featured.

Many oncologists believe that this should have been done long ago. For many years, they fought to reclassify small masses of the breast, lung and prostate, as well as some other types of cancer, and remove the name "cancer" from diagnoses. The only reclassification before this was the early stage of cancer of the genitourinary system, made in 1998, and early changes in the cervix and ovaries about 20 years ago. However, apart from specialists in the thyroid gland, no one else has dared to do this since then.

“In fact, the opposite was true,” says American Cancer Society chief physician Otis Broughley, “the changes happened in the opposite direction of scientific evidence. This is how precancerous small breast lumps became known as stage zero cancer. Small and early prostate masses have turned into cancerous tumors. At the same time, modern examination methods such as ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance therapy find more and more of these small "cancerous" formations, especially small nodes in the thyroid gland.

“If it's not cancer, let's not call it cancer,” says Dr. John C. Morris, president of the American Thyroid Association and Mayo Clinic professor of medicine.

Dr. Barnett Es Krammer, director of cancer prevention at the National Cancer Institute, said: “We are increasingly concerned that the terms we use do not match our understanding of cancer biology.”He goes on to say: "Calling growths cancerous when they are not, leads to unnecessary and traumatic treatment."

The article goes on to say that while some specialist medical centers are already beginning to treat encapsulated thyroid growths less aggressively, this is still not the norm in other healthcare settings. Unfortunately, there is a pattern that usually takes about 10 years for scientific evidence to be reflected in medical practice. Therefore, medicine is much less “scientifically sound” than it claims to be.

Obviously, the truth about the real causes of cancer, as well as the truth about the myths spread by the cancer industry, is beginning to seep even in medical institutions such as JAMA and even in the media, which usually plays a huge role in spreading misinformation on this topic.

Despite this success, we must continue to work in this direction. Research and educational work must continue. In addition to papillary thyroid cancer, this primarily concerns encapsulated cancer of the breast duct, some formations of the prostate (intrapithelial neoplasia) and lungs. When a reclassification of these conditions can be achieved, this will entail a significant change in their treatment protocols. Now they will not be treated with organ excision, carcinogenic chemotherapy and radiation therapy, which means that millions of people will not receive the crippling treatment that condemns them to constant suffering and dependence on mainstream medicine, and many of them will avoid the appearance of secondary cancers caused by these types of treatment. … For many, malignancy of the process will also not occur as a result of toxic treatments that destroy the body's defenses and convert a benign process into an aggressive malignant one.

Just imagine how many people around the world have already suffered and may still be affected, if only in the United States and only in breast cancer there are 1.3 million women? Now it should be obvious to everyone where the official oncology gets such optimistic statistics, where it cures cancer in more than 50% of patients. Most of them did not have a properly diagnosed cancer, and if these “patients” survived the treatment, they became officially cured of cancer. Moreover, if many after 5-15 years developed secondary cancers, then of course they have never been associated with the previous carcinogenic treatment.

Many oncologists, and especially those who use the naturopathic concept of understanding and treating cancer, believe that asymptomatic cancers do not need to be treated at all, but only make certain changes in their lifestyle, diet and thinking. You can, however, go further and quote the words of the professor of the University of California at Bakerley, Dr. treatment, lived on average 4 times longer than those who received such treatment.

All this forces us to take a fresh look at the situation with the diagnosis and treatment of this disease, as well as the fact that, unfortunately, today we cannot trust in this official medicine.

See also: Cancer drugs have been known for a long time