Who and why killed Stalin and Beria

2024 Author: Seth Attwood | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-16 15:55

The well-known modern researcher Yuri Ignatievich Mukhin in his famous book The Murder of Stalin and Beria brilliantly proved that shortly before his death, Stalin made a new attempt to cut off the party democracy from power, from the leadership of the state.

Detailed analysis of all causes

The first attempt, undertaken in 1937, ended in failure and a bacchanal of repressions provoked by the party democracy in response to Stalin's attempt, by direct, secret elections, on an alternative basis, to produce the already urgently needed rotation of the ruling elite.

The second attempt, undertaken by Stalin after the war, led to his assassination as a result of a conspiracy of the partocracy. This is the main (internal) motive for the murder.

And what is most terrible, it happened in strict accordance with the fundamental principles of the "classics of scientifically grounded" banditry on a worldwide scale. They have this, outwardly seemingly purely political-economic expression: "Together with the ability to hold a commodity as exchange value, or exchange value as a commodity, awakens greed or auri sacrafames," the damned thirst for gold, "as the ancient Roman poet Virgil said."

Meanwhile, in the sphere of politics, together with the ability to retain power (goods) as exchange value (that is, as an opportunity to "rule" the state, and not being responsible for anything, but having unprecedented privileges), greed, identical to the "accursed thirst for gold", awakens in the form "LIBIDO DOMINANTI", that is, in the form of "PASSION FOR DOMINATION".

Causes of the tragedy on June 22, 1941

When the partocracy realized that Stalin again decided to tear it away from power in the state, then, remembering 1937, it literally went berserk. After that, Stalin did not have much left to live. And although this is the main motive for the murder, but this is just one of four motives, moreover, of an internal order.

By the way, one more motive, if not in the status of the main, then very close to such a definition, is closely adjacent to it. The fact is that after the war, Stalin resumed an intensive investigation into the causes of the incredible tragedy of June 22, 1941 in order to establish both the essence of the tragedy and, even more so, the specific culprits. After the war, Stalin resumed an intensive investigation into the causes of the incredible tragedy of June 22, 1941.

Many are probably well aware of Stalin's words that "the winners can and should be judged, can and should be criticized and tested … there will be less arrogance, more modesty." Often these words of Stalin are linked with the case of Marshal Zhukov, especially since they were also uttered in 1946, when the commander was approximately "whipped" for desperate immodesty and ascribing to himself almost all the military merits of the Soviet Army. This is partially true, but only partially, and in a very small dose.

In fact, Stalin meant a thorough investigation of the causes of the tragedy of June 22, 1941, which he began in deep secrecy at the beginning of the war and which, in principle, never stopped - just for some time the activity of the proceedings was reduced.

After the war, Stalin resumed an intensive investigation into the causes of the incredible tragedy of June 22, 1941

By the end of 1952, Stalin had practically completed this investigation - the survey of the surviving generals who commanded units in the western border districts on the eve of the war had already been completed. And this very much alarmed the top generals and marshal. Especially the same Zhukov. It is no coincidence that they so briskly went over to the side of Khrushchev and a little later helped him carry out a coup d'état on June 26, 1953.

The deadly destructiveness of the materials of this investigation for the generals and the marshal was great. In 1989, the famous Voenno-Istoricheskiy Zhurnal began publishing some materials from this investigation, in particular the results of a survey of generals conducted by Stalin - when they received a warning about an attack by Germany.

By the way, everyone showed that on June 18-19, and only the generals of the Western Special Military District wrote in black and white that they had not received any instructions on this score, and some even learned about the war from Molotov's speech. So, as soon as the publication began, the editorial board of VIZH was given such a hand that the printing of the materials was immediately stopped.

It turns out that even then these materials were dangerous for the generals and the marshal. They have not been published in full to this day. Hence, they are still a threat. However, for the authorities too, because the publication of these materials in full will cause a thermonuclear explosion in all of historical science, because it will literally turn everything over and you will have to beg forgiveness on your knees before Stalin's grave for all the slander and dirt that was rained on him after March 5, 1953 of the year.

What is not a motive for the murder? Objectively, he consolidated the selfish interests of both parts of the military-party complex. Stalin planned to strike in two directions at once: on the partocracy, which he intended to forever cut off from the government, and on the highest generals and marshals - for the edification of future commanders. Because for those incredible sacrifices that the Soviet people suffered, they had to answer.

Stalin openly admitted his guilt, which is well known. Moreover, he generally intended to openly repent before the people for the mistakes he made, especially before the war. By the way, this, too, greatly frightened the partocracy, because she knew her bloody guilt before the people, oh, she knew, as, incidentally, she also knew that under Stalin she would have to answer for all the crimes.

Stalin perfectly saw and understood that during the war years, the party leadership and the highest generals had become so cemented on the mountain of the USSR that already as a military-party complex they posed a colossal threat to the very existence of the USSR - to Stalin's lifelong cause. Which, in general, was confirmed in 1991.

Undermining the gold standard

So the top generals and the marshal were also interested in Stalin's death, not all of them, of course, but a significant part led by Zhukov. I again draw your attention to this, since this group instantly went over to the side of Khrushchev and, under his general leadership, staged a coup d'etat on June 26, 1953, during which Lavrenty Pavlovich Beria was killed (shot in his own house) without trial or investigation.

Meanwhile, L. P. Beria, apparently, at that moment was the only person in the then elite who, after Stalin's death, concentrated in his hands the materials of this eloquent investigation into the causes of the June 22 tragedy. Not to mention the fact that he actually completely investigated the case of Stalin's murder.

The issue of the arrest of the main culprits - the murderers of Joseph Vissarionovich - the former Minister of State Security Ignatiev and Khrushchev, who was in charge of the state security organs, was on the agenda. On June 25, 1953, Beria officially requested authorization from the Central Committee and the Politburo to arrest Ignatiev, and by lunchtime on June 26 he was shot by the military.

By the way, the military, led by Zhukov, staged not just a coup d'etat using the armed forces, but precisely according to Tukhachevsky's scenario - that is, in accordance with his tank scenario for a coup d'état …

But here's what's interesting next. At present, we can confidently speak of a quartet of real motives for Stalin's assassination. It is striking but true that three of them are associated with the most secret anti-Soviet and Russophobic designs of the West. Accordingly, only one conclusion suggests itself: there has been an objective consolidation of the interests of the partocracy (including as an integral component of the military-party complex) with the global interests of the West.

Worse than that. It is by no means excluded, but most likely, that this consolidation of interests was previously discussed. Judge for yourself.

On March 1, 1950, Soviet newspapers published a Resolution of the Government of the USSR with the following content: “In Western countries, the depreciation of currencies has occurred and continues, which has already led to the devaluation of European currencies. As for the United States, the continuing rise in the prices of consumer goods and the continuing inflation on this basis, as repeatedly stated by the responsible representatives of the US government, have also led to a significant decrease in the purchasing power of the dollar.

In connection with the above circumstances, the purchasing power of the ruble has become higher than its official rate.

In view of this, the Soviet government recognized the need to increase the official exchange rate of the ruble, and the calculation of the ruble exchange rate should not be based on the dollar, as was established in July 1937, but on a more stable gold basis, in accordance with the gold content of the ruble.

Based on this, the Council of Ministers of the USSR decided:

1. To stop, from March 1, 1950, the determination of the ruble exchange rate against foreign currencies on the basis of the dollar and transfer to a more stable gold basis, in accordance with the gold content of the ruble.

2. Set the gold content of the ruble at 0, 222168 grams of pure gold.

3. To establish, from March 1, 1950, the purchase price of the State Bank for gold at 4 rubles 45 kopecks per 1 gram of pure gold.

4. Determine from March 1, 1950 the exchange rate in relation to foreign currencies, based on the gold content of the ruble, established in paragraph 2:

RUB 4 for one American dollar instead of the existing 5 rubles 30 kopecks.

11 rubles 20 kopecks for one pound sterling instead of the existing 14 rubles 84 kopecks.

5. Instruct the USSR State Bank to change the ruble exchange rate in relation to other foreign currencies accordingly.

In the event of further changes in the gold content of foreign currencies or changes in their rates, the USSR State Bank shall set the ruble exchange rate in relation to foreign currencies, taking into account these changes."

“Think about what Stalin encroached on,” emphasizes Yu. I. Mukhin, “on the holy of holies of the United States, on their parasitic base, on the dollar! Indeed, thanks to the fact that in international trade the dollar is the universal currency (at that time it became - AM), the United States has the opportunity to foist the world with colored paper with portraits of its presidents instead of real values.

And Stalin not only refused to use the dollar in the ever expanding international trade of the USSR, he even stopped valuing goods in dollars. Can there be any doubt that for the USA (and Great Britain too - AM) he became the most hated person?"

In fact, Stalin simply undermined the system of the gold standard of the dollar, established after the war, based on the scheme of $ 34.5 per troy ounce of gold (31.103477 g), under which the Yankees were madly producing a frantic emission of green candy wrappers.

Charles de Gaulle's wrath

More figuratively, the essence of the matter is conveyed by the example that happened with French President de Gaulle. In 1964, the French Minister of Finance told General de Gaulle the story of how the pre-war and then post-war international financial system took shape.

He gave an example like this:

De Gaulle became furious, collected 750 million paper dollars throughout France and in 1967, during an official visit to the United States with a wild scandal, but exchanged the paper for gold, since then the US retained the gold standard. De Gaulle returned to Paris with almost 66.5 tons of gold on board his plane (in 1967 the average price of one troy ounce of gold was 35.23 dollars).

"Where is the trick?" de Gaulle asked.

"The trick is," replied the Minister of Finance, "that the Yankees laid out one hundred hundred dollars, but actually paid three dollars, because the cost of paper for one banknote of one hundred dollars is three cents …"

That is, all the wealth of the world, all its gold flowed in exchange for green papers! Earlier, before the war, the British pound sterling played the same role.

After that, De Gaulle lived only two years, and the next year, in May 1968, he was staged, as they say now, the famous student riots, as a result of which he was forced to resign. And already in 1969, France with tears in her eyes said goodbye to her great compatriot. Stalin, on the other hand, after virtually the same action - except that he did not directly exchange dollars for gold - lived for exactly three years.

So why is this not a motive for the murder - the Resolution of the Council of Ministers of the USSR of March 1, 1950 ?! When it comes to gold, the West does not stop at any crime. By the way, pay attention to the fact that in all studies on Stalin's death it is clearly indicated that the trouble with Joseph Vissarionovich occurred on the night of March 1. Meanwhile, for a long time, since the death of Ivan the Terrible, history has been recording the foul Anglo-Saxon manner at the same time to be involved - directly or indirectly - in the deaths of the great sovereigns of Russia - at the very beginning of March …

Operations "Cross" and "Grave"

On the issue of introducing the gold standard of the ruble and calculating the exchange rate of the ruble, it is on this basis that one, in fact, detective story closely adjoins.

The fact is that according to Professor Vladlen Sirotkin:

“Stalin refused to look for“tsarist gold”together with his allies in the anti-Hitler coalition, did not send his representatives to the United States in July 1944 to the International Financial Conference at Bretton Woods, where the IMF and the World Bank were created (and everything was transferred to their authorized capital.” ownerless gold "- Nazi," Jewish ", tsarist, etc.), and the dollar after that became the most secured post-war international currency unit".

Stalin began his search for "tsarist gold", including the gold of the family of the last Russian emperor, on his own. For this, the "Cross" plan was developed. By the way, a similar operation was carried out before the war.

The Americans were not happy with such an action. Therefore, in 1946, “false Anastasia” appears again - the same Anderson. In response, Stalin instructed in the same 1946 to build a "Tomb" near Yekaterinburg of the executed tsarist family, closing the question of Anastasia.

By the way, Operation Grave was so serious that VM Molotov personally supervised its construction (as Professor Sirotkin remarked, “God knows what bones were buried in it”) personally.

For some reason, after Stalin's death, Operation Cross was stopped. Her materials are still sealed with seven seals in the archives of the FSB.

The thing is that the United States, as well as Great Britain, stole a gigantic amount of gold from Russia. Under the tsar, about 23 steamers loaded with gold sailed to the United States under a contrived and personally imposed pretext by Witte. At least a thousand tons. Lenin also sent a similar amount of gold to the USA (for more details, see my book "Who led the war in the USSR?", Moscow, 2007).

The personal gold and jewelry of the last Russian tsar, which he inadvertently transported to England, was impudently appropriated by the British royal family and still does not give them away. Worse than that. Great Britain and France also appropriated the collateral gold that the tsarist government kept in Western banks on the eve of the First World War.

With one stroke of the pen, on August 1, 1914, a banking moratorium was introduced on operations with Russian gold. Well, after two "revolutions" in Russia, there was no one at all to demand gold back. Gold, which was in German banks, was stolen, including that which Lenin took out under the second Brest-Litovsk Treaty.

In total, the gold stolen in the above way is more than 610 tons. So the furious reluctance to give the stolen gold, especially in such quantities, is more than a serious motive for the assassination of Stalin. Especially when it became known that he began to carry out Operations "Cross" and "Grave".

Stalin's "common market"

And what is not the motive for the murder of Stalin, which was discovered by one of the researchers of the Stalinist era, Alexei Chichkin, who published his discovery in the work "Forgotten idea without a statute of limitations." According to him, in April 1952, an international economic meeting was held in Moscow, at which the USSR, the countries of Eastern Europe and China proposed to create an alternative trade zone to the dollar. Moreover, other countries also showed tremendous interest in this plan: Iran, Ethiopia, Argentina, Mexico, Uruguay, Austria, Sweden, Finland, Ireland, Iceland.

At the meeting, Stalin proposed to create his own "common market". Moreover. The meeting also voiced the idea of introducing an interstate settlement currency. Considering that the Soviet Union was the initiator of the idea of creating an alternative to the dollar trade zone, in fact, a transcontinental "common market", then the interstate settlement currency in such a "common market" had all the chances to become precisely the Soviet ruble, the determination of the exchange rate of which had been translated two years earlier. on a gold base.

To make it clearer for the modern reader, let me remind you how the United States reacts only to a hypothetical idea of the possibility of creating a gas analogue of OPEC headed by Russia. With only one shadow of a hint of this idea, the Yankees are already falling into a rage and unequivocally threatening with very harsh sanctions, not hesitating to even hint at the use of force.

Can you imagine how the Yankees freaked out (and the Anglo-Saxon core of the West in general) when the news of this meeting and the ideas that were voiced at it reached Washington ?! That's just it … After all, then the situation was in many ways more favorable for the Soviet Union than it is now for modern Russia. Only the name of Stalin at once cooled the hottest heads in the West - jokes and tricks did not work with the Generalissimo. Moreover, it could have ended very badly for those who would dare to "joke" with the Soviet Union headed by Stalin!

Look at the chronology of events. In April 1952, an international economic meeting was held, the ideas voiced at which caused a wide response in virtually all continents of the world. Less than a year later, Stalin was killed …

Finally, the fourth motive: No one in the world expected that after such an extremely destructive war, the Soviet Union would restore its economy in the shortest possible time. In fact, by the beginning of 1948, the restoration stage was completed, which, by the way, made it possible not only to carry out the monetary reform, but also simultaneously to abolish the rationing system.

For comparison. Great Britain, which suffered disproportionately less in the war, back in the early 1950s. could not afford to give up the food rationing system.

In general, it should be noted that the very first post-war five-year plan, despite all the difficulties of this period, broke literally all records. Compare! If in the very first Soviet five-year plan a new enterprise was put into operation every twenty-nine hours, in the second - every ten hours, and in the third, not completed due to the outbreak of war - every seven hours, then in the post-war period - every six hours!

The explosive growth rates of the Soviet economy did not go unnoticed in the West. Already in the early 1950s. The West began to go crazy about this. And if the British, for example, basically limited themselves to the alarming statement of the fact - "Russia is experiencing extremely rapid economic growth", then the Yankees, with their inherent straightforwardness, concluded: "The Soviet economic challenge is real and dangerous."

Moreover, in the USSR, prices were also reduced 2 times a year by 10-20% (!!!) Lavrenty Beria: “The Soviet Government is pursuing a policy of systematic reduction in prices for consumer goods. In March of this [1951] year, a new, fourth in recent years, reduction of state retail prices for food and industrial goods was carried out, which ensured a further increase in real wages of workers and employees and a reduction in peasants' expenses for the purchase of cheaper industrial goods."

How long have you, dear readers, witnessed a decline in prices for consumer goods, and even more so a systematic decline? We are again convinced that Comrade Stalin, setting the task of a 5-hour working day and an increase in the material well-being of the working people, relied on quite realistic calculations. Among other things, it was planned to do this by reducing the cost of production.

"While in the capitalist camp the imperialist cannibals are busy inventing various 'scientific' means of exterminating the best part of humanity and reducing the birth rate, in our country, as Comrade Stalin said, people are the most valuable capital, and the welfare and happiness of people are the main concern of the state." From the report of L. P. Beria at a ceremonial meeting of the Moscow Council on November 6, 1951.

60 years have passed since this report, and the situation has not changed at all. The imperialist cannibals are still engaged in the development and implementation of "scientific" means of reducing the birth rate and extermination of people, GMOs, etc. And who can blame the Soviet leadership of that time for not caring about the happiness and well-being of people? What can I say.

In the same 1953, the American magazine "National Business" in the article "The Russians are catching up with us …" noted that the rate of growth of the economic power of the USSR is ahead of any country. Moreover, the growth rate in the USSR is 2-3 times higher than in the USA. Even more so. US presidential candidate Stevenson publicly declared that if the rate of production growth in Stalin's Russia continues, then by 1970 the volume of Russian production will be three to four times greater than that of America. And if this happens, the consequences for Western countries, primarily for the United States, will be more than catastrophic.

The Japanese billionaire Heroshi Terawama spoke most accurately of all: “You are not talking about the basics, about your leading role in the world. In 1939 you Russians were smart and we Japanese were fools. In 1949 you became even smarter, and we were still fools. And in 1955, we grew wiser, and you turned into five-year-old children. Our entire economic system is almost completely copied from yours, with the only difference that we have capitalism, private producers, and we have never achieved more than 15% growth, while you, with public ownership of the means of production, reached 30% or more. In all our firms your slogans of the Stalinist era are hanging …"

Threat to the West

In this regard, I would like to recall one of the most important reasons for Hitler's coming to power and the outbreak of World War II. The fact is that Hitler's "drive" to power was caused not only, and perhaps even not so much by geopolitical, political and ideological reasons as by economic ones of colossal importance.

Until 1932 (inclusive) there were four large industrial regions in the world: Pennsylvania in the USA, Birmingham in Great Britain, Ruhr in Germany and Donetsk (then part of the RSFSR) in the Soviet Union. At the end of the first five-year plan, Dneprovsky (in the Ukraine) and Ural-Kuznetsky (in the RSFSR) were added to them.

No matter how much they criticized the first five-year plan for any excesses, it was she who caused a tectonic shift in the alignment of global economic forces. And, consequently, it marked the same essentially tectonic shift in the alignment of world geopolitical forces.

After all, there are more than just six industrial regions in the world. It’s just that the West would somehow endure it. It became unbearably difficult for him for another reason. Until 1932, three quarters of the world's industrial areas were located in the West. Since the end of 1932, exactly half of the world-class industrial regions were already on the territory of the USSR!

It would seem that a country robbed to the last thread and almost to the point of losing its pulse weakened, within just five years, mainly by its own forces, not only overthrew the absolute and also seemingly unshakable superiority of the West from the pedestal of the world economic Olympus, but also fundamentally caught up with him.

But it was no secret that in the previously undeveloped regions of the Soviet Union in the near future several more large industrial regions of the world level were to appear. More than one third of the largest continent - Eurasia - turned out to be a gigantic platform for the creation, development and successful operation of large industrial production. Previously, the practically untouched wealth of its central part turned out to be not only available for development and use, but also was simply intensively involved in an active economic turnover.

Until then, only geographically, mainly through railroad transport, the potential of the geopolitical power of the Soviet Union began to rapidly fill with unprecedented and unknown to the West economic power, the transformation of which into an impressive military power was a matter of a short time and, as they say, of technology.

The true rulers of the West were (and are) excellent at the basic principles of economics. Therefore, they understood perfectly well that the fantastic amount achieved so quickly is transforming into a fantastic quality at an even faster pace, that the West will indeed have to “endure all the saints” and surrender to the mercy of the emerging socialism. And they were not mistaken in one iota.

That is why the West turned down the world crisis it had created, nicknamed the "Great Depression". Its further delay was already dangerous for the West itself. And at the same time Hitler was brought to power at the turn of the end of the first - the beginning of the second five-year plan.

It was Hitler, as a factor in the war, that had to interrupt the progressive development of Russia, hated by the West, even if it was then called the Soviet Union. At that time, the West could not invent anything else.

After the war, in general, a situation that worried the West was extremely alarming. A system of people's democracies was formed, which included the world demographic giant China. That is, in the hands of the countries that chose socialist development guidelines, gigantic resources were concentrated, which, with the assistance of the Soviet Union, could have been involved in economic circulation, which in turn would have led to an almost complete decline in the economic and, consequently, political significance of the West.

Naturally, the West thought about how to eliminate such a threat to their existence. Simply put, the aggressive entity has once again taken over. However, after the war, the military solution to the problem was already unsuitable. The Soviet Union convincingly demonstrated all its advantages and won an unprecedented Victory in history.

Moreover, already on the peaceful front, the USSR showed generally incredible rates of development, as a result of which the pre-war level was reached in just two years. Accordingly, it was already impossible to resort to war again in order to interrupt the development of the USSR. Moreover, in contrast to the pre-war situation, the Soviet Union now had allies both in the West and in the East.

Of course, this does not at all mean the degeneration of the West from Saul to Paul. This audience is not the kind to be guided by peaceful considerations. On the contrary, the West, especially the United States, spawned the darkness of all kinds of plans to attack the USSR after the war. But they simply could not realize them. At first, because no one in the world would understand the West if it dared to raise a hand against the main winner in the Second World War.

Now they pretend that America and England made some contribution to the defeat of Nazism. And then people all over the world knew perfectly well that if it were not for the Red Army and not Stalin, then everyone would be in brown slavery, including such bastards as the Anglo-Saxons, whom, in particular the British, the Nazis even planned to evict from the British Isles.

And a little later, the West could not do this for the simple reason that the USSR had mastered the secrets of atomic weapons, and it would have been simply useless to talk to it in the language of force, which was clearly shown by the war on the Korean Peninsula. Such numbers did not work with Stalin. The Generalissimo could answer in such a way that the West would turn upside down.

Some "well-known figures of television arts" continue to assert that Stalin, allegedly out of fright, was destroyed by Beria. Vile lies! Beria, of course, has nothing to do with it. Here we must look for the hand of the West. Because with a clear awareness of the fact that it is better not to speak with Stalin in the language of Mars ("the god of war"), especially after 1949, when the USSR became an atomic power, the West was really frightened of the prospects of real soon economic and political domination of the USSR (all the more so at the head of a whole system of people's democracies).

Lavrenty Beria: “Comrade Stalin sets a great task, to achieve a 5-hour working day. If we achieve this, then it will be a great revolution. At nine he started work, at 2 o'clock it was already over, without a break. I had lunch and time is free. We will bypass capitalism on this one, they cannot do that, give them a profit, and give them the workers - but how can the Russians in 5 hours and live well. No, give us socialism and Soviet Power too, we also want to live like people. This will be the peaceful offensive of communism."

“Communism is possible if the number of communists grows in life, not for fear, not for a bonus, but for conscience, those who are interested in working and living, who are able to work and relax, but not like dancing, but with a soul, so that develop.

After all, the growth rates were 2-3 times higher than the American ones. In combination with the motives indicated above, this is precisely what served as the basis for the decision to remove Stalin in the most vile, most insidious, but so characteristic of the West way: murder!

It remains only to guess how the West managed not so much to get in touch with such scoundrels as Khrushchev and Co., but to reach mutual understanding, and even more so to come to an agreement with them. However, even here there will be no particular difficulty if you carefully and thoroughly analyze everything, but this, unfortunately, goes far beyond the scope of this article. This is a subject for a separate study.

The Leningrad case as a forerunner of the collapse of the USSR

in 1991 Another motive for the assassination of Stalin by Khrushchev and his associate, the head of the MGB in 1950-53. Ignatiev - the Leningrad affair of 1949, when the party leadership of Leningrad organized the founding congress of the "Russian Communist Party", under the guise of an agricultural exhibition, and the leader of the Leningrad regional committee Kuznetsov (proto Yeltsin).

I would like to note that the collapse of the USSR during Perestroika also began with the formation of parallel party structures in the form of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the creation of the post of President of the RSFSR within the USSR, which was occupied by Yeltsin. Pure separatism! Kuznetsov even suggested moving the capital to Leningrad.

They did such separatist affairs, of course, under a secure roof - Ignatiev, as the Minister of State Security and the 2nd Secretary of Belarus, and Khrushchev, as the 1st in Ukraine. Nothing new: they wanted to divide the USSR into their own fiefdoms and become the first kings. Kuznetsov promoted them at one time to the local leadership positions in order to play out his scenario - Kuznetsov organized the founding congress of the RCP in Leningrad, and Khrushchev and Ignatiev with their most powerful communist parties in the USSR - Ukrainian and Belarusian - supported his RCP! And that's all, the Union is over!

But the plans were revealed - after the execution of the "Leningraders" Khrushchev and Ignatiev hid, but when they learned that the investigation was being secretly conducted, they fell into hysterics. After which they decided to kill Stalin. At the end of February 1953, at Stalin's dacha, a new government reform was discussed, and a week later Beria, as Minister of State Security, would have blocked all approaches to Stalin, so the Khrushchevites had to hurry.

By the way, that is why they also removed Stalin's loyal people - Vlasik, Poskrebyshev and others, in order to gain access to him. What's more interesting - Churchill, 2 weeks after the murder, received a knighthood. Coincidence? I do not think…

Martirosyan Arsen Benikovich- Russian writer. Was born in 1950 in Moscow. Formerly a KGB officer. The author of a number of books on the history of the Second World War and the Great Patriotic War - “Conspiracy of Marshals. British intelligence against the USSR "," June 22. The Truth of the Generalissimo "," The Tragedy of June 22: Blitzkrieg or Treason? Stalin's Truth "," Who Brought the War to the USSR?"

A member of the group of authors "Stalin's Case", the informational body of the "Multi-Regional Bloc of Russian Bolsheviks".