5 seditious facts about the Roman Empire

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

Historians have taught us that in the first millennium A. D. more than 500 years there was a so-called. Roman Empire: 30 BC to 476 A. D. Based on "scientific" information, the spread of "Roman civilization" was only a few centuries.

If you believe the orthodox history, the "Romans" founded many large cities and settlements with developed infrastructure and a single architectural style, covered Western Europe with a network of convenient and high-quality roads, which in some countries are still used today as a basis for laying modern roads. They also built many villas, aqueducts, fortifications, temples, forums and theaters.

Among the numerous ruins of ancient structures, there are even megalithic ones, such as Baalbek. But there is no evidence that they were built by the Romans and precisely during the time of the empire.

Moreover, there is no serious documentary evidence that for 500 years there was such an empire, which is now called the Roman Empire.

1. Maps of Ancient Europe

Here is a map of ancient Europe, dated 1595. Its compiler: the famous and officially recognized cartographer of the Middle Ages, Abraham Ortelius. There is no Western or Eastern Roman Empire on this map, although according to modern "history" they should have been and flourished. Most of it is occupied by SCYTHIA and SARMATIA.

And here is another card created by a certain Dionysius the Descriptor. It dates back to 124 AD. It shows the familiar names of countries, seas and continents. The only thing that is not on it is the "Roman Empire", which, according to orthodox science, was in this period at the beginning of its heyday …

2. Capital wolf - medieval fake

In 2008, a group of researchers from the University of Salerno, led by Professor Adriano La Regina, confirmed that the "Capitoline She-Wolf" - the symbol of Rome - was created in the 13th century AD, and not in the 5th century BC, as it was believed until now …

Thus, the most important symbol of Rome turns out to be a medieval craft, and not an ancient work of art two thousand years ago.

3. Etruscans

In order to somehow, albeit not very clearly, explain the abnormally rapid development of the so-called Roman Empire, historians consider the mysterious Etruscans to be the forerunners of Rome.

This people allegedly appeared in Italy in the eighth century BC and created a wonderful culture there.

They deliberately ignore the fact that the very name "ET-RUSKI" alludes to belonging to a certain ethnic group.

According to the well-established scientific paradigm, then the Etruscans allegedly mysteriously disappeared. They left behind numerous monuments covered with inscriptions, which are still officially recognized as unreadable. Orthodox historians have even come up with a saying: "Etruscan cannot be read."

However, if you decipher the Etruscan inscriptions using Slavic languages, then everything mysterious acquires a completely clear interpretation. Such studies were carried out as early as the 19th century.

In 1825, the Italian scientist, professor at the University of Warsaw, Sebastian Ciampi, proposed using the Slavic alphabet to decipher the Etruscan inscriptions. Having learned a little Polish, the Italian scientist was surprised to find that he began to read, and even understand something in Etruscan inscriptions. Back in Italy, Champi hastened to share his discovery with his colleagues. But his colleagues sternly pointed out to him that the Germans, as the most authoritative scientists in Europe, had already proved the appearance of the Slavs on the stage of history not earlier than the sixth century AD. Or even later. Therefore, no one in Italy paid due attention to Ciampi's words.

Deeper research was carried out by Tadeusz Volansky and Alexander Chertkov, for whom Slavic languages were native. The most interesting results of decoding the Etruscan inscriptions were obtained by Volansky. For the convenience of decoding, he compiled a special table, with the help of which he very successfully deciphered many Etruscan texts.

Not everything can be read in full, but not all Old Russian texts are read today to the last word. But if whole lines and turns are unambiguously read in the Etruscan text, then we can conclude that the language for decoding was chosen correctly. And this language is Russian.

Relying precisely on the Slavic languages, Tadeusz Volansky successfully read not only the Etruscan texts, but also many other inscriptions found in Western Europe. These inscriptions, like the Etruscan ones, were considered unreadable.

In a letter to the archaeologist Karol Rogavsky (1819-1888) Volansky wrote:

Are there no Slavic monuments in Italy, India and Persia - even in Egypt? … Do not the ancient books of Zoroaster, the ruins of Babylon, the monuments of Darius, the remains of Parsa-grad, covered with cuneiform writing, contain inscriptions understandable to the Slavs? The British, French and Germans look at it like a goat on water. We, the Slavs, will be able to bring these studies to the end, only if our children and grandchildren want to follow in our footsteps!

We can say that Volansky's research on the history of the Slavs in Western Europe was a scientific feat, therefore the fate of the scientist was not easy. In 1853, the Catholic Church included Volansky's books in the index of forbidden books, and the Polish Jesuits burned his works at the stake. But this seemed to them not enough, so they demanded to execute the scientist. Only thanks to the intervention of Nicholas the First, Volansky survived.

In this regard, an interesting fact is noteworthy. One of the widely recognized historiographers of the Roman Empire is Theodor Mommsen (1817-1903) - German historian, philologist and lawyer, winner of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1902 for his fundamental work "Roman History" in 5 volumes. He denied the Etruscan influence on the culture of Rome and did not take into account archaeological data when deciding the question of the emergence of Rome.

However, nowhere is it advertised that when writing his work, he used manuscripts from the Vatican, Berlin and Vienna libraries. And then these manuscripts were suddenly burned down in his house in a fire on July 12, 1880. In total, the fire destroyed 40 thousand (!) Historical sources. And it became impossible to check whether Mr. Mommsen rewrote them correctly.

Why, then, was it so stubbornly not recognized earlier and does not recognize now the Slavic character of the Etruscan inscriptions?

Since the 17th century, a false version of World History has been purposefully written in Western Europe. In this version, there was no place for the Etruscans, since all the achievements of mankind were attributed to the ancient Greeks and ancient ancient Romans. The Etruscans interfered, so they were "sent" away into the past, in the eighth century BC, even before the founding of Rome. It turned out that the history of the Rus of Western Europe in the 14-16th centuries - the Etruscans, was carried to the distant unreadable past, and thus, they destroyed the traces of the Slavic presence in Western Europe.

But back in 1697, the official eulogy in memory of the Swedish king CARL XI was written STILL IN RUSSIAN, BUT ALREADY IN LATIN LETTERS, and this written artifact of the 17th century is not disputed by anyone.

On the example of this Swedish "lamentable speech according to Charles XI" one can see how the Slavic language was actively ousted by newly invented languages from all over Europe, including from the territory of Scandinavia. The language of the Rus was declared in Western and Northern Europe of the 17th century "the language of the occupiers".

Having distorted the true past of the Slavs, historians made them homeless and landless, because according to their theory, not a single ancient European area can have a Slavic name. And in the languages of Europe and Asia, they look for any roots, but not Slavic.

However, there were scientists who did not see anything strange in the fact that traces of the Slavic population were constantly found in many European lands. One of them is the outstanding Russian scientist Vasily Markovich Florinsky.

In the 19th century, he studied comparative archeology. Florensky was looking for an answer to the question of which peoples belong to the thousands of ancient burial mounds located in Siberia. Florensky's answer to this question was clear and unambiguous: the mounds were erected by the most ancient population of Siberia, belonging to the Aryan race, which later became known as the Slavs. Florensky did a titanic job, comparing finds from a settlement that Schliemann declared to be ancient Troy, objects belonging to the Adriatic and Baltic Wends, with finds from the North Russian and South Russian burial mounds. The similarity of the found household items, ornaments and dishes was so striking that there was no doubt that they were made by representatives of the same people. That is, the Slavs. It turns out that Asia Minor and a significant part of Western Europe in the past were inhabited by the same Slavic people as Russia and Siberia.

Florensky wrote that the Wends are Adriatic or Italic Slavs. That they were part of an alliance of Trojan tribes who left the three. The Veneds founded Venice and Padua. It is interesting that Venice stands on ancient wooden piles, which are already several hundred years old. These piles are believed to be made from Siberian larch. But the connection between the builders of Venice and Siberia is difficult to explain within the framework of traditional history.

Another Russian scientist, Aleksey Stepanovich Khomyakov, wrote about the Wends, or Wends. In his works, he lists dozens of examples showing traces of the Slavs found in Western Europe.

Let's add to this the clearly expressed Slavic origin of a huge number of Western European toponyms - geographical names.

More recently, during the existence of the GDR, German archaeologists, conducting excavations, exclaimed: "Wherever you dig, everything is Slavic!"

The artist Ilya Glazunov even described a case when the archaeologists of the GDR simply buried the found Slavic boat, because, according to them, “no one needed it”.

4. King Arthur

Fast forward to the British Isles. The fact that the Slavic tribes in ancient times lived in the territory of foggy Albion and had a huge impact on its culture, the British themselves started talking.

In 2004, Hollywood released a new version of the story of the world famous King Arthur to the world. The director's version of the film shocked the audience with an unexpected interpretation of the canonical plot.

In the film, King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table are in the service of Rome and are a kind of special forces guarding the westernmost borders of the Roman Empire from the raids of the Saxons. The most shocking detail in the film's plot is the origins of the famous knights. They turned out to be "barbarians" - Sarmatians from the steppes of the Northern Black Sea region.

In 2000, Scott Littleton and Linda Malko's book From Scythia to Camelot: A Thorough Revision of the Legends of King Arthur, the Knights of the Round Table and the Holy Grail was published. The authors investigated the parallels between the legendary epics of the ancient British and the Narts, which researchers trace back to the ancient inhabitants of the Black Sea steppes: Scythians, Sarmatians and Alans, and convincingly proved the Scythian-Sarmatian basis of the Arthurian cycle.

But when could Sarmatian myths penetrate British territory?

The answer to this question was given by Howard Reid, Doctor of Anthropology from Cambridge University. In 2001, his book King Arthur - The Dragon King: How the Barbarian Nomad Became Britain's Greatest Hero was published. He studied 75 primary sources and came to the conclusion that the legends about King Arthur and accompanying characters go back to the history of the Sarmatians who lived in the steppes of the Northern Black Sea region. Reed drew attention to the items with images of dragons stored in the Hermitage: these items were found in the graves of nomadic warriors in Siberia and date back to 500 BC. Dragons similar to the Sarmatians are noted in an illustrated Irish manuscript written around 800. By the way, the British cavalry is still called dragoons today.

Reed argues that it was the squads of tall, fair-haired horsemen, protected by metal armor, under the dragon banners, that served as the basis for the legend of Arthur.

Interestingly, in addition to the dragon, the Griffin is very often found in the symbolism of the Sarmatians, which is considered by some researchers to be one of the symbols of Tartaria.

Here's another piece of evidence. The French historian Bernard Bakhrach wrote the book "The History of Alan in the West", in which he argued that the emergence of medieval chivalry the West owes, first of all, to the Scythian-Sarmatians.

Based on the above arguments of serious European scientists, an unambiguous conclusion can be made: the prototype of the famous English king Arthur was a Slav - a Sarmatian warrior.

5. "Roman" infrastructure

One has only to look at the maps, where objects from the times of the supposedly "Roman" empire are marked, to imagine its power and scale … Many kilometers of aqueducts, hundreds, if not thousands, of so-called "Roman villas", forums, temple complexes amaze with their monumentality.

It seems obvious to a modern person that structures of this level and quality should have been built by high-class specialists who had special tools, knowledge, skills and many years of experience. But we are told that all this was built by Roman soldiers, and even with the involvement of the local population as slaves.

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

The conquest of other countries by the "Romans" looks quite logical. But why spend fantastic resources for the construction of social facilities in these countries? Is this what normal conquerors do? Does anyone know at least one real example of the fact that the conquerors themselves built roads, bridges, cities, theaters, water conduits, baths, sewers? There are no such examples! How many social facilities were built by American "fighters for democracy" in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria? No. They only sowed death and destruction.

But if all the so-called Roman objects were not built by slaves or soldiers, then someone created all this. But who? And why are ancient Slavic symbols depicted on these objects? Why are the owners of these villas represented on the frescoes and mosaics not by short and black-haired curly Latins, but by tall, fair-haired white people? And where in a warm country could the richest "bath" culture, represented by the so-called "terms" come from? Where did she go then? If you think about these questions, then the statement of the 17th century historian Mavro Orbini no longer seems seditious.

In his book "Slavic Kingdom" he wrote:

The Slavic people owned Franzia, England, and established a state in Ishpania; seized the best provinces in Europe … And not without reason they called them Russians or scattered, because after the Slavs occupied the entire European part of Asian Sarmatia, their colonies are scattered from the Arctic Ocean to the Mediterranean Sea and the Adriatic Gulf, from the Big Sea to the Baltic Ocean …

At first glance, the scale of the substitution of concepts and falsification seems incredible.

But let's remember our immediate past.

Quite recently we witnessed the collapse of the Soviet Union, and which of the former Soviet republics, excluding Belarus, remembers the Russians with a kind word? Who rebuilt the cities in Central Asia? To whom do the Balts owe their industrial potential? Where did the modern leaders of the national elites study?

It is logical to assume that with a calm and progressive development, the transfer of experience from ancestors to descendants, such a falsification of the History of a planetary scale would be quite difficult to carry out. But if the destruction of the true chronicle of the peoples of the earth was preceded by a global cataclysm, about the reasons for which different opinions are currently expressed, then the general replacement of the Earth's past becomes not such a difficult task.