Missing letter

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

There is an "official point of view" that Cyril and Methodius brought literacy and writing to the Slavs. Is this so? It turns out that this is not the case. By the time the brothers came to the Slavs, the Slavs already had a written language. On many manuscripts, the Glagolitic alphabet has been scraped off and the new text is written in Cyrillic …

In the life of the "saint" Cyril it is said that while passing through Chersonesos-Korsun Tauride as part of the embassy to the Khazars, Constantine saw there the Gospel and the Psalter, written by "Russian letters."

Young Constantine compared the letter with the familiar to him, distinguished between vowels and consonants, and soon read fluently in a language that was new to him, which surprised them as a miracle of God. Thus, at the very beginning of Cyril's life, the Rus had a written language.

What kind of writing did the Slavs have? Verbolitics.

Cyril and Methodius invented the Cyrillic, shredding the Glagolitsa and adaptingSlavic letters under the Greek Alphabet - so as not to squirm and rewrite the Judeo-Christian Bible in a script that is inconvenient for a Greek.

The question immediately arises - maybe the Glagolitic alphabet is less ancient than the Cyrillic alphabet?

Not at all. Research has been carried out (fortunately, Glagolitic is still written in some villages in Croatia) and it has been established that there is not a single fact in favor of the fact that Cyrillic is older than Glagolitic. Of the dated monuments of Slavic writing that have come down to us, the oldest is written in Glagolitic. There are Cyril's manuscripts, which, by no doubt, are copied from the Glagolic originals. The language of the Glagolic monuments is much older, much more archaic than the language of the Cyril monuments.

The Cyrillic alphabet was created around 863 by Cyril and his brother Methodius by order of the Byzantine Greek emperor Michael III, a fanatical Judeo-Christian.

Since the translation into a new language for them (Slavic Glagolitsa) and rewriting of a huge book by hand could take up to 20 years, then, apparently, to make it easier to copy, distribute and read the texts of the Bible in his empire, Emperor Michael III issued a decree on the ordering of writing Slavic peoples that were part of the Byzantine Empire. Well, that is, it's easier - oh cultural genocide - when their native writing was taken away from the Slavs and forced to write in a new foreign language …

There is a direct and clear dependence of the Cyrillic alphabet on the Glagolitic alphabet: Cyril and Methodius replaced the verbal letters with Greek letters known to them, similar in sound, and they simply threw out some of the Glagolitic letters that they did not understand. As a result, a little more than 30 letters remained in the Cyrillic alphabet, and the original Glagolitic alphabet contained more than 46 characters.

The Slavs, including the Eastern ones, reached a high development of the tribal system in the first half of the 1st millennium AD. e. The emergence of the Slavic writing of the type "Devil and Rezov" should probably be attributed to this time.

This conclusion is also confirmed by linguistic data. As noted by many researchers, the words 'write', 'read', 'letter', 'book' are common for Slavic languages.

Consequently, these words, like the Slavic letter itself, probably arose before the division of the common Slavic language into branches, that is, no later than the middle of the 1st millennium AD. e.

This argument does not even apply to Glagolitic, but to the primary pictographic writing.

So the Slavs had a written language already in before 500 AD. e. at least, but in real life much earlier.

In 1848, the Russian philologist II Sreznevsky wrote: "The peculiarity of many Glagolic letters has long led to the conclusion that the Glagolitic alphabet is the ancient alphabet of the pagan Slavs and, therefore, is older than the Cyrillic alphabet …"

In 1766 g. Count Klemens Grubisich published in Venice a book with a very interesting title "In originem et historiam alphabet Slavonic Glagolitici, vulgo Hieronymiani disquisitio" (Origin and history of the Glagolic Slavic alphabet, study of the Vulgate of Jerome). Grubisich claims that the Glagolitic alphabet was compiled long before the birth of Christ, based on the Getae Runes (Getae - Eastern Goths, Slavs, self-name Drevlyans).

Around 1640 Raphael Lenakovich wrote the dialogue De litteris antiquorum Illyriorum, in which he says much the same as Grubisich, but almost 125 years earlier.

Considering what Herodotus, Grubisich and Lenakovich wrote, it turns out that the Glagolitic alphabet was composed long before the birth of Christ and, therefore, is much more ancient than the Cyrillic alphabet.

From all of the above, it becomes clear that the history of Glagolitic alphabet is completely different from what historians imagine it to be. But for some reason, these and many other facts stated above are completely ignored by Judeo-Christian historians.

Back in 972, some official documents in Russia were written by Glagolitsa, since Svyatoslav was an ardent enemy of Judeo-Christianity, and Cyrillic was an exclusively Judeo-Christian letter.

Wilhelm Postell in his work "Linguarum XXII characteribus dinerentium alphabetum" added to all this that I. von Hahn found among the Albanians an alphabet attributed to the Albanian Buthakukyc, very similar to the Glagolitic.

It is believed that this alphabet was introduced in the 2nd century. during the Christianization of the Albanians.

In the preface to the Novgorod manuscript copied from the ancient Glagolic manuscript of 1047, it is said: "As a favor to me to write a book of si and kurilotse." Signature - "Prophet Ghoul Dashing". That very eloquently reflects the attitude of the writer to the Cyrillic alphabet.

Palimpsests - manuscripts on parchment or papyrus, in which the old text has been washed off or scraped off, and a new one is written on top of it - also indicate the great antiquity of Glagolitic alphabet. On all the surviving palimpsests, the Glagolitic alphabet has been scraped off and the new text is written in Cyrillic. There is not a single palimpsest in which the Cyrillic alphabet has been scraped off and the Glagolitic alphabet is written in it.

Texts corresponding from the Glagolitic script to the Cyrillic alphabet contain chronological errors in the dates, since the numerical value of the Glagolitic and Cyrillic letters does not coincide.

Cyrillic numerical values are oriented towards the Greek alphabet …

Also, this version is confirmed by the found biblical manuscript of the 5th century, the origin of which is unknown. This manuscript was originally written in Glagolitic, but then the Glagolitic was scraped out and on many sheets of this manuscript a translation of 38 homilies of St. Ephraim the Syrian in Greek.

Thus, the document received the name "rewritten code of Ephraim" and began to be considered Greek.

By the way, the meaning of the widespread Russian proverb “what is written with a pen cannot be cut with an ax” is understandable only to those who dealt with palimpsests and knows how difficult it is to etch the original text out of parchment and what means were used for this.

All these facts indicate that the "saints" Cyril and Methodius committed a purposeful act of cultural genocide of the Slavs. Destruction of NATIVE writing, destruction of chronicles, substitution of all concepts, Intentional destruction of the NATIVE memory of the Slavs …

The Slavs were turned into Ivanov, who do not remember their kinship, do not remember their letter, their letters, their kindred, their culture … This is done still.