Table of contents:

TOP-4 selfish reasons for slowing down alternative energy
TOP-4 selfish reasons for slowing down alternative energy

Video: TOP-4 selfish reasons for slowing down alternative energy

Video: TOP-4 selfish reasons for slowing down alternative energy
Video: Period Clots Explained 🩸 #shorts 2024, May
Anonim

The energy industry around the world is undergoing a revolution, with the world's leading countries increasing their share of energy from renewable sources.

Russia was delayed at the start, but today a national project for creating a new energy sector is being implemented.

The current program to support the construction of up to 6 GW of solar, wind generation and solid municipal waste (MSW) processing plants creates a demand for investments of up to 1 trillion rubles [4].

If you believe the leading media, where for several years the excitement about the opening of more and more "clean" power plants around the world has not subsided, which convert the free energy of the sun and wind into kilowatts that people need.

But in parallel with this, more and more information about the economic inefficiency of "green" energy. In the world of capitalism, where profit is everything, these facts cannot be called anything other than a paradox. What real processes are behind all this and what goals are being pursued, let's try to figure it out in this article.

What we have at the moment. Many countries are developing alternative energy by implementing various government programs. For example, here is a diagram showing the share of energy from renewable sources in the countries of the world and in Russia:

Image
Image

Tenders are held, investors and executors of projects and power plant construction are found. Lands are allocated, capacities are included in the energy systems of countries. And what about the payback? These data were found on the Internet. [one]

Image
Image

This is the distribution of shares in the world energy sector by type of energy source. The second from the top (orange) bar shows the share of electricity generated by wind and solar power plants. As you can see, the share is negligible.

But this graph shows financial investments in different types of power plants.

Image
Image

Again, the orange stripe shows us that about 20% of capital investments go to alternative energy. How so? An obvious contradiction in the capitalist economy? Is everyone really so concerned about the environment? If we take the full life cycle of the same solar panel (from production to disposal), then there is no smell of nature conservation here.

In addition to economic problems, there are also purely technological ones. As you know, wind turbines and solar panels are highly dependent on the weather, and in order for the electricity supply to be stable, you need to have reserve capacities of "traditional" energy in stock, which will stand idle when alternative stations produce maximum. This question is discussed in more detail in this video:

What's happening? States are subsidizing clearly economically and technologically unprofitable projects, spending their own budgets on this. Moreover, this is done by many states. Just like on command. This suggests the assumption that the program is being pushed through from the supranational level.

The rulers of global politics, which are not tied by means, promote projects that, in their opinion, need to be developed within the framework of their goal-setting. And the states, represented by governments, together with business, regardless of the costs, carry out the task as if "entrusted" to them.

From the level of a common man in the street, who does not think about the management processes taking place around, it is possible to argue that the goal of any management is always money. But there are those for whom money is only a means of achieving goals and a tool, and the goals themselves are orders of magnitude higher.

Let's try to figure out what goals are pursued by the "world behind the scenes" (those who are engaged in global politics, that is, politics pursuing goals aimed at all of humanity, while we do not consider this some kind of "world government", since they may be completely unfamiliar with each other people or even algorithms dominating the collective unconscious), developing "green" energy. We tried to take into account all possible versions and motives.

So let's go.

Version 1. There is an evolutionary replacement of fossil resources with renewable ones. As we are told through the media, the reserves of oil and coal are not endless.

Image
Image

There is evidence that the processes of formation of hydrocarbon resources continue. We will not develop this topic in this material, we will agree that it is necessary to develop alternative technologies for obtaining energy.

And sooner or later mankind will have to find a replacement for fuel combustion technologies. But, if the version is correct, then there are several points that do not fit into it.

For example, nuclear energy can already provide mankind with energy stably, safely and in sufficient quantities. Fuel reserves are enormous. Yes, even if you decided to switch to solar panels, wouldn't it be better to first refine the technology by scientific research so that you can get energy at night, and then invest in the construction of stations?

Version 2. Preparing for a global catastrophe. As you know, we are not the first civilization on planet Earth. This is confirmed by some archaeological artifacts that could not have been made in antiquity at the level of technology described in history textbooks. This means that a new catastrophe is also possible. How can it happen?

Will a supervolcano explode, a meteorite will fall, or will people unleash a nuclear war? Thinking about the future, some of the "elite" and the rulers of global politics care about the post-apocalyptic period. And the considered power plants will be able to provide in the regions where they are located, the supply of energy to vital facilities in the context of the destruction of the system of extraction and transportation of raw materials, at least for the period of restoration of "traditional" energy.

Well, the version justifies the construction of economically ineffective facilities, but in order not to fall into conspiracy theories, let's say that a whole range of measures is needed to prepare for a disaster. This is the closure of nuclear power plants, at least in potentially dangerous places, and the construction of "arks", and much more [3]. Let's leave this version as possible for now and continue to consider the main issue.

Version 3. Stimulating the development of energy production technologies. Like the rise in interest in bitcoin spurred the mining process, which uses high-performance graphics cards. By the way, about the development of blockchain technology, read one of our works: “Blockchain technologies as a bridge to the transition to a bright future? Is there a place in it for Bitcoin?"

The demand for video cards has stimulated their accelerated improvement. So it is here. The rapid development of the network of power plants stimulates the improvement of technologies. This will lead to the development of new types of devices for generating energy. Good version.

However, one fact does not fit into it.

Image
Image

On July 15, 2015 on the site [2] there was a message that a talented young scientist Dmitry Lopatin was detained for the fact that he had prescribed a certain solvent from China for his developments, which is on the list of prohibited substances.

According to the website, Dmitry has developed a solar panel that can work in fog and at sunset. I wish I could grab hold of this technology, but someone slows down the development of the technology or directs it in the right direction.

This event led to the following idea. Does the “world behind the scenes” (aka the rulers of global politics) really need for every person to become energy-independent? Imagine, after a while a device appears that allows you to receive free energy.

What's going to happen? There will be no need not only for the power supply and heating system, but also the need to work 8 hours 5 days a week. And if for an individual person such a state of affairs is desirable, for the rulers of global politics this means the final loss of control over humanity. Hence the next version suggests itself.

Version 4. Controlled progress. Please note that when it comes to alternative energy, only two of its varieties immediately pop up. These are wind power and solar power plants (we know that there are also tidal power plants, both geothermal and biofuel, but from the information field it is clear that these are the main directions). As if fundamentally other directions do not exist.

Thus, developing these two directions, the process of "development" of "alternative" energy is going on (all the quotes are not accidental), and, at the same time, you are unlikely to be given funds for research in another area. In addition, by developing these two areas, it is possible to control this process without giving the opportunity for high-quality breakthroughs.

This is confirmed by the example described above with a young scientist. And how many more similar examples have passed the public's attention?

If you cannot stop an unwanted process - lead it. While “developing” “alternative” energy, the “world behind the scenes” is trying to take control of the evolution of energy production technologies in many ways. In the current financial, economic and legal system, this is easy to do through the allocation (or non-allocation) of funds and through the system of patents.

Conclusion

The development of mankind has always depended on the development of energy production technologies. And they acquired special significance with the development of the technosphere. Anyone who can control the development of technologies in the energy sector will largely control the entire process of human development. But we are not alone in the Universe.

There is God the Almighty (for atheists - the highest all-encompassing government). And there is an objective process of technology development. Including technologies for obtaining energy. An attempt to subjectively control this objective process is visible. Traces of the withdrawal of mankind from the technologies that were developed by the same Nikola Tesla are visible.

There is information that there is an unspoken ban on the study of the "vacuum". At least the same information about the presence in the original version of the "periodic table" of such an element as "ether"

Image
Image

In this study, we saw how a certain tunnel scenario is built, in which there are only two bands - the wind and the sun. But even here the "hand" of the Omnipotence is visible. Even in the study of these "allowed" technologies, young scientists through discrimination discover knowledge that can lead to breakthroughs, qualitative leaps.

And these breakthroughs have to be closed by the "owners of the system" so that the process does not get out of their control.

Image
Image

As mentioned above, new knowledge is revealed to people through the discrimination that is given from Above.

The process of technological development is closely related to the process of moral growth of society. If the former outstrips, then there will be a danger of self-destruction of mankind, therefore, if we want new discoveries that will lead to a new quality of life, we must take care of the moral development of ourselves and society as a whole.

Only then will discrimination be given and the walls of the “tunnel” will fall, allowing you to see the wide possibilities that are inherent in the Universe.

Only then will the energy become truly "green", will allow us to live in harmony with nature and not spend so much effort and time on obtaining this very energy, but use our time for the development of society, leading to new discoveries, to new horizons.

Materials:

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

Recommended: